IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v149y2018icp925-936.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

CO2 capture from syngas generated by a biomass gasification power plant with chemical absorption process

Author

Listed:
  • Dinca, Cristian
  • Slavu, Nela
  • Cormoş, Călin-Cristian
  • Badea, Adrian

Abstract

In the context of the climate changes and to improve people's life, solutions for reducing the amount of CO2 emissions into the atmosphere from the energy sector are being sought after. One of the solutions is to produce a greater part of the global energy requirement from renewable energy sources. Nowadays, biomass is one of the most easily available renewable energy sources. The biomass gasification is a technology which presents several important advantages of the bioenergy in terms of producing heat, power and biofuels for useful applications. In this article, the biomass gasification with the CO2 capture technology (BIGCC + CAP) by using an aqueous monoethanolamine solution was studied for converting the treated syngas into electricity in a combined cycle power plant. The biomass gasification can be done using either air or oxygen in order to improve the quality of the syngas produced. However, only the gasification with air was studied in this research due to the large energy consumption in the ASU (air separation unit) unit for oxygen separation. Thus, the CO2 post-combustion capture by the chemical absorption technology was studied to determine its effects on the performances of a gas turbine power plant with an HRSG (Heat Recovery Steam Generator) with a total installed power of 10 MW. In order to increase the performances of the combined cycle, the exhaust gases are supplementary used in an HRSG unit in order to produce steam for the steam turbine, with an installed power of 4 MW. The chemical solvent used for the CO2 capture separation was monoethanolamine with a concentration of 30 wt. %, considering a CO2 capture efficiency of 90%. The thermal heat required for the solvent regeneration is provided by the steam extracted from the low pressure steam turbine. To reduce the thermal energy requirement for the chemical solvent regeneration, an HRSG unit was used to recover the heat from the syngas. Thus, the overall efficiency was reduced from 50.9% to 45.8% in the case without the HRSG unit and to 47.03% in the case with the HRSG unit. By comparing the BIGCC + CAP with and without the HRSG unit, the lowest value of the LCOE was obtained for the BIGCC + CAP + HRSG, and was found to be 77.56 €/MWh.

Suggested Citation

  • Dinca, Cristian & Slavu, Nela & Cormoş, Călin-Cristian & Badea, Adrian, 2018. "CO2 capture from syngas generated by a biomass gasification power plant with chemical absorption process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 925-936.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:149:y:2018:i:c:p:925-936
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.02.109
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544218303372
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2018.02.109?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carapellucci, Roberto & Giordano, Lorena & Vaccarelli, Maura, 2017. "Application of an amine-based CO2 capture system in retrofitting combined gas-steam power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 808-826.
    2. Kraxner, Florian & Aoki, Kentaro & Leduc, Sylvain & Kindermann, Georg & Fuss, Sabine & Yang, Jue & Yamagata, Yoshiki & Tak, Kwang-Il & Obersteiner, Michael, 2014. "BECCS in South Korea—Analyzing the negative emissions potential of bioenergy as a mitigation tool," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 102-108.
    3. Jana, Kuntal & De, Sudipta, 2014. "Biomass integrated gasification combined cogeneration with or without CO2 capture – A comparative thermodynamic study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 243-252.
    4. Uddin, Sk Noim & Barreto, Leonardo, 2007. "Biomass-fired cogeneration systems with CO2 capture and storage," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 1006-1019.
    5. Skorek-Osikowska, Anna & Janusz-Szymańska, Katarzyna & Kotowicz, Janusz, 2012. "Modeling and analysis of selected carbon dioxide capture methods in IGCC systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 92-100.
    6. Carapellucci, Roberto & Giordano, Lorena & Vaccarelli, Maura, 2015. "Studying heat integration options for steam-gas power plants retrofitted with CO2 post-combustion capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 594-608.
    7. Cormos, Calin-Cristian, 2012. "Integrated assessment of IGCC power generation technology with carbon capture and storage (CCS)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 434-445.
    8. Pettinau, Alberto & Ferrara, Francesca & Amorino, Carlo, 2013. "Combustion vs. gasification for a demonstration CCS (carbon capture and storage) project in Italy: A techno-economic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 160-169.
    9. Davison, John, 2007. "Performance and costs of power plants with capture and storage of CO2," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1163-1176.
    10. Cormos, Calin-Cristian & Vatopoulos, Konstantinos & Tzimas, Evangelos, 2013. "Assessment of the consumption of water and construction materials in state-of-the-art fossil fuel power generation technologies involving CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 37-49.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Safarian, Sahar & Ebrahimi Saryazdi, Seyed Mohammad & Unnthorsson, Runar & Richter, Christiaan, 2020. "Artificial neural network integrated with thermodynamic equilibrium modeling of downdraft biomass gasification-power production plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    2. Safarian, Sahar & Unnthorsson, Runar & Richter, Christiaan, 2020. "Performance analysis and environmental assessment of small-scale waste biomass gasification integrated CHP in Iceland," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    3. Vera Marcantonio & Marcello De Falco & Enrico Bocci, 2022. "Non-Thermal Plasma Technology for CO 2 Conversion—An Overview of the Most Relevant Experimental Results and Kinetic Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-18, October.
    4. Aubaid Ullah & Nur Awanis Hashim & Mohamad Fairus Rabuni & Mohd Usman Mohd Junaidi, 2023. "A Review on Methanol as a Clean Energy Carrier: Roles of Zeolite in Improving Production Efficiency," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-35, February.
    5. Onyenkeadi, Victor & Kellici, Suela & Saha, Basudeb, 2018. "Greener synthesis of 1,2-butylene carbonate from CO2 using graphene-inorganic nanocomposite catalyst," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PA), pages 867-876.
    6. Mikulčić, Hrvoje & Ridjan Skov, Iva & Dominković, Dominik Franjo & Wan Alwi, Sharifah Rafidah & Manan, Zainuddin Abdul & Tan, Raymond & Duić, Neven & Hidayah Mohamad, Siti Nur & Wang, Xuebin, 2019. "Flexible Carbon Capture and Utilization technologies in future energy systems and the utilization pathways of captured CO2," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    7. Gao, Ningbo & Śliz, Maciej & Quan, Cui & Bieniek, Artur & Magdziarz, Aneta, 2021. "Biomass CO2 gasification with CaO looping for syngas production in a fixed-bed reactor," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 652-661.
    8. Miao, Guang & Zhong, Guotian & Cai, Guangming & Ma, Yujie & Zheng, Leizhao & Li, Guoqing & Xiao, Jing, 2022. "Intensification of steam reforming process for off-gas upgrading and energy optimization using evolutionary algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PB).
    9. Xiang, Yanlei & Cai, Lei & Guan, Yanwen & Liu, Wenbin & He, Tianzhi & Li, Juan, 2019. "Study on the biomass-based integrated gasification combined cycle with negative CO2 emissions under different temperatures and pressures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 571-580.
    10. Kong, Mengdi & Ye, Xuemin & Liu, Di & Li, Chunxi, 2024. "Comprehensive evaluation of medical waste gasification low-carbon multi-generation system based on AHP–EWM–GFCE method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 296(C).
    11. Li, Long & Liu, Weizao & Qin, Zhifeng & Zhang, Guoquan & Yue, Hairong & Liang, Bin & Tang, Shengwei & Luo, Dongmei, 2021. "Research on integrated CO2 absorption-mineralization and regeneration of absorbent process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nemet, Gregory F. & Baker, Erin & Jenni, Karen E., 2013. "Modeling the future costs of carbon capture using experts' elicited probabilities under policy scenarios," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 218-228.
    2. Alfredo Viskovic & Vladimir Valentic & Vladimir Franki, 2013. "The impac t of carbon prices on CCS investment in South East Europe," ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(3), pages 91-120.
    3. Rohlfs, Wilko & Madlener, Reinhard, 2013. "Assessment of clean-coal strategies: The questionable merits of carbon capture-readiness," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 27-36.
    4. Jana, Kuntal & De, Sudipta, 2014. "Biomass integrated gasification combined cogeneration with or without CO2 capture – A comparative thermodynamic study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 243-252.
    5. Višković, Alfredo & Franki, Vladimir & Valentić, Vladimir, 2014. "CCS (carbon capture and storage) investment possibility in South East Europe: A case study for Croatia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 325-337.
    6. Barelli, L. & Ottaviano, A., 2014. "Solid oxide fuel cell technology coupled with methane dry reforming: A viable option for high efficiency plant with reduced CO2 emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 118-129.
    7. Ren, Siyue & Feng, Xiao & Wang, Yufei, 2021. "Emergy evaluation of the integrated gasification combined cycle power generation systems with a carbon capture system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    8. Calin-Cristian Cormos, 2018. "Techno-Economic Evaluations of Copper-Based Chemical Looping Air Separation System for Oxy-Combustion and Gasification Power Plants with Carbon Capture," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, November.
    9. Cormos, Calin-Cristian, 2020. "Energy and cost efficient manganese chemical looping air separation cycle for decarbonized power generation based on oxy-fuel combustion and gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    10. Pettinau, Alberto & Ferrara, Francesca & Tola, Vittorio & Cau, Giorgio, 2017. "Techno-economic comparison between different technologies for CO2-free power generation from coal," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 426-439.
    11. Lee, Woo-Sung & Lee, Jae-Cheol & Oh, Hyun-Taek & Baek, Seung-Won & Oh, Min & Lee, Chang-Ha, 2017. "Performance, economic and exergy analyses of carbon capture processes for a 300 MW class integrated gasification combined cycle power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 731-742.
    12. Cao, Yang & He, Boshu & Ding, Guangchao & Su, Liangbin & Duan, Zhipeng, 2017. "Energy and exergy investigation on two improved IGCC power plants with different CO2 capture schemes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 47-57.
    13. Kotowicz, Janusz & Michalski, Sebastian, 2015. "Influence of four-end HTM (high temperature membrane) parameters on the thermodynamic and economic characteristics of a supercritical power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 662-673.
    14. Yi, Qun & Feng, Jie & Wu, Yanli & Li, Wenying, 2014. "3E (energy, environmental, and economy) evaluation and assessment to an innovative dual-gas polygeneration system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 285-294.
    15. Safdarnejad, Seyed Mostafa & Hedengren, John D. & Powell, Kody M., 2018. "Performance comparison of low temperature and chemical absorption carbon capture processes in response to dynamic electricity demand and price profiles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 577-592.
    16. Cormos, Calin-Cristian, 2014. "Economic evaluations of coal-based combustion and gasification power plants with post-combustion CO2 capture using calcium looping cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 665-673.
    17. Prabu, V. & Geeta, K., 2015. "CO2 enhanced in-situ oxy-coal gasification based carbon-neutral conventional power generating systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 672-683.
    18. Janusz Kotowicz & Sebastian Michalski & Mateusz Brzęczek, 2019. "The Characteristics of a Modern Oxy-Fuel Power Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-34, September.
    19. Kim, Young Sik & Park, Sung Ku & Lee, Jong Jun & Kang, Do Won & Kim, Tong Seop, 2013. "Analysis of the impact of gas turbine modifications in integrated gasification combined cycle power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 977-986.
    20. Xiping Wang & Hongdou Zhang, 2018. "Optimal design of carbon tax to stimulate CCS investment in China's coal‐fired power plants: A real options analysis," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 8(5), pages 863-875, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    CO2 capture; Chemical absorption; Syngas; Biomass; Gasification;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:149:y:2018:i:c:p:925-936. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.