IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v9y2016i9p669-d76588.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comprehensive Exergy Analysis of Three IGCC Power Plant Configurations with CO 2 Capture

Author

Listed:
  • Nicholas S. Siefert

    (National Energy Technology Laboratory, USA Development of Energy, Pittsburgh, PA 15025, USA)

  • Sarah Narburgh

    (National Energy Technology Laboratory, USA Development of Energy, Pittsburgh, PA 15025, USA)

  • Yang Chen

    (National Energy Technology Laboratory, USA Development of Energy, Pittsburgh, PA 15025, USA)

Abstract

We have conducted comprehensive exergy analyses of three integrated gasification combined cycle with carbon capture and storage (IGCC-CCS) power plant configurations: (1) a baseline model using Selexol™ for H 2 S/CO 2 removal; (2) a modified version that adds a H 2 -selective membrane before the Selexol™ acid gas removal system; and (3) a modified baseline version that uses a CO 2 -selective membrane before the Selexol™ acid gas removal system. While holding the coal input flow rate and the CO 2 captured flow rates constant, it was determined that the H 2 -selective membrane case had a higher net power output (584 MW) compared to the baseline (564 MW) and compared to the CO 2 -selective membrane case (550 MW). Interestingly, the CO 2 -selective membrane case destroyed the least amount of exergy within the power plant (967 MW), compared with the Baseline case (999 MW) and the H 2 -membrane case (972 MW). The main problem with the CO 2 -selective membrane case was the large amount of H 2 (48 MW worth of H 2 chemical exergy) remaining within the supercritical CO 2 that exits the power plant. Regardless of the CO 2 capture process used, the majority of the exergy destruction occurred in the gasifier (305 MW) and gas turbine (~380 MW) subsystems, suggesting that these two areas should be key areas of focus of future improvements.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicholas S. Siefert & Sarah Narburgh & Yang Chen, 2016. "Comprehensive Exergy Analysis of Three IGCC Power Plant Configurations with CO 2 Capture," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-19, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:9:y:2016:i:9:p:669-:d:76588
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/9/9/669/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/9/9/669/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Siefert, Nicholas S. & Litster, Shawn, 2013. "Exergy and economic analyses of advanced IGCC–CCS and IGFC–CCS power plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 315-328.
    2. Liszka, Marcin & Malik, Tomasz & Manfrida, Giampaolo, 2012. "Energy and exergy analysis of hydrogen-oriented coal gasification with CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 142-150.
    3. Yangyang Liu & Zhiyong U. Wang & Hong‐Cai Zhou, 2012. "Recent advances in carbon dioxide capture with metal‐organic frameworks," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 2(4), pages 239-259, August.
    4. Franz, Johannes & Maas, Pascal & Scherer, Viktor, 2014. "Economic evaluation of pre-combustion CO2-capture in IGCC power plants by porous ceramic membranes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 532-542.
    5. Siefert, Nicholas S. & Chang, Brian Y. & Litster, Shawn, 2014. "Exergy and economic analysis of a CaO-looping gasifier for IGFC–CCS and IGCC–CCS," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 230-245.
    6. Chen, Chao & Rubin, Edward S., 2009. "CO2 control technology effects on IGCC plant performance and cost," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 915-924, March.
    7. Erlach, B. & Schmidt, M. & Tsatsaronis, G., 2011. "Comparison of carbon capture IGCC with pre-combustion decarbonisation and with chemical-looping combustion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 3804-3815.
    8. Kunze, Christian & Riedl, Karsten & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2011. "Structured exergy analysis of an integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) plant with carbon capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 1480-1487.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Shiyi & Lior, Noam & Xiang, Wenguo, 2015. "Coal gasification integration with solid oxide fuel cell and chemical looping combustion for high-efficiency power generation with inherent CO2 capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 298-312.
    2. Igor Donskoy, 2023. "Techno-Economic Efficiency Estimation of Promising Integrated Oxyfuel Gasification Combined-Cycle Power Plants with Carbon Capture," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-18, February.
    3. Liszka, Marcin & Malik, Tomasz & Manfrida, Giampaolo, 2012. "Energy and exergy analysis of hydrogen-oriented coal gasification with CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 142-150.
    4. Moon, Dong-Kyu & Lee, Dong-Geun & Lee, Chang-Ha, 2016. "H2 pressure swing adsorption for high pressure syngas from an integrated gasification combined cycle with a carbon capture process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 760-774.
    5. Qin, Shiyue & Chang, Shiyan & Yao, Qiang, 2018. "Modeling, thermodynamic and techno-economic analysis of coal-to-liquids process with different entrained flow coal gasifiers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 413-432.
    6. Lee, Woo-Sung & Lee, Jae-Cheol & Oh, Hyun-Taek & Baek, Seung-Won & Oh, Min & Lee, Chang-Ha, 2017. "Performance, economic and exergy analyses of carbon capture processes for a 300 MW class integrated gasification combined cycle power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 731-742.
    7. Meng, Xiuxia & Liu, Yongna & Yang, Naitao & Tan, Xiaoyao & Liu, Jian & Diniz da Costa, João C. & Liu, Shaomin, 2017. "Highly compact and robust hollow fiber solid oxide cells for flexible power generation and gas production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 741-748.
    8. Zhong, Dong-Liang & Wang, Jia-Le & Lu, Yi-Yu & Li, Zheng & Yan, Jin, 2016. "Precombustion CO2 capture using a hybrid process of adsorption and gas hydrate formation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 621-629.
    9. Liszka, Marcin & Malik, Tomasz & Budnik, Michał & Ziębik, Andrzej, 2013. "Comparison of IGCC (integrated gasification combined cycle) and CFB (circulating fluidized bed) cogeneration plants equipped with CO2 removal," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 86-96.
    10. Yan, Pei & Zheng, Chenghang & Zhu, Weizhuo & Xu, Xi & Gao, Xiang & Luo, Zhongyang & Ni, Mingjiang & Cen, Kefa, 2016. "An experimental study on the effects of temperature and pressure on negative corona discharge in high-temperature ESPs," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 28-35.
    11. Arroyave, Juan D. & Chejne, Farid & Mejía, Juan M. & Maya, Juan C., 2020. "Evaluation of CO2 production for enhanced oil recovery from four power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    12. Oh, Hyun-Taek & Lee, Woo-Sung & Ju, Youngsan & Lee, Chang-Ha, 2019. "Performance evaluation and carbon assessment of IGCC power plant with coal quality," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    13. Chen, Wei-Hsin & Chen, Shu-Mi & Hung, Chen-I, 2013. "Carbon dioxide capture by single droplet using Selexol, Rectisol and water as absorbents: A theoretical approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 731-741.
    14. Esmaili, Ehsan & Mostafavi, Ehsan & Mahinpey, Nader, 2016. "Economic assessment of integrated coal gasification combined cycle with sorbent CO2 capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 341-352.
    15. Eide, Jan & de Sisternes, Fernando J. & Herzog, Howard J. & Webster, Mort D., 2014. "CO2 emission standards and investment in carbon capture," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 53-65.
    16. Khalili-Garakani, Amirhossein & Ivakpour, Javad & Kasiri, Norollah, 2016. "Evolutionary synthesis of optimum light ends recovery unit with exergy analysis application," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 507-522.
    17. Mehrpooya, Mehdi & Sharifzadeh, Mohammad Mehdi Moftakhari, 2017. "Conceptual and basic design of a novel integrated cogeneration power plant energy system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 516-533.
    18. Samuel C. Bayham & Andrew Tong & Mandar Kathe & Liang-Shih Fan, 2016. "Chemical looping technology for energy and chemical production," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(2), pages 216-241, March.
    19. Ren, Siyue & Feng, Xiao & Wang, Yufei, 2021. "Emergy evaluation of the integrated gasification combined cycle power generation systems with a carbon capture system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    20. Håkonsen, Silje Fosse & Grande, Carlos A. & Blom, Richard, 2014. "Rotating bed reactor for CLC: Bed characteristics dependencies on internal gas mixing," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1952-1957.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:9:y:2016:i:9:p:669-:d:76588. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.