IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v282y2023ics0360544223023551.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance evaluation of a flexible CO2-ORC and sorbent regeneration integrated novel dry gasification oxy-combustion power cycle for in-situ sulphur capture, CO2 capture and power generation

Author

Listed:
  • Kirtania, Bidesh
  • Shilapuram, Vidyasagar

Abstract

In this work, CO2-Organic Rankine Cycle (CO2-ORC) and sorbent regeneration integrated novel Dry Gasification Oxy-Combustion (DGOC) power cycle has been proposed. Integration of CO2-ORC, a low-temperature heat recovery cycle, further enhances the power cycle efficiency. This work presents the performance evaluation of proposed cycle in terms of optimum conditions of gasifier and regenerator, sulphur capture efficiency, quality of CO2 capture, net plant efficiency, exergy efficiency and economic aspect with different sorbents for in-situ sulphur capture at various operating pressures in the Aspen Plus simulation environment. Results show that optimum gasifier temperature increase with increase in operating pressure and trend is almost similar for all sorbents studied. Optimum regenerator conditions vary significantly with different sorbent and operating pressure. Maximum efficiency was obtained with CuO sorbent of about 39.85%. CuO has the maximum sulphur capture efficiency of 99.98% whereas Fe2O3 has the lowest Sulphur capture efficiency. Exergy analysis shows a similar trend, with CuO having the maximum exergetic efficiency. Economically combined cycle with MnO sorbent performs marginally better than other sorbents.

Suggested Citation

  • Kirtania, Bidesh & Shilapuram, Vidyasagar, 2023. "Performance evaluation of a flexible CO2-ORC and sorbent regeneration integrated novel dry gasification oxy-combustion power cycle for in-situ sulphur capture, CO2 capture and power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:282:y:2023:i:c:s0360544223023551
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.128961
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544223023551
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2023.128961?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Becker, C.M. & Marder, M. & Junges, E. & Konrad, O., 2022. "Technologies for biogas desulfurization - An overview of recent studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    2. Bi, Yujing & Ju, Yonglin, 2022. "Design and analysis of an efficient hydrogen liquefaction process based on helium reverse Brayton cycle integrating with steam methane reforming and liquefied natural gas cold energy utilization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    3. Moioli, Stefania & Giuffrida, Antonio & Romano, Matteo C. & Pellegrini, Laura A. & Lozza, Giovanni, 2016. "Assessment of MDEA absorption process for sequential H2S removal and CO2 capture in air-blown IGCC plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1452-1470.
    4. Lecompte, Steven & Huisseune, Henk & van den Broek, Martijn & Vanslambrouck, Bruno & De Paepe, Michel, 2015. "Review of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) architectures for waste heat recovery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 448-461.
    5. Querol, E. & Gonzalez-Regueral, B. & Ramos, A. & Perez-Benedito, J.L., 2011. "Novel application for exergy and thermoeconomic analysis of processes simulated with Aspen Plus®," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 964-974.
    6. Hamers, H.P. & Romano, M.C. & Spallina, V. & Chiesa, P. & Gallucci, F. & van Sint Annaland, M., 2015. "Boosting the IGCLC process efficiency by optimizing the desulfurization step," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 422-432.
    7. Nandy, Anirban & Loha, Chanchal & Gu, Sai & Sarkar, Pinaki & Karmakar, Malay K. & Chatterjee, Pradip K., 2016. "Present status and overview of Chemical Looping Combustion technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 597-619.
    8. Seferlis, Panos & Varbanov, Petar Sabev & Papadopoulos, Athanasios I. & Chin, Hon Huin & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír, 2021. "Sustainable design, integration, and operation for energy high-performance process systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    9. Zhang, Ruihang & Wu, Chufan & Song, Wuwenjie & Deng, Chun & Yang, Minbo, 2020. "Energy integration of LNG light hydrocarbon recovery and air separation: Process design and technic-economic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    10. Cormos, Calin-Cristian & Vatopoulos, Konstantinos & Tzimas, Evangelos, 2013. "Assessment of the consumption of water and construction materials in state-of-the-art fossil fuel power generation technologies involving CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 37-49.
    11. Chen, Huijuan & Goswami, D. Yogi & Stefanakos, Elias K., 2010. "A review of thermodynamic cycles and working fluids for the conversion of low-grade heat," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(9), pages 3059-3067, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christoph J.W. Kirmse & Oyeniyi A. Oyewunmi & Andrew J. Haslam & Christos N. Markides, 2016. "Comparison of a Novel Organic-Fluid Thermofluidic Heat Converter and an Organic Rankine Cycle Heat Engine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-26, June.
    2. Li, Jian & Ge, Zhong & Duan, Yuanyuan & Yang, Zhen & Liu, Qiang, 2018. "Parametric optimization and thermodynamic performance comparison of single-pressure and dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 409-421.
    3. Zhang, Lijun & Chennells, Michael & Xia, Xiaohua, 2018. "A power dispatch model for a ferrochrome plant heat recovery cogeneration system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 180-189.
    4. Kang, Lixia & Tang, Jianping & Liu, Yongzhong, 2020. "Optimal design of an organic Rankine cycle system considering the expected variations on heat sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    5. Zhang, Chenghu & Lin, Jiyou & Tan, Yufei, 2019. "A theoretical study on a novel combined organic Rankine cycle and ejector heat pump," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 81-90.
    6. Li, Jian & Peng, Xiayao & Yang, Zhen & Hu, Shuozhuo & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2022. "Design, improvements and applications of dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    7. Mondejar, M.E. & Andreasen, J.G. & Pierobon, L. & Larsen, U. & Thern, M. & Haglind, F., 2018. "A review of the use of organic Rankine cycle power systems for maritime applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 126-151.
    8. Xu, Bin & Rathod, Dhruvang & Yebi, Adamu & Filipi, Zoran & Onori, Simona & Hoffman, Mark, 2019. "A comprehensive review of organic rankine cycle waste heat recovery systems in heavy-duty diesel engine applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 145-170.
    9. Sarkar, Jahar & Bhattacharyya, Souvik, 2015. "Potential of organic Rankine cycle technology in India: Working fluid selection and feasibility study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 1618-1625.
    10. Marenco-Porto, Carlos A. & Nieto-Londoño, César & Lopera, Leonardo & Escudero-Atehortua, Ana & Giraldo, Mauricio & Jouhara, Hussam, 2023. "Evaluation of Organic Rankine Cycle alternatives for the cement industry using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) methodology and energy-economic-environmental (3E) analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    11. Zhang, Jianhua & Lin, Mingming & Fang, Fang & Xu, Jinliang & Li, Kang, 2016. "Gain scheduling control of waste heat energy conversion systems based on an LPV (linear parameter varying) model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 773-783.
    12. Farajollahi, Hossein & Hossainpour, Siamak, 2017. "Application of organic Rankine cycle in integration of thermal power plant with post-combustion CO2 capture and compression," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 927-936.
    13. Li, Jian & Ge, Zhong & Duan, Yuanyuan & Yang, Zhen, 2019. "Design and performance analyses for a novel organic Rankine cycle with supercritical-subcritical heat absorption process coupling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 1400-1414.
    14. Baccioli, A. & Antonelli, M. & Desideri, U., 2017. "Technical and economic analysis of organic flash regenerative cycles (OFRCs) for low temperature waste heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 69-87.
    15. Imran, Muhammad & Haglind, Fredrik & Asim, Muhammad & Zeb Alvi, Jahan, 2018. "Recent research trends in organic Rankine cycle technology: A bibliometric approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 552-562.
    16. Sanne Lemmens, 2016. "Cost Engineering Techniques and Their Applicability for Cost Estimation of Organic Rankine Cycle Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-18, June.
    17. Ge, Y.T. & Li, L. & Luo, X. & Tassou, S.A., 2018. "Performance evaluation of a low-grade power generation system with CO2 transcritical power cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 220-230.
    18. Steven Lecompte & Oyeniyi A. Oyewunmi & Christos N. Markides & Marija Lazova & Alihan Kaya & Martijn Van den Broek & Michel De Paepe, 2017. "Case Study of an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) for Waste Heat Recovery from an Electric Arc Furnace (EAF)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-16, May.
    19. Nenad Mustapić & Vladislav Brkić & Željko Duić & Toni Kralj, 2022. "Thermodynamic Optimization of Advanced Organic Rankine Cycle Configurations for Geothermal Energy Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-36, September.
    20. Liu, Changwei & Gao, Tieyu, 2019. "Off-design performance analysis of basic ORC, ORC using zeotropic mixtures and composition-adjustable ORC under optimal control strategy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 95-108.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:282:y:2023:i:c:s0360544223023551. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.