IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v189y2019ics0360544219318985.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Network-constrained unit commitment with RE uncertainty and PHES by using a binary artificial sheep algorithm

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Chaoshun
  • Wang, Wenxiao
  • Wang, Jinwen
  • Chen, Deshu

Abstract

With increasing share of renewable energy (RE) in power system, the unit commitment of hybrid power system have become more complicated due to network security demand and integration of pumped hydro energy storage (PHES). In this paper, a network-constrained unit commitment (NCUC) problem considering RE uncertainty and modulation of PHES has been raised. The NCUC model, with AC network security constraints and environmental constraints as well as traditional terms of constraints, is complicated to be solved. A novel Binary Artificial Sheep Algorithm (BASA) is used to solve the NCUC model. In the frame of BASA, the NCUC problem is decomposed as a master UC problem to determine start/stop status and economic load dispatch and a sub problem to check the AC network constraints. Based on the NCUC model and the solving method, the joint impacts of RE uncertainty and PHES have been studied. Test systems with different size have been adopted to verify the feasibility and effectiveness of the BASA. It is seen that the BASA has achieve an overall competitive performance on terms of operation cost and convergence speed by comparing it with existing methods. A modified IEEE 30-bus system with wind and photovoltaic power stations has been designed to reveal the impacts of RE and PHES. The results demonstrate that uncertainty of RE affects operation cost and security of the hybrid power system, and the adverse impact would aggravate as the RE forecasting error increase. The results also confirm the significant effect of PHES in restraining the negative influence of RE uncertainty.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Chaoshun & Wang, Wenxiao & Wang, Jinwen & Chen, Deshu, 2019. "Network-constrained unit commitment with RE uncertainty and PHES by using a binary artificial sheep algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:189:y:2019:i:c:s0360544219318985
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.116203
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544219318985
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116203?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, J. & Botterud, A. & Bessa, R. & Keko, H. & Carvalho, L. & Issicaba, D. & Sumaili, J. & Miranda, V., 2011. "Wind power forecasting uncertainty and unit commitment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(11), pages 4014-4023.
    2. Wang, Bo & Wang, Shuming & Zhou, Xianzhong & Watada, Junzo, 2016. "Multi-objective unit commitment with wind penetration and emission concerns under stochastic and fuzzy uncertainties," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 18-31.
    3. Quan, Hao & Srinivasan, Dipti & Khosravi, Abbas, 2016. "Integration of renewable generation uncertainties into stochastic unit commitment considering reserve and risk: A comparative study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 735-745.
    4. Anthony Papavasiliou & Shmuel S. Oren, 2013. "Multiarea Stochastic Unit Commitment for High Wind Penetration in a Transmission Constrained Network," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(3), pages 578-592, June.
    5. Lai, Xinjie & Li, Chaoshun & Zhou, Jianzhong & Zhang, Nan, 2019. "Multi-objective optimization of the closure law of guide vanes for pumped storage units," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 302-312.
    6. Ji, Bin & Yuan, Xiaohui & Chen, Zhihuan & Tian, Hao, 2014. "Improved gravitational search algorithm for unit commitment considering uncertainty of wind power," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 52-62.
    7. Li, Chaoshun & Wang, Wenxiao & Chen, Deshu, 2019. "Multi-objective complementary scheduling of hydro-thermal-RE power system via a multi-objective hybrid grey wolf optimizer," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 241-255.
    8. Nazari, M.E. & Ardehali, M.M. & Jafari, S., 2010. "Pumped-storage unit commitment with considerations for energy demand, economics, and environmental constraints," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(10), pages 4092-4101.
    9. Wang, Wenxiao & Li, Chaoshun & Liao, Xiang & Qin, Hui, 2017. "Study on unit commitment problem considering pumped storage and renewable energy via a novel binary artificial sheep algorithm," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 612-626.
    10. Tuohy, A. & O'Malley, M., 2011. "Pumped storage in systems with very high wind penetration," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 1965-1974, April.
    11. Bai, Yang & Zhong, Haiwang & Xia, Qing & Kang, Chongqing & Xie, Le, 2015. "A decomposition method for network-constrained unit commitment with AC power flow constraints," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 595-603.
    12. PAPAVASILIOU, Anthony & OREN, Schmuel S., 2013. "Multiarea stochastic unit commitment for high wind penetration in a transmission constrained network," LIDAM Reprints CORE 2500, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    13. Foley, A.M. & Leahy, P.G. & Li, K. & McKeogh, E.J. & Morrison, A.P., 2015. "A long-term analysis of pumped hydro storage to firm wind power," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 638-648.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang, Heng & Hu, Xiao & Cheng, Haozhong & Zhang, Shenxi & Hong, Shaoyun & Gu, Qingfa, 2021. "Coordinated scheduling of generators and tie lines in multi-area power systems under wind energy uncertainty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    2. Wang, Hong-Jiang & Pan, Jeng-Shyang & Nguyen, Trong-The & Weng, Shaowei, 2022. "Distribution network reconfiguration with distributed generation based on parallel slime mould algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PB).
    3. Zhu, Xiaodong & Zhao, Shihao & Yang, Zhile & Zhang, Ning & Xu, Xinzhi, 2022. "A parallel meta-heuristic method for solving large scale unit commitment considering the integration of new energy sectors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PC).
    4. Pan, Jeng-Shyang & Hu, Pei & Chu, Shu-Chuan, 2021. "Binary fish migration optimization for solving unit commitment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    5. Dong, Jizhe & Han, Shunjie & Shao, Xiangxin & Tang, Like & Chen, Renhui & Wu, Longfei & Zheng, Cunlong & Li, Zonghao & Li, Haolin, 2021. "Day-ahead wind-thermal unit commitment considering historical virtual wind power data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Wenxiao & Li, Chaoshun & Liao, Xiang & Qin, Hui, 2017. "Study on unit commitment problem considering pumped storage and renewable energy via a novel binary artificial sheep algorithm," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 612-626.
    2. Fattahi, Salar & Ashraphijuo, Morteza & Lavaei, Javad & Atamtürk, Alper, 2017. "Conic relaxations of the unit commitment problem," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 1079-1095.
    3. Pérez-Díaz, Juan I. & Jiménez, Javier, 2016. "Contribution of a pumped-storage hydropower plant to reduce the scheduling costs of an isolated power system with high wind power penetration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 92-104.
    4. Wang, Bo & Wang, Shuming & Zhou, Xianzhong & Watada, Junzo, 2016. "Multi-objective unit commitment with wind penetration and emission concerns under stochastic and fuzzy uncertainties," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 18-31.
    5. Chen, J.J. & Wu, Q.H. & Zhang, L.L. & Wu, P.Z., 2017. "Multi-objective mean–variance–skewness model for nonconvex and stochastic optimal power flow considering wind power and load uncertainties," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 263(2), pages 719-732.
    6. Jan Abrell & Friedrich Kunz, 2015. "Integrating Intermittent Renewable Wind Generation - A Stochastic Multi-Market Electricity Model for the European Electricity Market," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 117-147, March.
    7. Conor Sweeney & Ricardo J. Bessa & Jethro Browell & Pierre Pinson, 2020. "The future of forecasting for renewable energy," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(2), March.
    8. Waite, Michael & Modi, Vijay, 2016. "Modeling wind power curtailment with increased capacity in a regional electricity grid supplying a dense urban demand," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 299-317.
    9. Dong, Jizhe & Li, Yuanhan & Zuo, Shi & Wu, Xiaomei & Zhang, Zuyao & Du, Jiang, 2023. "An intraperiod arbitrary ramping-rate changing model in unit commitment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    10. Sharifzadeh, Mahdi & Lubiano-Walochik, Helena & Shah, Nilay, 2017. "Integrated renewable electricity generation considering uncertainties: The UK roadmap to 50% power generation from wind and solar energies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 385-398.
    11. Doubleday, Kate & Lara, José Daniel & Hodge, Bri-Mathias, 2022. "Investigation of stochastic unit commitment to enable advanced flexibility measures for high shares of solar PV," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    12. Liu, Guangbiao & Zhou, Jianzhong & Jia, Benjun & He, Feifei & Yang, Yuqi & Sun, Na, 2019. "Advance short-term wind energy quality assessment based on instantaneous standard deviation and variogram of wind speed by a hybrid method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 643-667.
    13. Faezeh Akhavizadegan & Lizhi Wang & James McCalley, 2020. "Scenario Selection for Iterative Stochastic Transmission Expansion Planning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, March.
    14. Toufani, Parinaz & Nadar, Emre & Kocaman, Ayse Selin, 2022. "Short-term assessment of pumped hydro energy storage configurations: Up, down, or closed?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(P1), pages 1086-1095.
    15. Noori, Ehsan & Khazaei, Ehsan & Tavaro, Mehdi & Bardideh, Farhad, 2019. "Economically Operation of Power Utilities Base on MILP Approach," MPRA Paper 95910, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Howard, B. & Waite, M. & Modi, V., 2017. "Current and near-term GHG emissions factors from electricity production for New York State and New York City," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 255-271.
    17. Hain, Martin & Kargus, Tobias & Schermeyer, Hans & Uhrig-Homburg, Marliese & Fichtner, Wolf, 2022. "An electricity price modeling framework for renewable-dominant markets," Working Paper Series in Production and Energy 66, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute for Industrial Production (IIP).
    18. Munoz, Francisco D. & Pumarino, Bruno J. & Salas, Ignacio A., 2017. "Aiming low and achieving it: A long-term analysis of a renewable policy in Chile," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 304-314.
    19. Le Cadre, Hélène & Mezghani, Ilyès & Papavasiliou, Anthony, 2019. "A game-theoretic analysis of transmission-distribution system operator coordination," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(1), pages 317-339.
    20. De Vos, K. & Stevens, N. & Devolder, O. & Papavasiliou, A. & Hebb, B. & Matthys-Donnadieu, J., 2019. "Dynamic dimensioning approach for operating reserves: Proof of concept in Belgium," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 272-285.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:189:y:2019:i:c:s0360544219318985. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.