IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v119y2017icp950-960.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimization of pre-combustion capture for thermal power plants using Pinch Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Valiani, Saba
  • Tahouni, Nassim
  • Panjeshahi, M. Hassan

Abstract

Carbon dioxide emissions from the chimneys of thermal power plants create major environmental risks. Therefore, an important step toward reducing the emissions in these power plants can be the carbon dioxide pre-combustion capture process. In this paper, a 150 MW thermal steam cycle power plant fueled by bagasse was studied. The power plant has an efficiency of 32.74%, and emits 246.52 t/h carbon dioxide. First, the design and simulation of a suggested pre-combustion carbon dioxide capture process was outperformed. In this process, the amount of carbon dioxide separation and capture using mono ethanol amine (MEA) 30 wt% as solvent is 90%. In this condition, the mass flow of bagasse was increased about 60% to keep the plant efficiency constant. At the same time, the energy loss as a result of the addition of the carbon dioxide recovery unit was around 11%. The process was optimized through Pinch Analysis to reduce energy waste and fuel flow. Moreover, it was indicated that power plant efficiency could be increased around 8% by integrating the hot exhaust gases from the gasification unit with power plant boiler using a heat recovery steam generation (HRSG) unit. With this modification, bagasse consumption was decreased by 23%.

Suggested Citation

  • Valiani, Saba & Tahouni, Nassim & Panjeshahi, M. Hassan, 2017. "Optimization of pre-combustion capture for thermal power plants using Pinch Analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 950-960.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:119:y:2017:i:c:p:950-960
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.11.046
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544216316528
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2016.11.046?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Harkin, Trent & Hoadley, Andrew & Hooper, Barry, 2012. "Using multi-objective optimisation in the design of CO2 capture systems for retrofit to coal power stations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 228-235.
    2. Pfaff, I. & Oexmann, J. & Kather, A., 2010. "Optimised integration of post-combustion CO2 capture process in greenfield power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(10), pages 4030-4041.
    3. Bernier, Etienne & Maréchal, François & Samson, Réjean, 2010. "Multi-objective design optimization of a natural gas-combined cycle with carbon dioxide capture in a life cycle perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 1121-1128.
    4. Duan, Liqiang & Zhao, Mingde & Yang, Yongping, 2012. "Integration and optimization study on the coal-fired power plant with CO2 capture using MEA," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 107-116.
    5. Panjeshahi, Mohammad Hassan & Tahouni, Nassim, 2008. "Pressure drop optimisation in debottlenecking of heat exchanger networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 942-951.
    6. Kunze, Christian & Riedl, Karsten & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2011. "Structured exergy analysis of an integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) plant with carbon capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 1480-1487.
    7. Davison, John, 2007. "Performance and costs of power plants with capture and storage of CO2," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1163-1176.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kazemi, Abolghasem & Moreno, Jovita & Iribarren, Diego, 2023. "Economic optimization and comparative environmental assessment of natural gas combined cycle power plants with CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    2. Chen, Shiyi & Yu, Ran & Soomro, Ahsanullah & Xiang, Wenguo, 2019. "Thermodynamic assessment and optimization of a pressurized fluidized bed oxy-fuel combustion power plant with CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 445-455.
    3. Kazemi, Abolghasem & Moreno, Jovita & Iribarren, Diego, 2022. "Techno-economic comparison of optimized natural gas combined cycle power plants with CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    4. Yaumi, A.L. & Bakar, M.Z. Abu & Hameed, B.H., 2017. "Reusable nitrogen-doped mesoporous carbon adsorbent for carbon dioxide adsorption in fixed-bed," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 776-784.
    5. Miguel Castro Oliveira & Muriel Iten & Henrique A. Matos, 2022. "Review on Water and Energy Integration in Process Industry: Water-Heat Nexus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-24, June.
    6. Feng Zhen & Jia Zhang & Wenzhe Li & Yongming Sun & Xiaoying Kong, 2018. "Optimizing Waste Heat Utilization in Vehicle Bio-Methane Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-13, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khalilpour, Rajab, 2014. "Multi-level investment planning and scheduling under electricity and carbon market dynamics: Retrofit of a power plant with PCC (post-combustion carbon capture) processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 172-186.
    2. Lara, Y. & Martínez, A. & Lisbona, P. & Romeo, L.M., 2016. "Heat integration of alternative Ca-looping configurations for CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(P1), pages 956-962.
    3. Jin, He & Liu, Pei & Li, Zheng, 2018. "Energy-efficient process intensification for post-combustion CO2 capture: A modeling approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 471-483.
    4. Cormos, Calin-Cristian & Vatopoulos, Konstantinos & Tzimas, Evangelos, 2013. "Assessment of the consumption of water and construction materials in state-of-the-art fossil fuel power generation technologies involving CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 37-49.
    5. Li, Chunxi & Guo, Shiqi & Ye, Xuemin & Fu, Wenfeng, 2019. "Performance and thermoeconomics of solar-aided double-reheat coal-fired power systems with carbon capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 1-15.
    6. Janusz Kotowicz & Sebastian Michalski & Mateusz Brzęczek, 2019. "The Characteristics of a Modern Oxy-Fuel Power Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-34, September.
    7. Van Wagener, David H. & Liebenthal, Ulrich & Plaza, Jorge M. & Kather, Alfons & Rochelle, Gary T., 2014. "Maximizing coal-fired power plant efficiency with integration of amine-based CO2 capture in greenfield and retrofit scenarios," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 824-831.
    8. Mores, Patricia & Scenna, Nicolás & Mussati, Sergio, 2012. "CO2 capture using monoethanolamine (MEA) aqueous solution: Modeling and optimization of the solvent regeneration and CO2 desorption process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 1042-1058.
    9. Cormos, Calin-Cristian, 2012. "Integrated assessment of IGCC power generation technology with carbon capture and storage (CCS)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 434-445.
    10. Liszka, Marcin & Malik, Tomasz & Budnik, Michał & Ziębik, Andrzej, 2013. "Comparison of IGCC (integrated gasification combined cycle) and CFB (circulating fluidized bed) cogeneration plants equipped with CO2 removal," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 86-96.
    11. Toffolo, Andrea & Lazzaretto, Andrea & von Spakovsky, Michael R., 2012. "On the nature of the heat transfer feasibility constraint in the optimal synthesis/design of complex energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 236-243.
    12. Guo, Liheng & Ding, Yudong & Liao, Qiang & Zhu, Xun & Wang, Hong, 2022. "A new heat supply strategy for CO2 capture process based on the heat recovery from turbine exhaust steam in a coal-fired power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    13. Skorek-Osikowska, Anna & Janusz-Szymańska, Katarzyna & Kotowicz, Janusz, 2012. "Modeling and analysis of selected carbon dioxide capture methods in IGCC systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 92-100.
    14. Rohlfs, Wilko & Madlener, Reinhard, 2013. "Assessment of clean-coal strategies: The questionable merits of carbon capture-readiness," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 27-36.
    15. Mo, Jian-Lei & Schleich, Joachim & Zhu, Lei & Fan, Ying, 2015. "Delaying the introduction of emissions trading systems—Implications for power plant investment and operation from a multi-stage decision model," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(PB), pages 255-264.
    16. Lai, N.Y.G. & Yap, E.H. & Lee, C.W., 2011. "Viability of CCS: A broad-based assessment for Malaysia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(8), pages 3608-3616.
    17. Liang, Ying & Cai, Lei & Guan, Yanwen & Liu, Wenbin & Xiang, Yanlei & Li, Juan & He, Tianzhi, 2020. "Numerical study on an original oxy-fuel combustion power plant with efficient utilization of flue gas waste heat," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    18. Igor Donskoy, 2023. "Techno-Economic Efficiency Estimation of Promising Integrated Oxyfuel Gasification Combined-Cycle Power Plants with Carbon Capture," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-18, February.
    19. Prabu, V. & Geeta, K., 2015. "CO2 enhanced in-situ oxy-coal gasification based carbon-neutral conventional power generating systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 672-683.
    20. Hanak, Dawid P. & Jenkins, Barrie G. & Kruger, Tim & Manovic, Vasilije, 2017. "High-efficiency negative-carbon emission power generation from integrated solid-oxide fuel cell and calciner," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 1189-1201.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:119:y:2017:i:c:p:950-960. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.