IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v252y2016i1p39-53.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An iterative approach for reducing the impact of infrastructure maintenance on the performance of railway systems

Author

Listed:
  • Vansteenwegen, Pieter
  • Dewilde, Thijs
  • Burggraeve, Sofie
  • Cattrysse, Dirk

Abstract

Planned infrastructure works reduce the available capacity of a railway system and make it more vulnerable to conflicts and delay propagation. The starting point of this paper is a published timetable that needs to be adapted due to the temporary unavailability of some resources. Since the timetable is in operation, changed arrival or departure times and cancelations have an impact on the passengers who need to adapt their travel behavior. In the light of passenger service, a trade-off is made between these inconveniences and the delays that occur in practice due to the reduced capacity. Taking the robustness of the adapted railway timetable into account is a new approach to rescheduling in case of a planned infrastructure unavailability. In this paper, an algorithm that adjusts the train routing and the train schedule to the planned maintenance interventions and keeps the level of passenger service as high as possible is presented. To avoid large inconveniences, the developed algorithm tries to minimize the number of cancelations. Computational results show that by allowing small modifications to the routing and the timetable, the robustness of the resulting solution can improve by more than 10 percent and only few trains need to be canceled.

Suggested Citation

  • Vansteenwegen, Pieter & Dewilde, Thijs & Burggraeve, Sofie & Cattrysse, Dirk, 2016. "An iterative approach for reducing the impact of infrastructure maintenance on the performance of railway systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(1), pages 39-53.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:252:y:2016:i:1:p:39-53
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.037
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221715011765
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.037?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Louwerse, Ilse & Huisman, Dennis, 2014. "Adjusting a railway timetable in case of partial or complete blockades," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(3), pages 583-593.
    2. Twan Dollevoet & Dennis Huisman & Marie Schmidt & Anita Schöbel, 2012. "Delay Management with Rerouting of Passengers," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(1), pages 74-89, February.
    3. J. I. van Zante--de Fokkert & D. den Hertog & F. J. van den Berg & J. H. M. Verhoeven, 2007. "The Netherlands Schedules Track Maintenance to Improve Track Workers’ Safety," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 37(2), pages 133-142, April.
    4. Carey, Malachy & Crawford, Ivan, 2007. "Scheduling trains on a network of busy complex stations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 159-178, February.
    5. Vansteenwegen, P. & Van Oudheusden, D., 2007. "Decreasing the passenger waiting time for an intercity rail network," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 478-492, May.
    6. Corman, F. & D’Ariano, A. & Pacciarelli, D. & Pranzo, M., 2012. "Optimal inter-area coordination of train rescheduling decisions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 71-88.
    7. Vromans, Michiel J.C.M. & Dekker, Rommert & Kroon, Leo G., 2006. "Reliability and heterogeneity of railway services," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(2), pages 647-665, July.
    8. Nielsen, Lars Kjær & Kroon, Leo & Maróti, Gábor, 2012. "A rolling horizon approach for disruption management of railway rolling stock," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(2), pages 496-509.
    9. Kroon, Leo & Maróti, Gábor & Helmrich, Mathijn Retel & Vromans, Michiel & Dekker, Rommert, 2008. "Stochastic improvement of cyclic railway timetables," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(6), pages 553-570, July.
    10. Törnquist, Johanna & Persson, Jan A., 2007. "N-tracked railway traffic re-scheduling during disturbances," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 342-362, March.
    11. Sels, P. & Vansteenwegen, P. & Dewilde, T. & Cattrysse, D. & Waquet, B. & Joubert, A., 2014. "The train platforming problem: The infrastructure management company perspective," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 55-72.
    12. Corman, Francesco & D'Ariano, Andrea & Pacciarelli, Dario & Pranzo, Marco, 2010. "A tabu search algorithm for rerouting trains during rail operations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 175-192, January.
    13. Carlo Mannino & Alessandro Mascis, 2009. "Optimal Real-Time Traffic Control in Metro Stations," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(4), pages 1026-1039, August.
    14. Wardman, Mark, 2004. "Public transport values of time," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 363-377, October.
    15. Gabrio Caimi & Dan Burkolter & Thomas Herrmann, 2005. "Finding Delay-Tolerant Train Routings through Stations," Operations Research Proceedings, in: Hein Fleuren & Dick Hertog & Peter Kort (ed.), Operations Research Proceedings 2004, pages 136-143, Springer.
    16. Peter J. Zwaneveld & Leo G. Kroon & H. Edwin Romeijn & Marc Salomon & Stéphane Dauzère-Pérès & Stan P. M. Van Hoesel & Harrie W. Ambergen, 1996. "Routing Trains Through Railway Stations: Model Formulation and Algorithms," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(3), pages 181-194, August.
    17. Valentina Cacchiani & Alberto Caprara & Laura Galli & Leo Kroon & Gábor Maróti & Paolo Toth, 2012. "Railway Rolling Stock Planning: Robustness Against Large Disruptions," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 217-232, May.
    18. Acuna-Agost, Rodrigo & Michelon, Philippe & Feillet, Dominique & Gueye, Serigne, 2011. "SAPI: Statistical Analysis of Propagation of Incidents. A new approach for rescheduling trains after disruptions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 215(1), pages 227-243, November.
    19. Mackie, P.J. & Jara-Díaz, S. & Fowkes, A.S., 0. "The value of travel time savings in evaluation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 37(2-3), pages 91-106, April.
    20. Cadarso, Luis & Marín, Ángel & Maróti, Gábor, 2013. "Recovery of disruptions in rapid transit networks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 15-33.
    21. Burdett, R.L. & Kozan, E., 2009. "Techniques for inserting additional trains into existing timetables," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 43(8-9), pages 821-836, September.
    22. Cacchiani, Valentina & Toth, Paolo, 2012. "Nominal and robust train timetabling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(3), pages 727-737.
    23. Bates, John & Polak, John & Jones, Peter & Cook, Andrew, 0. "The valuation of reliability for personal travel," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 37(2-3), pages 191-229, April.
    24. Alberto Caprara & Laura Galli & Paolo Toth, 2011. "Solution of the Train Platforming Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(2), pages 246-257, May.
    25. Meng, Lingyun & Zhou, Xuesong, 2011. "Robust single-track train dispatching model under a dynamic and stochastic environment: A scenario-based rolling horizon solution approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(7), pages 1080-1102, August.
    26. Dewilde, Thijs & Sels, Peter & Cattrysse, Dirk & Vansteenwegen, Pieter, 2014. "Improving the robustness in railway station areas," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(1), pages 276-286.
    27. Vansteenwegen, P. & Oudheusden, D. Van, 2006. "Developing railway timetables which guarantee a better service," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 173(1), pages 337-350, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ji, Hangyu & Wang, Rui & Zhang, Chuntian & Yin, Jiateng & Ma, Lin & Yang, Lixing, 2024. "Optimization of train schedule with uncertain maintenance plans in high-speed railways: A stochastic programming approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    2. Zhang, Huimin & Li, Shukai & Wang, Yihui & Yang, Lixing & Gao, Ziyou, 2021. "Collaborative real-time optimization strategy for train rescheduling and track emergency maintenance of high-speed railway: A Lagrangian relaxation-based decomposition algorithm," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    3. Liping Ge & Stefan Voß & Lin Xie, 2022. "Robustness and disturbances in public transport," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 191-261, March.
    4. Zhang, Yongxiang & D'Ariano, Andrea & He, Bisheng & Peng, Qiyuan, 2019. "Microscopic optimization model and algorithm for integrating train timetabling and track maintenance task scheduling," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 237-278.
    5. Zhang, Chuntian & Gao, Yuan & Yang, Lixing & Gao, Ziyou & Qi, Jianguo, 2020. "Joint optimization of train scheduling and maintenance planning in a railway network: A heuristic algorithm using Lagrangian relaxation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 64-92.
    6. Lusby, Richard M. & Larsen, Jesper & Bull, Simon, 2018. "A survey on robustness in railway planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(1), pages 1-15.
    7. Trepat Borecka, Jacob & Bešinović, Nikola, 2021. "Scheduling multimodal alternative services for managing infrastructure maintenance possessions in railway networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 147-174.
    8. Salvatore Antonio Biancardo & Francesco Avella & Ernesto Di Lisa & Xinqiang Chen & Francesco Abbondati & Gianluca Dell’Acqua, 2021. "Multiobjective Railway Alignment Optimization Using Ballastless Track and Reduced Cross-Section in Tunnel," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-19, September.
    9. Zhang, Chuntian & Gao, Yuan & Yang, Lixing & Kumar, Uday & Gao, Ziyou, 2019. "Integrated optimization of train scheduling and maintenance planning on high-speed railway corridors," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 86-104.
    10. Yuan, Yin & Li, Shukai & Yang, Lixing & Gao, Ziyou, 2022. "Real-time optimization of train regulation and passenger flow control for urban rail transit network under frequent disturbances," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    11. Van Aken, Sander & Bešinović, Nikola & Goverde, Rob M.P., 2017. "Designing alternative railway timetables under infrastructure maintenance possessions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 224-238.
    12. Hong, Liu & Ye, Bowen & Yan, Han & Zhang, Hui & Ouyang, Min & (Sean) He, Xiaozheng, 2019. "Spatiotemporal vulnerability analysis of railway systems with heterogeneous train flows," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 725-744.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dewilde, Thijs & Sels, Peter & Cattrysse, Dirk & Vansteenwegen, Pieter, 2014. "Improving the robustness in railway station areas," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(1), pages 276-286.
    2. Lusby, Richard M. & Larsen, Jesper & Bull, Simon, 2018. "A survey on robustness in railway planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(1), pages 1-15.
    3. Sels, P. & Dewilde, T. & Cattrysse, D. & Vansteenwegen, P., 2016. "Reducing the passenger travel time in practice by the automated construction of a robust railway timetable," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 124-156.
    4. Jens Parbo & Otto Anker Nielsen & Carlo Giacomo Prato, 2016. "Passenger Perspectives in Railway Timetabling: A Literature Review," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(4), pages 500-526, July.
    5. Lu, Gongyuan & Ning, Jia & Liu, Xiaobo & Nie, Yu (Marco), 2022. "Train platforming and rescheduling with flexible interlocking mechanisms: An aggregate approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    6. Lu, Gongyuan & Nie, Yu(Marco) & Liu, Xiaobo & Li, Denghui, 2019. "Trajectory-based traffic management inside an autonomous vehicle zone," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 76-98.
    7. Meng, Lingyun & Zhou, Xuesong, 2014. "Simultaneous train rerouting and rescheduling on an N-track network: A model reformulation with network-based cumulative flow variables," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 208-234.
    8. Schön, Cornelia & König, Eva, 2018. "A stochastic dynamic programming approach for delay management of a single train line," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(2), pages 501-518.
    9. Samà, Marcella & Pellegrini, Paola & D’Ariano, Andrea & Rodriguez, Joaquin & Pacciarelli, Dario, 2016. "Ant colony optimization for the real-time train routing selection problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 89-108.
    10. Corman, Francesco & D’Ariano, Andrea & Marra, Alessio D. & Pacciarelli, Dario & Samà, Marcella, 2017. "Integrating train scheduling and delay management in real-time railway traffic control," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 213-239.
    11. Leonardo Lamorgese & Carlo Mannino & Mauro Piacentini, 2016. "Optimal Train Dispatching by Benders’-Like Reformulation," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(3), pages 910-925, August.
    12. Zhan, Shuguang & Kroon, Leo G. & Zhao, Jun & Peng, Qiyuan, 2016. "A rolling horizon approach to the high speed train rescheduling problem in case of a partial segment blockage," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 32-61.
    13. Xu, Xiaoming & Li, Keping & Yang, Lixing, 2015. "Scheduling heterogeneous train traffic on double tracks with efficient dispatching rules," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 364-384.
    14. Jovanović, Predrag & Kecman, Pavle & Bojović, Nebojša & Mandić, Dragomir, 2017. "Optimal allocation of buffer times to increase train schedule robustness," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(1), pages 44-54.
    15. Wang, Yihui & Zhao, Kangqi & D’Ariano, Andrea & Niu, Ru & Li, Shukai & Luan, Xiaojie, 2021. "Real-time integrated train rescheduling and rolling stock circulation planning for a metro line under disruptions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 87-117.
    16. Lucas P. Veelenturf & Martin P. Kidd & Valentina Cacchiani & Leo G. Kroon & Paolo Toth, 2016. "A Railway Timetable Rescheduling Approach for Handling Large-Scale Disruptions," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(3), pages 841-862, August.
    17. Corman, F. & D’Ariano, A. & Pacciarelli, D. & Pranzo, M., 2012. "Optimal inter-area coordination of train rescheduling decisions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 71-88.
    18. Gao, Yuan & Kroon, Leo & Schmidt, Marie & Yang, Lixing, 2016. "Rescheduling a metro line in an over-crowded situation after disruptions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 425-449.
    19. Hassini, Elkafi & Verma, Manish, 2016. "Disruption risk management in railroad networks: An optimization-based methodology and a case studyAuthor-Name: Azad, Nader," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 70-88.
    20. Zhang, Chuntian & Gao, Yuan & Cacchiani, Valentina & Yang, Lixing & Gao, Ziyou, 2023. "Train rescheduling for large-scale disruptions in a large-scale railway network," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:252:y:2016:i:1:p:39-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.