IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v197y2020ics0360544220302693.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design and evaluation of a novel multi-generation system based on SOFC-GT for electricity, fresh water and hydrogen production

Author

Listed:
  • Chitgar, Nazanin
  • Moghimi, Mahdi

Abstract

A novel integrated system is proposed based on solid oxide fuel cell-gas turbine (SOFC-GT) for the simultaneous production of electricity, fresh water and hydrogen. Through a parametric study, the influences of major decision variables on the performance of the system are studied. The energy, exergy and exergoeconomic analysis are conducted. Then, the system is optimized by using the genetic algorithm by taking into account the exergy efficiency, fresh water production rate, hydrogen production rate, and total unit cost of the products as objective functions in three separate optimization problems. Considering the exergy efficiency and total unit cost of the products as the objective functions, the obtained values are 54.2% and 34.5 $/GJ at the optimal point, respectively. Regarding the fresh water production rate and total unit cost of the products as the objective functions, their values at the optimal point are 90.1 m3/h and 32.9 $/GJ, respectively. In the case of considering the hydrogen production rate and total unit cost of the product as the objective functions, their values at the optimal point are 11.6 kg/h and 32.8 $/GJ, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Chitgar, Nazanin & Moghimi, Mahdi, 2020. "Design and evaluation of a novel multi-generation system based on SOFC-GT for electricity, fresh water and hydrogen production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:197:y:2020:i:c:s0360544220302693
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117162
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544220302693
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117162?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Khani, Leyla & Mahmoudi, S. Mohammad S. & Chitsaz, Ata & Rosen, Marc A., 2016. "Energy and exergoeconomic evaluation of a new power/cooling cogeneration system based on a solid oxide fuel cell," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 64-77.
    2. Calise, F. & Dentice d’Accadia, M. & Palombo, A. & Vanoli, L., 2006. "Simulation and exergy analysis of a hybrid Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC)–Gas Turbine System," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(15), pages 3278-3299.
    3. Hosseinpour, Javad & Chitsaz, Ata & Eisavi, Beneta & Yari, Mortaza, 2018. "Investigation on performance of an integrated SOFC-Goswami system using wood gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 614-628.
    4. Yari, Mortaza, 2010. "Exergetic analysis of various types of geothermal power plants," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 112-121.
    5. Sadeghi, Mohsen & Chitsaz, Ata & Mahmoudi, S.M.S. & Rosen, Marc A., 2015. "Thermoeconomic optimization using an evolutionary algorithm of a trigeneration system driven by a solid oxide fuel cell," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 191-204.
    6. Emadi, Mohammad Ali & Chitgar, Nazanin & Oyewunmi, Oyeniyi A. & Markides, Christos N., 2020. "Working-fluid selection and thermoeconomic optimisation of a combined cycle cogeneration dual-loop organic Rankine cycle (ORC) system for solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) waste-heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    7. Lazzaretto, Andrea & Tsatsaronis, George, 2006. "SPECO: A systematic and general methodology for calculating efficiencies and costs in thermal systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(8), pages 1257-1289.
    8. El-Emam, Rami Salah & Dincer, Ibrahim, 2014. "Thermodynamic and thermoeconomic analyses of seawater reverse osmosis desalination plant with energy recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 154-163.
    9. Akrami, Ehsan & Chitsaz, Ata & Nami, Hossein & Mahmoudi, S.M.S., 2017. "Energetic and exergoeconomic assessment of a multi-generation energy system based on indirect use of geothermal energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 625-639.
    10. Yang, Xiaoyu & Zhao, Hongbin, 2019. "Thermodynamic performance study of the SOFC-STIG distributed energy system fueled by LNG with CO2 recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    11. Shayan, E. & Zare, V. & Mirzaee, I., 2019. "On the use of different gasification agents in a biomass fueled SOFC by integrated gasifier: A comparative exergo-economic evaluation and optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 1126-1138.
    12. Beyrami, Javid & Chitsaz, Ata & Parham, Kiyan & Arild, Øystein, 2019. "Optimum performance of a single effect desalination unit integrated with a SOFC system by multi-objective thermo-economic optimization based on genetic algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    13. sattari sadat, Seyed mohammad & Mirabdolah Lavasani, Arash & Ghaebi, Hadi, 2019. "Economic and thermodynamic evaluation of a new solid oxide fuel cell based polygeneration system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 515-533.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roy, Dibyendu & Samanta, Samiran & Ghosh, Sudip, 2020. "Performance assessment of a biomass fuelled advanced hybrid power generation system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 639-661.
    2. Abdolalipouradl, Mehran & Mohammadkhani, Farzad & Khalilarya, Shahram, 2020. "A comparative analysis of novel combined flash-binary cycles for Sabalan geothermal wells: Thermodynamic and exergoeconomic viewpoints," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    3. Fathy, Ahmed & Rezk, Hegazy & Mohamed Ramadan, Haitham Saad, 2020. "Recent moth-flame optimizer for enhanced solid oxide fuel cell output power via optimal parameters extraction process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    4. Soleymani, Elahe & Ghavami Gargari, Saeed & Ghaebi, Hadi, 2021. "Thermodynamic and thermoeconomic analysis of a novel power and hydrogen cogeneration cycle based on solid SOFC," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 495-518.
    5. Shamoushaki, Moein & Ehyaei, M.A. & Ghanatir, Farrokh, 2017. "Exergy, economic and environmental analysis and multi-objective optimization of a SOFC-GT power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 515-531.
    6. Mahmoudan, Alireza & Samadof, Parviz & Hosseinzadeh, Siamak & Garcia, Davide Astiaso, 2021. "A multigeneration cascade system using ground-source energy with cold recovery: 3E analyses and multi-objective optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    7. Mohammadkhani, F. & Shokati, N. & Mahmoudi, S.M.S. & Yari, M. & Rosen, M.A., 2014. "Exergoeconomic assessment and parametric study of a Gas Turbine-Modular Helium Reactor combined with two Organic Rankine Cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 533-543.
    8. Zhao, Lu & Hai, Qing & Mei, Junlun, 2024. "An integrated approach to green power, cooling, and freshwater production from geothermal and solar energy sources; case study of Jiangsu, China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    9. Crivellari, Anna & Cozzani, Valerio & Dincer, Ibrahim, 2019. "Exergetic and exergoeconomic analyses of novel methanol synthesis processes driven by offshore renewable energies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    10. S. Mohammad S. Mahmoudi & Sina Salehi & Mortaza Yari & Marc A. Rosen, 2017. "Exergoeconomic Performance Comparison and Optimization of Single-Stage Absorption Heat Transformers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-28, April.
    11. Hashemian, Nasim & Noorpoor, Alireza, 2022. "A geothermal-biomass powered multi-generation plant with freshwater and hydrogen generation options: Thermo-economic-environmental appraisals and multi-criteria optimization," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 254-266.
    12. Seyam, Shaimaa & Dincer, Ibrahim & Agelin-Chaab, Martin, 2024. "Optimization and comparative evaluation of novel marine engines integrated with fuel cells using sustainable fuel choices," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    13. Blanco-Marigorta, A.M. & Lozano-Medina, A. & Marcos, J.D., 2017. "A critical review of definitions for exergetic efficiency in reverse osmosis desalination plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 752-760.
    14. Zhang, Shaozhi & Luo, Jielin & Xu, Yiyang & Chen, Guangming & Wang, Qin, 2021. "Thermodynamic analysis of a combined cycle of ammonia-based battery and absorption refrigerator," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    15. Behzadi, Amirmohammad & Gholamian, Ehsan & Houshfar, Ehsan & Habibollahzade, Ali, 2018. "Multi-objective optimization and exergoeconomic analysis of waste heat recovery from Tehran's waste-to-energy plant integrated with an ORC unit," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 1055-1068.
    16. Shokati, Naser & Ranjbar, Faramarz & Yari, Mortaza, 2015. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of basic, dual-pressure and dual-fluid ORCs and Kalina geothermal power plants: A comparative study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 527-542.
    17. Moein Shamoushaki & Giampaolo Manfrida & Lorenzo Talluri & Pouriya H. Niknam & Daniele Fiaschi, 2021. "Different Geothermal Power Cycle Configurations Cost Estimation Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-19, October.
    18. Ouyang, Tiancheng & Zhang, Mingliang & Qin, Peijia & Liu, Wenjun & Shi, Xiaomin, 2022. "Converting waste into electric energy and carbon fixation through biosyngas-fueled SOFC hybrid system: A simulation study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 725-743.
    19. Zhang, Ji & Wu, Ding & Huang, Xiaohui & Hu, Xudong & Fang, Xi & Wen, Chuang, 2024. "Comparative study on the organic rankine cycle off-design performance under different zeotropic mixture flow boiling correlations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    20. Lee, Inkyu & Tester, Jefferson William & You, Fengqi, 2019. "Systems analysis, design, and optimization of geothermal energy systems for power production and polygeneration: State-of-the-art and future challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 551-577.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:197:y:2020:i:c:s0360544220302693. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.