IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i9p2176-d352985.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Preliminary Techno-Economic Analysis on the Calcium Looping Process with Simultaneous Capture of CO 2 and SO 2 from a Coal-Based Combustion Power Plant

Author

Listed:
  • Antonio Coppola

    (Istituto di Ricerche sulla Combustione, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Piazzale Vincenzo Tecchio 80, 80125 Napoli, Italy)

  • Fabrizio Scala

    (Istituto di Ricerche sulla Combustione, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Piazzale Vincenzo Tecchio 80, 80125 Napoli, Italy
    Dipartimento di Ingegneria Chimica, dei Materiali e della Produzione Industriale, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Piazzale Vincenzo Tecchio 80, 80125 Napoli, Italy)

Abstract

The increase of capital investments and operation and maintenance (O&M) costs represents a current limitation to the diffusion of carbon capture systems for the clean combustion of fossil fuels. However, post-combustion systems, such as calcium looping (CaL), for CO 2 capture from flue gas are the most attractive carbon capture systems since they can be installed at new plants and retrofitted into existing power plants. This work investigates the pros and cons of employing a calcium looping system for CO 2 capture and also as a desulphurization unit. A preliminary techno-economic analysis was carried out comparing a base case consisting of a coal-based power plant of about 550MWe with a desulphurization unit (Case 1), the same plant but with a CaL system added for CO 2 capture (Case 2), or the same plant but with a CaL system for simultaneous capture of CO 2 and SO 2 and the removal of the desulphurization unit (Case 3). Case 2 resulted in a 67% increase of capital investment with respect to the benchmark case, while the increase was lower (48%) in Case 3. In terms of O&M costs, the most important item was represented by the yearly maintenance cost of the desulphurization unit. In fact, in Case 3, a reduction of O&M costs of about 8% was observed with respect to Case 2.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonio Coppola & Fabrizio Scala, 2020. "A Preliminary Techno-Economic Analysis on the Calcium Looping Process with Simultaneous Capture of CO 2 and SO 2 from a Coal-Based Combustion Power Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-9, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:9:p:2176-:d:352985
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/9/2176/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/9/2176/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Perejón, Antonio & Romeo, Luis M. & Lara, Yolanda & Lisbona, Pilar & Martínez, Ana & Valverde, Jose Manuel, 2016. "The Calcium-Looping technology for CO2 capture: On the important roles of energy integration and sorbent behavior," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 787-807.
    2. Erans, María & Manovic, Vasilije & Anthony, Edward J., 2016. "Calcium looping sorbents for CO2 capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 722-742.
    3. Hanak, Dawid P. & Powell, Dante & Manovic, Vasilije, 2017. "Techno-economic analysis of oxy-combustion coal-fired power plant with cryogenic oxygen storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 193-203.
    4. Xu, Gang & Yang, Yong-ping & Ding, Jie & Li, Shoucheng & Liu, Wenyi & Zhang, Kai, 2013. "Analysis and optimization of CO2 capture in an existing coal-fired power plant in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 117-127.
    5. Cormos, Calin-Cristian & Vatopoulos, Konstantinos & Tzimas, Evangelos, 2013. "Assessment of the consumption of water and construction materials in state-of-the-art fossil fuel power generation technologies involving CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 37-49.
    6. Cormos, Calin-Cristian, 2014. "Economic evaluations of coal-based combustion and gasification power plants with post-combustion CO2 capture using calcium looping cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 665-673.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vyacheslav V. Rodaev & Svetlana S. Razlivalova, 2021. "Performance and Durability of the Zr-Doped CaO Sorbent under Cyclic Carbonation–Decarbonation at Different Operating Parameters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-9, August.
    2. Pilar Lisbona & Sara Pascual & Virginia Pérez, 2021. "Evaluation of Synergies of a Biomass Power Plant and a Biogas Station with a Carbon Capture System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-23, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cormos, Calin-Cristian, 2014. "Economic evaluations of coal-based combustion and gasification power plants with post-combustion CO2 capture using calcium looping cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 665-673.
    2. Abanades, Stéphane & André, Laurie, 2018. "Design and demonstration of a high temperature solar-heated rotary tube reactor for continuous particles calcination," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 1310-1320.
    3. Calin-Cristian Cormos, 2018. "Techno-Economic Evaluations of Copper-Based Chemical Looping Air Separation System for Oxy-Combustion and Gasification Power Plants with Carbon Capture," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, November.
    4. Cormos, Calin-Cristian, 2020. "Energy and cost efficient manganese chemical looping air separation cycle for decarbonized power generation based on oxy-fuel combustion and gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    5. Chi, Changyun & Li, Yingjie & Zhang, Wan & Wang, Zeyan, 2019. "Synthesis of a hollow microtubular Ca/Al sorbent with high CO2 uptake by hard templating," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    6. Yan, Linbo & Wang, Ziqi & Cao, Yang & He, Boshu, 2020. "Comparative evaluation of two biomass direct-fired power plants with carbon capture and sequestration," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 1188-1198.
    7. Zhang, Wan & Li, Yingjie & He, Zirui & Ma, Xiaotong & Song, Haiping, 2017. "CO2 capture by carbide slag calcined under high-concentration steam and energy requirement in calcium looping conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 869-878.
    8. Wang, Ke & Zhou, Zhongyun & Zhao, Pengfei & Yin, Zeguang & Su, Zhen & Sun, Ji, 2016. "Synthesis of a highly efficient Li4SiO4 ceramic modified with a gluconic acid-based carbon coating for high-temperature CO2 capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1418-1427.
    9. Li, Bin & Magoua Mbeugang, Christian Fabrice & Huang, Yong & Liu, Dongjing & Wang, Qian & Zhang, Shu, 2022. "A review of CaO based catalysts for tar removal during biomass gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PB).
    10. Zhou, Linfei & Duan, Lunbo & Anthony, Edward John, 2019. "A calcium looping process for simultaneous CO2 capture and peak shaving in a coal-fired power plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 480-486.
    11. Wu, Ying & Chen, Xiaoping & Ma, Jiliang & Wu, Ye & Liu, Daoyin & Xie, Weiyi, 2020. "System integration optimization for coal-fired power plant with CO2 capture by Na2CO3 dry sorbents," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    12. Alvarez Rivero, M. & Rodrigues, D. & Pinheiro, C.I.C. & Cardoso, J.P. & Mendes, L.F., 2022. "Solid–gas reactors driven by concentrated solar energy with potential application to calcium looping: A comparative review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    13. Forogh Dashtestani & Mohammad Nusheh & Vilailuck Siriwongrungson & Janjira Hongrapipat & Vlatko Materic & Alex C. K. Yip & Shusheng Pang, 2021. "Effect of the Presence of HCl on Simultaneous CO 2 Capture and Contaminants Removal from Simulated Biomass Gasification Producer Gas by CaO-Fe 2 O 3 Sorbent in Calcium Looping Cycles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-12, December.
    14. Ana-Maria Cormos & Simion Dragan & Letitia Petrescu & Vlad Sandu & Calin-Cristian Cormos, 2020. "Techno-Economic and Environmental Evaluations of Decarbonized Fossil-Intensive Industrial Processes by Reactive Absorption & Adsorption CO 2 Capture Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, March.
    15. Ortiz, C. & Valverde, J.M. & Chacartegui, R. & Perez-Maqueda, L.A. & Giménez, P., 2019. "The Calcium-Looping (CaCO3/CaO) process for thermochemical energy storage in Concentrating Solar Power plants," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    16. Schakel, Wouter & Hung, Christine Roxanne & Tokheim, Lars-Andre & Strømman, Anders Hammer & Worrell, Ernst & Ramírez, Andrea, 2018. "Impact of fuel selection on the environmental performance of post-combustion calcium looping applied to a cement plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 75-87.
    17. Ortiz, C. & Romano, M.C. & Valverde, J.M. & Binotti, M. & Chacartegui, R., 2018. "Process integration of Calcium-Looping thermochemical energy storage system in concentrating solar power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 535-551.
    18. Diglio, Giuseppe & Bareschino, Piero & Mancusi, Erasmo & Pepe, Francesco & Montagnaro, Fabio & Hanak, Dawid P. & Manovic, Vasilije, 2018. "Feasibility of CaO/CuO/NiO sorption-enhanced steam methane reforming integrated with solid-oxide fuel cell for near-zero-CO2 emissions cogeneration system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 241-256.
    19. Sánchez Jiménez, Pedro E. & Perejón, Antonio & Benítez Guerrero, Mónica & Valverde, José M. & Ortiz, Carlos & Pérez Maqueda, Luis A., 2019. "High-performance and low-cost macroporous calcium oxide based materials for thermochemical energy storage in concentrated solar power plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 543-552.
    20. Shi, Jiewen & Li, Yingjie & Zhang, Qing & Ma, Xiaotong & Duan, Lunbo & Zhou, Xingang, 2017. "CO2 capture performance of a novel synthetic CaO/sepiolite sorbent at calcium looping conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 412-421.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:9:p:2176-:d:352985. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.