IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jobhdp/v182y2024ics0749597824000232.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Not all allies are created equal: An intersectional examination of relational allyship for women of color at work

Author

Listed:
  • Bhattacharyya, Barnini
  • Erskine, Samantha E.
  • McCluney, Courtney

Abstract

Allyship is typically considered a positive relationship between marginalized individuals and their relatively more privileged allies. Yet, this flattened, unidirectional, and single-identity view of allyship prohibits us from capturing the nuances and inherent power struggles embedded in the allied relationship. Our study aims to expand our understanding of how and whether allyship across multiple levels of difference helps dismantle oppressive structures or maintains power inequalities in organizations. Integrating current allyship research with intersectionality theory, we conduct an inductive qualitative study of allied relationships between professional women of color in Canada (n = 30) and their nominated allies (n = 30). We find that power schemata, or cognitive and emotional framing of systems of power in allied relationships affect allyship behaviors, such that power cognizance is key for effective allyship to occur. We identify three dimensions of allyship behaviors that emerge from these power considerations —(de)centering, (dis)respecting, and (in)action – which vary in terms of expected allyship by women of color and enacted allyship by their allies. Integrating power schemata and allyship dimensions, we identify three types of allied relationships for women of color at work, varying in effectiveness. We identify ongoing learning as a mechanism to move towards power-cognizance and therefore more effective allyship. Women of color emerge as the most effective allies in our study, highlighting that marginalized individuals can not only be allies, but that they play a crucial role in their own liberation. Based on these findings, we develop our intersectional theory of relational allyship for women of color at work.

Suggested Citation

  • Bhattacharyya, Barnini & Erskine, Samantha E. & McCluney, Courtney, 2024. "Not all allies are created equal: An intersectional examination of relational allyship for women of color at work," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:182:y:2024:i:c:s0749597824000232
    DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2024.104331
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749597824000232
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.obhdp.2024.104331?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elad N. Sherf & Subrahmaniam Tangirala & Katy Connealy Weber, 2017. "It Is Not My Place! Psychological Standing and Men’s Voice and Participation in Gender-Parity Initiatives," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 193-210, April.
    2. Sabat, Isaac E. & Martinez, Larry R. & Wessel, Jennifer L., 2013. "Neo-Activism: Engaging Allies in Modern Workplace Discrimination Reduction," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(4), pages 480-485, December.
    3. King, Eden B. & Cortina, José M., 2010. "The Social and Economic Imperative of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgendered Supportive Organizational Policies," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 3(1), pages 69-78, March.
    4. Tracy L. Dumas & Katherine W. Phillips & Nancy P. Rothbard, 2013. "Getting Closer at the Company Party: Integration Experiences, Racial Dissimilarity, and Workplace Relationships," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(5), pages 1377-1401, October.
    5. Sabat, Isaac E. & Lindsey, Alex P. & Membere, Ashley & Anderson, Amanda & Ahmad, Afra & King, Eden & Bolunmez, Balca, 2014. "Invisible Disabilities: Unique Strategies for Workplace Allies," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(2), pages 259-265, June.
    6. Patricia Hill Collins, 2000. "Gender, Black Feminism, and Black Political Economy," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 568(1), pages 41-53, March.
    7. Michel Anteby, 2013. "PERSPECTIVE —Relaxing the Taboo on Telling Our Own Stories: Upholding Professional Distance and Personal Involvement," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(4), pages 1277-1290, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chawla, Nitya & Gabriel, Allison S. & Prengler, Melanie & Rogers, Kristie & Rogers, Benjamin & Tedder-King, Alyssa & Rosen, Christopher C., 2024. "Allyship in the fifth trimester: A multi-method investigation of Women’s postpartum return to work," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    2. Sonia Ghumman & Ann Marie Ryan & Jin Suk Park, 2024. "Who Helps Who? The Role of Stigma Dimensions in Harassment Intervention," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 189(1), pages 87-109, January.
    3. Saoirse Caitlin O'Shea, 2020. "Working at gender? An autoethnography," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(6), pages 1438-1449, November.
    4. Smriti Rao & Smita Ramnarain, 2023. "Gender, Social Protection, and Crises of Social Reproduction: Contextualizing NREGA," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 55(1), pages 70-92, March.
    5. Morana Fudurić & Andreina Mandelli, 2017. "Corporate and Non-Profit Social Media Policies: A Content Analysis," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 29(1), pages 7-22.
    6. Đurđana Ozretić Došen, 2017. "Editorial preface," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 29(1), pages 5-6.
    7. Pai, Jieun & DeVoe, Sanford E. & Pfeffer, Jeffrey, 2020. "How income and the economic evaluation of time affect who we socialize with outside of work," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 158-175.
    8. Beine, Michel & Peracchi, Silvia & Zanaj, Skerdilajda, 2023. "Ancestral diversity and performance: Evidence from football data," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 193-214.
    9. Dahling, Jason J. & Wiley, Shaun & Fishman, Zachary A. & Loihle, Amber, 2016. "A stake in the fight: When do heterosexual employees resist organizational policies that deny marriage equality to LGB peers?," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 1-15.
    10. Prasad, Ajnesh, 2014. "Corporeal ethics in an ethnographic encounter: A tale of embodiment from the Occupied Palestinian Territories," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 525-531.
    11. Burak Oc & Maryam Kouchaki, 2024. "The More the Merrier: How Psychological Standing and Work Group Size Explain Managers’ Willingness to Communicate About Unethical Conduct in Their Work Group," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 190(4), pages 775-786, April.
    12. Tripathi, Vinayak R. & Popli, Manish & Gaur, Ajai, 2022. "Spirituality meets science: Impact of founders’ imprint on healthcare practices for marginal communities in India," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 311-323.
    13. Ramirez, Carlos & Zicari, Adrián, 2024. "Between a corporatist past and a globalised future: Argentina's accounting profession and the social balance sheet," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    14. Reilley, Jacob & Löhlein, Lukas, 2023. "Theorizing (and) the future of interdisciplinary accounting research," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    15. Alexis Laszczuk & Lionel Garreau, 2018. "Le Journal de Bord Sibyllique," Post-Print hal-01990906, HAL.
    16. Rashedur Chowdhury, 2023. "Misrepresentation of Marginalized Groups: A Critique of Epistemic Neocolonialism," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 186(3), pages 553-570, September.
    17. Laura Little & Amanda Hinojosa & John Lynch, 2017. "Make Them Feel: How the Disclosure of Pregnancy to a Supervisor Leads to Changes in Perceived Supervisor Support," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 618-635, August.
    18. Greg Fisher, 2024. "Resourcefulness Enactment: The Sensemaking Process Underpinning Resourceful Actions," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 48(4), pages 911-940, July.
    19. Kevin Boudreau & Nilam Kaushik, 2020. "The Gender Gap in Tech & Competitive Work Environments? Field Experimental Evidence from an Internet-of-Things Product Development Platform," NBER Working Papers 27154, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Jessica Gordon-Nembhard, 2023. "Black Political Economy, Solidarity Economics, and Liberation: Toward an Economy of Caring and Abundance," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 55(4), pages 525-538, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:182:y:2024:i:c:s0749597824000232. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/obhdp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.