IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v61y2014icp55-72.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The train platforming problem: The infrastructure management company perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Sels, P.
  • Vansteenwegen, P.
  • Dewilde, T.
  • Cattrysse, D.
  • Waquet, B.
  • Joubert, A.

Abstract

If railway companies ask for station capacity numbers, their underlying question is in fact one about the platformability of extra trains. Train platformability depends not only on the infrastructure, buffer times, and the desired departure and arrival times of the trains, but also on route durations, which depend on train speeds and lengths, as well as on conflicts between routes at any given time. We consider all these factors in this paper. We assume a current train set and a future one, where the second is based on the expected traffic increase through the station considered. The platforming problem is about assigning a platform to each train, together with suitable in- and out-routes. Route choices lead to different route durations and imply different in-route-begin and out-route-end times. Our module platforms the maximum possible weighted sum of trains in the current and future train set. The resulting number of trains can be seen as the realistic capacity consumption of the schedule. Our goal function allows for current trains to be preferably allocated to their current platforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Sels, P. & Vansteenwegen, P. & Dewilde, T. & Cattrysse, D. & Waquet, B. & Joubert, A., 2014. "The train platforming problem: The infrastructure management company perspective," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 55-72.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:61:y:2014:i:c:p:55-72
    DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2014.01.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261514000058
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.trb.2014.01.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M Carey & S Carville, 2000. "Testing schedule performance and reliability for train stations," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 51(6), pages 666-682, June.
    2. Zwaneveld, Peter J. & Kroon, Leo G. & van Hoesel, Stan P. M., 2001. "Routing trains through a railway station based on a node packing model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 14-33, January.
    3. Richard Lusby & Jesper Larsen & David Ryan & Matthias Ehrgott, 2011. "Routing Trains Through Railway Junctions: A New Set-Packing Approach," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(2), pages 228-245, May.
    4. Alain Billionnet, 2003. "Using Integer Programming to Solve the Train-Platforming Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(2), pages 213-222, May.
    5. Jean-François Cordeau & Paolo Toth & Daniele Vigo, 1998. "A Survey of Optimization Models for Train Routing and Scheduling," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 380-404, November.
    6. Dewilde, Thijs & Sels, Peter & Cattrysse, Dirk & Vansteenwegen, Pieter, 2014. "Improving the robustness in railway station areas," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(1), pages 276-286.
    7. Ghoseiri, Keivan & Szidarovszky, Ferenc & Asgharpour, Mohammad Jawad, 2004. "A multi-objective train scheduling model and solution," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 927-952, December.
    8. Carey, Malachy, 1994. "A model and strategy for train pathing with choice of lines, platforms, and routes," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 28(5), pages 333-353, October.
    9. Kroon, Leo G. & Edwin Romeijn, H. & Zwaneveld, Peter J., 1997. "Routing trains through railway stations: complexity issues," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(3), pages 485-498, May.
    10. Peter J. Zwaneveld & Leo G. Kroon & H. Edwin Romeijn & Marc Salomon & Stéphane Dauzère-Pérès & Stan P. M. Van Hoesel & Harrie W. Ambergen, 1996. "Routing Trains Through Railway Stations: Model Formulation and Algorithms," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(3), pages 181-194, August.
    11. Chakroborty, Partha & Vikram, Durgesh, 2008. "Optimum assignment of trains to platforms under partial schedule compliance," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 169-184, February.
    12. Vansteenwegen, P. & Van Oudheusden, D., 2007. "Decreasing the passenger waiting time for an intercity rail network," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 478-492, May.
    13. Carey, Malachy & Carville, Sinead, 2003. "Scheduling and platforming trains at busy complex stations," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 195-224, March.
    14. Carey, Malachy, 1994. "Extending a train pathing model from one-way to two-way track," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 28(5), pages 395-400, October.
    15. Alberto Caprara & Laura Galli & Paolo Toth, 2011. "Solution of the Train Platforming Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(2), pages 246-257, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lu, Gongyuan & Nie, Yu(Marco) & Liu, Xiaobo & Li, Denghui, 2019. "Trajectory-based traffic management inside an autonomous vehicle zone," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 76-98.
    2. Lu, Gongyuan & Ning, Jia & Liu, Xiaobo & Nie, Yu (Marco), 2022. "Train platforming and rescheduling with flexible interlocking mechanisms: An aggregate approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    3. Sels, P. & Dewilde, T. & Cattrysse, D. & Vansteenwegen, P., 2016. "Reducing the passenger travel time in practice by the automated construction of a robust railway timetable," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 124-156.
    4. Jens Parbo & Otto Anker Nielsen & Carlo Giacomo Prato, 2016. "Passenger Perspectives in Railway Timetabling: A Literature Review," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(4), pages 500-526, July.
    5. Samà, Marcella & Pellegrini, Paola & D’Ariano, Andrea & Rodriguez, Joaquin & Pacciarelli, Dario, 2016. "Ant colony optimization for the real-time train routing selection problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 89-108.
    6. Zhang, Qin & Lusby, Richard Martin & Shang, Pan & Zhu, Xiaoning, 2022. "A heuristic approach to integrate train timetabling, platforming, and railway network maintenance scheduling decisions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 210-238.
    7. Burggraeve, Sofie & Vansteenwegen, Pieter, 2017. "Robust routing and timetabling in complex railway stations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 228-244.
    8. Vansteenwegen, Pieter & Dewilde, Thijs & Burggraeve, Sofie & Cattrysse, Dirk, 2016. "An iterative approach for reducing the impact of infrastructure maintenance on the performance of railway systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(1), pages 39-53.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lu, Gongyuan & Ning, Jia & Liu, Xiaobo & Nie, Yu (Marco), 2022. "Train platforming and rescheduling with flexible interlocking mechanisms: An aggregate approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    2. Lu, Gongyuan & Nie, Yu(Marco) & Liu, Xiaobo & Li, Denghui, 2019. "Trajectory-based traffic management inside an autonomous vehicle zone," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 76-98.
    3. Jingliu Xu & Zhimei Wang & Shangjun Yao & Jiarong Xue, 2022. "Train Operations Organization in High-Speed Railway Station Considering Variable Configuration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    4. Burdett, R.L. & Kozan, E., 2010. "A disjunctive graph model and framework for constructing new train schedules," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 85-98, January.
    5. Matthew E. H. Petering & Mojtaba Heydar & Dietrich R. Bergmann, 2016. "Mixed-Integer Programming for Railway Capacity Analysis and Cyclic, Combined Train Timetabling and Platforming," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(3), pages 892-909, August.
    6. Carey, Malachy & Crawford, Ivan, 2007. "Scheduling trains on a network of busy complex stations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 159-178, February.
    7. Richard Lusby & Jesper Larsen & David Ryan & Matthias Ehrgott, 2011. "Routing Trains Through Railway Junctions: A New Set-Packing Approach," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(2), pages 228-245, May.
    8. Lee, Yusin & Chen, Chuen-Yih, 2009. "A heuristic for the train pathing and timetabling problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 43(8-9), pages 837-851, September.
    9. Sels, P. & Dewilde, T. & Cattrysse, D. & Vansteenwegen, P., 2016. "Reducing the passenger travel time in practice by the automated construction of a robust railway timetable," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 124-156.
    10. Alberto Caprara & Laura Galli & Paolo Toth, 2011. "Solution of the Train Platforming Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(2), pages 246-257, May.
    11. Dennis Huisman & Leo G. Kroon & Ramon M. Lentink & Michiel J. C. M. Vromans, 2005. "Operations Research in passenger railway transportation," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 59(4), pages 467-497, November.
    12. Delorme, Xavier & Gandibleux, Xavier & Rodriguez, Joaquín, 2009. "Stability evaluation of a railway timetable at station level," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 195(3), pages 780-790, June.
    13. Yinggui Zhang & Ruihua Hu & Qiongfang Zeng & Yuhang Wang & Ya Liu & Shan Huang, 2023. "Optimal Train Platforming with Shunting Operations for Multidirectional Passenger Stations: A Case Study of Guangzhou Station," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-19, July.
    14. Nikola Bešinović & Rob M. P. Goverde, 2019. "Stable and robust train routing in station areas with balanced infrastructure capacity occupation," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 211-236, August.
    15. Flamini, Marta & Pacciarelli, Dario, 2008. "Real time management of a metro rail terminus," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(3), pages 746-761, September.
    16. Carey, Malachy & Carville, Sinead, 2003. "Scheduling and platforming trains at busy complex stations," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 195-224, March.
    17. G. Caimi & F. Chudak & M. Fuchsberger & M. Laumanns & R. Zenklusen, 2011. "A New Resource-Constrained Multicommodity Flow Model for Conflict-Free Train Routing and Scheduling," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(2), pages 212-227, May.
    18. Talebian, Ahmadreza & Zou, Bo, 2015. "Integrated modeling of high performance passenger and freight train planning on shared-use corridors in the US," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 114-140.
    19. E. Ursavas & Stuart X. Zhu, 2018. "Integrated Passenger and Freight Train Planning on Shared-Use Corridors," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(6), pages 1376-1390, December.
    20. Gabrio Caimi & Dan Burkolter & Thomas Herrmann & Fabian Chudak & Marco Laumanns, 2009. "Design of a Railway Scheduling Model for Dense Services," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 25-46, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:61:y:2014:i:c:p:55-72. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.