IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ininma/v32y2012i4p372-380.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors affecting attitudes and intentions towards knowledge sharing in the Dubai Police Force

Author

Listed:
  • Seba, Ibrahim
  • Rowley, Jennifer
  • Lambert, Sian

Abstract

This study contributes to the limited research base on knowledge sharing in public sector organisations, specifically police forces, and organisations in the Middle East through a case study investigation into the factors that affect knowledge sharing in the Dubai Police Force. A questionnaire-based survey was conducted with staff in key departments in the Dubai Police Force. Informed by the literature and by interviews conducted in a previous phase, the core of the questionnaire was a bank of Likert-style questions covering the dependent variables intention to knowledge share, and attitude towards knowledge sharing, and the independent variables, trust, organisational structure, leadership, reward, time, and information technology. Data was analysed using structured equation modelling, in order to test the measurement model using confirmatory factor analysis, and to test the structural model. The structural model suggests a strong relationship between attitude to knowledge sharing, and intention to share knowledge. Hypotheses regarding the influence of leadership, trust, organisational structure, time, and information technology on attitude to knowledge sharing were upheld. Rewards did not to influence attitude to knowledge sharing. Recommendations are offered for practice and further research.

Suggested Citation

  • Seba, Ibrahim & Rowley, Jennifer & Lambert, Sian, 2012. "Factors affecting attitudes and intentions towards knowledge sharing in the Dubai Police Force," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 372-380.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ininma:v:32:y:2012:i:4:p:372-380
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.12.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268401211001563
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.12.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gee W. Bock & Young-Gul Kim, 2002. "Breaking the Myths of Rewards: An Exploratory Study of Attitudes about Knowledge Sharing," Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), IGI Global, vol. 15(2), pages 14-21, April.
    2. Willem, Annick & Buelens, Marc, 2009. "Knowledge sharing in inter-unit cooperative episodes: The impact of organizational structure dimensions," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 151-160.
    3. Lu, Lin & Leung, Kwok & Koch, Pamela Tremain, 2006. "Managerial Knowledge Sharing: The Role of Individual, Interpersonal, and Organizational Factors," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(1), pages 15-41, March.
    4. Jeffrey H. Dyer & Kentaro Nobeoka, 2000. "Creating and managing a high‐performance knowledge‐sharing network: the Toyota case," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(3), pages 345-367, March.
    5. Lee, Dong-Joo & Ahn, Jae-Hyeon, 2007. "Reward systems for intra-organizational knowledge sharing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 180(2), pages 938-956, July.
    6. Martine R. Haas & Morten T. Hansen, 2007. "Different knowledge, different benefits: toward a productivity perspective on knowledge sharing in organizations," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(11), pages 1133-1153, November.
    7. Torsten Ringberg & Markus Reihlen, 2008. "Towards a Socio‐Cognitive Approach to Knowledge Transfer," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(5), pages 912-935, July.
    8. Lin Lu & Kwok Leung & Pamela Tremain Koch, 2006. "Managerial Knowledge Sharing: The Role of Individual, Interpersonal, and Organizational Factors," Management and Organization Review, International Association of Chinese Management Research, vol. 2(1), pages 15-41, March.
    9. Jacky F. L. Hong & Mark Easterby‐Smith & Robin Stanley Snell, 2006. "Transferring Organizational Learning Systems to Japanese Subsidiaries in China," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(5), pages 1027-1058, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pervin Ersoy & Gülmüş Börühan & Sachin Kumar Mangla & Jorge Hernandez Hormazabal & Yigit Kazancoglu & Çisem Lafcı, 2022. "Impact of information technology and knowledge sharing on circular food supply chains for green business growth," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 1875-1904, July.
    2. Pee, L.G. & Lee, J., 2015. "Intrinsically motivating employees’ online knowledge sharing: Understanding the effects of job design," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 679-690.
    3. Hau, Yong Sauk & Kim, Byoungsoo & Lee, Heeseok & Kim, Young-Gul, 2013. "The effects of individual motivations and social capital on employees’ tacit and explicit knowledge sharing intentions," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 356-366.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaolei Zou & Xiaoxi Chen & Fengling Chen & Chuxin Luo & Hongyan Liu, 2020. "The Influence of Negative Workplace Gossip on Knowledge Sharing: Insight from the Cognitive Dissonance Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Sajjad Jasimuddin & Jun Li & Nicholas Perdikis, 2015. "Linkage between geographic space and knowledge transfer by multinational enterprises: a structural equation approach," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 54(3), pages 769-795, May.
    3. Bindu Gupta & Sahil Joshi & Mohit Agarwal, 2012. "The Effect of Expected Benefit and Perceived Cost on Employees’ Knowledge Sharing Behavior: A Study of IT Employees in India," Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, Faculty of Economics, Vilnius University, vol. 3(1).
    4. Syed Talib Hussain & Jaffar Abbas & Shen Lei & Muhammad Jamal Haider & Tayyaba Akram, 2017. "Transactional leadership and organizational creativity: Examining the mediating role of knowledge sharing behavior," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1361663-136, January.
    5. Lee, Cheng-Yu & Wang, Ming-Chao & Huang, Yen-Chih, 2015. "The double-edged sword of technological diversity in R&D alliances: Network position and learning speed as moderators," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 450-461.
    6. Ma, Danni & Fee, Anthony & Grabowski, Simone & Scerri, Moira, 2022. "Dual Organizational Identification in Multinational Enterprises and Interpersonal Horizontal Knowledge Sharing: A Conceptual Model," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(1).
    7. Jiacheng, Wei & Lu, Liu & Francesco, Calabrese A., 2010. "A cognitive model of intra-organizational knowledge-sharing motivations in the view of cross-culture," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 220-230.
    8. Yuan Jin & Ho Cheung Brian Lee & Sulin Ba & Jan Stallaert, 2021. "Winning by Learning? Effect of Knowledge Sharing in Crowdsourcing Contests," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 836-859, September.
    9. Xiaowan Lin, 2015. "How does procedural justice climate influence individual outcomes? An affective perspective," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 771-800, September.
    10. Sheehan, Maura & Garavan, Thomas N. & Morley, Michael J., 2020. "Transformational leadership and work unit innovation: A dyadic two-wave investigation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 399-412.
    11. Jon C. Carr & Michael S. Cole & J. Kirk Ring & Daniela P. Blettner, 2011. "A Measure of Variations in Internal Social Capital among Family Firms," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 35(6), pages 1207-1227, November.
    12. Michael Twum-Darko & Lee-Anne Lesley Harker, 2017. "Understanding Knowledge Sharing in an Organization: A Perspective of Actor-Network Theory," International Journal of Knowledge Management (IJKM), IGI Global, vol. 13(1), pages 53-74, January.
    13. Wonseok Choi & Wongun Goo & Yongjun Choi, 2022. "Perceived Organizational Support and Knowledge Sharing: A Moderated-Mediation Approach," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, April.
    14. Billy Whisnant & Odai Khasawneh, 2014. "How vertical exchanges in it organizations encourage the sharing of knowledge and the mediating influence of trust and reciprocity," Journal of Knowledge Management, Economics and Information Technology, ScientificPapers.org, vol. 4(1.1), pages 1-8, February.
    15. Sasmita Palo & Linu Charles, 2015. "Investigating Factors Affecting Knowledge Sharing Intention of Salespeople," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 40(3-4), pages 302-324, August.
    16. Ying Zhang & Puzhen Xiong & Wei Zhou & Lang Sun & Edwin T.C. Cheng, 2023. "Exploring the longitudinal effects of emotional intelligence and cultural intelligence on knowledge management processes," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 40(4), pages 1555-1578, December.
    17. Xingshan Zheng & Lan Li & Fangyu Zhang & Mengyuan Zhu, 2019. "The Roles of Power Distance Orientation and Perceived Insider Status in the Subordinates’ Moqi with Supervisors and Sustainable Knowledge-Sharing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-17, March.
    18. Matošková Jana & Směšná Petra, 2017. "Human resource management practices stimulating knowledge sharing," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 12(4), pages 614-632, December.
    19. Hong Tian & Ao Wang, 2023. "Sustainable Leadership, Knowledge Sharing, and Frugal Innovation: The Moderating Role of Organizational Innovation Climate," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, October.
    20. Venkatesh, Viswanath & Davis, Fred D. & Zhu, Yaping, 2022. "A cultural contingency model of knowledge sharing and job performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 202-219.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ininma:v:32:y:2012:i:4:p:372-380. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-information-management .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.