IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v261y2022ipas0360544222019533.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How the power-to-liquid technology can contribute to reaching carbon neutrality of the China's transportation sector?

Author

Listed:
  • Zhao, Jinyang
  • Yu, Yadong
  • Ren, Hongtao
  • Makowski, Marek
  • Granat, Janusz
  • Nahorski, Zbigniew
  • Ma, Tieju

Abstract

There is a growing interest in the power-to-liquid (PTL) technology, especially in using electricity from renewable sources to generate H2, and then coupled with CO2 captured from various sources (e.g., coal-fired power plants) to produce liquid fuels (e.g., gasoline). As a negative emission technology, the product of PTL could be used in the internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEV) and thus cause limited shifts in current energy infrastructure and automobile industry compared with the electrification paths. However, it is still unknown whether the PTL technology could be adopted and contributed to reaching carbon neutrality in China's transportation sector. Against this, a novel model of the liquid fuel supply system considering multiple low-emission technologies, including PTL, is constructed to evaluate PTL's potential contribution and cost to the carbon-neutral target of China's transportation sector. Results show the following: First, PTL can achieve a maximum 93% carbon emission reduction compared with oil to liquid (OTL). Second, the most cost-effective deployment strategy for PTL is to increase the total cost by 5–10%. Third, international oil prices and technology-learning effects have significant impacts on the diffusion of PTL. Fourth, PTL can be a supplementary solution to achieve net-zero emissions in the transportation sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhao, Jinyang & Yu, Yadong & Ren, Hongtao & Makowski, Marek & Granat, Janusz & Nahorski, Zbigniew & Ma, Tieju, 2022. "How the power-to-liquid technology can contribute to reaching carbon neutrality of the China's transportation sector?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PA).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:261:y:2022:i:pa:s0360544222019533
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.125058
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544222019533
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2022.125058?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexandre Milovanoff & I. Daniel Posen & Heather L. MacLean, 2020. "Electrification of light-duty vehicle fleet alone will not meet mitigation targets," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 10(12), pages 1102-1107, December.
    2. Ruffini, Eleonora & Wei, Max, 2018. "Future costs of fuel cell electric vehicles in California using a learning rate approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 329-341.
    3. Zhou, Wenji & Zhu, Bing & Chen, Dingjiang & Zhao, Fangxian & Fei, Weiyang, 2011. "Technoeconomic assessment of China’s indirect coal liquefaction projects with different CO2 capture alternatives," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 6559-6566.
    4. Dimitriou, Ioanna & Goldingay, Harry & Bridgwater, Anthony V., 2018. "Techno-economic and uncertainty analysis of Biomass to Liquid (BTL) systems for transport fuel production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 160-175.
    5. König, Daniel H. & Baucks, Nadine & Dietrich, Ralph-Uwe & Wörner, Antje, 2015. "Simulation and evaluation of a process concept for the generation of synthetic fuel from CO2 and H2," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 833-841.
    6. Lim, Chansu & Lee, Jongsu, 2020. "An analysis of the efficiency of the oil refining industry in the OECD countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    7. Zhou, Li & Duan, Maosheng & Yu, Yadong & Zhang, Xiliang, 2018. "Learning rates and cost reduction potential of indirect coal-to-liquid technology coupled with CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 21-32.
    8. Newbery, David, 2018. "Evaluating the case for supporting renewable electricity," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 684-696.
    9. Zhang, Yaru & Ma, Tieju & Guo, Fei, 2018. "A multi-regional energy transport and structure model for China’s electricity system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 907-919.
    10. Guo, Meiyu & Xu, Yuan, 2018. "Coal-to-liquids projects in China under water and carbon constraints," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 58-65.
    11. Li, Xi & Yu, Biying, 2019. "Peaking CO2 emissions for China's urban passenger transport sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    12. Xu, Zhongming & Fang, Chenhao & Ma, Tieju, 2020. "Analysis of China’s olefin industry using a system optimization model considering technological learning and energy consumption reduction," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    13. Peng, Tianduo & Ou, Xunmin & Yuan, Zhiyi & Yan, Xiaoyu & Zhang, Xiliang, 2018. "Development and application of China provincial road transport energy demand and GHG emissions analysis model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 313-328.
    14. Yu, Yang & Li, Shuangqi & Sun, Huaping & Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad, 2021. "Energy carbon emission reduction of China’s transportation sector: An input–output approach," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 378-393.
    15. McDonald, Alan & Schrattenholzer, Leo, 2001. "Learning rates for energy technologies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 255-261, March.
    16. Becker, W.L. & Braun, R.J. & Penev, M. & Melaina, M., 2012. "Production of Fischer–Tropsch liquid fuels from high temperature solid oxide co-electrolysis units," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 99-115.
    17. Run-Ping Ye & Jie Ding & Weibo Gong & Morris D. Argyle & Qin Zhong & Yujun Wang & Christopher K. Russell & Zhenghe Xu & Armistead G. Russell & Qiaohong Li & Maohong Fan & Yuan-Gen Yao, 2019. "CO2 hydrogenation to high-value products via heterogeneous catalysis," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, December.
    18. Tieju Ma, 2010. "Coping with Uncertainties in Technological Learning," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(1), pages 192-201, January.
    19. Yan, Dan & Liu, Litao & Li, Jinkai & Wu, Jiaqian & Qin, Wei & Werners, Saskia E., 2021. "Are the planning targets of liquid biofuel development achievable in China under climate change?," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    20. Zhou, Huairong & Yang, Siyu & Xiao, Honghua & Yang, Qingchun & Qian, Yu & Gao, Li, 2016. "Modeling and techno-economic analysis of shale-to-liquid and coal-to-liquid fuels processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 201-210.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ding, Bingqing & Makowski, Marek & Nahorski, Zbigniew & Ren, Hongtao & Ma, Tieju, 2022. "Optimizing the technology pathway of China's liquid fuel production considering uncertain oil prices: A robust programming model," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    2. Qin, Shiyue & Wang, Ming & Cui, Hongyou & Li, Zhihe & Yi, Weiming, 2022. "Opportunities for renewable electricity utilization in coal to liquid fuels process: Thermodynamic and techo-economic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    3. Bu, Chujie & Cui, Xueqin & Li, Ruiyao & Li, Jin & Zhang, Yaxin & Wang, Can & Cai, Wenjia, 2021. "Achieving net-zero emissions in China’s passenger transport sector through regionally tailored mitigation strategies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    4. Chen, Huayi & Ma, Tieju, 2017. "Optimizing systematic technology adoption with heterogeneous agents," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(1), pages 287-296.
    5. Chen, Huayi & Ma, Tieju, 2021. "Technology adoption and carbon emissions with dynamic trading among heterogeneous agents," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    6. Lester, Mason Scott & Bramstoft, Rasmus & Münster, Marie, 2020. "Analysis on Electrofuels in Future Energy Systems: A 2050 Case Study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    7. Qin, Shiyue & Chang, Shiyan & Yao, Qiang, 2018. "Modeling, thermodynamic and techno-economic analysis of coal-to-liquids process with different entrained flow coal gasifiers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 413-432.
    8. Ma, Tieju & Chen, Huayi, 2015. "Adoption of an emerging infrastructure with uncertain technological learning and spatial reconfiguration," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(3), pages 995-1003.
    9. Brynolf, Selma & Taljegard, Maria & Grahn, Maria & Hansson, Julia, 2018. "Electrofuels for the transport sector: A review of production costs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 1887-1905.
    10. Zakerinia, Saleh, 2018. "Understanding the Role of Transportation in Meeting California’s Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Target: A Focus on Technology Forcing Policies, Interactions with the Electric Sector and Mitigation," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt0r69m651, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    11. Thomassen, Gwenny & Van Passel, Steven & Dewulf, Jo, 2020. "A review on learning effects in prospective technology assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    12. Gao, Ruxing & Zhang, Leiyu & Wang, Lei & Zhang, Chundong & Jun, Ki-Won & Kim, Seok Ki & Park, Hae-Gu & Gao, Ying & Zhu, Yuezhao & Wan, Hui & Guan, Guofeng & Zhao, Tiansheng, 2022. "Efficient production of renewable hydrocarbon fuels using waste CO2 and green H2 by integrating Fe-based Fischer-Tropsch synthesis and olefin oligomerization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    13. Chen, Huayi & Ma, Tieju, 2014. "Technology adoption with limited foresight and uncertain technological learning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(1), pages 266-275.
    14. Zhou, Li & Duan, Maosheng & Yu, Yadong & Zhang, Xiliang, 2018. "Learning rates and cost reduction potential of indirect coal-to-liquid technology coupled with CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 21-32.
    15. Zhou, Wenji & Zhu, Bing & Chen, Dingjiang & Zhao, Fangxian & Fei, Weiyang, 2014. "How policy choice affects investment in low-carbon technology: The case of CO2 capture in indirect coal liquefaction in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 670-679.
    16. Yang, Qingchun & Yang, Qing & Xu, Simin & Zhang, Dawei & Liu, Chengling & Zhou, Huairong, 2021. "Optimal design, exergy and economic analyses of coal-to-ethylene glycol process coupling different shale gas reforming technologies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    17. Chi, Chunjie & Ma, Tieju & Zhu, Bing, 2012. "Towards a low-carbon economy: Coping with technological bifurcations with a carbon tax," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 2081-2088.
    18. Zhang, Yueling & Li, Junjie & Yang, Xiaoxiao, 2021. "Comprehensive competitiveness assessment of four coal-to-liquid routes and conventional oil refining route in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    19. Estefania Vega Puga & Gkiokchan Moumin & Nicole Carina Neumann & Martin Roeb & Armin Ardone & Christian Sattler, 2022. "Holistic View on Synthetic Natural Gas Production: A Technical, Economic and Environmental Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-27, February.
    20. Xiao, Jin & Li, Guohao & Xie, Ling & Wang, Shouyang & Yu, Lean, 2021. "Decarbonizing China's power sector by 2030 with consideration of technological progress and cross-regional power transmission," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:261:y:2022:i:pa:s0360544222019533. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.