IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v239y2021ics0925527321001444.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mediating the impact of power on supplier satisfaction: Do buyer status and relational conflict matter?

Author

Listed:
  • Vos, F.G.S.
  • Van der Lelij, R.
  • Schiele, H.
  • Praas, N.H.J.

Abstract

Recent sociological and psychological studies suggest that the power dynamics (coercive and reward power), relational conflict, and the quality of the status-affecting relationship between partners should be analyzed in conjunction. This study applies this notion to supply chain management and buyer-supplier relationships to assess the implications for supplier satisfaction in buyer-supplier relationships. Structural equation modeling was used to analyze the survey data of suppliers of three buying organizations. The results show that a buyer's coercive power, conflict, and status have a strong impact on supplier satisfaction. However, the effect of coercive power is only indirect, significantly mediated by status, and causes relational conflict. Remarkably, the status of the buyers seemed to play a significant role in improving supplier satisfaction and reducing relational conflict. With regard to contributions, this study implements the concept of status to buyer-supplier relationships and highlights the strong and highly significant influence of a buyer's status on reducing relational conflict and improving supplier satisfaction. This implies that future studies on conflict and supplier satisfaction must consider buyer status as a central variable. Furthermore, this study suggests that although coercive power is not directly detrimental to supplier satisfaction, it indirectly impacts it by increasing relational conflict and demoting buyer status. Both status and conflict appear to be the significant mediators of the relationship between coercive power and supplier satisfaction. Future studies can build on these findings and continue research on the complex interplay among conflict, status, and power in buyer-supplier relationships.

Suggested Citation

  • Vos, F.G.S. & Van der Lelij, R. & Schiele, H. & Praas, N.H.J., 2021. "Mediating the impact of power on supplier satisfaction: Do buyer status and relational conflict matter?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:239:y:2021:i:c:s0925527321001444
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108168
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527321001444
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108168?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tekleab, Amanuel G. & Quigley, Narda R., 2014. "Team deep-level diversity, relationship conflict, and team members' affective reactions: A cross-level investigation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 394-402.
    2. Wolfgang Ulaga & Andreas Eggert, 2005. "Relationship Value in Business Market: The Construct and its Dimension," Post-Print hal-00482539, HAL.
    3. Oosterhuis, Marian & Molleman, Eric & van der Vaart, Taco, 2013. "Differences in buyers’ and suppliers’ perceptions of supply chain attributes," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(1), pages 158-171.
    4. Holger Schiele & Richard Calvi & Michael Gibbert, 2012. "Customer attractiveness, supplier satisfaction and preferred customer status: Introduction, definitions and an overarching framework," Post-Print hal-00948480, HAL.
    5. Boyle, Brett A. & Dwyer, F. Robert, 1995. "Power, bureaucracy, influence, and performance: Their relationships in industrial distribution channels," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 189-200, March.
    6. Rosenberg, Larry J., 1974. "A new approach to distribution conflict management," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 67-74, October.
    7. Yeung, Jeff Hoi Yan & Selen, Willem & Zhang, Min & Huo, Baofeng, 2009. "The effects of trust and coercive power on supplier integration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 66-78, July.
    8. Prajogo, Daniel & Chowdhury, Mesbahuddin & Yeung, Andy C.L. & Cheng, T.C.E., 2012. "The relationship between supplier management and firm's operational performance: A multi-dimensional perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(1), pages 123-130.
    9. Son, Byung-Gak & Lee, Chang-Hun & Ha, Byoung-Chun & Nam, Hyunjeong, 2019. "Investigating the fair treatment of suppliers and its trust fostering role and performance benefits," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 54-66.
    10. Vos, Frederik G.S. & Schiele, Holger & Hüttinger, Lisa, 2016. "Supplier satisfaction: Explanation and out-of-sample prediction," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 4613-4623.
    11. Ernst Fehr & Holger Herz & Tom Wilkening, 2013. "The Lure of Authority: Motivation and Incentive Effects of Power," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 103(4), pages 1325-1359, June.
    12. Pena, Edsel A. & Slate, Elizabeth H., 2006. "Global Validation of Linear Model Assumptions," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 101, pages 341-354, March.
    13. Kaiser, Jasmin, 2014. "Management of IS Outsourcing Relationships – A Dyadic Analysis of Antecedents and Consequences of Dependencies and Power," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 64451, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    14. Sinha, Ruchi & Janardhanan, Niranjan S. & Greer, Lindred L. & Conlon, Donald E. & Edwards, Jeffery R., 2016. "Skewed task conflicts in teams: what happens when a few members see more conflict than the rest?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 88148, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Chen, Yi-Su & Su, Hung-Chung & Ro, Young K., 2017. "The co-evolution of supplier relationship quality and product quality in the U.S. auto industry: A cultural perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 245-255.
    16. Son, Byung-Gak & Kocabasoglu-Hillmer, Canan & Roden, Sinéad, 2016. "A dyadic perspective on retailer–supplier relationships through the lens of social capital," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 120-131.
    17. Manoj Hudnurkar & Suhas Suresh Ambekar, 2019. "Framework for measurement of supplier satisfaction," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 68(8), pages 1475-1492, June.
    18. Rosenau-Tornow, Dirk & Buchholz, Peter & Riemann, Axel & Wagner, Markus, 2009. "Assessing the long-term supply risks for mineral raw materials--a combined evaluation of past and future trends," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 161-175, December.
    19. Ehie, Ike C., 2010. "The impact of conflict on manufacturing decisions and company performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(2), pages 145-157, August.
    20. Zhi Huang & Marvin Washington, 2015. "Assimilation or Contrast? Status Inequality, Judgment of Product Quality, and Product Choices in Markets," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(6), pages 1752-1768, December.
    21. He, Qile & Ghobadian, Abby & Gallear, David, 2013. "Knowledge acquisition in supply chain partnerships: The role of power," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(2), pages 605-618.
    22. Wolfgang Ulaga & Andreas Eggert, 2006. "Value-Based Differentiation in Business Relationships: Gaining and Sustaining Key Supplier Status," Post-Print hal-00482456, HAL.
    23. Holger Schiele & Jasper Veldman & Lisa Hüttinger, 2011. "Supplier Innovativeness And Supplier Pricing: The Role Of Preferred Customer Status," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(01), pages 1-27.
    24. Pollock, Timothy G. & Chen, Guoli & Jackson, Eric M. & Hambrick, Donald C., 2010. "How much prestige is enough? Assessing the value of multiple types of high-status affiliates for young firms," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 6-23, January.
    25. MacKenzie, Scott B. & Podsakoff, Philip M., 2012. "Common Method Bias in Marketing: Causes, Mechanisms, and Procedural Remedies," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 88(4), pages 542-555.
    26. Rose, Gregory M. & Shoham, Aviv & Neill, Stern & Ruvio, Ayalla, 2007. "Manufacturer perceptions of the consequences of task and emotional conflict within domestic channels of distribution," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(4), pages 296-304, April.
    27. Rose, Gregory M. & Shoham, Aviv, 2004. "Interorganizational task and emotional conflict with international channels of distribution," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(9), pages 942-950, September.
    28. Podolny, Joel M & Phillips, Damon J, 1996. "The Dynamics of Organizational Status," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 5(2), pages 453-471.
    29. Renata P. Brito & Priscila L. S. Miguel, 2017. "Power, Governance, and Value in Collaboration: Differences between Buyer and Supplier Perspectives," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 53(2), pages 61-87, April.
    30. Selnes, Fred & Gonhaug, Kjell, 2000. "Effects of Supplier Reliability and Benevolence in Business Marketing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 259-271, September.
    31. Torelli, Carlos J. & Leslie, Lisa M. & Stoner, Jennifer L. & Puente, Raquel, 2014. "Cultural determinants of status: Implications for workplace evaluations and behaviors," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 123(1), pages 34-48.
    32. Andrew V. Shipilov & Stan Xiao Li & Henrich R. Greve, 2011. "The Prince and the Pauper: Search and Brokerage in the Initiation of Status-Heterophilous Ties," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 1418-1434, December.
    33. Rosseel, Yves, 2012. "lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 48(i02).
    34. Sangho Chae & Thomas Y. Choi & Daesik Hur, 2017. "Buyer Power and Supplier Relationship Commitment: A Cognitive Evaluation Theory Perspective," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 53(2), pages 39-60, April.
    35. Muthusamy, Senthil Kumar & White, Margaret A., 2006. "Does power sharing matter? The role of power and influence in alliance performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(7), pages 811-819, July.
    36. Akira Takeishi, 2002. "Knowledge Partitioning in the Interfirm Division of Labor: The Case of Automotive Product Development," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 321-338, June.
    37. Moody, Patricia E., 1992. "Customer supplier integration: Why being an excellent customer counts," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 52-57.
    38. Sean M. Handley & Jurriaan de Jong & W. C. Benton, 2019. "How Service Provider Dependence Perceptions Moderate the Power–Opportunism Relationship with Professional Services," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 28(7), pages 1692-1715, July.
    39. Niels J. Pulles & Jasper Veldman & Holger Schiele & Henk Sierksma, 2014. "Pressure or Pamper? The Effects of Power and Trust Dimensions on Supplier Resource Allocation," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 50(3), pages 16-36, July.
    40. T. Russell Crook & Christopher W. Craighead & Chad W. Autry, 2017. "Hold Back or Held Back? The Roles of Constraint Mitigation and Exchange Diffusion on Power “Nonuse” in Buyer–Supplier Exchanges," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 53(2), pages 10-21, April.
    41. Derek D. Rucker & Adam D. Galinsky, 2008. "Desire to Acquire: Powerlessness and Compensatory Consumption," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 35(2), pages 257-267, April.
    42. Mohanty, R. P., 1992. "Consensus and conflicts in understanding productivity," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 95-106, November.
    43. Felix Reimann & David J. Ketchen Jr., 2017. "Power in Supply Chain Management," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 53(2), pages 3-9, April.
    44. Welch, Catherine & Wilkinson, Ian, 2005. "Network perspectives on interfirm conflict: reassessing a critical case in international business," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 205-213, February.
    45. Yan, Tingting & Wagner, Stephan M., 2017. "Do what and with whom? Value creation and appropriation in inter-organizational new product development projects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 1-14.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Patrucco, Andrea S. & Schoenherr, Tobias & Moretto, Antonella, 2024. "Sustaining commitment in preferred buyer-supplier relationships: How to retain the ‘customer of choice’ status?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Felix Reimann & David J. Ketchen Jr., 2017. "Power in Supply Chain Management," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 53(2), pages 3-9, April.
    2. Else, Tim & Choudhary, Sonal & Genovese, Andrea, 2022. "Uncovering sustainability storylines from dairy supply chain discourse," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 858-874.
    3. Lutz Kaufmann & Jens Esslinger & Craig R. Carter, 2018. "Toward Relationship Resilience: Managing Buyer‐Induced Breaches of Psychological Contracts During Joint Buyer–Supplier Projects," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 54(4), pages 62-85, October.
    4. Huo, Baofeng & Liu, Ruolei & Tian, Min, 2022. "The bright side of dependence asymmetry: Mitigating power use and facilitating relational ties," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    5. Patrucco, Andrea S. & Schoenherr, Tobias & Moretto, Antonella, 2024. "Sustaining commitment in preferred buyer-supplier relationships: How to retain the ‘customer of choice’ status?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    6. Antonella La Rocca & Ivan Snehota, 2021. "Mobilizing suppliers when starting up a new business venture," Post-Print hal-03328945, HAL.
    7. Hao, Bin & Feng, Yanan, 2018. "Leveraging learning forces in asymmetric alliances: Small firms’ perceived power imbalance in driving exploration and exploitation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 27-39.
    8. Patrucco, Andrea S. & Moretto, Antonella & Luzzini, Davide & Glas, Andreas H., 2020. "Obtaining supplier commitment: antecedents and performance outcomes," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    9. Antonio Carlos Rodrigues, 2021. "Response Surface Analysis: A Tutorial for Examining Linear and Curvilinear Effects," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 25(6), pages 200293-2002.
    10. Janina Milena Goldberg & Holger Schiele, 2019. "Innovating With Dominant Suppliers: Lessons From The Race For Laser Light," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(01), pages 1-26, January.
    11. Munten, Pauline & Vanhamme, Joëlle & Maon, François & Swaen, Valérie & Lindgreen, Adam, 2021. "Addressing tensions in coopetition for sustainable innovation: Insights from the automotive industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 10-20.
    12. Jeremy J. Kovach & Morgan Swink & Mauricio Rodriguez, 2023. "Delaying supplier payments to increase buyer profits," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 59(1), pages 26-47, January.
    13. Marika Makkonen & Anna Aminoff & Katri Valkokari, 2018. "Stimulating Supplier Innovation In A Complex And Regulated Business Environment — A Dyadic Case Study," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(03), pages 1-34, April.
    14. Chen Qian & Paul A. Dion & Ralf Wagner & Stefan Seuring, 2023. "Efficacy of supply chain relationships – differences in performance appraisals between buyers and suppliers," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 1302-1320, September.
    15. Ho, Foo Nin & Wong, Jared & Brodowsky, Glen, 2023. "Does masstige offer the prestige of luxury without the social costs? Status and warmth perceptions from masstige and luxury signals," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(PA).
    16. Castaldo, Sandro & Ciacci, Andrea & Penco, Lara & Profumo, Giorgia, 2024. "Which trust layer better counterbalances the risk impact on travel intentions in a crisis scenario?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    17. Olsen, Per Ingvar & Prenkert, Frans & Hoholm, Thomas & Harrison, Debbie, 2014. "The dynamics of networked power in a concentrated business network," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(12), pages 2579-2589.
    18. Guo, Chiquan & Wang, Yong J. & Metcalf, Ashley, 2014. "How to calibrate conventional market-oriented organizational culture in 21st century production-centered firms? A customer relationship perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 235-245.
    19. Duffy, Rachel & Fearne, Andrew & Hornibrook, Sue & Hutchinson, Karise & Reid, Andrea, 2013. "Engaging suppliers in CRM: The role of justice in buyer–supplier relationships," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 20-27.
    20. Ghosh, R.K. & Eriksson, M. & Istamov, A., 2018. "Food waste due to coercive power in agri-food chains: Evidence from Sweden," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277496, International Association of Agricultural Economists.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:239:y:2021:i:c:s0925527321001444. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.