IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v298y2021ics0306261921006516.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimization of a wind farm by coupled actuator disk and mesoscale models to mitigate neighboring wind farm wake interference from repowering perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Khan, Mehtab Ahmad
  • Javed, Adeel
  • Shakir, Sehar
  • Syed, Abdul Haseeb

Abstract

This study explores the effects of inter-farm wakes and proposes staggering schemes that are most suitable for optimization of existing wind farm arrays to mitigate the effects of compound wakes. The case study considers a total of 9 out of 33 most deteriorated wind turbine for a microscale numerical analysis using the steady-state actuator disk model coupled with the mesoscale boundary condition data. Furthermore, the convective atmospheric boundary layer has also been considered. For vertically staggered layouts, the effect of the inter-farm wakes appeared mild at 100 m, modest at 80 m, and high at 60 m; as the maximum velocity deficit observed under the influence of compound wakes is approximately 13.3%, 14.1%, and 15.2%, respectively. Onsite recorded power data has been used to validate the baseline predicted powers at 80 m hub height. Both vertical and horizontal staggering options have been assessed for partial repowering. By elevating the turbines to a 100 m hub height, the cumulative power generation from the 9 × turbines increased by approximately 13.5% while reducing the hub height to 60 m decreased the power output by approximately 11.5% of that of the baseline at 80 m hub height. Further increase in cumulative power of up to 23% compared to existing layout is achieved by applying a lateral repositioning of 3 × underperforming turbines now positioned at 100 m hub height. This paper hence presents an applied insight for partial repowering of onshore wind farms affected by inter-farm wakes.

Suggested Citation

  • Khan, Mehtab Ahmad & Javed, Adeel & Shakir, Sehar & Syed, Abdul Haseeb, 2021. "Optimization of a wind farm by coupled actuator disk and mesoscale models to mitigate neighboring wind farm wake interference from repowering perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:298:y:2021:i:c:s0306261921006516
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117229
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261921006516
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117229?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gao, Xiaoxia & Yang, Hongxing & Lu, Lin, 2016. "Optimization of wind turbine layout position in a wind farm using a newly-developed two-dimensional wake model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 192-200.
    2. J. K. Lundquist & K. K. DuVivier & D. Kaffine & J. M. Tomaszewski, 2019. "Publisher Correction: Costs and consequences of wind turbine wake effects arising from uncoordinated wind energy development," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 4(3), pages 251-251, March.
    3. Sun, Haiying & Yang, Hongxing, 2018. "Study on an innovative three-dimensional wind turbine wake model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 483-493.
    4. J. K. Lundquist & K. K. DuVivier & D. Kaffine & J. M. Tomaszewski, 2019. "Costs and consequences of wind turbine wake effects arising from uncoordinated wind energy development," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 4(1), pages 26-34, January.
    5. Zhaobin Li & Xiaolei Yang, 2020. "Evaluation of Actuator Disk Model Relative to Actuator Surface Model for Predicting Utility-Scale Wind Turbine Wakes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-18, July.
    6. Yuan, Renyu & Ji, Wenju & Luo, Kun & Wang, Jianwen & Zhang, Sanxia & Wang, Qiang & Fan, Jianren & Ni, MingJiang & Cen, Kefa, 2017. "Coupled wind farm parameterization with a mesoscale model for simulations of an onshore wind farm," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 113-125.
    7. Chen, K. & Song, M.X. & Zhang, X. & Wang, S.F., 2016. "Wind turbine layout optimization with multiple hub height wind turbines using greedy algorithm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA), pages 676-686.
    8. Jeon, Sanghyeon & Kim, Bumsuk & Huh, Jongchul, 2015. "Comparison and verification of wake models in an onshore wind farm considering single wake condition of the 2 MW wind turbine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 1769-1777.
    9. Stevens, Richard J.A.M. & Graham, Jason & Meneveau, Charles, 2014. "A concurrent precursor inflow method for Large Eddy Simulations and applications to finite length wind farms," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 46-50.
    10. Syed, Abdul Haseeb & Javed, Adeel & Asim Feroz, Raja M. & Calhoun, Ronald, 2020. "Partial repowering analysis of a wind farm by turbine hub height variation to mitigate neighboring wind farm wake interference using mesoscale simulations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    11. Martínez, E. & Latorre-Biel, J.I. & Jiménez, E. & Sanz, F. & Blanco, J., 2018. "Life cycle assessment of a wind farm repowering process," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 260-271.
    12. Fernando Porté-Agel & Yu-Ting Wu & Chang-Hung Chen, 2013. "A Numerical Study of the Effects of Wind Direction on Turbine Wakes and Power Losses in a Large Wind Farm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(10), pages 1-17, October.
    13. Topham, Eva & McMillan, David, 2017. "Sustainable decommissioning of an offshore wind farm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(PB), pages 470-480.
    14. Archer, Cristina L. & Vasel-Be-Hagh, Ahmadreza & Yan, Chi & Wu, Sicheng & Pan, Yang & Brodie, Joseph F. & Maguire, A. Eoghan, 2018. "Review and evaluation of wake loss models for wind energy applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 1187-1207.
    15. Wang, Qiang & Luo, Kun & Yuan, Renyu & Zhang, Sanxia & Fan, Jianren, 2019. "Wake and performance interference between adjacent wind farms: Case study of Xinjiang in China by means of mesoscale simulations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 1168-1180.
    16. Serri, Laura & Lembo, Ettore & Airoldi, Davide & Gelli, Camilla & Beccarello, Massimo, 2018. "Wind energy plants repowering potential in Italy: technical-economic assessment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 382-390.
    17. Mendecka, Barbara & Lombardi, Lidia, 2019. "Life cycle environmental impacts of wind energy technologies: A review of simplified models and harmonization of the results," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 462-480.
    18. Staffell, Iain & Green, Richard, 2014. "How does wind farm performance decline with age?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 775-786.
    19. Vasel-Be-Hagh, Ahmadreza & Archer, Cristina L., 2017. "Wind farm hub height optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 905-921.
    20. Wu, Yu-Ting & Liao, Teh-Lu & Chen, Chang-Kuo & Lin, Chuan-Yao & Chen, Po-Wei, 2019. "Power output efficiency in large wind farms with different hub heights and configurations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 941-949.
    21. Yang, Xiaolei & Pakula, Maggie & Sotiropoulos, Fotis, 2018. "Large-eddy simulation of a utility-scale wind farm in complex terrain," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 767-777.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. João Agra Neto & Mario Orestes Aguirre González & Rajiv Lucas Pereira de Castro & David Cassimiro de Melo & Kezauyn Miranda Aiquoc & Andressa Medeiros Santiso & Rafael Monteiro de Vasconcelos & Lucas , 2024. "Factors Influencing the Decision-Making Process at the End-of-Life Cycle of Onshore Wind Farms: A Systematic Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-42, February.
    2. He, Yuhang & Han, Xingxing & Xu, Chang & Cheng, Zhe & Wang, Jincheng & Liu, Wei & Xu, Dong, 2023. "Sensitivity of simulated wind power under diverse spatial scales and multiple terrains using the weather research and forecasting model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    3. Zhiwen Deng & Chang Xu & Zhihong Huo & Xingxing Han & Feifei Xue, 2023. "Yaw Optimisation for Wind Farm Production Maximisation Based on a Dynamic Wake Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-20, May.
    4. Barasa, Maulidi & Li, Xuemin & Zhang, Yi & Xu, Weiming, 2022. "The balance effects of momentum deficit and thrust in cumulative wake models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    5. Gao, Xiaoxia & Chen, Yao & Xu, Shinai & Gao, Wei & Zhu, Xiaoxun & Sun, Haiying & Yang, Hongxing & Han, Zhonghe & Wang, Yu & Lu, Hao, 2022. "Comparative experimental investigation into wake characteristics of turbines in three wind farms areas with varying terrain complexity from LiDAR measurements," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Syed, Abdul Haseeb & Javed, Adeel & Asim Feroz, Raja M. & Calhoun, Ronald, 2020. "Partial repowering analysis of a wind farm by turbine hub height variation to mitigate neighboring wind farm wake interference using mesoscale simulations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    2. Amiri, Mojtaba Maali & Shadman, Milad & Estefen, Segen F., 2024. "A review of physical and numerical modeling techniques for horizontal-axis wind turbine wakes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    3. Brogna, Roberto & Feng, Ju & Sørensen, Jens Nørkær & Shen, Wen Zhong & Porté-Agel, Fernando, 2020. "A new wake model and comparison of eight algorithms for layout optimization of wind farms in complex terrain," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    4. Leite, Gustavo de Novaes Pires & Weschenfelder, Franciele & Farias, João Gabriel de & Kamal Ahmad, Muhammad, 2022. "Economic and sensitivity analysis on wind farm end-of-life strategies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    5. Tao, Siyu & Xu, Qingshan & Feijóo, Andrés & Zheng, Gang & Zhou, Jiemin, 2020. "Nonuniform wind farm layout optimization: A state-of-the-art review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    6. Zhang, Ziyu & Huang, Peng, 2023. "Prediction of multiple-wake velocity and wind power using a cosine-shaped wake model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(P1).
    7. Ju, Xinglong & Liu, Feng, 2019. "Wind farm layout optimization using self-informed genetic algorithm with information guided exploitation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C), pages 429-445.
    8. Gao, Xiaoxia & Li, Bingbing & Wang, Tengyuan & Sun, Haiying & Yang, Hongxing & Li, Yonghua & Wang, Yu & Zhao, Fei, 2020. "Investigation and validation of 3D wake model for horizontal-axis wind turbines based on filed measurements," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    9. Rohan Zafar Butt & Syed Ali Abbas Kazmi & Mohammed Alghassab & Zafar A. Khan & Abdullah Altamimi & Muhammad Imran & Fahad F. Alruwaili, 2022. "Techno-Economic and Environmental Impact Analysis of Large-Scale Wind Farms Integration in Weak Transmission Grid from Mid-Career Repowering Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-31, February.
    10. Mamdouh Abdulrahman & David Wood, 2019. "Wind Farm Layout Upgrade Optimization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-25, June.
    11. Tao, Siyu & Xu, Qingshan & Feijóo, Andrés & Zheng, Gang & Zhou, Jiemin, 2020. "Wind farm layout optimization with a three-dimensional Gaussian wake model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 553-569.
    12. Cao, Lichao & Ge, Mingwei & Gao, Xiaoxia & Du, Bowen & Li, Baoliang & Huang, Zhi & Liu, Yongqian, 2022. "Wind farm layout optimization to minimize the wake induced turbulence effect on wind turbines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    13. Francisco Haces-Fernandez, 2020. "GoWInD: Wind Energy Spatiotemporal Assessment and Characterization of End-of-Life Activities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-20, November.
    14. Cuevas-Figueroa, Gabriel & Stansby, Peter K. & Stallard, Timothy, 2022. "Accuracy of WRF for prediction of operational wind farm data and assessment of influence of upwind farms on power production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PB).
    15. Gu, Bo & Meng, Hang & Ge, Mingwei & Zhang, Hongtao & Liu, Xinyu, 2021. "Cooperative multiagent optimization method for wind farm power delivery maximization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    16. Feng, Ju & Shen, Wen Zhong, 2017. "Design optimization of offshore wind farms with multiple types of wind turbines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 1283-1297.
    17. Dou, Bingzheng & Guala, Michele & Lei, Liping & Zeng, Pan, 2019. "Wake model for horizontal-axis wind and hydrokinetic turbines in yawed conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 1383-1395.
    18. Doukas, H. & Arsenopoulos, A. & Lazoglou, M. & Nikas, A. & Flamos, A., 2022. "Wind repowering: Unveiling a hidden asset," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    19. Hanan M. Taleb & Bassam Abu Hijleh, 2021. "Optimizing the Power Generation of a Wind Farm in Low Wind Speed Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-26, May.
    20. Michael F. Howland & John O. Dabiri, 2019. "Wind Farm Modeling with Interpretable Physics-Informed Machine Learning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-21, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:298:y:2021:i:c:s0306261921006516. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.