IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v140y2015icp1-13.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integration of in-situ CO2-oxy coal gasification with advanced power generating systems performing in a chemical looping approach of clean combustion

Author

Listed:
  • Prabu, V.

Abstract

Underground coal gasification (UCG) is a clean coal technology to utilize deep coal resources effectively. In-situ CO2-oxy coal gasification may eliminate the operational difficulty of the steam gasification process and utilize CO2 (greenhouse gas) effectively. Furthermore, it is necessary to convert the clean gasified energy from the UCG into clean combustion energy for an end-use. In order to achieve efficient clean power production, the present work investigates the thermodynamic feasibility of integration of CO2 based UCG with power generating systems operating in a chemical looping combustion (CLC) of product gas. The use of CO enriched syngas from O2/CO2 based UCG reduces the difficulty of the heat balance between a fuel reactor and an air reactor in a nickel oxygen-carrier based CLC system. Thermodynamic analyses have been made for various routes of power generation systems such as subcritical, supercritical and ultra-supercritical boiler based steam turbines and gas turbines for the UCG integrated system. It is shown, based on mass and energy balance analysis, that the integration of CO2 based UCG with the CLC system reduces the energy penalty of carbon capture and storage (CCS) significantly. A net thermal efficiency of 29.42% is estimated for the CCS incorporated system, which operates in a subcritical condition based steam turbine power plant. Furthermore, it is found that the efficiency of the proposed steam turbine system increases to 35.40% for an ultra-supercritical operating condition. The effect of operating temperature of the air reactor and the fuel reactor of the CLC system on the net thermal efficiency of combined cycle power plant is investigated. It is found that a net thermal efficiency of 42.53% can be obtained for the CCS incorporated combined cycle power system operating at an air reactor temperature of 1200°C.

Suggested Citation

  • Prabu, V., 2015. "Integration of in-situ CO2-oxy coal gasification with advanced power generating systems performing in a chemical looping approach of clean combustion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 1-13.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:140:y:2015:i:c:p:1-13
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.11.056
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261914012252
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.11.056?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mayer, Florian & Bidwe, Ajay R. & Schopf, Alexander & Taheri, Kamran & Zieba, Mariusz & Scheffknecht, Günter, 2014. "Comparison of a new micaceous iron oxide and ilmenite as oxygen carrier for Chemical looping combustion with respect to syngas conversion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1863-1868.
    2. Daggupati, Sateesh & Mandapati, Ramesh N. & Mahajani, Sanjay M. & Ganesh, Anuradda & Mathur, D.K. & Sharma, R.K. & Aghalayam, Preeti, 2010. "Laboratory studies on combustion cavity growth in lignite coal blocks in the context of underground coal gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 2374-2386.
    3. Prabu, V. & Jayanti, S., 2011. "Simulation of cavity formation in underground coal gasification using bore hole combustion experiments," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 5854-5864.
    4. Daggupati, Sateesh & Mandapati, Ramesh N. & Mahajani, Sanjay M. & Ganesh, Anuradda & Sapru, R.K. & Sharma, R.K. & Aghalayam, Preeti, 2011. "Laboratory studies on cavity growth and product gas composition in the context of underground coal gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 1776-1784.
    5. Hu, Yukun & Yan, Jinyue & Li, Hailong, 2012. "Effects of flue gas recycle on oxy-coal power generation systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 255-263.
    6. Hedin, Niklas & Andersson, Linnéa & Bergström, Lennart & Yan, Jinyue, 2013. "Adsorbents for the post-combustion capture of CO2 using rapid temperature swing or vacuum swing adsorption," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 418-433.
    7. Jafarian, Mehdi & Arjomandi, Maziar & Nathan, Graham J., 2013. "A hybrid solar and chemical looping combustion system for solar thermal energy storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 671-678.
    8. Sorgenfrei, Max & Tsatsaronis, George, 2014. "Design and evaluation of an IGCC power plant using iron-based syngas chemical-looping (SCL) combustion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1958-1964.
    9. Khadse, Anil & Qayyumi, Mohammed & Mahajani, Sanjay & Aghalayam, Preeti, 2007. "Underground coal gasification: A new clean coal utilization technique for India," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(11), pages 2061-2071.
    10. Prabu, V. & Jayanti, S., 2012. "Underground coal-air gasification based solid oxide fuel cell system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 406-414.
    11. Ströhle, Jochen & Orth, Matthias & Epple, Bernd, 2014. "Design and operation of a 1MWth chemical looping plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1490-1495.
    12. Hamers, H.P. & Gallucci, F. & Cobden, P.D. & Kimball, E. & van Sint Annaland, M., 2014. "CLC in packed beds using syngas and CuO/Al2O3: Model description and experimental validation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 163-172.
    13. Naqvi, Rehan & Wolf, Jens & Bolland, Olav, 2007. "Part-load analysis of a chemical looping combustion (CLC) combined cycle with CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 360-370.
    14. Hu, Yukun & Li, Hailong & Yan, Jinyue, 2014. "Numerical investigation of heat transfer characteristics in utility boilers of oxy-coal combustion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 543-551.
    15. Zhang, Xiaosong & Han, Wei & Hong, Hui & Jin, Hongguang, 2009. "A chemical intercooling gas turbine cycle with chemical-looping combustion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(12), pages 2131-2136.
    16. Yang, Lanhe & Liang, Jie & Yu, Li, 2003. "Clean coal technology—Study on the pilot project experiment of underground coal gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 28(14), pages 1445-1460.
    17. Prabu, V. & Jayanti, S., 2012. "Laboratory scale studies on simulated underground coal gasification of high ash coals for carbon-neutral power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 351-358.
    18. Schwebel, G.L. & Filippou, D. & Hudon, G. & Tworkowski, M. & Gipperich, A. & Krumm, W., 2014. "Experimental comparison of two different ilmenites in fluidized bed and fixed bed chemical-looping combustion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1902-1908.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zheng, Yawen & Gao, Lin & He, Song, 2023. "Analysis of the mechanism of energy consumption for CO2 capture in a power system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PA).
    2. Prabu, V. & Geeta, K., 2015. "CO2 enhanced in-situ oxy-coal gasification based carbon-neutral conventional power generating systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 672-683.
    3. Yan, Linbo & Yue, Guangxi & He, Boshu, 2015. "Exergy analysis of a coal/biomass co-hydrogasification based chemical looping power generation system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 1778-1787.
    4. Rajabi, Mahsa & Mehrpooya, Mehdi & Haibo, Zhao & Huang, Zhen, 2019. "Chemical looping technology in CHP (combined heat and power) and CCHP (combined cooling heating and power) systems: A critical review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Mishra, Navneet & Bhui, Barnali & Vairakannu, Prabu, 2019. "Comparative evaluation of performance of high and low ash coal fuelled chemical looping combustion integrated combined cycle power generating systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 305-318.
    6. Hongtao Liu & Feng Chen & Yuanyuan Wang & Gang Liu & Hong Yao & Shuqin Liu, 2018. "Experimental Study of Reverse Underground Coal Gasification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-13, October.
    7. Prabu, V. & Mallick, Nirmal, 2015. "Coalbed methane with CO2 sequestration: An emerging clean coal technology in India," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 229-244.
    8. Li, Xin & Tian, Jijun & Ju, Yiwen & Chen, Yanpeng, 2022. "Permeability variations of lignite and bituminous coals under elevated pyrolysis temperatures (35–600 °C): An experimental study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).
    9. Zhao, Ying-jie & Zhang, Yu-ke & Cui, Yang & Duan, Yuan-yuan & Huang, Yi & Wei, Guo-qiang & Mohamed, Usama & Shi, Li-juan & Yi, Qun & Nimmo, William, 2022. "Pinch combined with exergy analysis for heat exchange network and techno-economic evaluation of coal chemical looping combustion power plant with CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Su, Fa-qiang & Itakura, Ken-ichi & Deguchi, Gota & Ohga, Koutarou, 2017. "Monitoring of coal fracturing in underground coal gasification by acoustic emission techniques," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 142-156.
    2. Prabu, V. & Geeta, K., 2015. "CO2 enhanced in-situ oxy-coal gasification based carbon-neutral conventional power generating systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 672-683.
    3. Prabu, V. & Jayanti, S., 2012. "Laboratory scale studies on simulated underground coal gasification of high ash coals for carbon-neutral power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 351-358.
    4. Rajabi, Mahsa & Mehrpooya, Mehdi & Haibo, Zhao & Huang, Zhen, 2019. "Chemical looping technology in CHP (combined heat and power) and CCHP (combined cooling heating and power) systems: A critical review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Javed, Syed Bilal & Uppal, Ali Arshad & Bhatti, Aamer Iqbal & Samar, Raza, 2019. "Prediction and parametric analysis of cavity growth for the underground coal gasification project Thar," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 1277-1290.
    6. Yuteng Xiao & Jihang Yin & Yifan Hu & Junzhe Wang & Hongsheng Yin & Honggang Qi, 2019. "Monitoring and Control in Underground Coal Gasification: Current Research Status and Future Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, January.
    7. Prabu, V. & Jayanti, S., 2012. "Underground coal-air gasification based solid oxide fuel cell system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 406-414.
    8. Huijun Fang & Yuewu Liu & Tengze Ge & Taiyi Zheng & Yueyu Yu & Danlu Liu & Jiuge Ding & Longlong Li, 2022. "A Review of Research on Cavity Growth in the Context of Underground Coal Gasification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-21, December.
    9. Prabu, V. & Jayanti, S., 2011. "Simulation of cavity formation in underground coal gasification using bore hole combustion experiments," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 5854-5864.
    10. Ján Kačur & Marek Laciak & Milan Durdán & Patrik Flegner, 2023. "Investigation of Underground Coal Gasification in Laboratory Conditions: A Review of Recent Research," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-55, August.
    11. Wang, Xiaorui & Zhang, Qinghe & Yuan, Liang, 2024. "A coupled thermal-force-chemical-displacement multi-field model for underground coal gasification based on controlled retraction injection point technology and its thermal analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    12. Su, Fa-qiang & He, Xiao-long & Dai, Meng-jia & Yang, Jun-nan & Hamanaka, Akihiro & Yu, Yi-he & Li, Wen & Li, Jiao-yuan, 2023. "Estimation of the cavity volume in the gasification zone for underground coal gasification under different oxygen flow conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    13. Su, Fa-qiang & Wu, Jun-bo & Tao-Zhang, & Deng, Qi-chao & Yu, Yi-he & Hamanaka, Akihiro & Dai, Meng-Jia & Yang, Jun-Nan & He, Xiao-long, 2023. "Study on the monitoring method of cavity growth in underground coal gasification under laboratory conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).
    14. Kumari, Geeta & Vairakannu, Prabu, 2018. "CO2-air based two stage gasification of low ash and high ash Indian coals in the context of underground coal gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 822-832.
    15. Hongtao Liu & Feng Chen & Yuanyuan Wang & Gang Liu & Hong Yao & Shuqin Liu, 2018. "Experimental Study of Reverse Underground Coal Gasification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-13, October.
    16. Cui, Yong & Liang, Jie & Wang, Zhangqing & Zhang, Xiaochun & Fan, Chenzi & Liang, Dongyu & Wang, Xuan, 2014. "Forward and reverse combustion gasification of coal with production of high-quality syngas in a simulated pilot system for in situ gasification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 9-19.
    17. Prabu, V. & Mallick, Nirmal, 2015. "Coalbed methane with CO2 sequestration: An emerging clean coal technology in India," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 229-244.
    18. Laciak, Marek & Kostúr, Karol & Durdán, Milan & Kačur, Ján & Flegner, Patrik, 2016. "The analysis of the underground coal gasification in experimental equipment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 332-343.
    19. Basavaraja, R.J. & Jayanti, S., 2015. "Viability of fuel switching of a gas-fired power plant operating in chemical looping combustion mode," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 213-221.
    20. Olateju, Babatunde & Kumar, Amit, 2013. "Techno-economic assessment of hydrogen production from underground coal gasification (UCG) in Western Canada with carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) for upgrading bitumen from oil sands," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 428-440.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:140:y:2015:i:c:p:1-13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.