IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v179y2016icp191-202.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of experimental design techniques in the optimization of the ultrasonic pretreatment time and enhancement of methane production in anaerobic co-digestion

Author

Listed:
  • Zou, Shuzhen
  • Wang, Hui
  • Wang, Xiaojiao
  • Zhou, Sha
  • Li, Xue
  • Feng, Yongzhong

Abstract

In this study, wheat straw (WS) and dairy manure (DM) were ultrasonically pretreated to optimize the time for ultrasonic pretreatment (UP), identify the most appropriate optimization method, clarify whether UP is a high efficiency method for application, and explain why UP improves total methane production (TMP). The pretreatment conditions were designed using orthogonal experiment design (OED) and central composite design (CCD) and were optimized using the direct measurement method and response surface method, the relationships among the initial digestion characteristics and TMP were subsequently analyzed, the net energy, and energy benefit were calculated. The OEM results showed that mixed DM pretreated for 30minutes (min) and WS pretreated for 20min (DM30WS20) produced the maximum TMP, net energy, and energy benefit of 186mL/g TS (total solid), 6.04kJ/g TS, and 2.88kJ/g TS, respectively. For CCD, the maximum TMP, net energy, and energy benefit were 146.61mL/g TS, 4.91kJ/g TS, and 1.75kJ/g TS, respectively, and were obtained with DM9WS25. The maximum TMP, net energy, and energy benefit of OED were greater than those of CCD, indicating that OED is more suitable for UP in anaerobic digestion (AD). When pretreated with UP, the surface of DM showed an increasingly uniform distribution and WS became increasingly rough and displayed fractures of different degrees. Cellulose activity contributed the maximum (0.3856) direct decision influence to TMP, and the comprehensive decision influence at a pH of 0.328 was the highest in TMP. This study concluded that the direct measurementmethod in OED was best suited for the design and optimization of pretreatment conditions by UP in AD. UP improved TMP, net energy, and energy benefit by changing the initial environment of AD. Therefore, UP is a high-energy benefit method and worth popularizing for AD.

Suggested Citation

  • Zou, Shuzhen & Wang, Hui & Wang, Xiaojiao & Zhou, Sha & Li, Xue & Feng, Yongzhong, 2016. "Application of experimental design techniques in the optimization of the ultrasonic pretreatment time and enhancement of methane production in anaerobic co-digestion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 191-202.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:179:y:2016:i:c:p:191-202
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.06.120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261916308959
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.06.120?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ariunbaatar, Javkhlan & Panico, Antonio & Esposito, Giovanni & Pirozzi, Francesco & Lens, Piet N.L., 2014. "Pretreatment methods to enhance anaerobic digestion of organic solid waste," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 143-156.
    2. Chen, Yinguang & Luo, Jingyang & Yan, Yuanyuan & Feng, Leiyu, 2013. "Enhanced production of short-chain fatty acid by co-fermentation of waste activated sludge and kitchen waste under alkaline conditions and its application to microbial fuel cells," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 1197-1204.
    3. Mei, Xiaojie & Wang, Zhiwei & Miao, Yan & Wu, Zhichao, 2016. "Recover energy from domestic wastewater using anaerobic membrane bioreactor: Operating parameters optimization and energy balance analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 146-154.
    4. Wang, Xiaojiao & Lu, Xingang & Yang, Gaihe & Feng, Yongzhong & Ren, Guangxin & Han, Xinhui, 2016. "Development process and probable future transformations of rural biogas in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 703-712.
    5. Monlau, Florian & Latrille, Eric & Da Costa, Aline Carvalho & Steyer, Jean-Philippe & Carrère, Hélène, 2013. "Enhancement of methane production from sunflower oil cakes by dilute acid pretreatment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 1105-1113.
    6. John M. Finney, 1972. "Indirect Effects in Path Analysis," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 1(2), pages 175-186, November.
    7. Shen, Yanwen & Linville, Jessica L. & Urgun-Demirtas, Meltem & Schoene, Robin P. & Snyder, Seth W., 2015. "Producing pipeline-quality biomethane via anaerobic digestion of sludge amended with corn stover biochar with in-situ CO2 removal," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 300-309.
    8. Mao, Chunlan & Feng, Yongzhong & Wang, Xiaojiao & Ren, Guangxin, 2015. "Review on research achievements of biogas from anaerobic digestion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 540-555.
    9. Chen, Xiaohua & Zhang, YaLei & Gu, Yu & Liu, Zhanguang & Shen, Zheng & Chu, Huaqiang & Zhou, Xuefei, 2014. "Enhancing methane production from rice straw by extrusion pretreatment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 34-41.
    10. Ma, Shenghua & Wang, Hui & Wang, Yu & Bu, Huaiyu & Bai, Jinbo, 2011. "Bio-hydrogen production from cornstalk wastes by orthogonal design method," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 709-713.
    11. Wu, Xuan & Leung, Dennis Y.C., 2011. "Optimization of biodiesel production from camelina oil using orthogonal experiment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(11), pages 3615-3624.
    12. Behera, Shuvashish & Arora, Richa & Nandhagopal, N. & Kumar, Sachin, 2014. "Importance of chemical pretreatment for bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 91-106.
    13. Moraes, Bruna S. & Junqueira, Tassia L. & Pavanello, Lucas G. & Cavalett, Otávio & Mantelatto, Paulo E. & Bonomi, Antonio & Zaiat, Marcelo, 2014. "Anaerobic digestion of vinasse from sugarcane biorefineries in Brazil from energy, environmental, and economic perspectives: Profit or expense?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 825-835.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mao, Chunlan & Xi, Jianchao & Feng, Yongzhong & Wang, Xiaojiao & Ren, Guangxin, 2019. "Biogas production and synergistic correlations of systematic parameters during batch anaerobic digestion of corn straw," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 1271-1279.
    2. Chowdhury, M.M.I. & Nakhla, G. & Zhu, J., 2017. "Ultrasonically enhanced anaerobic digestion of thickened waste activated sludge using fluidized bed reactors," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 807-818.
    3. Chen, Yinguang & Liu, Hui & Zheng, Xiong & Wang, Xin & Wu, Jiang, 2017. "New method for enhancement of bioenergy production from municipal organic wastes via regulation of anaerobic fermentation process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 190-198.
    4. Lina Luo & Youpei Qu & Weijia Gong & Liyuan Qin & Wenzhe Li & Yong Sun, 2021. "Effect of Particle Size on the Aerobic and Anaerobic Digestion Characteristics of Whole Rice Straw," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-15, July.
    5. Liu, Yang & He, Pinjing & Duan, Haowen & Shao, Liming & Lü, Fan, 2021. "Low calcium dosage favors methanation of long-chain fatty acids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    6. Zou, Shuzhen & Kang, Di, 2018. "Relationship between anaerobic digestion characteristics and biogas production under composting pretreatment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 485-494.
    7. Ormaechea, P. & Castrillón, L. & Suárez-Peña, B. & Megido, L. & Fernández-Nava, Y. & Negral, L. & Marañón, E. & Rodríguez-Iglesias, J., 2018. "Enhancement of biogas production from cattle manure pretreated and/or co-digested at pilot-plant scale. Characterization by SEM," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 897-904.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khan, Mohd Atiqueuzzaman & Ngo, Huu Hao & Guo, Wenshan & Liu, Yiwen & Zhang, Xinbo & Guo, Jianbo & Chang, Soon Woong & Nguyen, Dinh Duc & Wang, Jie, 2018. "Biohydrogen production from anaerobic digestion and its potential as renewable energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(PB), pages 754-768.
    2. Zamri, M.F.M.A. & Hasmady, Saiful & Akhiar, Afifi & Ideris, Fazril & Shamsuddin, A.H. & Mofijur, M. & Fattah, I. M. Rizwanul & Mahlia, T.M.I., 2021. "A comprehensive review on anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    3. Ma, Shuaishuai & Li, Yuling & Li, Jingxue & Yu, Xiaona & Cui, Zongjun & Yuan, Xufeng & Zhu, Wanbin & Wang, Hongliang, 2022. "Features of single and combined technologies for lignocellulose pretreatment to enhance biomethane production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    4. Zheng, Lei & Cheng, Shikun & Han, Yanzhao & Wang, Min & Xiang, Yue & Guo, Jiali & Cai, Di & Mang, Heinz-Peter & Dong, Taili & Li, Zifu & Yan, Zhengxu & Men, Yu, 2020. "Bio-natural gas industry in China: Current status and development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    5. Feng, Qunjie & Lin, Yunqin, 2017. "Integrated processes of anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis for higher bioenergy recovery from lignocellulosic biomass: A brief review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 1272-1287.
    6. Ndayisenga, Fabrice & Yu, Zhisheng & Zheng, Jianzhong & Wang, Bobo & Liang, Hongxia & Phulpoto, Irfan Ali & Habiyakare, Telesphore & Zhou, Dandan, 2021. "Microbial electrohydrogenesis cell and dark fermentation integrated system enhances biohydrogen production from lignocellulosic agricultural wastes: Substrate pretreatment towards optimization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    7. Zhang, Jingxin & Kan, Xiang & Shen, Ye & Loh, Kai-Chee & Wang, Chi-Hwa & Dai, Yanjun & Tong, Yen Wah, 2018. "A hybrid biological and thermal waste-to-energy system with heat energy recovery and utilization for solid organic waste treatment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 214-222.
    8. Bhatnagar, N. & Ryan, D. & Murphy, R. & Enright, A.M., 2022. "A comprehensive review of green policy, anaerobic digestion of animal manure and chicken litter feedstock potential – Global and Irish perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    9. Zou, Shuzhen & Kang, Di, 2018. "Relationship between anaerobic digestion characteristics and biogas production under composting pretreatment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 485-494.
    10. Zealand, A.M. & Roskilly, A.P. & Graham, D.W., 2017. "Effect of feeding frequency and organic loading rate on biomethane production in the anaerobic digestion of rice straw," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 156-165.
    11. Hassan, Muhammad & Zhao, Chao & Ding, Weimin, 2020. "Enhanced methane generation and biodegradation efficiencies of goose manure by thermal-sonication pretreatment and organic loading management in CSTR," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    12. Gupte, Ameya Pankaj & Basaglia, Marina & Casella, Sergio & Favaro, Lorenzo, 2022. "Rice waste streams as a promising source of biofuels: feedstocks, biotechnologies and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    13. Mohammed Ali Musa & Syazwani Idrus & Hasfalina Che Man & Nik Norsyahariati Nik Daud, 2018. "Wastewater Treatment and Biogas Recovery Using Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactors (AnMBRs): Strategies and Achievements," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-24, June.
    14. Brémond, Ulysse & de Buyer, Raphaëlle & Steyer, Jean-Philippe & Bernet, Nicolas & Carrere, Hélène, 2018. "Biological pretreatments of biomass for improving biogas production: an overview from lab scale to full-scale," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 583-604.
    15. Li, Yue & Chen, Yinguang & Wu, Jiang, 2019. "Enhancement of methane production in anaerobic digestion process: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 120-137.
    16. Gunes, Burcu & Stokes, Joseph & Davis, Paul & Connolly, Cathal & Lawler, Jenny, 2019. "Pre-treatments to enhance biogas yield and quality from anaerobic digestion of whiskey distillery and brewery wastes: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    17. Kostas, Emily T. & Beneroso, Daniel & Robinson, John P., 2017. "The application of microwave heating in bioenergy: A review on the microwave pre-treatment and upgrading technologies for biomass," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 12-27.
    18. Hafid, Halimatun Saadiah & Rahman, Nor’ Aini Abdul & Shah, Umi Kalsom Md & Baharuddin, Azhari Samsu & Ariff, Arbakariya B., 2017. "Feasibility of using kitchen waste as future substrate for bioethanol production: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 671-686.
    19. Li, Wei & Guo, Jianbin & Cheng, Huicai & Wang, Wei & Dong, Renjie, 2017. "Two-phase anaerobic digestion of municipal solid wastes enhanced by hydrothermal pretreatment: Viability, performance and microbial community evaluation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 613-622.
    20. Cheng, F. & Brewer, C.E., 2021. "Conversion of protein-rich lignocellulosic wastes to bio-energy: Review and recommendations for hydrolysis + fermentation and anaerobic digestion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:179:y:2016:i:c:p:191-202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.