IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v244y2022ipbs0360544221032606.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Distribution network reconfiguration with distributed generation based on parallel slime mould algorithm

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Hong-Jiang
  • Pan, Jeng-Shyang
  • Nguyen, Trong-The
  • Weng, Shaowei

Abstract

This paper proposes a solution for the distribution network reconfiguration (DNR) problem with distributed generation (DG) based on the parallel slime mould algorithm (PSMA). Firstly, we construct the four optimization objectives of active power loss, voltage stability index, load balance degree, and switching operation times are integrated by the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the DNR problem models with different DG types. Next, we propose PSMA based on the grouping communication strategy and inertia weight; we verify the performance of PSMA by testing a CEC2014 test suite. Finally, we apply the PSMA for the six types of DG of the IEEE-33 bus distribution network as the case study; the outcomes are compared with the other four algorithms. Experimental results show that the PSMA can solve the DNR problem with DG more accurately and quickly than the other three algorithms. At the same time, the results show that the type and access location of DG will affect the DNR problem in different degrees.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Hong-Jiang & Pan, Jeng-Shyang & Nguyen, Trong-The & Weng, Shaowei, 2022. "Distribution network reconfiguration with distributed generation based on parallel slime mould algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PB).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:244:y:2022:i:pb:s0360544221032606
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.123011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544221032606
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2021.123011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jayabarathi, T. & Raghunathan, T. & Adarsh, B.R. & Suganthan, Ponnuthurai Nagaratnam, 2016. "Economic dispatch using hybrid grey wolf optimizer," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 630-641.
    2. Pan, Jeng-Shyang & Hu, Pei & Chu, Shu-Chuan, 2021. "Binary fish migration optimization for solving unit commitment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    3. Azizivahed, Ali & Narimani, Hossein & Fathi, Mehdi & Naderi, Ehsan & Safarpour, Hamid Reza & Narimani, Mohammad Rasoul, 2018. "Multi-objective dynamic distribution feeder reconfiguration in automated distribution systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 896-914.
    4. Badran, Ola & Mekhilef, Saad & Mokhlis, Hazlie & Dahalan, Wardiah, 2017. "Optimal reconfiguration of distribution system connected with distributed generations: A review of different methodologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 854-867.
    5. Anand, Himanshu & Narang, Nitin & Dhillon, J.S., 2019. "Multi-objective combined heat and power unit commitment using particle swarm optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 794-807.
    6. Vaidya, Omkarprasad S. & Kumar, Sushil, 2006. "Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(1), pages 1-29, February.
    7. Bogdan Tomoiagă & Mircea Chindriş & Andreas Sumper & Antoni Sudria-Andreu & Roberto Villafafila-Robles, 2013. "Pareto Optimal Reconfiguration of Power Distribution Systems Using a Genetic Algorithm Based on NSGA-II," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-17, March.
    8. Santos, Sérgio F. & Fitiwi, Desta Z. & Cruz, Marco R.M. & Cabrita, Carlos M.P. & Catalão, João P.S., 2017. "Impacts of optimal energy storage deployment and network reconfiguration on renewable integration level in distribution systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P1), pages 44-55.
    9. Jeng-Shyang Pan & Pei-Cheng Song & Shu-Chuan Chu & Yan-Jun Peng, 2020. "Improved Compact Cuckoo Search Algorithm Applied to Location of Drone Logistics Hub," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-19, March.
    10. Sultana, U. & Khairuddin, Azhar B. & Mokhtar, A.S. & Zareen, N. & Sultana, Beenish, 2016. "Grey wolf optimizer based placement and sizing of multiple distributed generation in the distribution system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 525-536.
    11. Li, Chaoshun & Wang, Wenxiao & Wang, Jinwen & Chen, Deshu, 2019. "Network-constrained unit commitment with RE uncertainty and PHES by using a binary artificial sheep algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    12. Azad-Farsani, Ehsan & Sardou, Iman Goroohi & Abedini, Saeed, 2021. "Distribution Network Reconfiguration based on LMP at DG connected busses using game theory and self-adaptive FWA," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(PB).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, J.Y. & Chen, J.J. & Wang, Y.X. & Chen, W.G., 2024. "Combining multi-step reconfiguration with many-objective reduction as iterative bi-level scheduling for stochastic distribution network," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhu, Xiaodong & Zhao, Shihao & Yang, Zhile & Zhang, Ning & Xu, Xinzhi, 2022. "A parallel meta-heuristic method for solving large scale unit commitment considering the integration of new energy sectors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PC).
    2. Pan, Jeng-Shyang & Hu, Pei & Chu, Shu-Chuan, 2021. "Binary fish migration optimization for solving unit commitment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    3. Aml Sayed & Mohamed Ebeed & Ziad M. Ali & Adel Bedair Abdel-Rahman & Mahrous Ahmed & Shady H. E. Abdel Aleem & Adel El-Shahat & Mahmoud Rihan, 2021. "A Hybrid Optimization Algorithm for Solving of the Unit Commitment Problem Considering Uncertainty of the Load Demand," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-21, November.
    4. Mukhopadhyay, Bineeta & Das, Debapriya, 2020. "Multi-objective dynamic and static reconfiguration with optimized allocation of PV-DG and battery energy storage system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    5. Papadimitrakis, M. & Giamarelos, N. & Stogiannos, M. & Zois, E.N. & Livanos, N.A.-I. & Alexandridis, A., 2021. "Metaheuristic search in smart grid: A review with emphasis on planning, scheduling and power flow optimization applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    6. Salil Madhav Dubey & Hari Mohan Dubey & Surender Reddy Salkuti, 2022. "Modified Quasi-Opposition-Based Grey Wolf Optimization for Mathematical and Electrical Benchmark Problems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-29, August.
    7. Nina Almasifar & Tülay Özdemir Canbolat & Milad Akhavan & Roberto Alonso González-Lezcano, 2021. "Proposing a New Methodology for Monument Conservation “SCOPE MANAGEMENT” by the Use of an Analytic Hierarchy Process Project Management Institute System and the ICOMOS Burra Charter," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-13, November.
    8. Razavi, Seyed-Ehsan & Rahimi, Ehsan & Javadi, Mohammad Sadegh & Nezhad, Ali Esmaeel & Lotfi, Mohamed & Shafie-khah, Miadreza & Catalão, João P.S., 2019. "Impact of distributed generation on protection and voltage regulation of distribution systems: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 157-167.
    9. Sushil, 2019. "Efficient interpretive ranking process incorporating implicit and transitive dominance relationships," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 1489-1516, December.
    10. Wang, Ying-Ming & Elhag, Taha M.S., 2007. "A goal programming method for obtaining interval weights from an interval comparison matrix," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(1), pages 458-471, February.
    11. Madjid Tavana & Mariya Sodenkamp & Leena Suhl, 2010. "A soft multi-criteria decision analysis model with application to the European Union enlargement," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 393-421, December.
    12. Lim, Chulmin & Rowsell, Joe & Kim, Seongcheol, 2023. "Exploring the killer domains to create new value: A Comparative case study of Canadian and Korean telcos," 32nd European Regional ITS Conference, Madrid 2023: Realising the digital decade in the European Union – Easier said than done? 277998, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    13. Wenshuai Wu & Gang Kou, 2016. "A group consensus model for evaluating real estate investment alternatives," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 2(1), pages 1-10, December.
    14. Rubio-Aliaga, Alvaro & García-Cascales, M. Socorro & Sánchez-Lozano, Juan Miguel & Molina-Garcia, Angel, 2021. "MCDM-based multidimensional approach for selection of optimal groundwater pumping systems: Design and case example," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 213-224.
    15. Sheng, Wanxing & Li, Rui & Yan, Tao & Tseng, Ming-Lang & Lou, Jiale & Li, Lingling, 2023. "A hybrid dynamic economics emissions dispatch model: Distributed renewable power systems based on improved COOT optimization algorithm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 493-506.
    16. Zhu, Bin & Xu, Zeshui, 2014. "Stochastic preference analysis in numerical preference relations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(2), pages 628-633.
    17. Wang, Ying-Ming & Luo, Ying & Hua, Zhongsheng, 2008. "On the extent analysis method for fuzzy AHP and its applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(2), pages 735-747, April.
    18. Jing Xu & Ren Zhang & Yangjun Wang & Hengqian Yan & Quanhong Liu & Yutong Guo & Yongcun Ren, 2022. "A New Framework for Assessment of Offshore Wind Farm Location," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-17, September.
    19. M Tavana & M A Sodenkamp, 2010. "A fuzzy multi-criteria decision analysis model for advanced technology assessment at Kennedy Space Center," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(10), pages 1459-1470, October.
    20. Shiyao Zhu & Dezhi Li & Haibo Feng & Tiantian Gu & Jiawei Zhu, 2019. "AHP-TOPSIS-Based Evaluation of the Relative Performance of Multiple Neighborhood Renewal Projects: A Case Study in Nanjing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-17, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:244:y:2022:i:pb:s0360544221032606. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.