IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i12p2329-d240824.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-Footprint Constrained Energy Sector Planning

Author

Listed:
  • Jui-Yuan Lee

    (Department of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, National Taipei University of Technology, 1, Sec. 3, Zhongxiao E. Rd., Taipei 10608, Taiwan
    Research Center of Energy Conservation for New Generation of Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Sectors, National Taipei University of Technology, 1, Sec. 3, Zhongxiao E. Rd., Taipei 10608, Taiwan)

  • Han-Fu Lin

    (Department of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, National Taipei University of Technology, 1, Sec. 3, Zhongxiao E. Rd., Taipei 10608, Taiwan)

Abstract

Fossil fuels have been heavily exploited since the Industrial Revolution. The resulting carbon emissions are widely regarded as being the main cause of global warming and climate change. Key mitigation technologies for reducing carbon emissions include carbon capture and storage (CCS) and renewables. According to recent analysis of the International Energy Agency, renewables and CCS will contribute more than 50% of the cumulative emissions reductions by 2050. This paper presents a new mathematical programming model for multi-footprint energy sector planning with CCS and renewables deployment. The model is generic and considers a variety of carbon capture (CC) options for the retrofit of individual thermal power generation units. For comprehensive planning, the Integrated Environmental Control Model is employed in this work to assess the performance and costs of different types of power generation units before and after CC retrofits. A case study of Taiwan’s energy sector is presented to demonstrate the use of the proposed model for complex decision-making and cost trade-offs in the deployment of CC technologies and additional low-carbon energy sources. Different scenarios are analysed, and the results are compared to identify the optimal strategy for the energy mix to satisfy the electricity demand and the various planning constraints.

Suggested Citation

  • Jui-Yuan Lee & Han-Fu Lin, 2019. "Multi-Footprint Constrained Energy Sector Planning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-18, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:12:p:2329-:d:240824
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/12/2329/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/12/2329/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Krishna Priya, G.S. & Bandyopadhyay, Santanu, 2017. "Multi-objective pinch analysis for power system planning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 335-347.
    2. Bhowmik, Chiranjib & Bhowmik, Sumit & Ray, Amitava & Pandey, Krishna Murari, 2017. "Optimal green energy planning for sustainable development: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 796-813.
    3. Unknown, 1967. "Index," 1967 Conference, August 21-30, 1967, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia 209796, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Atkins, Martin J. & Morrison, Andrew S. & Walmsley, Michael R.W., 2010. "Carbon Emissions Pinch Analysis (CEPA) for emissions reduction in the New Zealand electricity sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(3), pages 982-987, March.
    5. Walmsley, Michael R.W. & Walmsley, Timothy G. & Atkins, Martin J., 2015. "Achieving 33% renewable electricity generation by 2020 in California," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(P3), pages 260-269.
    6. Walmsley, Michael R.W. & Walmsley, Timothy G. & Atkins, Martin J. & Kamp, Peter J.J. & Neale, James R., 2014. "Minimising carbon emissions and energy expended for electricity generation in New Zealand through to 2050," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 656-665.
    7. Tan, Raymond R. & Foo, Dominic Chwan Yee & Aviso, Kathleen B. & Ng, Denny Kok Sum, 2009. "The use of graphical pinch analysis for visualizing water footprint constraints in biofuel production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(5), pages 605-609, May.
    8. Ooi, Raymond E.H. & Foo, Dominic C.Y. & Tan, Raymond R., 2014. "Targeting for carbon sequestration retrofit planning in the power generation sector for multi-period problems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 477-487.
    9. Lee, Jui-Yuan, 2017. "A multi-period optimisation model for planning carbon sequestration retrofits in the electricity sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 12-20.
    10. Crilly, Damien & Zhelev, Toshko, 2008. "Emissions targeting and planning: An application of CO2 emissions pinch analysis (CEPA) to the Irish electricity generation sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(10), pages 1498-1507.
    11. Almansoori, Ali & Betancourt-Torcat, Alberto, 2015. "Design optimization model for the integration of renewable and nuclear energy in the United Arab Emirates’ power system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 234-251.
    12. Chen, Qixin & Kang, Chongqing & Xia, Qing & Guan, Dabo, 2011. "Preliminary exploration on low-carbon technology roadmap of China’s power sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 1500-1512.
    13. DeCarolis, Joseph & Daly, Hannah & Dodds, Paul & Keppo, Ilkka & Li, Francis & McDowall, Will & Pye, Steve & Strachan, Neil & Trutnevyte, Evelina & Usher, Will & Winning, Matthew & Yeh, Sonia & Zeyring, 2017. "Formalizing best practice for energy system optimization modelling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 184-198.
    14. Xie, Y.L. & Huang, G.H. & Li, W. & Ji, L., 2014. "Carbon and air pollutants constrained energy planning for clean power generation with a robust optimization model—A case study of Jining City, China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 150-167.
    15. Lee, Sin Cherng & Sum Ng, Denny Kok & Yee Foo, Dominic Chwan & Tan, Raymond R., 2009. "Extended pinch targeting techniques for carbon-constrained energy sector planning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(1), pages 60-67, January.
    16. Bai, Hsunling & Wei, Jong-Hourm, 1996. "The CO2 mitigation options for the electric sector. A case study of Taiwan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 221-228, March.
    17. Malkawi, Salaheddin & Al-Nimr, Moh'd & Azizi, Danah, 2017. "A multi-criteria optimization analysis for Jordan's energy mix," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 680-696.
    18. Pekala, Lukasz M. & Tan, Raymond R. & Foo, Dominic C.Y. & Jezowski, Jacek M., 2010. "Optimal energy planning models with carbon footprint constraints," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(6), pages 1903-1910, June.
    19. Oree, Vishwamitra & Sayed Hassen, Sayed Z. & Fleming, Peter J., 2017. "Generation expansion planning optimisation with renewable energy integration: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 790-803.
    20. Foo, Dominic C.Y. & Tan, Raymond R. & Ng, Denny K.S., 2008. "Carbon and footprint-constrained energy planning using cascade analysis technique," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(10), pages 1480-1488.
    21. Muis, Z.A. & Hashim, H. & Manan, Z.A. & Taha, F.M. & Douglas, P.L., 2010. "Optimal planning of renewable energy-integrated electricity generation schemes with CO2 reduction target," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(11), pages 2562-2570.
    22. Tan, Raymond R. & Foo, Dominic C.Y., 2007. "Pinch analysis approach to carbon-constrained energy sector planning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(8), pages 1422-1429.
    23. Kim, Seunghyok & Koo, Jamin & Lee, Chang Jun & Yoon, En Sup, 2012. "Optimization of Korean energy planning for sustainability considering uncertainties in learning rates and external factors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 126-134.
    24. Tan, Raymond R., 2011. "A general source-sink model with inoperability constraints for robust energy sector planning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(11), pages 3759-3764.
    25. Walmsley, Michael R.W. & Walmsley, Timothy G. & Atkins, Martin J. & Kamp, Peter J.J. & Neale, James R. & Chand, Alvin, 2015. "Carbon Emissions Pinch Analysis for emissions reductions in the New Zealand transport sector through to 2050," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(P3), pages 569-576.
    26. Koltsaklis, Nikolaos E. & Dagoumas, Athanasios S. & Kopanos, Georgios M. & Pistikopoulos, Efstratios N. & Georgiadis, Michael C., 2014. "A spatial multi-period long-term energy planning model: A case study of the Greek power system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 456-482.
    27. Ko, Fu-Kuang & Huang, Chang-Bin & Tseng, Pei-Ying & Lin, Chung-Han & Zheng, Bo-Yan & Chiu, Hsiu-Mei, 2010. "Long-term CO2 emissions reduction target and scenarios of power sector in Taiwan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 288-300, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lopez, Neil Stephen A. & Foo, Dominic C.Y. & Tan, Raymond R., 2021. "Optimizing regional electricity trading with Carbon Emissions Pinch Analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    2. Rok Gomilšek & Lidija Čuček & Marko Homšak & Raymond R. Tan & Zdravko Kravanja, 2020. "Carbon Emissions Constrained Energy Planning for Aluminum Products," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, June.
    3. Mitavachan Hiremath & Peter Viebahn & Sascha Samadi, 2021. "An Integrated Comparative Assessment of Coal-Based Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Vis-à-Vis Renewable Energies in India’s Low Carbon Electricity Transition Scenarios," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-28, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lee, Jui-Yuan, 2017. "A multi-period optimisation model for planning carbon sequestration retrofits in the electricity sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 12-20.
    2. Lopez, Neil Stephen A. & Foo, Dominic C.Y. & Tan, Raymond R., 2021. "Optimizing regional electricity trading with Carbon Emissions Pinch Analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    3. Rok Gomilšek & Lidija Čuček & Marko Homšak & Raymond R. Tan & Zdravko Kravanja, 2020. "Carbon Emissions Constrained Energy Planning for Aluminum Products," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, June.
    4. Krishna Priya, G.S. & Bandyopadhyay, Santanu, 2017. "Multi-objective pinch analysis for power system planning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 335-347.
    5. Li, Zhiwei & Jia, Xiaoping & Foo, Dominic C.Y. & Tan, Raymond R., 2016. "Minimizing carbon footprint using pinch analysis: The case of regional renewable electricity planning in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1051-1062.
    6. de Lira Quaresma, Ana Carolina & Francisco, Flávio S. & Pessoa, Fernando L.P. & Queiroz, Eduardo M., 2018. "Carbon emission reduction in the Brazilian electricity sector using Carbon Sources Diagram," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 134-150.
    7. Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír & Varbanov, Petar Sabev & Walmsley, Timothy G. & Jia, Xuexiu, 2018. "New directions in the implementation of Pinch Methodology (PM)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 439-468.
    8. Sinha, Rakesh Kumar & Chaturvedi, Nitin Dutt, 2019. "A review on carbon emission reduction in industries and planning emission limits," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    9. Nair, Purusothmn Nair S Bhasker & Tan, Raymond R. & Foo, Dominic C.Y., 2022. "Extended graphical approach for the implementation of energy-consuming negative emission technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    10. Yu, Dongwei & Tan, Hongwei, 2016. "Application of ‘potential carbon’ in energy planning with carbon emission constraints," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 363-369.
    11. Nair, Purusothmn Nair S. Bhasker & Tan, Raymond R. & Foo, Dominic C.Y., 2021. "A generic algebraic targeting approach for integration of renewable energy sources, CO2 capture and storage and negative emission technologies in carbon-constrained energy planning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    12. Tan, Raymond R., 2011. "A general source-sink model with inoperability constraints for robust energy sector planning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(11), pages 3759-3764.
    13. Kong, Karen Gah Hie & How, Bing Shen & Lim, Juin Yau & Leong, Wei Dong & Teng, Sin Yong & Ng, Wendy Pei Qin & Moser, Irene & Sunarso, Jaka, 2022. "Shaving electric bills with renewables? A multi-period pinch-based methodology for energy planning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).
    14. Ooi, Raymond E.H. & Foo, Dominic C.Y. & Tan, Raymond R., 2014. "Targeting for carbon sequestration retrofit planning in the power generation sector for multi-period problems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 477-487.
    15. Walmsley, Michael R.W. & Walmsley, Timothy G. & Atkins, Martin J. & Kamp, Peter J.J. & Neale, James R., 2014. "Minimising carbon emissions and energy expended for electricity generation in New Zealand through to 2050," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 656-665.
    16. Tan, Raymond R. & Aviso, Kathleen B. & Barilea, Ivan U. & Culaba, Alvin B. & Cruz, Jose B., 2012. "A fuzzy multi-regional input–output optimization model for biomass production and trade under resource and footprint constraints," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 154-160.
    17. Liang, Sai & Zhang, Tianzhu, 2011. "Managing urban energy system: A case of Suzhou in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 2910-2918, May.
    18. Mohd Yahya, Nur Syahira & Ng, Lik Yin & Andiappan, Viknesh, 2021. "Optimisation and planning of biomass supply chain for new and existing power plants based on carbon reduction targets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    19. Walmsley, Michael R.W. & Walmsley, Timothy G. & Atkins, Martin J., 2015. "Achieving 33% renewable electricity generation by 2020 in California," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(P3), pages 260-269.
    20. Walmsley, Michael R.W. & Walmsley, Timothy G. & Atkins, Martin J. & Kamp, Peter J.J. & Neale, James R. & Chand, Alvin, 2015. "Carbon Emissions Pinch Analysis for emissions reductions in the New Zealand transport sector through to 2050," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(P3), pages 569-576.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:12:p:2329-:d:240824. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.