IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v195y2020ics0360544220300621.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Process simulation of Chemical Looping Combustion using ASPEN plus for a mixture of biomass and coal with various oxygen carriers

Author

Listed:
  • Zhou, Ling
  • Deshpande, Kartik
  • Zhang, Xiao
  • Agarwal, Ramesh K.

Abstract

Chemical Looping Combustion (CLC) is an emerging technology that has shown great promise for capture of almost pure CO2 in combustion of fossil fuels in power plants. In this paper, the CLC process is modeled in ASPEN Plus and then validated using experimental data from combustion of three types of biomass as fuel, and Hematite (Fe2O3) as an oxygen carrier (OC). Three types of biomass used in the simulation are pine sawdust, almond shells, and olive stones. The effect of the fuel reactor temperature on gas concentrations (namely CO2, CO, H2, and CH4) in the fuel reactor, and the carbon capture efficiency are examined. It is found that all three biomass types have very high carbon capture efficiencies, with pine sawdust and almond shell reaching nearly 100% capture efficiency when temperatures are greater than or equal to 950 °C, while olive stones reach a capture efficiency of nearly 100% at temperatures greater than 980 °C. It is also found that the CO2 concentrations in the fuel reactor vary across the three biomass types. The effect of using Mn2O3 as OC in place of Fe2O3 was also investigated. It was found that switching the oxygen carrier to Mn2O3 caused the concentrations of CO and H2 in the fuel reactor to decrease slightly, while the concentration of CO2 increased slightly. Additionally, a mixture of coal and biomass at 895 °C was used with each of the two oxygen carriers. The results show that the system using Fe2O3 had a greater power output than the one using Mn2O3, and that power output increased as the fraction of coal in the coal-biomass mixture increased.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhou, Ling & Deshpande, Kartik & Zhang, Xiao & Agarwal, Ramesh K., 2020. "Process simulation of Chemical Looping Combustion using ASPEN plus for a mixture of biomass and coal with various oxygen carriers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:195:y:2020:i:c:s0360544220300621
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.116955
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544220300621
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2020.116955?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lyngfelt, Anders, 2014. "Chemical-looping combustion of solid fuels – Status of development," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1869-1873.
    2. Yan, Linbo & Yue, Guangxi & He, Boshu, 2015. "Exergy analysis of a coal/biomass co-hydrogasification based chemical looping power generation system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 1778-1787.
    3. E. A. G. Schuur & A. D. McGuire & C. Schädel & G. Grosse & J. W. Harden & D. J. Hayes & G. Hugelius & C. D. Koven & P. Kuhry & D. M. Lawrence & S. M. Natali & D. Olefeldt & V. E. Romanovsky & K. Schae, 2015. "Climate change and the permafrost carbon feedback," Nature, Nature, vol. 520(7546), pages 171-179, April.
    4. Meng, William X. & Banerjee, Subhodeep & Zhang, Xiao & Agarwal, Ramesh K., 2015. "Process simulation of multi-stage chemical-looping combustion using Aspen Plus," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 1869-1877.
    5. Banerjee, Subhodeep & Agarwal, Ramesh, 2015. "Transient reacting flow simulation of spouted fluidized bed for coal-direct chemical looping combustion with different Fe-based oxygen carriers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 552-560.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Wei & Ji, Leilei & Li, Enda & Shi, Weidong & Agarwal, Ramesh & Zhou, Ling, 2021. "Numerical investigation of energy loss mechanism of mixed-flow pump under stall condition," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 740-760.
    2. Lei, Yang & Chen, Yuming & Chen, Jinghai & Liu, Xinyan & Wu, Xiaoqin & Chen, Yuqiu, 2023. "A novel modeling strategy for the prediction on the concentration of H2 and CH4 in raw coke oven gas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    3. Ji, Leilei & Li, Wei & Shi, Weidong & Chang, Hao & Yang, Zhenyu, 2020. "Energy characteristics of mixed-flow pump under different tip clearances based on entropy production analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    4. Zhou, Ling & Han, Chen & Bai, Ling & Li, Wei & El-Emam, Mahmoud Ahmed & Shi, Weidong, 2020. "CFD-DEM bidirectional coupling simulation and experimental investigation of particle ejections and energy conversion in a spouted bed," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    5. Krzywanski, J. & Czakiert, T. & Nowak, W. & Shimizu, T. & Zylka, A. & Idziak, K. & Sosnowski, M. & Grabowska, K., 2022. "Gaseous emissions from advanced CLC and oxyfuel fluidized bed combustion of coal and biomass in a complex geometry facility:A comprehensive model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    6. Zhang, Qiyan & Liu, Yanxing & Cao, Yuhao & Li, Zhengyuan & Hou, Jiachen & Gou, Xiang, 2023. "Parametric study and optimization of MEA-based carbon capture for a coal and biomass co-firing power plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 838-850.
    7. Ji, Leilei & Li, Wei & Shi, Weidong & Tian, Fei & Agarwal, Ramesh, 2021. "Effect of blade thickness on rotating stall of mixed-flow pump using entropy generation analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    8. Wang, Xudong & Shao, Yali & Jin, Baosheng, 2021. "Thermodynamic evaluation and modelling of an auto-thermal hybrid system of chemical looping combustion and air separation for power generation coupling with CO2 cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    9. Li, Zhengkuan & Tian, Songfeng & Zhang, Du & Chang, Chengzhi & Zhang, Qian & Zhang, Peijie, 2022. "Optimization study on improving energy efficiency of power cycle system of staged coal gasification coupled with supercritical carbon dioxide," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PC).
    10. Farajollahi, Hossein & Hossainpour, Siamak, 2023. "Techno-economic assessment of biomass and coal co-fueled chemical looping combustion unit integrated with supercritical CO2 cycle and Organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    11. Koo, Taehyung & Kim, Young Sang & Lee, Dongkeun & Yu, Sangseok & Lee, Young Duk, 2021. "System simulation and exergetic analysis of solid oxide fuel cell power generation system with cascade configuration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Xudong & Shao, Yali & Jin, Baosheng, 2021. "Thermodynamic evaluation and modelling of an auto-thermal hybrid system of chemical looping combustion and air separation for power generation coupling with CO2 cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    2. Yi, Qun & Gong, Min-Hui & Huang, Yi & Feng, Jie & Hao, Yan-Hong & Zhang, Ji-Long & Li, Wen-Ying, 2016. "Process development of coke oven gas to methanol integrated with CO2 recycle for satisfactory techno-economic performance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 618-628.
    3. Fan, Junming & Zhu, Lin & Hong, Hui & Jiang, Qiongqiong & Jin, Hongguang, 2017. "A thermodynamic and environmental performance of in-situ gasification of chemical looping combustion for power generation using ilmenite with different coals and comparison with other coal-driven powe," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 1171-1180.
    4. Khasani, & Prasidha, Willie & Widyatama, Arif & Aziz, Muhammad, 2021. "Energy-saving and environmentally-benign integrated ammonia production system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    5. Lin, Junjie & Luo, Kun & Wang, Shuai & Sun, Liyan & Fan, Jianren, 2022. "Particle-scale study of coal-direct chemical looping combustion (CLC)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    6. Chen, Liangyong & Bao, Jinhua & Kong, Liang & Combs, Megan & Nikolic, Heather S. & Fan, Zhen & Liu, Kunlei, 2016. "The direct solid-solid reaction between coal char and iron-based oxygen carrier and its contribution to solid-fueled chemical looping combustion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 9-18.
    7. Rajabi, Mahsa & Mehrpooya, Mehdi & Haibo, Zhao & Huang, Zhen, 2019. "Chemical looping technology in CHP (combined heat and power) and CCHP (combined cooling heating and power) systems: A critical review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    8. Xiangwen Wu & Shuying Zang & Dalong Ma & Jianhua Ren & Qiang Chen & Xingfeng Dong, 2019. "Emissions of CO 2 , CH 4 , and N 2 O Fluxes from Forest Soil in Permafrost Region of Daxing’an Mountains, Northeast China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-14, August.
    9. Medrano, J.A. & Potdar, I. & Melendez, J. & Spallina, V. & Pacheco-Tanaka, D.A. & van Sint Annaland, M. & Gallucci, F., 2018. "The membrane-assisted chemical looping reforming concept for efficient H2 production with inherent CO2 capture: Experimental demonstration and model validation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 75-86.
    10. M. Shahabuddin & Tanvir Alam, 2022. "Gasification of Solid Fuels (Coal, Biomass and MSW): Overview, Challenges and Mitigation Strategies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-20, June.
    11. Shao, Yali & Wang, Xudong & Jin, Baosheng, 2022. "Numerical investigation of hydrodynamics and cluster characteristics in a chemical looping combustion system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PB).
    12. Dmitry Orlov & Marija Menshakova & Tomas Thierfelder & Yulia Zaika & Sepp Böhme & Birgitta Evengard & Natalia Pshenichnaya, 2020. "Healthy Ecosystems Are a Prerequisite for Human Health—A Call for Action in the Era of Climate Change with a Focus on Russia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-11, November.
    13. Wang, Dongxiang & Fu, Shuang & Ling, Xiang & Peng, Hao & Yang, Xinjun & Yuan, Fangyang & Du, Jiyun & Yu, Wei, 2023. "Turbulent fluidization and transition velocity of Geldart B granules in a spout–fluidized bed reactor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    14. Gür, Turgut M., 2020. "Perspectives on oxygen-based coal conversion towards zero-carbon power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    15. Ping Wang & Nicholas Means & Dushyant Shekhawat & David Berry & Mehrdad Massoudi, 2015. "Chemical-Looping Combustion and Gasification of Coals and Oxygen Carrier Development: A Brief Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-31, September.
    16. Zhu, Lin & He, Yangdong & Li, Luling & Lv, Liping & He, Jingling, 2018. "Thermodynamic assessment of SNG and power polygeneration with the goal of zero CO2 emission," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 34-46.
    17. Hsieh, Tien-Lin & Xu, Dikai & Zhang, Yitao & Nadgouda, Sourabh & Wang, Dawei & Chung, Cheng & Pottimurphy, Yaswanth & Guo, Mengqing & Chen, Yu-Yen & Xu, Mingyuan & He, Pengfei & Fan, Liang-Shih & Tong, 2018. "250 kWth high pressure pilot demonstration of the syngas chemical looping system for high purity H2 production with CO2 capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 1660-1672.
    18. Zhichao Xu & Wei Shan & Ying Guo & Chengcheng Zhang & Lisha Qiu, 2022. "Swamp Wetlands in Degraded Permafrost Areas Release Large Amounts of Methane and May Promote Wildfires through Friction Electrification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-28, July.
    19. Gu, Haiming & Shen, Laihong & Zhong, Zhaoping & Niu, Xin & Liu, Weidong & Ge, Huijun & Jiang, Shouxi & Wang, Lulu, 2015. "Cement/CaO-modified iron ore as oxygen carrier for chemical looping combustion of coal," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 314-322.
    20. Míguez, José Luis & Porteiro, Jacobo & Pérez-Orozco, Raquel & Patiño, David & Gómez, Miguel Ángel, 2020. "Biological systems for CCS: Patent review as a criterion for technological development," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:195:y:2020:i:c:s0360544220300621. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.