IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jotrge/v42y2015icp34-47.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating the associations between road network structure and non-motorist accidents

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Yuanyuan
  • Bigham, John
  • Ragland, David
  • Chen, Xiaohong

Abstract

Road networks channel traffic flow and can impact the volume and proximity of walking and bicycling. Therefore, the structure of road networks—the pattern by which roads are connected—can affect the safety of non-motorized road users. To understand the impact of roads’ structural features on pedestrian and bicyclist safety, this study analyzes the associations between road network structure and non-motorist-involved crashes using data from 321 census tracts in Alameda County, California. Average geodesic distance, network betweenness centrality, and an overall clustering coefficient were calculated to quantify the structure of road networks. Three statistical models were developed using the geographically weighted regression (GWR) technique for the three structural factors, in addition to other zonal factors including traffic behavior, land use, transportation facility, and demographic features. The results indicate that longer average geodesic distance, higher network betweenness centrality, and a larger overall clustering coefficient were related to fewer non-motorist-involved accidents. Thus, results suggest that: (1) if a network is more highly centered on major roads, there will be fewer non-motorist-involved crashes; (2) a network with a greater average number of intersections on the shortest path connecting each pair of roads tends to experience fewer crashes involving pedestrians and bicyclists; and (3) the more clustered road networks are into several sub-core networks, the lower the non-motorist crash count. The three structural measurements can reflect the configuration of a network so that it can be used in other network analyses. More information about the types of road network structures that are conducive to non-motorist traffic safety can help to guide the design of new networks and the retrofitting of existing networks. The estimation results of GWR models explain the spatial heterogeneity of correlations between explanatory factors and non-motorist crashes, which can support regional agencies in establishing local safety policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Yuanyuan & Bigham, John & Ragland, David & Chen, Xiaohong, 2015. "Investigating the associations between road network structure and non-motorist accidents," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 34-47.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:42:y:2015:i:c:p:34-47
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.10.010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692314002336
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.10.010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Porta, Sergio & Crucitti, Paolo & Latora, Vito, 2006. "The network analysis of urban streets: A dual approach," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 369(2), pages 853-866.
    2. Shakil Rifaat & Richard Tay & Alexandre de Barros, 2012. "Urban Street Pattern and Pedestrian Traffic Safety," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 337-352.
    3. Robin Haynes & Andrew Jones & Victoria Kennedy & Ian Harvey & Tony Jewell, 2007. "District Variations in Road Curvature in England and Wales and their Association with Road-Traffic Crashes," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(5), pages 1222-1237, May.
    4. Grembek, Offer, 2012. "The relative vulnerability index: a framework for evaluating multimodal traffic safety," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt9xg8n6vr, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    5. Schneider, Robert J. & Arnold, Lindsay S. & Ragland, David R., 2009. "A Pilot Model for Estimating Pedestrian Intersection Crossing Volumes," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt3nr8h66j, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Parthasarathi, Pavithra & Levinson, David, 2018. "Network structure and the journey to work: An intra-metropolitan analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 292-304.
    2. Xie, Kun & Ozbay, Kaan & Yang, Di & Xu, Chuan & Yang, Hong, 2021. "Modeling bicycle crash costs using big data: A grid-cell-based Tobit model with random parameters," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    3. Ji, Shujuan & Wang, Xin & Lyu, Tao & Liu, Xiaojie & Wang, Yuanqing & Heinen, Eva & Sun, Zhenwei, 2022. "Understanding cycling distance according to the prediction of the XGBoost and the interpretation of SHAP: A non-linear and interaction effect analysis," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    4. Mohamed Bayoumi Kamel & Tarek Sayed, 2021. "The impact of bike network indicators on bike kilometers traveled and bike safety: A network theory approach," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(7), pages 2055-2072, September.
    5. Brendan Murphy & David Levinson & Andrew Owen, 2015. "Accessibility and Centrality Based Estimation of Urban Pedestrian Activity," Working Papers 000143, University of Minnesota: Nexus Research Group.
    6. Obelheiro, Marta Rodrigues & da Silva, Alan Ricardo & Nodari, Christine Tessele & Cybis, Helena Beatriz Bettella & Lindau, Luis Antonio, 2020. "A new zone system to analyze the spatial relationships between the built environment and traffic safety," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    7. Zhaowei Yin & Yuanyuan Guo & Mengshu Zhou & Yixuan Wang & Fengliang Tang, 2024. "Integration between Dockless Bike-Sharing and Buses: The Effect of Urban Road Network Characteristics," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-27, August.
    8. Wang, Shiguang & Yu, Dexin & Kwan, Mei-Po & Zheng, Lili & Miao, Hongzhi & Li, Yongxing, 2020. "The impacts of road network density on motor vehicle travel: An empirical study of Chinese cities based on network theory," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 144-156.
    9. Brendan Murphy & David Levinson & Andrew Owen, 2015. "Evaluating the "Safety In Numbers" Effect With Estimated Pedestrian Activity," Working Papers 000136, University of Minnesota: Nexus Research Group.
    10. Ji, Shujuan & Liu, Xiaojie & Wang, Yuanqing, 2024. "The role of road infrastructures in the usage of bikeshare and private bicycle," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 234-246.
    11. An, Zihao & Xie, Bo & Liu, Qiyang, 2023. "No street is an Island: Street network morphologies and traffic safety," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 167-181.
    12. Freiria, Susana & Ribeiro, Bernardete & Tavares, Alexandre O., 2015. "Understanding road network dynamics: Link-based topological patterns," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 55-66.
    13. Hwachyi Wang & S. K. Jason Chang & Hans De Backer & Dirk Lauwers & Philippe De Maeyer, 2019. "Integrating Spatial and Temporal Approaches for Explaining Bicycle Crashes in High-Risk Areas in Antwerp (Belgium)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-28, July.
    14. Wu, Peijie & Meng, Xianghai & Song, Li, 2021. "Bayesian space–time modeling of bicycle and pedestrian crash risk by injury severity levels to explore the long-term spatiotemporal effects," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 581(C).
    15. Choi, Dong-ah & Ewing, Reid, 2021. "Effect of street network design on traffic congestion and traffic safety," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    16. Li, Jia & Li, Chengqian & Zhao, Xiaohua & Wang, Xuesong, 2024. "Do road network patterns and points of interest influence bicycle safety? Evidence from dockless bike sharing in China and policy implications for traffic safety planning," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 21-35.
    17. Wang, Hwachyi & De Backer, Hans & Lauwers, Dirk & Chang, S.K.Jason, 2019. "A spatio-temporal mapping to assess bicycle collision risks on high-risk areas (Bridges) - A case study from Taipei (Taiwan)," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 94-109.
    18. Sun, Chenshuo & Pei, Xin & Hao, Junheng & Wang, Yewen & Zhang, Zuo & Wong, S.C., 2018. "Role of road network features in the evaluation of incident impacts on urban traffic mobility," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PA), pages 101-116.
    19. Cooper, Crispin H.V., 2017. "Using spatial network analysis to model pedal cycle flows, risk and mode choice," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 157-165.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Choi, Dong-ah & Ewing, Reid, 2021. "Effect of street network design on traffic congestion and traffic safety," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    2. Jiang, Bin, 2007. "A topological pattern of urban street networks: Universality and peculiarity," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 384(2), pages 647-655.
    3. Boeing, Geoff, 2017. "OSMnx: New Methods for Acquiring, Constructing, Analyzing, and Visualizing Complex Street Networks," SocArXiv q86sd, Center for Open Science.
    4. Ryus, Paul & Ferguson, Erin & Laustsen, Kelly M. & Schneider, Robert J. & Proulx, Frank R. & Hull, Tony & Miranda-Moreno, Luis, 2014. "Guidebook on Pedestrian and Bicycle Volume Data Collection," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt11q5p33w, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    5. Zhou, Yaoming & Wang, Junwei, 2018. "Efficiency of complex networks under failures and attacks: A percolation approach," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 512(C), pages 658-664.
    6. Lordan, Oriol & Sallan, Jose M., 2019. "Core and critical cities of global region airport networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 513(C), pages 724-733.
    7. Wagner, Roy, 2008. "On the metric, topological and functional structures of urban networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 387(8), pages 2120-2132.
    8. Juwon Chung & Seung-Nam Kim & Hyungkyoo Kim, 2019. "The Impact of PM 10 Levels on Pedestrian Volume: Findings from Streets in Seoul, South Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-23, December.
    9. Zhang, Tong & Zeng, Zhe & Jia, Tao & Li, Jing, 2016. "Examining the amenability of urban street networks for locating facilities," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 457(C), pages 469-479.
    10. Lin, Ting (Grace) & Xia, Jianhong (Cecilia) & Robinson, Todd P. & Goulias, Konstadinos G. & Church, Richard L. & Olaru, Doina & Tapin, John & Han, Renlong, 2014. "Spatial analysis of access to and accessibility surrounding train stations: a case study of accessibility for the elderly in Perth, Western Australia," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 111-120.
    11. Geoff Boeing, 2020. "Urban Street Network Analysis in a Computational Notebook," REGION, European Regional Science Association, vol. 7, pages 39-51.
    12. Geoff Boeing, 2020. "A multi-scale analysis of 27,000 urban street networks: Every US city, town, urbanized area, and Zillow neighborhood," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(4), pages 590-608, May.
    13. Omer Dogan & Jaewon Han & Sugie Lee, 2020. "Analysis of Large-Scale Residential Development on Walking Environments in Surrounding Neighborhoods: A Before-and-After Comparison of Apartment Complex Developments in Seoul, Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-17, September.
    14. Wang, Shiguang & Zheng, Lili & Yu, Dexin, 2017. "The improved degree of urban road traffic network: A case study of Xiamen, China," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 469(C), pages 256-264.
    15. Qin Zhang & Rolf Moeckel & Kelly J. Clifton, 2024. "MoPeD meets MITO: a hybrid modeling framework for pedestrian travel demand," Transportation, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 1327-1347, August.
    16. Asya Natapov & Daniel Czamanski & Dafna Fisher-Gewirtzman, 2018. "A Network Approach to Link Visibility and Urban Activity Location," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 555-575, September.
    17. Ding, Rui & Zhou, Tao & Zhang, Yilin & Du, YiMing & Chen, Shihui & Fu, Jun & Du, Linyu & Zhang, Ting & Li, Tongfei, 2022. "The influence of average speed ratio on multilayer traffic network," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 594(C).
    18. Liu, Chengliang & Duan, Dezhong, 2020. "Spatial inequality of bus transit dependence on urban streets and its relationships with socioeconomic intensities: A tale of two megacities in China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    19. Zhao, Pengxiang & Jia, Tao & Qin, Kun & Shan, Jie & Jiao, Chenjing, 2015. "Statistical analysis on the evolution of OpenStreetMap road networks in Beijing," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 420(C), pages 59-72.
    20. Freiria, Susana & Ribeiro, Bernardete & Tavares, Alexandre O., 2015. "Understanding road network dynamics: Link-based topological patterns," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 55-66.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:42:y:2015:i:c:p:34-47. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-transport-geography .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.