IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ3/2024-03-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Elevating Industry IQ: The Dance of Empowerment, Resourcefulness, and Innovation in Petrochemical Realms

Author

Listed:
  • Nadeem Akhtar

    (Royal Commission for Yanbu, Yanbu Industrial College, Yanbu, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Aim of research was to explore the connections between perceived organizational support, job resourcefulness, and innovation. Our investigation also investigated into the mediating role played by job psychological empowerment in these relationships. Data was collected from 25 petrochemical companies, amassing 100 valuable datasets. These were analyzed using PLS-SEM 4. Findings cast light on important role that employee empowerment plays as a mediator in the link between job resourcefulness and innovation. Job resourcefulness indeed wields a significant total impact on innovation, this effect dissipates when the lens shifts to include empowerment. This underscores the pivotal importance of empowerment in the complex relationship between job resourcefulness and innovation. The study advances our understanding of the intricate dynamics of perceived organizational support, job resourcefulness, psychological empowerment, and innovation within the petrochemical industry. Notably, it introduces the concept of job psychological empowerment as a mediator between resourcefulness and innovation, adding depth to existing models.

Suggested Citation

  • Nadeem Akhtar, 2024. "Elevating Industry IQ: The Dance of Empowerment, Resourcefulness, and Innovation in Petrochemical Realms," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 14(3), pages 56-64, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ3:2024-03-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/irmm/article/download/16041/7936
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/irmm/article/view/16041
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alisher Tohirovich Dedahanov & Faridun Bozorov & Sanghyun Sung, 2019. "Paternalistic Leadership and Innovative Behavior: Psychological Empowerment as a Mediator," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Rose B. Mathafena & Anton Grobler, 2021. "Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange in cultivating innovative behaviour in South African organizations," African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(5), pages 559-571, July.
    3. Annum Tariq Maan & Ghulam Abid & Tahira Hassan Butt & Fouzia Ashfaq & Saira Ahmed, 2020. "Perceived organizational support and job satisfaction: a moderated mediation model of proactive personality and psychological empowerment," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-12, December.
    4. Antonio Juan Briones Peñalver & Juan Andrés Bernal Conesa & Carmen de Nieves Nieto, 2018. "Analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility in Spanish Agribusiness and Its Influence on Innovation and Performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(2), pages 182-193, March.
    5. Marfuatun Marfuatun & Muafi Muafi, 2021. "Perceived organizational support and psychological empowerment on service performance mediated by organizational citizenship behavior Islamic perspective (OCBIP)," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 10(1), pages 15-27, January.
    6. Harris, Eric G. & Artis, Andrew B. & Walters, Jack H. & Licata, Jane W., 2006. "Role stressors, service worker job resourcefulness, and job outcomes: An empirical analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(4), pages 407-415, April.
    7. Yuanyuan Guo & Ke Jin, 2019. "How Empowerment and Innovation Climates Influence Employees' Innovative IS Use: The Mediating Role of Thriving," International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems (IJEIS), IGI Global, vol. 15(4), pages 26-42, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anaf Abdulkarem & Wenhua Hou, 2022. "The Influence of the Environment on Cross-Border E-Commerce Adoption Levels Among SMEs in China: The Mediating Role of Organizational Context," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, June.
    2. Johan Graafland, 2020. "Competition in technology and innovation, motivation crowding, and environmental policy," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1), pages 137-145, January.
    3. Muriel Davies & Michel Moulinet & Stéphanie Buisine, 2023. "Innovation culture in French organisations," Post-Print hal-04085432, HAL.
    4. Yuan Jing Luo & Yan Ping Li & Jing Du, 2020. "Coping with Supervisor Sanctions During Organizational Change: Core Members’ Active Change Behavior and Followers’ Middle Way Thinking," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-12, August.
    5. Shao-Long Li & Fang Sun & Mingze Li, 2019. "Sustainable Human Resource Management Nurtures Change-Oriented Employees: Relationship between High-Commitment Work Systems and Employees’ Taking Charge Behaviors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-15, June.
    6. Pere Mercadé‐Melé & Carmina Fandos‐Herrera & Sofía Velasco‐Gómez, 2021. "How corporate social responsibility influences consumer behavior: An empirical analysis in the Spanish agrifood sector," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(3), pages 590-611, July.
    7. Xue-Zhou Zhao & Jun Chen & Feng-Wen Chen & Wei Wang & Senmao Xia, 2020. "How High-Polluting Firms Suffer from Being Distracted form Intended Purpose: A Corporate Social Responsibility Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-29, December.
    8. Suyun Chen & Yu Ji, 2022. "Do Corporate Social Responsibility Categories Distinctly Influence Innovation? A Resource-Based Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-25, March.
    9. Jinan Fattah & Mehmet Yesiltas & Tarik Atan, 2022. "The Impact of Knowledge Sharing and Participative Decision-Making on Employee Turnover Intention: The Mediating Role of Perceived Organizational Support," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, October.
    10. Xiumei Xu & Ruolan Jing & Feifei Lu, 2022. "Environmental Regulation, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Disclosure and Enterprise Green Innovation: Evidence from Listed Companies in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-24, November.
    11. Evgeni Stanimirov & Vladimir Jechev, 2013. "Consumer Orientation as a Factor for Satisfying the Clients," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 3, pages 56-89.
    12. Dongdong Li & Leonard F. S. Wang, 2022. "Does environmental corporate social responsibility (ECSR) promote green product and process innovation?," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(5), pages 1439-1447, July.
    13. Lin Zhang & Jianhao Huang, 2023. "Can Paternalistic Leadership Promote Chinese College Teachers’ Creativity? Understanding the Mediating Role of Creative Self-Efficacy," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 12(5), pages 195-195, October.
    14. Aihua Wu & Tianfu Li, 2020. "Gaining sustainable development by green supply chain innovation: Perspectives of specific investments and stakeholder engagement," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 962-975, March.
    15. Antonio Martos‐Pedrero & David Jiménez‐Castillo & Vera Ferrón‐Vílchez & Francisco Joaquín Cortés‐García, 2023. "Corporate social responsibility and export performance under stakeholder view: The mediation of innovation and the moderation of the legal form," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1), pages 248-266, January.
    16. Chen, Wen, 2023. "Bank connections, corporate social responsibility and low-carbon innovation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    17. Edilson Bacinello & Gérson Tontini & Anete Alberton, 2021. "Influence of corporate social responsibility on sustainable practices of small and medium‐sized enterprises: Implications on business performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(2), pages 776-785, March.
    18. Navaneetha Krishnan Rajagopal & Maryam Khalid Ahmed Ba Zanbour & Noor Mohammed Alawi Al Kaaf, 2024. "Exploring Work–Life Balance among Female Staff Members (Teaching and Non-Teaching) in Higher Educational Institutions of Oman: A Study," Economies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-30, August.
    19. Brenes, Esteban R. & Ciravegna, Luciano & Acuña, Joseph, 2020. "Differentiation strategies in agribusiness – A configurational approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 522-539.
    20. Feifei Yu & Dong Jiang & Teng Wang, 2022. "The impact of green innovation on manufacturing small and medium enterprises corporate social responsibility fulfillment: The moderating role of regional environmental regulation," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3), pages 712-727, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Perceived Organizational Support; Job Resourcefulness; Empowerment; Innovation; Mediation Analysis;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity
    • J28 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Safety; Job Satisfaction; Related Public Policy
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ3:2024-03-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ilhan Ozturk (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.econjournals.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.