IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jobhdp/v182y2024ics0749597824000232.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Not all allies are created equal: An intersectional examination of relational allyship for women of color at work

Author

Listed:
  • Bhattacharyya, Barnini
  • Erskine, Samantha E.
  • McCluney, Courtney

Abstract

Allyship is typically considered a positive relationship between marginalized individuals and their relatively more privileged allies. Yet, this flattened, unidirectional, and single-identity view of allyship prohibits us from capturing the nuances and inherent power struggles embedded in the allied relationship. Our study aims to expand our understanding of how and whether allyship across multiple levels of difference helps dismantle oppressive structures or maintains power inequalities in organizations. Integrating current allyship research with intersectionality theory, we conduct an inductive qualitative study of allied relationships between professional women of color in Canada (n = 30) and their nominated allies (n = 30). We find that power schemata, or cognitive and emotional framing of systems of power in allied relationships affect allyship behaviors, such that power cognizance is key for effective allyship to occur. We identify three dimensions of allyship behaviors that emerge from these power considerations —(de)centering, (dis)respecting, and (in)action – which vary in terms of expected allyship by women of color and enacted allyship by their allies. Integrating power schemata and allyship dimensions, we identify three types of allied relationships for women of color at work, varying in effectiveness. We identify ongoing learning as a mechanism to move towards power-cognizance and therefore more effective allyship. Women of color emerge as the most effective allies in our study, highlighting that marginalized individuals can not only be allies, but that they play a crucial role in their own liberation. Based on these findings, we develop our intersectional theory of relational allyship for women of color at work.

Suggested Citation

  • Bhattacharyya, Barnini & Erskine, Samantha E. & McCluney, Courtney, 2024. "Not all allies are created equal: An intersectional examination of relational allyship for women of color at work," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:182:y:2024:i:c:s0749597824000232
    DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2024.104331
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749597824000232
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.obhdp.2024.104331?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elad N. Sherf & Subrahmaniam Tangirala & Katy Connealy Weber, 2017. "It Is Not My Place! Psychological Standing and Men’s Voice and Participation in Gender-Parity Initiatives," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 193-210, April.
    2. Sabat, Isaac E. & Martinez, Larry R. & Wessel, Jennifer L., 2013. "Neo-Activism: Engaging Allies in Modern Workplace Discrimination Reduction," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(4), pages 480-485, December.
    3. King, Eden B. & Cortina, José M., 2010. "The Social and Economic Imperative of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgendered Supportive Organizational Policies," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 3(1), pages 69-78, March.
    4. Patricia Hill Collins, 2000. "Gender, Black Feminism, and Black Political Economy," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 568(1), pages 41-53, March.
    5. Tracy L. Dumas & Katherine W. Phillips & Nancy P. Rothbard, 2013. "Getting Closer at the Company Party: Integration Experiences, Racial Dissimilarity, and Workplace Relationships," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(5), pages 1377-1401, October.
    6. Michel Anteby, 2013. "PERSPECTIVE —Relaxing the Taboo on Telling Our Own Stories: Upholding Professional Distance and Personal Involvement," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(4), pages 1277-1290, August.
    7. Sabat, Isaac E. & Lindsey, Alex P. & Membere, Ashley & Anderson, Amanda & Ahmad, Afra & King, Eden & Bolunmez, Balca, 2014. "Invisible Disabilities: Unique Strategies for Workplace Allies," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(2), pages 259-265, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kossek, Ellen Ernst & Ladge, Jamie & Little, Laura M. & Loyd, Denise Lewin & Smith, Alexis Nicole & Tinsley, Catherine H., 2024. "Introduction to the special issue: Allyship, advocacy, and social justice to support equality for marginalized groups in the workplace," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kossek, Ellen Ernst & Ladge, Jamie & Little, Laura M. & Loyd, Denise Lewin & Smith, Alexis Nicole & Tinsley, Catherine H., 2024. "Introduction to the special issue: Allyship, advocacy, and social justice to support equality for marginalized groups in the workplace," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    2. Sonia Ghumman & Ann Marie Ryan & Jin Suk Park, 2024. "Who Helps Who? The Role of Stigma Dimensions in Harassment Intervention," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 189(1), pages 87-109, January.
    3. Chawla, Nitya & Gabriel, Allison S. & Prengler, Melanie & Rogers, Kristie & Rogers, Benjamin & Tedder-King, Alyssa & Rosen, Christopher C., 2024. "Allyship in the fifth trimester: A multi-method investigation of Women’s postpartum return to work," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    4. Saoirse Caitlin O'Shea, 2020. "Working at gender? An autoethnography," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(6), pages 1438-1449, November.
    5. Jinia Mukerjee & Roy Thurik & Olivier Torrès & Annelot Wismans, 2024. "Measuring organizational play in small businesses," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 74(4), pages 2443-2476, December.
    6. Smriti Rao & Smita Ramnarain, 2023. "Gender, Social Protection, and Crises of Social Reproduction: Contextualizing NREGA," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 55(1), pages 70-92, March.
    7. Sharon Koppman & Elisa Mattarelli & Amar Gupta, 2016. "Third-World “Sloggers” or Elite Global Professionals? Using Organizational Toolkits to Redefine Work Identity in Information Technology Offshore Outsourcing," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 825-845, August.
    8. Nick Drydakis, 2019. "School‐Age Bullying, Workplace Bullying and Job Satisfaction: Experiences of LGB People in Britain," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 87(4), pages 455-488, July.
    9. Erin A. Cech & William R. Rothwell, 2020. "LGBT Workplace Inequality in the Federal Workforce: Intersectional Processes, Organizational Contexts, and Turnover Considerations," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 73(1), pages 25-60, January.
    10. Kennedy, Jessica A. & Schweitzer, Maurice E., 2018. "Building trust by tearing others down: When accusing others of unethical behavior engenders trust," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 111-128.
    11. Sarah Duffy & Michelle O’Shea & Liyaning Maggie Tang, 2023. "Sexually harassed, assaulted, silenced, and now heard: Institutional betrayal and its affects," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 1387-1406, July.
    12. Morana Fudurić & Andreina Mandelli, 2017. "Corporate and Non-Profit Social Media Policies: A Content Analysis," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 29(1), pages 7-22.
    13. Giurge, Laura M. & Bohns, Vanessa K., 2021. "You don’t need to answer right away! Receivers overestimate how quickly senders expect responses to non-urgent work emails," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 114-128.
    14. Đurđana Ozretić Došen, 2017. "Editorial preface," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 29(1), pages 5-6.
    15. O'Higgins, Ciara & Andreeva, Tatiana & Goya, Nekane Aramburu, 2022. "The hows and whys of foreign operation mode combinations: The role of knowledge processes," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 57(2).
    16. Grey, Colette & Flynn, Antoinette & Adu, Douglas A., 2024. "An examination of how executive remuneration and firm performance are influenced by Chair-CEO diversity attributes," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    17. Pai, Jieun & DeVoe, Sanford E. & Pfeffer, Jeffrey, 2020. "How income and the economic evaluation of time affect who we socialize with outside of work," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 158-175.
    18. Anne Antoni & Haley Beer, 2024. "Ethical Sensibilities for Practicing Care in Management and Organization Research," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 190(2), pages 279-294, March.
    19. Beine, Michel & Peracchi, Silvia & Zanaj, Skerdilajda, 2023. "Ancestral diversity and performance: Evidence from football data," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 193-214.
    20. Dahling, Jason J. & Wiley, Shaun & Fishman, Zachary A. & Loihle, Amber, 2016. "A stake in the fight: When do heterosexual employees resist organizational policies that deny marriage equality to LGB peers?," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 1-15.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:182:y:2024:i:c:s0749597824000232. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/obhdp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.