IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v119y2017icp1171-1180.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A thermodynamic and environmental performance of in-situ gasification of chemical looping combustion for power generation using ilmenite with different coals and comparison with other coal-driven power technologies for CO2 capture

Author

Listed:
  • Fan, Junming
  • Zhu, Lin
  • Hong, Hui
  • Jiang, Qiongqiong
  • Jin, Hongguang

Abstract

Chemical looping combustion (CLC), as “next-generation” CCS, is suggested as the most promising candidate for a long-term implementation of carbon capture. This study is aimed to examine both thermodynamic and environmental performances of ilmenite-based in-situ gasification chemical looping combustion (iG-CLC) power plant with different coals. Besides, comparison with already-achievable coal-feed plants are involved. Thermodynamically, lower oxygen carrier to fuel ratio (ф) is more feasible to obtain autothermal operation in high-rank coal-feed iG-CLC plant. Anthracite-feed iG-CLC power plant obtains the highest net electricity efficiency (46.0%). Approximately more than 10% net electricity efficiency benefits are earned in an iG-CLC power plant (anthracite-based case) compared with that in conventional plants. From environmental aspect, CO2 emission rates for lignite-feed iG-CLC plant amount to be the highest, i.e. 103.05 kg/MW h vs. the lowest bituminous-based case (91.94 kg/MW h). Due to the higher CO and sulfur compounds concentration, the captured CO2 stream in an iG-CLC plant may not be qualified for direct transport, and further pre-transport treatment is required. For anthracite-feed iG-CLC power station, the net NO emission rate ranks the highest (4.14 kg/MW h). By contrast, it has been reduced by 0.07 kg/MW h and 0.28 kg/MW for bituminous and lignite-feed case, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Fan, Junming & Zhu, Lin & Hong, Hui & Jiang, Qiongqiong & Jin, Hongguang, 2017. "A thermodynamic and environmental performance of in-situ gasification of chemical looping combustion for power generation using ilmenite with different coals and comparison with other coal-driven powe," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 1171-1180.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:119:y:2017:i:c:p:1171-1180
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.11.072
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544216317017
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2016.11.072?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lee, Jong Min & Kim, Yong Jeon & Lee, Woon Jae & Kim, Sang Done, 1998. "Coal-gasification kinetics derived from pyrolysis in a fluidized-bed reactor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 23(6), pages 475-488.
    2. Vasudevan, Suraj & Farooq, Shamsuzzaman & Karimi, Iftekhar A. & Saeys, Mark & Quah, Michael C.G. & Agrawal, Rakesh, 2016. "Energy penalty estimates for CO2 capture: Comparison between fuel types and capture-combustion modes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 709-714.
    3. Lyngfelt, Anders, 2014. "Chemical-looping combustion of solid fuels – Status of development," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1869-1873.
    4. Meng, William X. & Banerjee, Subhodeep & Zhang, Xiao & Agarwal, Ramesh K., 2015. "Process simulation of multi-stage chemical-looping combustion using Aspen Plus," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 1869-1877.
    5. Ohlemüller, Peter & Alobaid, Falah & Gunnarsson, Adrian & Ströhle, Jochen & Epple, Bernd, 2015. "Development of a process model for coal chemical looping combustion and validation against 100kWth tests," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 433-448.
    6. Ridha, Firas N. & Duchesne, Marc A. & Lu, Xuao & Lu, Dennis Y. & Filippou, Dimitrios & Hughes, Robin W., 2016. "Characterization of an ilmenite ore for pressurized chemical looping combustion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 323-333.
    7. Ströhle, Jochen & Orth, Matthias & Epple, Bernd, 2015. "Chemical looping combustion of hard coal in a 1MWth pilot plant using ilmenite as oxygen carrier," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 288-294.
    8. Davison, John, 2007. "Performance and costs of power plants with capture and storage of CO2," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1163-1176.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiang, Dong & Jin, Tong & Lei, Xinru & Liu, Shuai & Jiang, Yong & Dong, Zhongbing & Tao, Quanbao & Cao, Yan, 2018. "The high efficient synthesis of natural gas from a joint-feedstock of coke-oven gas and pulverized coke via a chemical looping combustion scheme," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 944-954.
    2. Zhu, Lin & He, Yangdong & Li, Luling & Lv, Liping & He, Jingling, 2018. "Thermodynamic assessment of SNG and power polygeneration with the goal of zero CO2 emission," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 34-46.
    3. Lin, Yan & Wang, Haitao & Fang, Shiwen & Huang, Zhen & Wei, Guoqiang & Zhang, Yongqi & Xia, Hongqiang & Zhao, Zengli & Huang, Hongyu, 2022. "Chemical looping combustion of lignite using iron ore: C-gas products (CO2, CO, CH4) and NOx emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    4. He, Yangdong & Zhu, Lin & Li, Luling & Rao, Dong, 2019. "Life-cycle assessment of SNG and power generation: The role of implement of chemical looping combustion for carbon capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 777-786.
    5. Najmus S. Sifat & Yousef Haseli, 2019. "A Critical Review of CO 2 Capture Technologies and Prospects for Clean Power Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-33, October.
    6. Yang, Jie & Wei, Yi & Yang, Jing & Xiang, Huaping & Ma, Liping & Zhang, Wei & Wang, Lichun & Peng, Yuhui & Liu, Hongpan, 2019. "Syngas production by chemical looping gasification using Fe supported on phosphogypsum compound oxygen carrier," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 126-135.
    7. Fan, Junming & Hong, Hui & Jin, Hongguang, 2018. "Biomass and coal co-feed power and SNG polygeneration with chemical looping combustion to reduce carbon footprint for sustainable energy development: Process simulation and thermodynamic assessment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 260-269.
    8. Rajabi, Mahsa & Mehrpooya, Mehdi & Haibo, Zhao & Huang, Zhen, 2019. "Chemical looping technology in CHP (combined heat and power) and CCHP (combined cooling heating and power) systems: A critical review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    9. Zhao, Ying-jie & Zhang, Yu-ke & Cui, Yang & Duan, Yuan-yuan & Huang, Yi & Wei, Guo-qiang & Mohamed, Usama & Shi, Li-juan & Yi, Qun & Nimmo, William, 2022. "Pinch combined with exergy analysis for heat exchange network and techno-economic evaluation of coal chemical looping combustion power plant with CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fan, Junming & Hong, Hui & Zhu, Lin & Jiang, Qiongqiong & Jin, Hongguang, 2017. "Thermodynamic and environmental evaluation of biomass and coal co-fuelled gasification chemical looping combustion with CO2 capture for combined cooling, heating and power production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 861-876.
    2. Zhu, Lin & He, Yangdong & Li, Luling & Lv, Liping & He, Jingling, 2018. "Thermodynamic assessment of SNG and power polygeneration with the goal of zero CO2 emission," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 34-46.
    3. Xiang, Dong & Jin, Tong & Lei, Xinru & Liu, Shuai & Jiang, Yong & Dong, Zhongbing & Tao, Quanbao & Cao, Yan, 2018. "The high efficient synthesis of natural gas from a joint-feedstock of coke-oven gas and pulverized coke via a chemical looping combustion scheme," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 944-954.
    4. Siriwardane, Ranjani & Benincosa, William & Riley, Jarrett & Tian, Hanjing & Richards, George, 2016. "Investigation of reactions in a fluidized bed reactor during chemical looping combustion of coal/steam with copper oxide-iron oxide-alumina oxygen carrier," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1550-1564.
    5. Alobaid, Falah & Ohlemüller, Peter & Ströhle, Jochen & Epple, Bernd, 2015. "Extended Euler–Euler model for the simulation of a 1 MWth chemical–looping pilot plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 2395-2405.
    6. Wang, Xudong & Shao, Yali & Jin, Baosheng, 2021. "Thermodynamic evaluation and modelling of an auto-thermal hybrid system of chemical looping combustion and air separation for power generation coupling with CO2 cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    7. Ströhle, Jochen & Orth, Matthias & Epple, Bernd, 2015. "Chemical looping combustion of hard coal in a 1MWth pilot plant using ilmenite as oxygen carrier," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 288-294.
    8. Rana, Shazadi & Sun, Zhenkun & Mehrani, Poupak & Hughes, Robin & Macchi, Arturo, 2019. "Ilmenite oxidation kinetics for pressurized chemical looping combustion of natural gas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 747-759.
    9. Zhou, Ling & Deshpande, Kartik & Zhang, Xiao & Agarwal, Ramesh K., 2020. "Process simulation of Chemical Looping Combustion using ASPEN plus for a mixture of biomass and coal with various oxygen carriers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    10. Paul Dieringer & Falko Marx & Jochen Ströhle & Bernd Epple, 2023. "System Hydrodynamics of a 1 MW th Dual Circulating Fluidized Bed Chemical Looping Gasifier," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-46, July.
    11. Olabi, A.G. & Obaideen, Khaled & Elsaid, Khaled & Wilberforce, Tabbi & Sayed, Enas Taha & Maghrabie, Hussein M. & Abdelkareem, Mohammad Ali, 2022. "Assessment of the pre-combustion carbon capture contribution into sustainable development goals SDGs using novel indicators," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    12. Zhang, Hao & Hong, Hui & Jiang, Qiongqiong & Deng, Ya'nan & Jin, Hongguang & Kang, Qilan, 2018. "Development of a chemical-looping combustion reactor having porous honeycomb chamber and experimental validation by using NiO/NiAl2O4," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 259-268.
    13. Zhu, Lin & He, Yangdong & Li, Luling & Wu, Pengbin, 2018. "Tech-economic assessment of second-generation CCS: Chemical looping combustion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 915-927.
    14. Falko Marx & Paul Dieringer & Jochen Ströhle & Bernd Epple, 2021. "Design of a 1 MW th Pilot Plant for Chemical Looping Gasification of Biogenic Residues," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-25, April.
    15. Lucia Blas & Patrick Dutournié & Mejdi Jeguirim & Ludovic Josien & David Chiche & Stephane Bertholin & Arnold Lambert, 2017. "Numerical Modeling of Oxygen Carrier Performances (NiO/NiAl 2 O 4 ) for Chemical-Looping Combustion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, June.
    16. Safdarnejad, Seyed Mostafa & Hedengren, John D. & Powell, Kody M., 2018. "Performance comparison of low temperature and chemical absorption carbon capture processes in response to dynamic electricity demand and price profiles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 577-592.
    17. Mo, Jian-Lei & Schleich, Joachim & Zhu, Lei & Fan, Ying, 2015. "Delaying the introduction of emissions trading systems—Implications for power plant investment and operation from a multi-stage decision model," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(PB), pages 255-264.
    18. Lai, N.Y.G. & Yap, E.H. & Lee, C.W., 2011. "Viability of CCS: A broad-based assessment for Malaysia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(8), pages 3608-3616.
    19. Liang, Ying & Cai, Lei & Guan, Yanwen & Liu, Wenbin & Xiang, Yanlei & Li, Juan & He, Tianzhi, 2020. "Numerical study on an original oxy-fuel combustion power plant with efficient utilization of flue gas waste heat," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    20. Chen, Liangyong & Bao, Jinhua & Kong, Liang & Combs, Megan & Nikolic, Heather S. & Fan, Zhen & Liu, Kunlei, 2016. "The direct solid-solid reaction between coal char and iron-based oxygen carrier and its contribution to solid-fueled chemical looping combustion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 9-18.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:119:y:2017:i:c:p:1171-1180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.