IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v228y2020ics0378377419307528.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparisons of spray characteristics between vertical impact and turbine drive sprinklers—A case study of the 50PYC and HY50 big gun-type sprinklers

Author

Listed:
  • Ge, Maosheng
  • Wu, Pute
  • Zhu, Delan
  • Zhang, Lin

Abstract

Vertical impact and turbine drive sprinklers are the most widely used high-volume sprinklers with both solid set spray and hose-drawn traveler irrigator systems. Different mechanical structures and driving modes between the two types of sprinklers will inevitably lead to differences in spray performance, which may affect the adaptability of each sprinkler. Thus far, there are few comparative studies that have quantitatively analyzed the spray characteristics of the two types of gun sprinklers, resulting in the lack of guidance in sprinkler-type selection for both sprinkler system designers and farmers. In this paper, the vertical impact drive gun sprinkler (50PYC) and turbine drive gun sprinkler (HY50) were used to conduct a comparative analysis of water distribution and kinetic energy distribution between these two commonly-used sprinklers. The results show that the average radial application rate of 50PYC was 11.0%–35.9% higher than that of HY50 under fixed spray conditions. Under mobile spray conditions, the water distribution of the two gun sprinklers initially increased and then decreased as the distance from the travel lane increased, exhibiting a unimodal distribution. Both the cumulative irrigation depth and average radial application rate of 50PYC were significantly higher than those of HY50 in the spray area close to the travel lane. Under overlapping spraying conditions using two adjacent sprinklers of the same type, various working pressures and different spacing between sprinklers, the maximum distribution uniformity coefficients of the 50PYC gun sprinkler reached 80.5% to 87.8%, while the maximum distribution uniformity coefficients of the HY50 gun sprinkler were approximately 67.1% to 76.9% (5.3% to 13.5% lower than that of 50PYC). Under fixed spray conditions, the peak values of spray kinetic energy of the turbine drive-HY50 was about 1.5–2.7 times that of the 50PYC gun sprinkler under different working pressures. Under mobile spray conditions, the cumulative kinetic energy in the whole spray area of the HY50 gun sprinkler was about 1.5–2.4 times that of the 50PYC gun sprinkler. This quantitative study on two common types of sprinkler guns, vertical impact and turbine drive sprinklers, indicates that to comprehensively obtain greater irrigation benefits, soil and crop types, irrigation water quality, and economic and labor costs should also be taken into consideration when selecting between the two gun sprinklers.

Suggested Citation

  • Ge, Maosheng & Wu, Pute & Zhu, Delan & Zhang, Lin, 2020. "Comparisons of spray characteristics between vertical impact and turbine drive sprinklers—A case study of the 50PYC and HY50 big gun-type sprinklers," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:228:y:2020:i:c:s0378377419307528
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105847
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377419307528
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105847?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mantovani, E. C. & Villalobos, F. J. & Organ, F. & Fereres, E., 1995. "Modelling the effects of sprinkler irrigation uniformity on crop yield," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(3-4), pages 243-257, July.
    2. Sheikhesmaeili, Omid & Montero, Jesús & Laserna, Santiago, 2016. "Analysis of water application with semi-portable big size sprinkler irrigation systems in semi-arid areas," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 275-284.
    3. Ge, Maosheng & Wu, Pute & Zhu, Delan & Zhang, Lin, 2018. "Analysis of kinetic energy distribution of big gun sprinkler applied to continuous moving hose-drawn traveler," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 118-132.
    4. Playan, E. & Salvador, R. & Faci, J.M. & Zapata, N. & Martinez-Cob, A. & Sanchez, I., 2005. "Day and night wind drift and evaporation losses in sprinkler solid-sets and moving laterals," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 76(3), pages 139-159, August.
    5. Sanchez, I. & Faci, J.M. & Zapata, N., 2011. "The effects of pressure, nozzle diameter and meteorological conditions on the performance of agricultural impact sprinklers," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 102(1), pages 13-24.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang, Rui & Zheng, Changjuan & Zhu, Delan & Wu, Pute & Liu, Yichuan & Zhang, Xiaomin & Khudayberdi, Nazarov & Liu, Changxin, 2023. "Variation in sprinkler irrigation droplet impact angle on the physical crusting properties of soils," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    2. Zhang, Qianwen & Ge, Maosheng & Wu, Pute & Wei, Fuqiang & Xue, Shaopeng & Wang, Bo & Ge, Xinbo, 2023. "Solar photovoltaic coupled with compressed air energy storage: A novel method for energy saving and high quality sprinkler irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    3. Zhu, Zhongrui & Li, Jiusheng & Zhu, Delan, 2024. "Influence of biotic and abiotic factors and water partitioning on the kinetic energy of sprinkler irrigation on a maize canopy," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    4. Pan Tang & Chao Chen & Hong Li, 2020. "Improving Water Distribution Uniformity by Optimizing the Structural Size of the Drive Spoon Blades for a Vertical Impact Sprinkler," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-13, September.
    5. Hui, Xin & Zhao, He & Zhang, Haohui & Wang, Wentao & Wang, Jingjing & Yan, Haijun, 2023. "Specific power or droplet shear stress: Which is the primary cause of soil erosion under low-pressure sprinklers?," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).
    6. Chen, Rui & Li, Hong & Wang, Jian & Song, Zhuoyang, 2023. "Critical factors influencing soil runoff and erosion in sprinkler irrigation: Water application rate and droplet kinetic energy," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    7. Jian Wang & Zhuoyang Song & Rui Chen & Ting Yang & Zuokun Tian, 2022. "Experimental Study on Droplet Characteristics of Rotating Sprinklers with Circular Nozzles and Diffuser," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-21, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ge, Maosheng & Wu, Pute & Zhu, Delan & Zhang, Lin, 2018. "Analysis of kinetic energy distribution of big gun sprinkler applied to continuous moving hose-drawn traveler," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 118-132.
    2. Cavero, Jose & Faci, Jose M. & Martínez-Cob, Antonio, 2016. "Relevance of sprinkler irrigation time of the day on alfalfa forage production," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 304-313.
    3. Zhang, Qianwen & Ge, Maosheng & Wu, Pute & Wei, Fuqiang & Xue, Shaopeng & Wang, Bo & Ge, Xinbo, 2023. "Solar photovoltaic coupled with compressed air energy storage: A novel method for energy saving and high quality sprinkler irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    4. Baifus Manke, Emanuele & Nörenberg, Bernardo Gomes & Faria, Lessandro Coll & Tarjuelo, José Maria & Colombo, Alberto & Chagas Neta, Maria Clotilde Carré & Parfitt, José Maria Barbat, 2019. "Wind drift and evaporation losses of a mechanical lateral-move irrigation system: Oscillating plate versus fixed spray plate sprinklers," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    5. Robles, O. & Latorre, B. & Zapata, N. & Burguete, J., 2019. "Self-calibrated ballistic model for sprinkler irrigation with a field experiments data base," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 1-1.
    6. Berbel, J. & Mateos, L., 2014. "Does investment in irrigation technology necessarily generate rebound effects? A simulation analysis based on an agro-economic model," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 25-34.
    7. Mattar, Mohamed A. & Roy, Dilip Kumar & Al-Ghobari, Hussein M. & Dewidar, Ahmed Z., 2022. "Machine learning and regression-based techniques for predicting sprinkler irrigation's wind drift and evaporation losses," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    8. Al-Ghobari, Hussein M. & El-Marazky, Mohamed S. & Dewidar, Ahmed Z. & Mattar, Mohamed A., 2018. "Prediction of wind drift and evaporation losses from sprinkler irrigation using neural network and multiple regression techniques," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 211-221.
    9. Maroufpoor, Saman & Maroufpoor, Eisa & Khaledi, Mohammad, 2019. "Effect of farmers’ management on movable sprinkler solid-set systems," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 1-1.
    10. Aminpour, Younes & Dehghan, Darya & Playán, Enrique & Maroufpoor, Eisa, 2023. "Estimation of wind drift and evaporation losses of sprinkler irrigation systems using dimensional analysis," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    11. Robles, O. & Playán, E. & Cavero, J. & Zapata, N., 2017. "Assessing low-pressure solid-set sprinkler irrigation in maize," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 37-49.
    12. Maroufpoor, Saman & Shiri, Jalal & Maroufpoor, Eisa, 2019. "Modeling the sprinkler water distribution uniformity by data-driven methods based on effective variables," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 63-73.
    13. Zhao, Weixia & Li, Jiusheng & Li, Yanfeng & Yin, Jianfeng, 2012. "Effects of drip system uniformity on yield and quality of Chinese cabbage heads," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 118-128.
    14. Jovanovic, N. & Pereira, L.S. & Paredes, P. & Pôças, I. & Cantore, V. & Todorovic, M., 2020. "A review of strategies, methods and technologies to reduce non-beneficial consumptive water use on farms considering the FAO56 methods," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    15. Hui, Xin & Zheng, Yudong & Yan, Haijun, 2021. "Water distributions of low-pressure sprinklers as affected by the maize canopy under a centre pivot irrigation system," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    16. Iniesta, F. & Testi, L. & Goldhamer, D.A. & Fereres, E., 2008. "Quantifying reductions in consumptive water use under regulated deficit irrigation in pistachio (Pistacia vera L.)," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 95(7), pages 877-886, July.
    17. Franco-Luesma, Samuel & Álvaro-Fuentes, Jorge & Plaza-Bonilla, Daniel & Arrúe, José Luis & Cantero-Martínez, Carlos & Cavero, José, 2019. "Influence of irrigation time and frequency on greenhouse gas emissions in a solid-set sprinkler-irrigated maize under Mediterranean conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 303-311.
    18. Jiménez-Aguirre, M.T. & Isidoro, D., 2018. "Hydrosaline Balance in and Nitrogen Loads from an irrigation district before and after modernization," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 163-175.
    19. Ulpiani, Giulia, 2019. "Water mist spray for outdoor cooling: A systematic review of technologies, methods and impacts," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    20. Li, Jiusheng & Rao, Minjie, 2003. "Field evaluation of crop yield as affected by nonuniformity of sprinkler-applied water and fertilizers," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(1), pages 1-13, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:228:y:2020:i:c:s0378377419307528. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.