IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v86y2015icp115-127.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design consideration of supercritical CO2 power cycle integral experiment loop

Author

Listed:
  • Ahn, Yoonhan
  • Lee, Jekyoung
  • Kim, Seong Gu
  • Lee, Jeong Ik
  • Cha, Jae Eun
  • Lee, Si-Woo

Abstract

Supercritical-CO2 Brayton cycle has been recently gaining a lot of attention for the mild temperature (450–650 °C) heat source application due to its high efficiency and compact footprint as the system layout of S–CO2 cycle is simple and small turbomachinery and compact micro-channel heat exchangers are utilized. As CO2 properties behave more like an incompressible fluid near the critical point (30.98 °C, 7.38 MPa), the control of compressor operating condition and stability is the key technology that influences the cycle efficiency. Based on the previous works on the S–CO2 test facilities from various research institutions, a Korean research team designed the SCIEL (Supercritical CO2 Integral Experiment Loop) to achieve higher efficiency with higher pressure ratio with S–CO2 power cycle compared to other pre-existing facilities. This paper will describe the underlying design principles of the integral experiment facility and the current status of SCIEL which is being constructed in KAERI (Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute).

Suggested Citation

  • Ahn, Yoonhan & Lee, Jekyoung & Kim, Seong Gu & Lee, Jeong Ik & Cha, Jae Eun & Lee, Si-Woo, 2015. "Design consideration of supercritical CO2 power cycle integral experiment loop," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 115-127.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:86:y:2015:i:c:p:115-127
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.03.066
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544215003758
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2015.03.066?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Singh, Rajinesh & Miller, Sarah A. & Rowlands, Andrew S. & Jacobs, Peter A., 2013. "Dynamic characteristics of a direct-heated supercritical carbon-dioxide Brayton cycle in a solar thermal power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 194-204.
    2. Le Moullec, Yann, 2013. "Conceptual study of a high efficiency coal-fired power plant with CO2 capture using a supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 32-46.
    3. Sarkar, Jahar, 2009. "Second law analysis of supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(9), pages 1172-1178.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rovira, Antonio & Muñoz, Marta & Sánchez, Consuelo & Martínez-Val, José María, 2015. "Proposal and study of a balanced hybrid Rankine–Brayton cycle for low-to-moderate temperature solar power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 305-317.
    2. Akbari, Ata D. & Mahmoudi, Seyed M.S., 2014. "Thermoeconomic analysis & optimization of the combined supercritical CO2 (carbon dioxide) recompression Brayton/organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 501-512.
    3. Wang, Kun & He, Ya-Ling & Zhu, Han-Hui, 2017. "Integration between supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles and molten salt solar power towers: A review and a comprehensive comparison of different cycle layouts," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 819-836.
    4. Li, Hongzhi & Zhang, Yifan & Yao, Mingyu & Yang, Yu & Han, Wanlong & Bai, Wengang, 2019. "Design assessment of a 5 MW fossil-fired supercritical CO2 power cycle pilot loop," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 792-804.
    5. Al-Sulaiman, Fahad A. & Atif, Maimoon, 2015. "Performance comparison of different supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycles integrated with a solar power tower," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 61-71.
    6. Wang, Lin & Pan, Liang-ming & Wang, Junfeng & Chen, Deqi & Huang, Yanping & Hu, Lian, 2019. "Investigation on the temperature sensitivity of the S-CO2 Brayton cycle efficiency," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 739-750.
    7. Padilla, Ricardo Vasquez & Soo Too, Yen Chean & Benito, Regano & Stein, Wes, 2015. "Exergetic analysis of supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles integrated with solar central receivers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 348-365.
    8. Linares, José Ignacio & Cantizano, Alexis & Arenas, Eva & Moratilla, Beatriz Yolanda & Martín-Palacios, Víctor & Batet, Lluis, 2017. "Recuperated versus single-recuperator re-compressed supercritical CO2 Brayton power cycles for DEMO fusion reactor based on dual coolant lithium lead blanket," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 307-317.
    9. Singh, Rajinesh & Kearney, Michael P. & Manzie, Chris, 2013. "Extremum-seeking control of a supercritical carbon-dioxide closed Brayton cycle in a direct-heated solar thermal power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 380-387.
    10. Bai, Ziwei & Zhang, Guoqiang & Li, Yongyi & Xu, Gang & Yang, Yongping, 2018. "A supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle with a bleeding anabranch used in coal-fired power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 731-738.
    11. Ma, Yuegeng & Liu, Ming & Yan, Junjie & Liu, Jiping, 2017. "Thermodynamic study of main compression intercooling effects on supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 746-756.
    12. Duniam, Sam & Veeraragavan, Ananthanarayanan, 2019. "Off-design performance of the supercritical carbon dioxide recompression Brayton cycle with NDDCT cooling for concentrating solar power," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    13. Battisti, Felipe G. & Cardemil, José M. & da Silva, Alexandre K., 2016. "A multivariable optimization of a Brayton power cycle operating with CO2 as working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 908-916.
    14. Marchionni, Matteo & Bianchi, Giuseppe & Tassou, Savvas A., 2018. "Techno-economic assessment of Joule-Brayton cycle architectures for heat to power conversion from high-grade heat sources using CO2 in the supercritical state," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 1140-1152.
    15. S. Mohammad S. Mahmoudi & Ata D. Akbari & Marc A. Rosen, 2016. "Thermoeconomic Analysis and Optimization of a New Combined Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Recompression Brayton/Kalina Cycle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-19, October.
    16. George Stamatellos & Tassos Stamatelos, 2022. "Effect of Actual Recuperators’ Effectiveness on the Attainable Efficiency of Supercritical CO 2 Brayton Cycles for Solar Thermal Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-20, October.
    17. Uusitalo, Antti & Turunen-Saaresti, Teemu & Grönman, Aki, 2021. "Design and loss analysis of radial turbines for supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    18. Linares, José Ignacio & Cantizano, Alexis & Moratilla, Beatriz Yolanda & Martín-Palacios, Víctor & Batet, Lluis, 2016. "Supercritical CO2 Brayton power cycles for DEMO (demonstration power plant) fusion reactor based on dual coolant lithium lead blanket," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 271-283.
    19. Atif, Maimoon. & Al-Sulaiman, Fahad A., 2017. "Energy and exergy analyses of solar tower power plant driven supercritical carbon dioxide recompression cycles for six different locations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 153-167.
    20. Ma, Yuegeng & Zhang, Xuwei & Liu, Ming & Yan, Junjie & Liu, Jiping, 2018. "Proposal and assessment of a novel supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle integrated with LiBr absorption chiller for concentrated solar power applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 839-854.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:86:y:2015:i:c:p:115-127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.