IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v113y2014icp1475-1483.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal scheduling for enhanced coal bed methane production through CO2 injection

Author

Listed:
  • Huang, Yuping
  • Zheng, Qipeng P.
  • Fan, Neng
  • Aminian, Kashy

Abstract

Enhanced coal bed methane production with CO2 injection (CO2-ECBM) is an effective technology for accessing the natural gas embedded in the traditionally unmineable coal seams. The revenue via this production process is generated not only by the sales of coal bed methane, but also by trading CO2 credits in the carbon market. As the technology of CO2-ECBM becomes mature, its commercialization opportunities are also springing up. This paper proposes applicable mathematical models for CO2-ECBM production and compares the impacts of their production schedules on the total profit. A novel basic deterministic model for CO2-ECBM production including the technical and chemical details is proposed and then a multistage stochastic programming model is formulated in order to address uncertainties of natural gas price and CO2 credit. Both models are nonlinear programming problems, which are solved by commercial nonlinear programming software BARON via GAMS. Numerical experiments show the benefits (e.g., expected profit gain) of using stochastic models versus deterministic models.

Suggested Citation

  • Huang, Yuping & Zheng, Qipeng P. & Fan, Neng & Aminian, Kashy, 2014. "Optimal scheduling for enhanced coal bed methane production through CO2 injection," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1475-1483.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:113:y:2014:i:c:p:1475-1483
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.08.074
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261913007186
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.08.074?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Q.Y. & Wang, L. & Ju, Y.L., 2011. "Analysis of flammability limits for the liquefaction process of oxygen-bearing coal-bed methane," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(9), pages 2934-2939.
    2. Pettinau, Alberto & Ferrara, Francesca & Amorino, Carlo, 2012. "Techno-economic comparison between different technologies for a CCS power generation plant integrated with a sub-bituminous coal mine in Italy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 32-39.
    3. Gao, Ting & Lin, Wensheng & Gu, Anzhong & Gu, Min, 2010. "Coalbed methane liquefaction adopting a nitrogen expansion process with propane pre-cooling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(7), pages 2142-2147, July.
    4. Bai, Hsunling & Wei, Jong-Hourm, 1996. "The CO2 mitigation options for the electric sector. A case study of Taiwan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 221-228, March.
    5. Pekala, Lukasz M. & Tan, Raymond R. & Foo, Dominic C.Y. & Jezowski, Jacek M., 2010. "Optimal energy planning models with carbon footprint constraints," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(6), pages 1903-1910, June.
    6. Chen, Shiyi & Xiang, Wenguo & Wang, Dong & Xue, Zhipeng, 2012. "Incorporating IGCC and CaO sorption-enhanced process for power generation with CO2 capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 285-294.
    7. Muis, Z.A. & Hashim, H. & Manan, Z.A. & Taha, F.M. & Douglas, P.L., 2010. "Optimal planning of renewable energy-integrated electricity generation schemes with CO2 reduction target," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(11), pages 2562-2570.
    8. Perera, M.S.A. & Ranjith, P.G. & Viete, D.R., 2013. "Effects of gaseous and super-critical carbon dioxide saturation on the mechanical properties of bituminous coal from the Southern Sydney Basin," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 73-81.
    9. Qipeng P. Zheng & Panos M. Pardalos, 2010. "Stochastic and Risk Management Models and Solution Algorithm for Natural Gas Transmission Network Expansion and LNG Terminal Location Planning," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 147(2), pages 337-357, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Yiwei & Du, Mei & Guo, Xuqiang & Sun, Qiang & Liu, Aixian & Chen, Bo & Chen, Guangjin & Sun, Changyu & Yang, Lanying, 2017. "Experiments and simulations for continuous recovery of methane from coal seam gas (CSG) utilizing hydrate formation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 28-41.
    2. Ahn, Yuchan & Han, Jeehoon, 2018. "Economic optimization of integrated network for utility supply and carbon dioxide mitigation with multi-site and multi-period demand uncertainties," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 723-734.
    3. Tapia, John Frederick D. & Lee, Jui-Yuan & Ooi, Raymond E.H. & Foo, Dominic C.Y. & Tan, Raymond R., 2016. "Optimal CO2 allocation and scheduling in enhanced oil recovery (EOR) operations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 337-345.
    4. Mohd Yasin, Nazlina Haiza & Maeda, Toshinari & Hu, Anyi & Yu, Chang-Ping & Wood, Thomas K., 2015. "CO2 sequestration by methanogens in activated sludge for methane production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 426-434.
    5. De Silva, G.P.D. & Ranjith, P.G. & Perera, M.S.A. & Chen, B., 2016. "Effect of bedding planes, their orientation and clay depositions on effective re-injection of produced brine into clay rich deep sandstone formations: Implications for deep earth energy extraction," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 24-40.
    6. Zhong, Dong-Liang & Ding, Kun & Lu, Yi-Yu & Yan, Jin & Zhao, Wei-Long, 2016. "Methane recovery from coal mine gas using hydrate formation in water-in-oil emulsions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1619-1626.
    7. Zhong, Dong-Liang & Wang, Wen-Chun & Zou, Zhen-Lin & Lu, Yi-Yu & Yan, Jin & Ding, Kun, 2018. "Investigation on methane recovery from low-concentration coal mine gas by tetra-n-butyl ammonium chloride semiclathrate hydrate formation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 686-693.
    8. Lee, Jui-Yuan, 2017. "A multi-period optimisation model for planning carbon sequestration retrofits in the electricity sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 12-20.
    9. Zhou, Aitao & Li, Jingwen & Gong, Weili & Wang, Kai & Du, Changang, 2023. "Theoretical and numerical study on the contribution of multi-hole arrangement to coalbed methane extraction," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    10. Fan, Zhanglei & Fan, Gangwei & Zhang, Dongsheng & Zhang, Lei & Zhang, Shuai & Liang, Shuaishuai & Yu, Wei, 2021. "Optimal injection timing and gas mixture proportion for enhancing coalbed methane recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    11. Fan, Lurong & Xu, Jiuping, 2020. "Authority–enterprise equilibrium based mixed subsidy mechanism for carbon reduction and energy utilization in the coalbed methane industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    12. Zhou, Lijun & Zhou, Xihua & Fan, Chaojun & Bai, Gang, 2022. "Coal permeability evolution triggered by variable injection parameters during gas mixture enhanced methane recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    13. Yang, Ruiyue & Hong, Chunyang & Huang, Zhongwei & Song, Xianzhi & Zhang, Shikun & Wen, Haitao, 2019. "Coal breakage using abrasive liquid nitrogen jet and its implications for coalbed methane recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    14. Guozhong Hu & Jialin Xu & Fuxi Zhang & Changchun Zhao & Wei Qin & Yiran Zhu, 2015. "Coal and Coalbed Methane Co-Extraction Technology Based on the Ground Movement in the Yangquan Coalfield, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-17, July.
    15. Huang, Zhouchun & Zheng, Qipeng Phil, 2020. "A multistage stochastic programming approach for preventive maintenance scheduling of GENCOs with natural gas contract," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(3), pages 1036-1051.
    16. Wang, Yiwei & Deng, Ye & Guo, Xuqiang & Sun, Qiang & Liu, Aixian & Zhang, Guangqing & Yue, Gang & Yang, Lanying, 2018. "Experimental and modeling investigation on separation of methane from coal seam gas (CSG) using hydrate formation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 377-395.
    17. Fan, Lurong & Wang, Binyu & Song, Xiaoling, 2023. "An authority-enterprise equilibrium differentiated subsidy mechanism for promoting coalbed methane extraction in multiple coal seams," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PA).
    18. Yan, Jin & Lu, Yi-Yu & Zhong, Dong-Liang & Zou, Zhen-Lin & Li, Jian-Bo, 2019. "Enhanced methane recovery from low-concentration coalbed methane by gas hydrate formation in graphite nanofluids," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 728-736.
    19. Fan, Lurong & Ma, Ning & Zhang, Wen, 2023. "Multi-stakeholder equilibrium-based subsidy allocation mechanism for promoting coalbed methane scale extraction-utilization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohd Yasin, Nazlina Haiza & Maeda, Toshinari & Hu, Anyi & Yu, Chang-Ping & Wood, Thomas K., 2015. "CO2 sequestration by methanogens in activated sludge for methane production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 426-434.
    2. Jui-Yuan Lee & Han-Fu Lin, 2019. "Multi-Footprint Constrained Energy Sector Planning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-18, June.
    3. Mustapa, Siti Indati & Bekhet, Hussain Ali, 2016. "Analysis of CO2 emissions reduction in the Malaysian transportation sector: An optimisation approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 171-183.
    4. Wang, Chenghong & Sun, Daming & Shen, Qie & Shen, Keyi & Linghu, Jianshe & Wang, Xiaodong, 2023. "Techno-economic analysis on nitrogen reverse Brayton cycles for efficient coalbed methane liquefaction process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    5. Adeel Arif & Muhammad Rizwan & Ali Elkamel & Luqman Hakeem & Muhammad Zaman, 2020. "Optimal Selection of Integrated Electricity Generation Systems for the Power Sector with Low Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-37, September.
    6. Krishna Priya, G.S. & Bandyopadhyay, Santanu, 2017. "Multi-objective pinch analysis for power system planning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 335-347.
    7. Yin, Hong & Zhou, Junping & Xian, Xuefu & Jiang, Yongdong & Lu, Zhaohui & Tan, Jingqiang & Liu, Guojun, 2017. "Experimental study of the effects of sub- and super-critical CO2 saturation on the mechanical characteristics of organic-rich shales," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 84-95.
    8. Olateju, Babatunde & Kumar, Amit, 2013. "Techno-economic assessment of hydrogen production from underground coal gasification (UCG) in Western Canada with carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) for upgrading bitumen from oil sands," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 428-440.
    9. Xu, Shisen & Ren, Yongqiang & Wang, Baomin & Xu, Yue & Chen, Liang & Wang, Xiaolong & Xiao, Tiancun, 2014. "Development of a novel 2-stage entrained flow coal dry powder gasifier," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 318-323.
    10. Reham Alhindawi & Yousef Abu Nahleh & Arun Kumar & Nirajan Shiwakoti, 2020. "Projection of Greenhouse Gas Emissions for the Road Transport Sector Based on Multivariate Regression and the Double Exponential Smoothing Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-18, November.
    11. Moioli, Stefania & Giuffrida, Antonio & Romano, Matteo C. & Pellegrini, Laura A. & Lozza, Giovanni, 2016. "Assessment of MDEA absorption process for sequential H2S removal and CO2 capture in air-blown IGCC plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1452-1470.
    12. Ye, Bin & Yang, Peng & Jiang, Jingjing & Miao, Lixin & Shen, Bo & Li, Ji, 2017. "Feasibility and economic analysis of a renewable energy powered special town in China," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 40-50.
    13. Li, Y.P. & Huang, G.H. & Li, M.W., 2014. "An integrated optimization modeling approach for planning emission trading and clean-energy development under uncertainty," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 31-46.
    14. Rochedo, Pedro R.R. & Szklo, Alexandre, 2013. "Designing learning curves for carbon capture based on chemical absorption according to the minimum work of separation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 383-391.
    15. Tan, Raymond R. & Aviso, Kathleen B. & Barilea, Ivan U. & Culaba, Alvin B. & Cruz, Jose B., 2012. "A fuzzy multi-regional input–output optimization model for biomass production and trade under resource and footprint constraints," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 154-160.
    16. Constantino Dário Justo & José Eduardo Tafula & Pedro Moura, 2022. "Planning Sustainable Energy Systems in the Southern African Development Community: A Review of Power Systems Planning Approaches," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-28, October.
    17. Chen, Wei-Hsin & Chen, Chih-Jung & Hung, Chen-I & Shen, Cheng-Hsien & Hsu, Heng-Wen, 2013. "A comparison of gasification phenomena among raw biomass, torrefied biomass and coal in an entrained-flow reactor," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 421-430.
    18. Wang, B. & Liu, L. & Huang, G.H. & Li, W. & Xie, Y.L., 2018. "Effects of carbon and environmental tax on power mix planning - A case study of Hebei Province, China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 645-657.
    19. Mofid, Hossein & Jazayeri-Rad, Hooshang & Shahbazian, Mehdi & Fetanat, Abdolvahhab, 2019. "Enhancing the performance of a parallel nitrogen expansion liquefaction process (NELP) using the multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 286-303.
    20. Munoz, Francisco D. & van der Weijde, Adriaan Hendrik & Hobbs, Benjamin F. & Watson, Jean-Paul, 2017. "Does risk aversion affect transmission and generation planning? A Western North America case study," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 213-225.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:113:y:2014:i:c:p:1475-1483. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.