IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/opmare/v16y2023i3d10.1007_s12063-023-00354-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficacy of supply chain relationships – differences in performance appraisals between buyers and suppliers

Author

Listed:
  • Chen Qian

    (University of Kassel)

  • Paul A. Dion

    (Susquehanna University)

  • Ralf Wagner

    (University of Kassel)

  • Stefan Seuring

    (University of Kassel)

Abstract

This paper examines the efficacy of three supply chain relationship factors: trust, commitment, and relationship specific investment (RSI) in affecting firms’ cooperation, innovation and financial performance, comparing buyers’ and suppliers’ perspectives. A questionnaire survey was conducted in mainland China. Two independent samples with 101 and 108 responses respectively from the Chinese business buyers and suppliers were collected by visiting nine large annual exhibitions. Both samples involved buyer–supplier business relationships across three business markets: textiles, food, and consumer electronics. The data was analysed using structural equation modelling and a two-groups invariance test. The results indicate that the efficacies of trust, commitment, and RSI influencing buyers’ and suppliers’ performance are different. The paths from the relationship factors leading to performance form patterns that differ between buyers and suppliers in the Chinese business context. While trust and RSI are the direct antecedents of buyers’ cooperation performance, commitment is the immediate precursor of suppliers’ cooperation performance. Trust and commitment lead to buyer’s innovation performance directly, while RSI is a direct driver of supplier’ innovation performance. In addition, RSI is not a significant factor for buyers’ financial performance, whereas it will generate financial return for suppliers. Based on these findings, we provide differentiated relationship management suggestions to managers of buying and supplying firms for helping them improve performance in the Chinese business market in particular. For example, trust and commitment are more important relationship factors than RSI for buying firms, while RSI is as significant as trust and commitment for supplying firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen Qian & Paul A. Dion & Ralf Wagner & Stefan Seuring, 2023. "Efficacy of supply chain relationships – differences in performance appraisals between buyers and suppliers," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 1302-1320, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:opmare:v:16:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s12063-023-00354-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s12063-023-00354-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12063-023-00354-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12063-023-00354-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Terawatanavong, Civilai & Whitwell, Gregory J. & Widing, Robert E. & O'Cass, Aron, 2011. "Technological turbulence, supplier market orientation, and buyer satisfaction," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(8), pages 911-918, August.
    2. Wu, Lei-Yu & Chen, Po-Yuan & Chen, Kuan-Yang, 2015. "Why does loyalty–cooperation behavior vary over buyer–seller relationship?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(11), pages 2322-2329.
    3. Kim, Kyung Kyu & Park, Seung-Hoon & Ryoo, Sung Yul & Park, Sung Kook, 2010. "Inter-organizational cooperation in buyer-supplier relationships: Both perspectives," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(8), pages 863-869, August.
    4. Son, Byung-Gak & Kocabasoglu-Hillmer, Canan & Roden, Sinéad, 2016. "A dyadic perspective on retailer–supplier relationships through the lens of social capital," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 120-131.
    5. MacKenzie, Scott B. & Podsakoff, Philip M., 2012. "Common Method Bias in Marketing: Causes, Mechanisms, and Procedural Remedies," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 88(4), pages 542-555.
    6. Fynes, Brian & de Burca, Sean & Mangan, John, 2008. "The effect of relationship characteristics on relationship quality and performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(1), pages 56-69, January.
    7. Renata P. Brito & Priscila L. S. Miguel, 2017. "Power, Governance, and Value in Collaboration: Differences between Buyer and Supplier Perspectives," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 53(2), pages 61-87, April.
    8. Kim, Daekwan & Basu, Choton & Naidu, G.M. & Cavusgil, Erin, 2011. "The innovativeness of Born-Globals and customer orientation: Learning from Indian Born-Globals," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(8), pages 879-886, August.
    9. Chung-Yean Chiang & Mark Hanna & Zhenyu Liu & Xiangyu Lu, 2018. "Obtaining collaboration benefits: the role of collaboration-specific investment and absorptive capacity in China," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 69-82, December.
    10. Chen Qian & Stefan Seuring & Ralf Wagner, 2021. "Reviewing interfirm relationship quality from a supply chain management perspective," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(3), pages 625-650, July.
    11. Ali Shamsollahi & Danielle A. Chmielewski-Raimondo & Simon J. Bell & Reza Kachouie, 2021. "Buyer–supplier relationship dynamics: a systematic review," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(2), pages 418-436, March.
    12. Patrucco, Andrea S. & Moretto, Antonella & Luzzini, Davide & Glas, Andreas H., 2020. "Obtaining supplier commitment: antecedents and performance outcomes," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen Qian & Stefan Seuring & Ralf Wagner, 2021. "Reviewing interfirm relationship quality from a supply chain management perspective," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(3), pages 625-650, July.
    2. Vos, F.G.S. & Van der Lelij, R. & Schiele, H. & Praas, N.H.J., 2021. "Mediating the impact of power on supplier satisfaction: Do buyer status and relational conflict matter?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    3. Hong, Paul & Jagani, Sandeep & Kim, Jinhwan & Youn, Sun Hee, 2019. "Managing sustainability orientation: An empirical investigation of manufacturing firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 71-81.
    4. Padgett, Daniel & Hopkins, Christopher D. & Williams, Zac, 2020. "Buyer dependence in B2B relationships: The role of supplier investments, commitment form, and trust," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 13-24.
    5. Lees, Nic & Nuthall, Peter & Wilson, Mark M.J., 2020. "Relationship quality and supplier performance in food supply chains," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 23(3), August.
    6. Jianqi Qiao & Suicheng Li & Antonio Capaldo, 2022. "Green supply chain management, supplier environmental commitment, and the roles of supplier perceived relationship attractiveness and justice. A moderated moderation analysis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3523-3541, November.
    7. Bai, Jingkun & Su, Jiaoyue & Xin, Zihao & Wang, Chengqi, 2024. "Calculative trust, relational trust, and organizational performance: A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    8. Talwar, Shalini & Kaur, Puneet & Escobar, Octavio & Lan, Sai, 2022. "Virtual reality tourism to satisfy wanderlust without wandering: An unconventional innovation to promote sustainability," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 128-143.
    9. Ramendra Pratap Singh & Neelotpaul Banerjee, 2018. "Exploring the Influence of Celebrity Credibility on Brand Attitude, Advertisement Attitude and Purchase Intention," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 19(6), pages 1622-1639, December.
    10. Alev Ozer Torgaloz & Mehmet Fatih Acar & Cemil Kuzey, 2023. "The effects of organizational learning culture and decentralization upon supply chain collaboration: analysis of covid-19 period," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 511-530, March.
    11. Muhamad Azrin Nazri & Nor Asiah Omar & Aini Aman & Abu Hanifah Ayob & Nur Ainna Ramli, 2020. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Performance in Takaful Agencies: The Moderating Role of Objective Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-18, October.
    12. Samadhiya, Ashutosh & Yadav, Sanjeev & Kumar, Anil & Majumdar, Abhijit & Luthra, Sunil & Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo & Upadhyay, Arvind, 2023. "The influence of artificial intelligence techniques on disruption management: Does supply chain dynamism matter?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    13. Vendrell-Herrero, Ferran & Bustinza, Oscar F. & Opazo-Basaez, Marco, 2021. "Information technologies and product-service innovation: The moderating role of service R&D team structure," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 673-687.
    14. Mohamed Albaity & Mahfuzur Rahman, 2021. "Customer Loyalty towards Islamic Banks: The Mediating Role of Trust and Attitude," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-19, September.
    15. Heena Thanki & Sweety Shah & Harishchandra Singh Rathod & Ankit D. Oza & Dumitru Doru Burduhos-Nergis, 2022. "I Am Ready to Invest in Socially Responsible Investments (SRI) Options Only If the Returns Are Not Compromised: Individual Investors’ Intentions toward SRI," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-17, September.
    16. İpek, İlayda & Bıçakcıoğlu-Peynirci, Nilay, 2020. "Export market orientation: An integrative review and directions for future research," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(4).
    17. Surajit Bag & Muhammad Sabbir Rahman & Gautam Srivastava & Peter Kilbourn & Nishikant Mishra, 2024. "Buyer–supplier partnerships and circular economy performance in food supply chains: Serial mediation by commitment contract and innovation performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 1247-1264, February.
    18. Eduardo Terán-Yépez & David Jiménez-Castillo & Manuel Sánchez-Pérez, 2023. "The role of affect in international opportunity recognition and the formation of international opportunity beliefs," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 941-983, April.
    19. Hung M. Nguyen & George Onofrei & Dothang Truong & Simon Lockrey, 2020. "Customer green orientation and process innovation alignment: A configuration approach in the global manufacturing industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2498-2513, September.
    20. Simona-Mihaela TRIF, 2012. "Antecedents and consequences of relationship quality. A case study of banking sector in Romania," Timisoara Journal of Economics, West University of Timisoara, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 5(18), pages 253-271.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:opmare:v:16:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s12063-023-00354-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.