IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v51y2013icp37-49.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of the consumption of water and construction materials in state-of-the-art fossil fuel power generation technologies involving CO2 capture

Author

Listed:
  • Cormos, Calin-Cristian
  • Vatopoulos, Konstantinos
  • Tzimas, Evangelos

Abstract

There is a growing concern about the impact of energy system decarbonisation on natural resources, such as raw materials and freshwater. Along this line, this paper assesses the needs for cooling water and construction materials of pulverised coal combustion (PF), integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) and natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) power generation technologies with and without CCS (Carbon capture and storage). Moreover, the paper evaluates how the integration of CCS technologies influences the economics and operational performance of power plants providing up-dated techno-economic indicators. Introduction of CO2 capture results in an increase of specific water consumption compared to a conventional plant which is more significant in the cases of PF and NGCC (56–62% and 50%) than in IGCC (9–12%). Therefore, the large scale deployment of CCS can have a significant impact on freshwater resources. The introduction of CO2 capture also increases significantly the amount of plant construction materials. The increase is up to 100% for concrete and steel and up to 27% for copper and polyethylene. The cost of construction materials is 8–15% of total investment costs, hence any changes in their prices can have a measurable impact on the cost of a plant and hence on the competitiveness of the underlying technology.

Suggested Citation

  • Cormos, Calin-Cristian & Vatopoulos, Konstantinos & Tzimas, Evangelos, 2013. "Assessment of the consumption of water and construction materials in state-of-the-art fossil fuel power generation technologies involving CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 37-49.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:51:y:2013:i:c:p:37-49
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2012.12.050
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544213000285
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2012.12.050?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pettinau, Alberto & Ferrara, Francesca & Amorino, Carlo, 2012. "Techno-economic comparison between different technologies for a CCS power generation plant integrated with a sub-bituminous coal mine in Italy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 32-39.
    2. Lohwasser, Richard & Madlener, Reinhard, 2012. "Economics of CCS for coal plants: Impact of investment costs and efficiency on market diffusion in Europe," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 850-863.
    3. Viebahn, Peter & Daniel, Vallentin & Samuel, Höller, 2012. "Integrated assessment of carbon capture and storage (CCS) in the German power sector and comparison with the deployment of renewable energies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 238-248.
    4. Agraniotis, Michalis & Koumanakos, Antonis & Doukelis, Aggelos & Karellas, Sotirios & Kakaras, Emmanuel, 2012. "Investigation of technical and economic aspects of pre-dried lignite utilisation in a modern lignite power plant towards zero CO2 emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 134-141.
    5. Belaissaoui, Bouchra & Cabot, Gilles & Cabot, Marie-Sophie & Willson, David & Favre, Eric, 2012. "An energetic analysis of CO2 capture on a gas turbine combining flue gas recirculation and membrane separation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 167-175.
    6. Botros, Barbara B. & Brisson, John G., 2011. "Targeting the optimum steam system for power generation with increased flexibility in the steam power island design," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 4625-4632.
    7. Duan, Liqiang & Zhao, Mingde & Yang, Yongping, 2012. "Integration and optimization study on the coal-fired power plant with CO2 capture using MEA," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 107-116.
    8. Kunze, Christian & Riedl, Karsten & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2011. "Structured exergy analysis of an integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) plant with carbon capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 1480-1487.
    9. Strube, R. & Pellegrini, G. & Manfrida, G., 2011. "The environmental impact of post-combustion CO2 capture with MEA, with aqueous ammonia, and with an aqueous ammonia-ethanol mixture for a coal-fired power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 3763-3770.
    10. Davison, John, 2007. "Performance and costs of power plants with capture and storage of CO2," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1163-1176.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cormos, Calin-Cristian, 2020. "Energy and cost efficient manganese chemical looping air separation cycle for decarbonized power generation based on oxy-fuel combustion and gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    2. Antonio Coppola & Fabrizio Scala, 2020. "A Preliminary Techno-Economic Analysis on the Calcium Looping Process with Simultaneous Capture of CO 2 and SO 2 from a Coal-Based Combustion Power Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-9, May.
    3. Cormos, Calin-Cristian, 2014. "Economic evaluations of coal-based combustion and gasification power plants with post-combustion CO2 capture using calcium looping cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 665-673.
    4. Yan, Linbo & Wang, Ziqi & Cao, Yang & He, Boshu, 2020. "Comparative evaluation of two biomass direct-fired power plants with carbon capture and sequestration," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 1188-1198.
    5. Kirtania, Bidesh & Shilapuram, Vidyasagar, 2023. "Performance evaluation of a flexible CO2-ORC and sorbent regeneration integrated novel dry gasification oxy-combustion power cycle for in-situ sulphur capture, CO2 capture and power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    6. Zhu, Yongnan & Ke, Jing & Wang, Jianhua & Liu, He & Jiang, Shan & Blum, Helcio & Zhao, Yong & He, Guohua & Meng, Yuan & Su, Jian, 2020. "Water transfer and losses embodied in the West–East electricity transmission project in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    7. Song, Chunfeng & Kitamura, Yutaka & Li, Shuhong, 2014. "Energy analysis of the cryogenic CO2 capture process based on Stirling coolers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 580-589.
    8. Herraiz, Laura & Hogg, Dougal & Cooper, Jim & Lucquiaud, Mathieu, 2019. "Reducing the water usage of post-combustion capture systems: The role of water condensation/evaporation in rotary regenerative gas/gas heat exchangers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 434-453.
    9. Stevanovic, Vladimir D. & Wala, Tadeusz & Muszynski, Slawomir & Milic, Milos & Jovanovic, Milorad, 2014. "Efficiency and power upgrade by an additional high pressure economizer installation at an aged 620 MWe lignite-fired power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 907-918.
    10. Yi, Qun & Feng, Jie & Wu, Yanli & Li, Wenying, 2014. "3E (energy, environmental, and economy) evaluation and assessment to an innovative dual-gas polygeneration system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 285-294.
    11. Calin-Cristian Cormos, 2018. "Techno-Economic Evaluations of Copper-Based Chemical Looping Air Separation System for Oxy-Combustion and Gasification Power Plants with Carbon Capture," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, November.
    12. Višković, Alfredo & Franki, Vladimir & Valentić, Vladimir, 2014. "CCS (carbon capture and storage) investment possibility in South East Europe: A case study for Croatia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 325-337.
    13. Dinca, Cristian & Slavu, Nela & Cormoş, Călin-Cristian & Badea, Adrian, 2018. "CO2 capture from syngas generated by a biomass gasification power plant with chemical absorption process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 925-936.
    14. Alfredo Viskovic & Vladimir Valentic & Vladimir Franki, 2013. "The impac t of carbon prices on CCS investment in South East Europe," ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(3), pages 91-120.
    15. Cheng Xu & Yachi Gao & Qiang Zhang & Guoqiang Zhang & Gang Xu, 2018. "Thermodynamic, Economic and Environmental Evaluation of an Improved Ventilation Air Methane-Based Hot Air Power Cycle Integrated with a De-Carbonization Oxy-Coal Combustion Power Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-17, June.
    16. Herraiz, Laura & Hogg, Dougal & Cooper, Jim & Gibbins, Jon & Lucquiaud, Mathieu, 2015. "Reducing water usage with rotary regenerative gas/gas heat exchangers in natural gas-fired power plants with post-combustion carbon capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 1994-2005.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Janusz Kotowicz & Sebastian Michalski & Mateusz Brzęczek, 2019. "The Characteristics of a Modern Oxy-Fuel Power Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-34, September.
    2. Pettinau, Alberto & Ferrara, Francesca & Amorino, Carlo, 2013. "Combustion vs. gasification for a demonstration CCS (carbon capture and storage) project in Italy: A techno-economic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 160-169.
    3. Bartela, Łukasz & Skorek-Osikowska, Anna & Kotowicz, Janusz, 2014. "Economic analysis of a supercritical coal-fired CHP plant integrated with an absorption carbon capture installation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 513-523.
    4. Tola, Vittorio & Pettinau, Alberto, 2014. "Power generation plants with carbon capture and storage: A techno-economic comparison between coal combustion and gasification technologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1461-1474.
    5. Višković, Alfredo & Franki, Vladimir & Valentić, Vladimir, 2014. "CCS (carbon capture and storage) investment possibility in South East Europe: A case study for Croatia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 325-337.
    6. Cormos, Calin-Cristian, 2012. "Integrated assessment of IGCC power generation technology with carbon capture and storage (CCS)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 434-445.
    7. Valiani, Saba & Tahouni, Nassim & Panjeshahi, M. Hassan, 2017. "Optimization of pre-combustion capture for thermal power plants using Pinch Analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 950-960.
    8. Siefert, Nicholas S. & Litster, Shawn, 2013. "Exergy and economic analyses of advanced IGCC–CCS and IGFC–CCS power plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 315-328.
    9. Rochedo, Pedro R.R. & Szklo, Alexandre, 2013. "Designing learning curves for carbon capture based on chemical absorption according to the minimum work of separation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 383-391.
    10. Janusz-Szymańska, Katarzyna & Dryjańska, Aleksandra, 2015. "Possibilities for improving the thermodynamic and economic characteristics of an oxy-type power plant with a cryogenic air separation unit," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 45-61.
    11. Chen, Wei-Hsin & Tsai, Ming-Hang & Hung, Chen-I, 2013. "Numerical prediction of CO2 capture process by a single droplet in alkaline spray," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 125-134.
    12. Hosseini, Tahereh & Haque, Nawshad & Selomulya, Cordelia & Zhang, Lian, 2016. "Mineral carbonation of Victorian brown coal fly ash using regenerative ammonium chloride – Process simulation and techno-economic analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 54-68.
    13. Pettinau, Alberto & Ferrara, Francesca & Tola, Vittorio & Cau, Giorgio, 2017. "Techno-economic comparison between different technologies for CO2-free power generation from coal," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 426-439.
    14. López, R. & Menéndez, M. & Fernández, C. & Bernardo-Sánchez, A., 2018. "The effects of scale-up and coal-biomass blending on supercritical coal oxy-combustion power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 571-584.
    15. Rübbelke, Dirk & Vögele, Stefan, 2013. "Effects of carbon dioxide capture and storage in Germany on European electricity exchange and welfare," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 582-588.
    16. Wang, Lu & Wei, Yi-Ming & Brown, Marilyn A., 2017. "Global transition to low-carbon electricity: A bibliometric analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 57-68.
    17. Michaelides, Efstathios E., 2021. "Thermodynamic analysis and power requirements of CO2 capture, transportation, and storage in the ocean," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    18. Njomza Ibrahimi & Alemayehu Gebremedhin & Alketa Sahiti, 2019. "Achieving a Flexible and Sustainable Energy System: The Case of Kosovo," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-22, December.
    19. Lara, Y. & Martínez, A. & Lisbona, P. & Romeo, L.M., 2016. "Heat integration of alternative Ca-looping configurations for CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(P1), pages 956-962.
    20. Jin, He & Liu, Pei & Li, Zheng, 2018. "Energy-efficient process intensification for post-combustion CO2 capture: A modeling approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 471-483.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:51:y:2013:i:c:p:37-49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.