IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i15p6277-d394324.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coping with Supervisor Sanctions During Organizational Change: Core Members’ Active Change Behavior and Followers’ Middle Way Thinking

Author

Listed:
  • Yuan Jing Luo

    (Research Center for Human Resource Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)

  • Yan Ping Li

    (Research Center for Human Resource Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)

  • Jing Du

    (Research Center for Human Resource Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)

Abstract

Recent research has shown that an organizational change implementation tactic is vital for influencing employee reactions to change. Hard tactics, such as supervisor sanction, are generally verified as obstructive to employees’ positive change behavior. The aim of this study is to identify the contingency circumstances under which sanction would be less harmful or even effective to change. By identifying the organizational situational influence of core members’ active change behavior and followers’ individual differences of middle way thinking, this study constructed a model that offers insight into the effectiveness of supervisor sanctions during change. Data from 250 employees in China were gathered by questionnaires. Results from hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) revealed that core members’ behavior neutralized the negative effect of supervisor sanctions on followers’ active change behavior. Moreover, this moderating effect was further magnified by followers’ personal middle way thinking value. The conclusions emphasized the roles of core members’ supportive behavior to change, which acts as role model, and of the individual middle way thinking values that have sustained Eastern Asia for thousands of years in successfully implementing change. The findings provide insights for the successful implementation tactics in organization change and enrich the understanding of the organizational change process. Research should continue to treat followers’ change reactions as a synergy output of situational factors and individual characteristics and examine the variables of these dimensions in the work environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuan Jing Luo & Yan Ping Li & Jing Du, 2020. "Coping with Supervisor Sanctions During Organizational Change: Core Members’ Active Change Behavior and Followers’ Middle Way Thinking," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-12, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:15:p:6277-:d:394324
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/15/6277/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/15/6277/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chong, Melody P.M. & Muethel, Miriam & Richards, Malika & Fu, Ping Ping & Peng, Tai-Kuang & Shang, Yu Fan & Caldas, Miguel P., 2013. "Influence behaviors and employees’ reactions: An empirical test among six societies based on a transactional–relational contract model," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 373-384.
    2. Alisher Tohirovich Dedahanov & Faridun Bozorov & Sanghyun Sung, 2019. "Paternalistic Leadership and Innovative Behavior: Psychological Empowerment as a Mediator," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-14, March.
    3. Chowdhury, Sanjib & Schulz, Eric & Milner, Morgan & Van De Voort, David, 2014. "Core employee based human capital and revenue productivity in small firms: An empirical investigation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(11), pages 2473-2479.
    4. Jiing-Lih Farh & Bor-Shiuan Cheng, 2000. "A Cultural Analysis of Paternalistic Leadership in Chinese Organizations," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: J. T. Li & Anne S. Tsui & Elizabeth Weldon (ed.), Management and Organizations in the Chinese Context, chapter 4, pages 84-127, Palgrave Macmillan.
    5. Zeynep Aycan & Birgit Schyns & Jian-Min Sun & Jörg Felfe & Noreen Saher, 2013. "Convergence and divergence of paternalistic leadership: A cross-cultural investigation of prototypes," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 44(9), pages 962-969, December.
    6. Mirko Duradoni & Annamaria Di Fabio, 2019. "Intrapreneurial Self-Capital and Sustainable Innovative Behavior within Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-10, January.
    7. Lip Ryan Shin & Sunghyup Sean Hyun, 2019. "Impact of Managerial Influence Tactics on Job Creativity and Performance: A Focus on Korean Airline Service Employees," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-14, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alisher Tohirovich Dedahanov & Faridun Bozorov & Sanghyun Sung, 2019. "Paternalistic Leadership and Innovative Behavior: Psychological Empowerment as a Mediator," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Wei Liang & Tingyi Li & Li Lu & Jaehyoung Kim & Sanggyun Na, 2020. "Influence of Implicit Followership Cognitive Differences on Innovation Behavior: An Empirical Analysis in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-15, June.
    3. Ching-Han Fang & Ching-Lin Fang & Ren-Fang Chao & Shang-Ping Lin, 2019. "Paternalistic Leadership and Employees’ Sustained Work Behavior: A Perspective of Playfulness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-12, November.
    4. Mansur, Juliana & Sobral, Filipe & Goldszmidt, Rafael, 2017. "Shades of paternalistic leadership across cultures," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 52(5), pages 702-713.
    5. Jian Tian & Yan Peng & Xing Zhou, 2020. "The Effects of Abusive Supervision and Motivational Preference on Employees’ Innovative Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-15, October.
    6. Yuyan Zheng & Les Graham & Jiing-Lih Farh & Xu Huang, 2021. "The Impact of Authoritarian Leadership on Ethical Voice: A Moderated Mediation Model of Felt Uncertainty and Leader Benevolence," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 170(1), pages 133-146, April.
    7. Ela Ünler & Bülent Kılıç, 2019. "Paternalistic Leadership and Employee Organizational Attitudes: The Role of Positive/Negative Affectivity," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(3), pages 21582440198, July.
    8. An-Chih Wang & Jack Ting-Ju Chiang & Wan-Ju Chou & Bor-Shiuan Cheng, 2017. "One definition, different manifestations: Investigating ethical leadership in the Chinese context," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 505-535, September.
    9. Chua Bee Seok & Harris Shah Abd Hamid & Rosnah Ismail, 2019. "Psychometric Properties of the Intrapreneurial Self-Capital Scale in Malaysian University Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-9, February.
    10. Dae Seok Chai & Shinhee Jeong & Junhee Kim & Sewon Kim & Robert G. Hamlin, 2016. "Perceived managerial and leadership effectiveness in a Korean context: An indigenous qualitative study," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 789-820, September.
    11. Ka Chan & Xu Huang & Peng Ng, 2008. "Managers’ conflict management styles and employee attitudinal outcomes: The mediating role of trust," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 277-295, June.
    12. Shao-Long Li & Fang Sun & Mingze Li, 2019. "Sustainable Human Resource Management Nurtures Change-Oriented Employees: Relationship between High-Commitment Work Systems and Employees’ Taking Charge Behaviors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-15, June.
    13. Weipeng Lin & Jingjing Ma & Qi Zhang & Jenny Chen Li & Feng Jiang, 2018. "How is Benevolent Leadership Linked to Employee Creativity? The Mediating Role of Leader–Member Exchange and the Moderating Role of Power Distance Orientation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(4), pages 1099-1115, November.
    14. Wei, Jiuchang & Ouyang, Zhe & Chen, Haipeng (Allan), 2018. "CEO characteristics and corporate philanthropic giving in an emerging market: The case of China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 1-11.
    15. Kozhakhmet, Sanat & Nurgabdeshov, Assylbek, 2022. "Knowledge acquisition of Chinese expatriates: managing Chinese MNEs in Kazakhstan," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(2).
    16. Isabel Carmona-Cobo & Eva Garrosa & Esther Lopez-Zafra, 2021. "Workers’ Observation of Uncivil Leadership: Is Tolerance for Workplace Incivility a Gendered Issue?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, May.
    17. Jol Stoffers & Beatrice van der Heijden & Ilse Schrijver, 2019. "Towards a Sustainable Model of Innovative Work Behaviors’ Enhancement: The Mediating Role of Employability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-25, December.
    18. Joo Hun Han & Hui Liao & Seongsu Kim & Jian Han, 2020. "Narcissism and Empowerment: How Narcissism Influences the Trickle‐Down Effects of Organizational Empowerment Climate on Performance," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(6), pages 1217-1245, September.
    19. Stephan, Ute & Strauss, Karoline & Gorgievski, Marjan J. & Wach, Dominika, 2024. "How entrepreneurs influence their employees’ job satisfaction: The double-edged sword of proactive personality," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    20. Matthias Weiss & Laura Joan Salm & Miriam Muethel & Martin Hoegl, 2018. "Team personal-life inclusion in socially- versus task-oriented countries: A cross-cultural study of Chinese versus German teams," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 49(7), pages 919-928, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:15:p:6277-:d:394324. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.