IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i5p1421-d211858.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Roles of Power Distance Orientation and Perceived Insider Status in the Subordinates’ Moqi with Supervisors and Sustainable Knowledge-Sharing

Author

Listed:
  • Xingshan Zheng

    (Antai College of Economics and Management, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China)

  • Lan Li

    (Antai College of Economics and Management, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China)

  • Fangyu Zhang

    (International Business School Suzhou, Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou 215123, China)

  • Mengyuan Zhu

    (School of Economics and Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, Weihai 264209, China)

Abstract

Although knowledge-sharing, an important facet of knowledge management, has been encouraged for the sustainable development of organizations, this kind of behavior is still not prevalent among group members. To enrich the literature and contribute to its practical usage, this research proposed a model based on the fit theory to examine the roles of perceived insider status (PIS) and power distance orientation in subordinates’ Moqi with supervisors (SMS) and knowledge-sharing. Survey data from eight firms in China contained 196 samples and was analyzed by MPLUS software to justify the hypotheses. The results showed that: first, SMS predicted knowledge-sharing and perceived insider status; second, perceived insider status positively mediated the relationship between SMS and knowledge-sharing; third, power distance orientation not only positively moderated the relationship between SMS and perceived insider status, but also positively moderated the relationship between SMS and knowledge-sharing. This study enriched the literature on the antecedents of knowledge-sharing and application of SMS. Additionally, this study proposes a few suggestions to practitioners and researchers for establishing sustainable organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Xingshan Zheng & Lan Li & Fangyu Zhang & Mengyuan Zhu, 2019. "The Roles of Power Distance Orientation and Perceived Insider Status in the Subordinates’ Moqi with Supervisors and Sustainable Knowledge-Sharing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-17, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:5:p:1421-:d:211858
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/5/1421/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/5/1421/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Francesc Solé Parellada & Domingo Ribeiro Soriano & Kun-Huang Huarng, 2011. "An overview of the service industries' future (priorities: linking past and future)," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 1-6, January.
    2. Woocheol Kim & Jiwon Park, 2017. "Examining Structural Relationships between Work Engagement, Organizational Procedural Justice, Knowledge Sharing, and Innovative Work Behavior for Sustainable Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-16, February.
    3. Naresh Khatri, 2009. "Consequences of Power Distance Orientation in Organisations," Vision, , vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, January.
    4. Nancy Vargas & M. Begoña Lloria & Salvador Roig-Dobón, 2016. "Main drivers of human capital, learning and performance," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 41(5), pages 961-978, October.
    5. Chieh-Peng Lin, 2007. "To Share or Not to Share: Modeling Tacit Knowledge Sharing, Its Mediators and Antecedents," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 70(4), pages 411-428, February.
    6. Jonathon N. Cummings, 2004. "Work Groups, Structural Diversity, and Knowledge Sharing in a Global Organization," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(3), pages 352-364, March.
    7. Qi Zhang & Siwei Sun & Xingshan Zheng & Wei Liu, 2019. "The Role of Cynicism and Personal Traits in the Organizational Political Climate and Sustainable Creativity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, January.
    8. Berbegal-Mirabent, Jasmina & Sánchez García, José Luís & Ribeiro-Soriano, D. Enrique, 2015. "University–industry partnerships for the provision of R&D services," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(7), pages 1407-1413.
    9. Oyvin Kyvik, 2018. "The global mindset: a must for international innovation and entrepreneurship," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 309-327, June.
    10. Jason Lortie & Kevin C. Cox, 2018. "On the boundaries of social entrepreneurship: a review of relationships with related research domains," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 639-648, September.
    11. Rey-Martí, Andrea & Ribeiro-Soriano, Domingo & Palacios-Marqués, Daniel, 2016. "A bibliometric analysis of social entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 1651-1655.
    12. Lu, Lin & Leung, Kwok & Koch, Pamela Tremain, 2006. "Managerial Knowledge Sharing: The Role of Individual, Interpersonal, and Organizational Factors," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(1), pages 15-41, March.
    13. Raymond Loi & Long Lam & Ka Chan, 2012. "Coping with Job Insecurity: The Role of Procedural Justice, Ethical Leadership and Power Distance Orientation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 108(3), pages 361-372, July.
    14. Hsiu‐Fen Lin, 2007. "Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability: an empirical study," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 28(3/4), pages 315-332, June.
    15. Hsiu-Fen Lin, 2007. "Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability: an empirical study," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 28(1), pages 315 - 332, April.
    16. Lin Lu & Kwok Leung & Pamela Tremain Koch, 2006. "Managerial Knowledge Sharing: The Role of Individual, Interpersonal, and Organizational Factors," Management and Organization Review, International Association of Chinese Management Research, vol. 2(1), pages 15-41, March.
    17. Astakhova, Marina N., 2016. "Explaining the effects of perceived person-supervisor fit and person-organization fit on organizational commitment in the U.S. and Japan," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 956-963.
    18. Kun-Huang Huarng, 2018. "Entrepreneurship for Long-term Care in Sharing Economy," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 97-104, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alexandra Marcos & María del Carmen Pérez-Llantada & Gabriela Topa, 2019. "Integration in the Organizational Environment of the Spanish National Police," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-13, August.
    2. Jingyan Guo & Byunghak Ahn, 2023. "Tacit Knowledge Sharing for Enhancing the Sustainability of Intangible Cultural Heritage (ICH) Crafts: A Perspective from Artisans and Academics under Craft–Design Collaboration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-26, October.
    3. Pilar Ficapal-Cusí & Mihaela Enache-Zegheru & Joan Torrent-Sellens, 2020. "Linking Perceived Organizational Support, Affective Commitment, and Knowledge Sharing with Prosocial Organizational Behavior of Altruism and Civic Virtue," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-20, December.
    4. Ștefan Andrei Neștian & Silviu Mihail Tiță & Elena-Sabina Turnea, 2020. "Using Mobile Phones at Work in Personal and Professional Information Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-25, January.
    5. Natàlia Cugueró-Escofet & Pilar Ficapal-Cusí & Joan Torrent-Sellens, 2019. "Sustainable Human Resource Management: How to Create a Knowledge Sharing Behavior through Organizational Justice, Organizational Support, Satisfaction and Commitment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-20, September.
    6. Bin Du & Bin He & Luxiaohe Zhang & Nan Luo & Xuan Yu & Ai Wang, 2022. "From Subordinate Moqi to Work Engagement: The Role of Leader–Member Exchange in the Sustainability Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    7. Xie, Xuemei & Liu, Xiaojie & Chen, Jialing, 2023. "A meta-analysis of the relationship between collaborative innovation and innovation performance: The role of formal and informal institutions," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaolei Zou & Xiaoxi Chen & Fengling Chen & Chuxin Luo & Hongyan Liu, 2020. "The Influence of Negative Workplace Gossip on Knowledge Sharing: Insight from the Cognitive Dissonance Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Natàlia Cugueró-Escofet & Pilar Ficapal-Cusí & Joan Torrent-Sellens, 2019. "Sustainable Human Resource Management: How to Create a Knowledge Sharing Behavior through Organizational Justice, Organizational Support, Satisfaction and Commitment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-20, September.
    3. Sheehan, Maura & Garavan, Thomas N. & Morley, Michael J., 2020. "Transformational leadership and work unit innovation: A dyadic two-wave investigation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 399-412.
    4. Pilar Ficapal-Cusí & Mihaela Enache-Zegheru & Joan Torrent-Sellens, 2020. "Linking Perceived Organizational Support, Affective Commitment, and Knowledge Sharing with Prosocial Organizational Behavior of Altruism and Civic Virtue," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Haradhan Kumar MOHAJAN, 2019. "Knowledge Sharing among Employees in Organizations," Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, Alliance of Central-Eastern European Universities, vol. 8(1), pages 52-61, March.
    6. Ahyar Yuniawan & Udin Udin, 2020. "The Influence of Knowledge Sharing, Affective Commitment, and Meaningful Work on Employee‘s Performance," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(3), pages 72-82.
    7. Perotti, Francesco Antonio & Ferraris, Alberto & Candelo, Elena & Busso, Donatella, 2022. "The dark side of knowledge sharing: Exploring “knowledge sabotage” and its antecedents," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 422-432.
    8. da Silva, Filipa Pires & Mosquera, Pilar & Soares, Maria Eduarda, 2022. "Factors influencing knowledge sharing among IT geographically dispersed teams," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    9. Farooq Ahmad & Md Billal Hossain & Khurram Mustafa & Faisal Ejaz & Kausar Fiaz Khawaja & Anna Dunay, 2023. "Green HRM Practices and Knowledge Sharing Improve Environmental Performance by Raising Employee Commitment to the Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-19, March.
    10. Wang, Changyu & Zuo, Meiyun & An, Xiaomi, 2017. "Differential influences of perceived organizational factors on younger employees’ participation in offline and online intergenerational knowledge transfer," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 650-663.
    11. Michael Twum-Darko & Lee-Anne Lesley Harker, 2017. "Understanding Knowledge Sharing in an Organization: A Perspective of Actor-Network Theory," International Journal of Knowledge Management (IJKM), IGI Global, vol. 13(1), pages 53-74, January.
    12. Wonseok Choi & Wongun Goo & Yongjun Choi, 2022. "Perceived Organizational Support and Knowledge Sharing: A Moderated-Mediation Approach," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, April.
    13. Billy Whisnant & Odai Khasawneh, 2014. "How vertical exchanges in it organizations encourage the sharing of knowledge and the mediating influence of trust and reciprocity," Journal of Knowledge Management, Economics and Information Technology, ScientificPapers.org, vol. 4(1.1), pages 1-8, February.
    14. Syed Talib Hussain & Jaffar Abbas & Shen Lei & Muhammad Jamal Haider & Tayyaba Akram, 2017. "Transactional leadership and organizational creativity: Examining the mediating role of knowledge sharing behavior," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1361663-136, January.
    15. Muhammad Zafar Yaqub & Abdullah Alsabban, 2023. "Knowledge Sharing through Social Media Platforms in the Silicon Age," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-19, April.
    16. Kathryn Cormican & Chen Meng & Suzana Sampaio & Qiong Wu, 2021. "Towards Sustainable Knowledge Sharing Practices: An Analysis of Organizational Level Enablers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-18, November.
    17. Muhammad Asrar-ul-Haq & Sadia Anwar, 2016. "A systematic review of knowledge management and knowledge sharing: Trends, issues, and challenges," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 1127744-112, December.
    18. Nancy Vargas & M. Begoña Lloria & Addisson Salazar & Luis Vergara, 2018. "Effect of exploitation and exploration on the innovative as outcomes in entrepreneurial firms," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 1053-1069, December.
    19. F. Landini & C. Franco, 2020. "Organizational Drivers of Innovation: The Role of Workforce Agility," Economics Department Working Papers 2020-EP01, Department of Economics, Parma University (Italy).
    20. Arun Kumar A & Shekhar V, 2020. "SCL of Knowledge in Indian Universities," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 11(3), pages 1043-1058, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:5:p:1421-:d:211858. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.