IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v90y2015ip2p1869-1877.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Process simulation of multi-stage chemical-looping combustion using Aspen Plus

Author

Listed:
  • Meng, William X.
  • Banerjee, Subhodeep
  • Zhang, Xiao
  • Agarwal, Ramesh K.

Abstract

In recent years, Chemical-looping combustion (CLC) is increasingly being considered as a promising technology to increase the efficiency of carbon capture in coal-fired power plants and for reducing CO2 emissions into the atmosphere. The char gasification step required in the CLC process when using solid fuels such as coal is slow and often incomplete, which limits the rate of fuel conversion. The concept of multi-staged fuel reaction is proposed as an improvement to the original CLC concept to address this issue. System-level simulations of the single-stage, two-stage and four-stage CLC processes are conducted in Aspen Plus using a plug flow reactor model for the gasification step to incorporate the reaction kinetics into the simulation. By varying the reactor size and examining the char conversion and net energy output, the optimum reactor size for each multi-stage configuration is determined. The effect of multi-staging on the exhaust composition is also investigated. The results of the simulations show that multi-staging allows the use of multiple smaller reactors with the same total volume without incurring any penalty on the net energy output.

Suggested Citation

  • Meng, William X. & Banerjee, Subhodeep & Zhang, Xiao & Agarwal, Ramesh K., 2015. "Process simulation of multi-stage chemical-looping combustion using Aspen Plus," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 1869-1877.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:90:y:2015:i:p2:p:1869-1877
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.06.139
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036054421500910X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2015.06.139?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Jinsheng & Anthony, Edward J., 2008. "Clean combustion of solid fuels," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(2-3), pages 73-79, February.
    2. Hong, Jongsup & Chaudhry, Gunaranjan & Brisson, J.G. & Field, Randall & Gazzino, Marco & Ghoniem, Ahmed F., 2009. "Analysis of oxy-fuel combustion power cycle utilizing a pressurized coal combustor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(9), pages 1332-1340.
    3. Ishida, M. & Zheng, D. & Akehata, T., 1987. "Evaluation of a chemical-looping-combustion power-generation system by graphic exergy analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 147-154.
    4. Naqvi, Rehan & Wolf, Jens & Bolland, Olav, 2007. "Part-load analysis of a chemical looping combustion (CLC) combined cycle with CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 360-370.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Xudong & Shao, Yali & Jin, Baosheng, 2021. "Thermodynamic evaluation and modelling of an auto-thermal hybrid system of chemical looping combustion and air separation for power generation coupling with CO2 cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    2. Banerjee, Subhodeep & Agarwal, Ramesh, 2015. "Transient reacting flow simulation of spouted fluidized bed for coal-direct chemical looping combustion with different Fe-based oxygen carriers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 552-560.
    3. Yi, Qun & Gong, Min-Hui & Huang, Yi & Feng, Jie & Hao, Yan-Hong & Zhang, Ji-Long & Li, Wen-Ying, 2016. "Process development of coke oven gas to methanol integrated with CO2 recycle for satisfactory techno-economic performance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 618-628.
    4. Fan, Junming & Zhu, Lin & Hong, Hui & Jiang, Qiongqiong & Jin, Hongguang, 2017. "A thermodynamic and environmental performance of in-situ gasification of chemical looping combustion for power generation using ilmenite with different coals and comparison with other coal-driven powe," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 1171-1180.
    5. Huang, Zhen & He, Fang & Chen, Dezhen & Zhao, Kun & Wei, Guoqiang & Zheng, Anqing & Zhao, Zengli & Li, Haibin, 2016. "Investigation on reactivity of iron nickel oxides in chemical looping dry reforming," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(P1), pages 53-63.
    6. Yan, Linbo & Yue, Guangxi & He, Boshu, 2015. "Exergy analysis of a coal/biomass co-hydrogasification based chemical looping power generation system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 1778-1787.
    7. Shi, Bin & Wu, Erdorng & Wu, Wei, 2017. "Novel design of chemical looping air separation process for generating electricity and oxygen," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 449-457.
    8. Zhou, Ling & Deshpande, Kartik & Zhang, Xiao & Agarwal, Ramesh K., 2020. "Process simulation of Chemical Looping Combustion using ASPEN plus for a mixture of biomass and coal with various oxygen carriers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    9. Qitai Eri & Wenzhen Wu & Xinjun Zhao, 2017. "Numerical Investigation of the Air-Steam Biomass Gasification Process Based on Thermodynamic Equilibrium Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-19, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shareq Mohd Nazir & Olav Bolland & Shahriar Amini, 2018. "Analysis of Combined Cycle Power Plants with Chemical Looping Reforming of Natural Gas and Pre-Combustion CO 2 Capture," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, January.
    2. Schwebel, G.L. & Filippou, D. & Hudon, G. & Tworkowski, M. & Gipperich, A. & Krumm, W., 2014. "Experimental comparison of two different ilmenites in fluidized bed and fixed bed chemical-looping combustion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1902-1908.
    3. Han, Lu & Bollas, George M., 2016. "Chemical-looping combustion in a reverse-flow fixed bed reactor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 669-681.
    4. Hashim, S.S. & Mohamed, A.R. & Bhatia, S., 2011. "Oxygen separation from air using ceramic-based membrane technology for sustainable fuel production and power generation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 1284-1293, February.
    5. Mohammed N. Khan & Schalk Cloete & Shahriar Amini, 2020. "Efficient Production of Clean Power and Hydrogen Through Synergistic Integration of Chemical Looping Combustion and Reforming," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-19, July.
    6. Basavaraja, R.J. & Jayanti, S., 2015. "Viability of fuel switching of a gas-fired power plant operating in chemical looping combustion mode," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 213-221.
    7. Zhu, Lin & He, Yangdong & Li, Luling & Wu, Pengbin, 2018. "Tech-economic assessment of second-generation CCS: Chemical looping combustion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 915-927.
    8. Fernández, J.R. & Abanades, J.C., 2014. "Conceptual design of a Ni-based chemical looping combustion process using fixed-beds," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 309-319.
    9. Rajabi, Mahsa & Mehrpooya, Mehdi & Haibo, Zhao & Huang, Zhen, 2019. "Chemical looping technology in CHP (combined heat and power) and CCHP (combined cooling heating and power) systems: A critical review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    10. Yaser Khojasteh Salkuyeh & Thomas A. Adams II, 2015. "Co-Production of Olefins, Fuels, and Electricity from Conventional Pipeline Gas and Shale Gas with Near-Zero CO 2 Emissions. Part I: Process Development and Technical Performance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-23, April.
    11. Li, Yingjie & Zhao, Changsui & Chen, Huichao & Ren, Qiangqiang & Duan, Lunbo, 2011. "CO2 capture efficiency and energy requirement analysis of power plant using modified calcium-based sorbent looping cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 1590-1598.
    12. Samuel C. Bayham & Andrew Tong & Mandar Kathe & Liang-Shih Fan, 2016. "Chemical looping technology for energy and chemical production," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(2), pages 216-241, March.
    13. Medrano, J.A. & Potdar, I. & Melendez, J. & Spallina, V. & Pacheco-Tanaka, D.A. & van Sint Annaland, M. & Gallucci, F., 2018. "The membrane-assisted chemical looping reforming concept for efficient H2 production with inherent CO2 capture: Experimental demonstration and model validation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 75-86.
    14. Imtiaz, Qasim & Broda, Marcin & Müller, Christoph R., 2014. "Structure–property relationship of co-precipitated Cu-rich, Al2O3- or MgAl2O4-stabilized oxygen carriers for chemical looping with oxygen uncoupling (CLOU)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 557-565.
    15. Prabu, V., 2015. "Integration of in-situ CO2-oxy coal gasification with advanced power generating systems performing in a chemical looping approach of clean combustion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 1-13.
    16. Zhang, Yongxing & Doroodchi, Elham & Moghtaderi, Behdad, 2014. "Chemical looping combustion of ultra low concentration of methane with Fe2O3/Al2O3 and CuO/SiO2," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1916-1923.
    17. Gopan, Akshay & Kumfer, Benjamin M. & Phillips, Jeffrey & Thimsen, David & Smith, Richard & Axelbaum, Richard L., 2014. "Process design and performance analysis of a Staged, Pressurized Oxy-Combustion (SPOC) power plant for carbon capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 179-188.
    18. Rashwan, Sherif S. & Ibrahim, Abdelmaged H. & Abou-Arab, Tharwat W. & Nemitallah, Medhat A. & Habib, Mohamed A., 2017. "Experimental study of atmospheric partially premixed oxy-combustion flames anchored over a perforated plate burner," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 159-167.
    19. Erlach, B. & Schmidt, M. & Tsatsaronis, G., 2011. "Comparison of carbon capture IGCC with pre-combustion decarbonisation and with chemical-looping combustion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 3804-3815.
    20. Hsieh, Tien-Lin & Xu, Dikai & Zhang, Yitao & Nadgouda, Sourabh & Wang, Dawei & Chung, Cheng & Pottimurphy, Yaswanth & Guo, Mengqing & Chen, Yu-Yen & Xu, Mingyuan & He, Pengfei & Fan, Liang-Shih & Tong, 2018. "250 kWth high pressure pilot demonstration of the syngas chemical looping system for high purity H2 production with CO2 capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 1660-1672.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:90:y:2015:i:p2:p:1869-1877. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.