IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jobhdp/v182y2024ics0749597824000220.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Allyship in the fifth trimester: A multi-method investigation of Women’s postpartum return to work

Author

Listed:
  • Chawla, Nitya
  • Gabriel, Allison S.
  • Prengler, Melanie
  • Rogers, Kristie
  • Rogers, Benjamin
  • Tedder-King, Alyssa
  • Rosen, Christopher C.

Abstract

Recognizing that postpartum mothers’ organizational reentry is fraught with physical, emotional, and psychological challenges, we explored the specific behaviors that coworkers and managers can enact to support and advocate for working mothers during their reentry process—behaviors we conceptualize as postpartum allyship. In Study 1, we adopted a qualitative approach to gain insight into the forms of allyship that working mothers found valuable. We then build upon these findings in Study 2 by developing and validating a scale of postpartum allyship. Finally, in Study 3, integrating emergent themes from our qualitative data with tenets of the social cognitive model of career self-management (Lent & Brown, 2013, 2019), we use our newly-developed measure in a time-lagged study focused on the cognitive, affective, and behavioral impact of postpartum mothers’ experiences of allyship. Results indicated that postpartum allyship experiences bolster work-motherhood self-efficacy and reduce guilt which, in turn, yield important implications for working mothers’ turnover intentions, work-family capital, and postpartum depressive symptoms. Combined across our studies, the current research illuminates the critical impact of allies’ support and advocacy for postpartum mothers during reentry.

Suggested Citation

  • Chawla, Nitya & Gabriel, Allison S. & Prengler, Melanie & Rogers, Kristie & Rogers, Benjamin & Tedder-King, Alyssa & Rosen, Christopher C., 2024. "Allyship in the fifth trimester: A multi-method investigation of Women’s postpartum return to work," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:182:y:2024:i:c:s0749597824000220
    DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2024.104330
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749597824000220
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.obhdp.2024.104330?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:182:y:2024:i:c:s0749597824000220. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/obhdp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.