IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v203y2010i1p14-21.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Solving multiobjective, multiconstraint knapsack problems using mathematical programming and evolutionary algorithms

Author

Listed:
  • Florios, Kostas
  • Mavrotas, George
  • Diakoulaki, Danae

Abstract

In this paper, we solve instances of the multiobjective multiconstraint (or multidimensional) knapsack problem (MOMCKP) from the literature, with three objective functions and three constraints. We use exact as well as approximate algorithms. The exact algorithm is a properly modified version of the multicriteria branch and bound (MCBB) algorithm, which is further customized by suitable heuristics. Three branching heuristics and a more general purpose composite branching and construction heuristic are devised. Comparison is made to the published results from another exact algorithm, the adaptive [epsilon]-constraint method [Laumanns, M., Thiele, L., Zitzler, E., 2006. An efficient, adaptive parameter variation scheme for Metaheuristics based on the epsilon-constraint method. European Journal of Operational Research 169, 932-942], using the same data sets. Furthermore, the same problems are solved using standard multiobjective evolutionary algorithms (MOEA), namely, the SPEA2 and the NSGAII. The results from the exact case show that the branching heuristics greatly improve the performance of the MCBB algorithm, which becomes faster than the adaptive [epsilon] -constraint. Regarding the performance of the MOEA algorithms in the specific problems, SPEA2 outperforms NSGAII in the degree of approximation of the Pareto front, as measured by the coverage metric (especially for the largest instance).

Suggested Citation

  • Florios, Kostas & Mavrotas, George & Diakoulaki, Danae, 2010. "Solving multiobjective, multiconstraint knapsack problems using mathematical programming and evolutionary algorithms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(1), pages 14-21, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:203:y:2010:i:1:p:14-21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377-2217(09)00497-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jaszkiewicz, Andrzej, 2004. "On the computational efficiency of multiple objective metaheuristics. The knapsack problem case study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(2), pages 418-433, October.
    2. Thomas Erlebach & Hans Kellerer & Ulrich Pferschy, 2002. "Approximating Multiobjective Knapsack Problems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(12), pages 1603-1612, December.
    3. Laumanns, Marco & Thiele, Lothar & Zitzler, Eckart, 2006. "An efficient, adaptive parameter variation scheme for metaheuristics based on the epsilon-constraint method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(3), pages 932-942, March.
    4. Matthias Ehrgott, 2006. "A discussion of scalarization techniques for multiple objective integer programming," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 147(1), pages 343-360, October.
    5. Gomes da Silva, Carlos & Climaco, Joao & Figueira, Jose, 2006. "A scatter search method for bi-criteria {0, 1}-knapsack problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(2), pages 373-391, March.
    6. Shukla, Pradyumn Kumar & Deb, Kalyanmoy, 2007. "On finding multiple Pareto-optimal solutions using classical and evolutionary generating methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(3), pages 1630-1652, September.
    7. Bazgan, Cristina & Hugot, Hadrien & Vanderpooten, Daniel, 2009. "Implementing an efficient fptas for the 0-1 multi-objective knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(1), pages 47-56, October.
    8. Alves, Maria Joao & Climaco, Joao, 2007. "A review of interactive methods for multiobjective integer and mixed-integer programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 180(1), pages 99-115, July.
    9. Mavrotas, G. & Diakoulaki, D., 1998. "A branch and bound algorithm for mixed zero-one multiple objective linear programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(3), pages 530-541, June.
    10. Zhang, Cai Wen & Ong, Hoon Liong, 2004. "Solving the biobjective zero-one knapsack problem by an efficient LP-based heuristic," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(3), pages 545-557, December.
    11. Gomes da Silva, Carlos & Figueira, Jose & Climaco, Joao, 2007. "Integrating partial optimization with scatter search for solving bi-criteria {0, 1}-knapsack problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(3), pages 1656-1677, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Brester Christina & Ryzhikov Ivan & Semenkin Eugene, 2017. "Multi-objective Optimization Algorithms with the Island Metaheuristic for Effective Project Management Problem Solving," Organizacija, Sciendo, vol. 50(4), pages 364-373, December.
    2. Rong, Aiying & Figueira, José Rui, 2013. "A reduction dynamic programming algorithm for the bi-objective integer knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 231(2), pages 299-313.
    3. Tsionas, Mike G., 2019. "Multi-objective optimization using statistical models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(1), pages 364-378.
    4. Rong, Aiying & Figueira, José Rui, 2014. "Dynamic programming algorithms for the bi-objective integer knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(1), pages 85-99.
    5. Audrey Cerqueus & Xavier Gandibleux & Anthony Przybylski & Frédéric Saubion, 2017. "On branching heuristics for the bi-objective 0/1 unidimensional knapsack problem," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 285-319, October.
    6. Przybylski, Anthony & Gandibleux, Xavier, 2017. "Multi-objective branch and bound," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(3), pages 856-872.
    7. Mavrotas, George & Florios, Kostas, 2013. "An improved version of the augmented epsilon-constraint method (AUGMECON2) for finding the exact Pareto set in Multi-Objective Integer Programming problems," MPRA Paper 105034, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Hedieh Sajedi & Seyedeh Fatemeh Razavi, 2017. "DGSA: discrete gravitational search algorithm for solving knapsack problem," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 563-591, July.
    9. Harris, Irina & Mumford, Christine L. & Naim, Mohamed M., 2014. "A hybrid multi-objective approach to capacitated facility location with flexible store allocation for green logistics modeling," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 1-22.
    10. Forget, Nicolas & Gadegaard, Sune Lauth & Nielsen, Lars Relund, 2022. "Warm-starting lower bound set computations for branch-and-bound algorithms for multi objective integer linear programs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(3), pages 909-924.
    11. Sune Lauth Gadegaard & Lars Relund Nielsen & Matthias Ehrgott, 2019. "Bi-objective Branch-and-Cut Algorithms Based on LP Relaxation and Bound Sets," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 790-804, October.
    12. Mavrotas, George & Florios, Kostas & Figueira, José Rui, 2015. "An improved version of a core based algorithm for the multi-objective multi-dimensional knapsack problem: A computational study and comparison with meta-heuristics," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 270(C), pages 25-43.
    13. Madjid Tavana & Kaveh Khalili-Damghani & Amir-Reza Abtahi, 2013. "A fuzzy multidimensional multiple-choice knapsack model for project portfolio selection using an evolutionary algorithm," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 206(1), pages 449-483, July.
    14. García-Martínez, C. & Rodriguez, F.J. & Lozano, M., 2014. "Tabu-enhanced iterated greedy algorithm: A case study in the quadratic multiple knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 232(3), pages 454-463.
    15. Cerqueus, Audrey & Przybylski, Anthony & Gandibleux, Xavier, 2015. "Surrogate upper bound sets for bi-objective bi-dimensional binary knapsack problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(2), pages 417-433.
    16. Bas, Esra, 2011. "An investment plan for preventing child injuries using risk priority number of failure mode and effects analysis methodology and a multi-objective, multi-dimensional mixed 0-1 knapsack model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(7), pages 748-756.
    17. Mauricio Diéguez & Jaime Bustos & Carlos Cares, 0. "Mapping the variations for implementing information security controls to their operational research solutions," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-30.
    18. Mauricio Diéguez & Jaime Bustos & Carlos Cares, 2020. "Mapping the variations for implementing information security controls to their operational research solutions," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 157-186, June.
    19. Cacchiani, Valentina & D’Ambrosio, Claudia, 2017. "A branch-and-bound based heuristic algorithm for convex multi-objective MINLPs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(3), pages 920-933.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rong, Aiying & Figueira, José Rui, 2013. "A reduction dynamic programming algorithm for the bi-objective integer knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 231(2), pages 299-313.
    2. Rong, Aiying & Figueira, José Rui, 2014. "Dynamic programming algorithms for the bi-objective integer knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(1), pages 85-99.
    3. Barbati, Maria & Greco, Salvatore & Kadziński, Miłosz & Słowiński, Roman, 2018. "Optimization of multiple satisfaction levels in portfolio decision analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 192-204.
    4. José Figueira & Luís Paquete & Marco Simões & Daniel Vanderpooten, 2013. "Algorithmic improvements on dynamic programming for the bi-objective {0,1} knapsack problem," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 97-111, September.
    5. Mavrotas, George & Florios, Kostas, 2013. "An improved version of the augmented epsilon-constraint method (AUGMECON2) for finding the exact Pareto set in Multi-Objective Integer Programming problems," MPRA Paper 105034, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. David Bergman & Merve Bodur & Carlos Cardonha & Andre A. Cire, 2022. "Network Models for Multiobjective Discrete Optimization," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 990-1005, March.
    7. Barbati, Maria & Corrente, Salvatore & Greco, Salvatore, 2020. "A general space-time model for combinatorial optimization problems (and not only)," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    8. Bashir Bashir & Özlem Karsu, 2022. "Solution approaches for equitable multiobjective integer programming problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(2), pages 967-995, April.
    9. Konur, Dinçer & Campbell, James F. & Monfared, Sepideh A., 2017. "Economic and environmental considerations in a stochastic inventory control model with order splitting under different delivery schedules among suppliers," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 46-65.
    10. Dinçer Konur & Hadi Farhangi & Cihan H. Dagli, 2016. "A multi-objective military system of systems architecting problem with inflexible and flexible systems: formulation and solution methods," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 38(4), pages 967-1006, October.
    11. Bas, Esra, 2011. "An investment plan for preventing child injuries using risk priority number of failure mode and effects analysis methodology and a multi-objective, multi-dimensional mixed 0-1 knapsack model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(7), pages 748-756.
    12. S. Razavyan, 2016. "A Method for Generating a Well-Distributed Pareto Set in Multiple Objective Mixed Integer Linear Programs Based on the Decision Maker’s Initial Aspiration Level," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 33(04), pages 1-23, August.
    13. Kirlik, Gokhan & Sayın, Serpil, 2014. "A new algorithm for generating all nondominated solutions of multiobjective discrete optimization problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 232(3), pages 479-488.
    14. Filippi, C. & Guastaroba, G. & Speranza, M.G., 2016. "A heuristic framework for the bi-objective enhanced index tracking problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 122-137.
    15. Di Martinelly, Christine & Meskens, Nadine, 2017. "A bi-objective integrated approach to building surgical teams and nurse schedule rosters to maximise surgical team affinities and minimise nurses' idle time," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 323-334.
    16. Holzmann, Tim & Smith, J.C., 2018. "Solving discrete multi-objective optimization problems using modified augmented weighted Tchebychev scalarizations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(2), pages 436-449.
    17. Daniel Vanderpooten & Lakmali Weerasena & Margaret M. Wiecek, 2017. "Covers and approximations in multiobjective optimization," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 67(3), pages 601-619, March.
    18. Özlen, Melih & Azizoglu, Meral, 2009. "Multi-objective integer programming: A general approach for generating all non-dominated solutions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(1), pages 25-35, November.
    19. Mavrotas, George & Figueira, José Rui & Florios, Kostas, 2009. "Solving the bi-objective multidimensional knapsack problem exploiting the concept of core," MPRA Paper 105087, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Natashia Boland & Hadi Charkhgard & Martin Savelsbergh, 2015. "A Criterion Space Search Algorithm for Biobjective Integer Programming: The Balanced Box Method," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 735-754, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:203:y:2010:i:1:p:14-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.