IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v113y2016icp76-84.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cow's urine as a yellow gold for bioelectricity generation in low cost clayware microbial fuel cell

Author

Listed:
  • Jadhav, Dipak A.
  • Jain, Sumat C.
  • Ghangrekar, Makarand M.

Abstract

Treatment of cow's urine was first time explored in clayware microbial fuel cell (MFC) by varying dilution to have different chemical oxygen demand (COD) in the feed. Improvement in power output of MFC was attained with increase in feed concentration from 1.5 to 3 kg COD/m3; however further increase in influent COD up to 30 kg COD/m3 decreased the power. Maximum power of 5.23 W/m3 was attained in MFC fed with diluted urine of cow with COD concentration of 3 kg COD/m3, which was seven-fold higher than MFC fed with raw urine. Nitrate removal of 77± 4.1% and carbohydrate removal of 80± 3.9% were achieved in MFC fed with 3 kg COD/m3. Electrochemical analysis showed that electrogenic activity of anodic biofilm boosted at optimum feed concentration (3 kg COD/m3) of cow's urine in anodic chamber. Using two MFCs, fed with diluted cow's urine, maximum voltage of 1.36 ± 0.05 V in series connection and maximum current of 48 A/m3 in parallel connection were achieved. Thus, cow's urine can serve as sustainable yellow gold to harvest bioelectricity using low cost clayware MFC, and to curb the water pollution likely caused from cattle sheds.

Suggested Citation

  • Jadhav, Dipak A. & Jain, Sumat C. & Ghangrekar, Makarand M., 2016. "Cow's urine as a yellow gold for bioelectricity generation in low cost clayware microbial fuel cell," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 76-84.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:113:y:2016:i:c:p:76-84
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.07.025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544216309495
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2016.07.025?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carton, J.G. & Olabi, A.G., 2010. "Design of experiment study of the parameters that affect performance of three flow plate configurations of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 2796-2806.
    2. Nikhil, G.N. & Venkata Subhash, G. & Yeruva, Dileep Kumar & Venkata Mohan, S., 2015. "Synergistic yield of dual energy forms through biocatalyzed electrofermentation of waste: Stoichiometric analysis of electron and carbon distribution," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 281-291.
    3. Schilirò, T. & Tommasi, T. & Armato, C. & Hidalgo, D. & Traversi, D. & Bocchini, S. & Gilli, G. & Pirri, C.F., 2016. "The study of electrochemically active planktonic microbes in microbial fuel cells in relation to different carbon-based anode materials," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 277-284.
    4. Shewa, Wudneh Ayele & Lalman, Jerald A. & Chaganti, Subba Rao & Heath, Daniel D., 2016. "Electricity production from lignin photocatalytic degradation byproducts," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 774-784.
    5. Kadier, Abudukeremu & Abdeshahian, Peyman & Simayi, Yibadatihan & Ismail, Manal & Hamid, Aidil Abdul & Kalil, Mohd Sahaid, 2015. "Grey relational analysis for comparative assessment of different cathode materials in microbial electrolysis cells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 1556-1562.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maria G. Savvidou & Pavlos K. Pandis & Diomi Mamma & Georgia Sourkouni & Christos Argirusis, 2022. "Organic Waste Substrates for Bioenergy Production via Microbial Fuel Cells: A Key Point Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-53, August.
    2. Magotra, Verjesh Kumar & Kang, T.W. & Kim, D.Y. & Inamdar, Akbar I. & Walke, Pundalik D. & Lee, S.J. & Chavan, Harish S. & Kadam, Avinash A. & Im, Hyunsik & Jeon, H.C., 2022. "Urea fuel cell using cow dung compost soil as a novel biocatalyst for power generation applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).
    3. Gajda, Iwona & Greenman, John & Santoro, Carlo & Serov, Alexey & Melhuish, Chris & Atanassov, Plamen & Ieropoulos, Ioannis A., 2018. "Improved power and long term performance of microbial fuel cell with Fe-N-C catalyst in air-breathing cathode," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 1073-1079.
    4. Cheraghipoor, Marzieh & Mohebbi-Kalhori, Davod & Noroozifar, Meissam & Maghsoodlou, Malek Taher, 2019. "Comparative study of bioelectricity generation in a microbial fuel cell using ceramic membranes made of ceramic powder, Kalporgan's soil, and acid leached Kalporgan's soil," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 368-377.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ortiz-Martínez, V.M. & Salar-García, M.J. & Touati, K. & Hernández-Fernández, F.J. & de los Ríos, A.P. & Belhoucine, F. & Berrabbah, A. Alioua, 2016. "Assessment of spinel-type mixed valence Cu/Co and Ni/Co-based oxides for power production in single-chamber microbial fuel cells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1241-1249.
    2. Parnian, Mohammad Javad & Rowshanzamir, Soosan & Gashoul, Fatemeh, 2017. "Comprehensive investigation of physicochemical and electrochemical properties of sulfonated poly (ether ether ketone) membranes with different degrees of sulfonation for proton exchange membrane fuel ," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 614-628.
    3. Zhang, Zumeng & Ding, Liping & Wang, Chaofan & Dai, Qiyao & Shi, Yin & Zhao, Yujia & Zhu, Yuxuan, 2022. "Do operation and maintenance contracts help photovoltaic poverty alleviation power stations perform better?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    4. Okur, Osman & İyigün Karadağ, Çiğdem & Boyacı San, Fatma Gül & Okumuş, Emin & Behmenyar, Gamze, 2013. "Optimization of parameters for hot-pressing manufacture of membrane electrode assembly for PEM (polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells) fuel cell," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 574-580.
    5. Abdollahzadeh, M. & Ribeirinha, P. & Boaventura, M. & Mendes, A., 2018. "Three-dimensional modeling of PEMFC with contaminated anode fuel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 939-959.
    6. Yuan, Zhenyu & Yang, Jie & Li, Xiaoyang & Wang, Shikai, 2016. "The micro-scale analysis of the micro direct methanol fuel cell," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 10-17.
    7. Okur, Osman & Alper, Erdogan & Almansoori, Ali, 2014. "Optimization of catalyst preparation conditions for direct sodium borohydride fuel cell using response surface methodology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 97-105.
    8. Wang, Junye, 2015. "Theory and practice of flow field designs for fuel cell scaling-up: A critical review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 640-663.
    9. Boyacı San, Fatma Gül & Okur, Osman & İyigün Karadağ, Çiğdem & Isik-Gulsac, Isil & Okumuş, Emin, 2014. "Evaluation of operating conditions on DBFC (direct borohydride fuel cell) performance with PtRu anode catalyst by response surface method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 160-169.
    10. Wang, Hongjian & Cao, Tianyu & Shi, Yixiang & Cai, Ningsheng & Yuan, Wei, 2014. "Liquid antimony anode direct carbon fuel cell fueled with mass-produced de-ash coal," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 555-559.
    11. Perng, Shiang-Wuu & Wu, Horng-Wen & Shih, Gin-Jang, 2015. "Effect of prominent gas diffusion layer (GDL) on non-isothermal transport characteristics and cell performance of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 126-138.
    12. Rahnavard, Aylin & Rowshanzamir, Soosan & Parnian, Mohammad Javad & Amirkhanlou, Gholam Reza, 2015. "The effect of sulfonated poly (ether ether ketone) as the electrode ionomer for self-humidifying nanocomposite proton exchange membrane fuel cells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 746-757.
    13. Yun Kang & Shunxiang Wu & Yuwen Li & Wei Weng, 2017. "New and improved: grey multi-granulation rough sets," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(12), pages 2575-2589, September.
    14. Zhang, Xiuqin & Guo, Juncheng & Chen, Jincan, 2010. "The parametric optimum analysis of a proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell and its load matching," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 5294-5299.
    15. Ercelik, Mustafa & Ismail, Mohammed S. & Ingham, Derek B. & Hughes, Kevin J. & Ma, Lin & Pourkashanian, Mohamed, 2023. "Efficient X-ray CT-based numerical computations of structural and mass transport properties of nickel foam-based GDLs for PEFCs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PB).
    16. Tafaoli-Masoule, M. & Bahrami, A. & Elsayed, E.M., 2014. "Optimum design parameters and operating condition for maximum power of a direct methanol fuel cell using analytical model and genetic algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 643-652.
    17. Awin, Yussef & Dukhan, Nihad, 2019. "Experimental performance assessment of metal-foam flow fields for proton exchange membrane fuel cells," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 1-1.
    18. Alipour Najmi, Ali & Rowshanzamir, Soosan & Parnian, Mohammad Javad, 2016. "Investigation of NaOH concentration effect in injected fuel on the performance of passive direct methanol alkaline fuel cell with modified cation exchange membrane," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 589-599.
    19. Yuan, Zhenyu & Yang, Jie & Zhang, Yufeng & Wang, Shikai & Xu, Tingnian, 2015. "Mass transport optimization in the anode diffusion layer of a micro direct methanol fuel cell," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P1), pages 599-605.
    20. Yang, Shipin & Chellali, Ryad & Lu, Xiaohua & Li, Lijuan & Bo, Cuimei, 2016. "Modeling and optimization for proton exchange membrane fuel cell stack using aging and challenging P systems based optimization algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 569-577.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:113:y:2016:i:c:p:76-84. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.