IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jconsa/v57y2023i3p1000-1014.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consumer skepticism, advertising regulation, and the internet: Questions worth exploring

Author

Listed:
  • Debra Jones Ringold

Abstract

Since 1990, the US advertising, regulatory, and consumer information landscapes have changed materially, raising the possibility that consumers' fundamental beliefs about advertising as an activity or institution have also changed. Nine national polls of advertising sentiment, fielded between 1964 and 1989 by the Roper Organization or the Opinion Research Corporation, were replicated with panel members matched to the US adult population. Preliminary results suggest that the internet era may have fostered a trust‐because‐we‐can‐verify consumer attitude toward advertising. The internet has changed the consumer information landscape by reducing the difficulty of assessing claims, fostering independent evaluators who often include competitors, and providing a venue for consumer retaliation. The implications for advertising regulation may contradict the Pertschuk view (1982) of regulation again embraced by some at the Federal Trade Commission. Rather than enhancing the need for advertising regulation and enforcement, the internet may have reduced the need for such efforts.

Suggested Citation

  • Debra Jones Ringold, 2023. "Consumer skepticism, advertising regulation, and the internet: Questions worth exploring," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(3), pages 1000-1014, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jconsa:v:57:y:2023:i:3:p:1000-1014
    DOI: 10.1111/joca.12544
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12544
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joca.12544?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Debra Jones Ringold, 2016. "Assumptions about Consumers, Producers, and Regulators: What They Tell Us about Ourselves," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 1(3), pages 341-354.
    2. Tülin Erdem & Michael P. Keane & Baohong Sun, 2008. "A Dynamic Model of Brand Choice When Price and Advertising Signal Product Quality," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(6), pages 1111-1125, 11-12.
    3. Ford, Gary T & Smith, Darlene B & Swasy, John L, 1990. "Consumer Skepticism of Advertising Claims: Testing Hypotheses from Economics of Information," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 16(4), pages 433-441, March.
    4. Boush, David M & Friestad, Marian & Rose, Gregory M, 1994. "Adolescent Skepticism toward TV Advertising and Knowledge of Advertiser Tactics," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 21(1), pages 165-175, June.
    5. Manoj Hastak & Anusree Mitra & Debra J. Ringold, 2020. "Do consumers view the nutrition facts panel when making healthfulness assessments of food products? Antecedents and consequences," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 395-416, June.
    6. Nelson, Philip, 1974. "Advertising as Information," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 82(4), pages 729-754, July/Aug..
    7. Jacoby, Jacob & Hoyer, Wayne D, 1989. "The Comprehension/Miscomprehension of Print Communication: Selected Findings," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 15(4), pages 434-443, March.
    8. Friestad, Marian & Wright, Peter, 1994. "The Persuasion Knowledge Model: How People Cope with Persuasion Attempts," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 21(1), pages 1-31, June.
    9. Tijs Broek & David Langley & Tobias Hornig, 2017. "The Effect of Online Protests and Firm Responses on Shareholder and Consumer Evaluation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 146(2), pages 279-294, December.
    10. Nelson, Phillip, 1970. "Information and Consumer Behavior," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 78(2), pages 311-329, March-Apr.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lim, Boon C. & Chung, Cindy M.Y., 2011. "The impact of word-of-mouth communication on attribute evaluation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 18-23, January.
    2. Mingyu Joo & Jiaqi Shi & Vibhanshu Abhishek, 2024. "Do Sellers Benefit from Sponsored Product Listings? Evidence from an Online Marketplace," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(4), pages 817-839, July.
    3. Suwelack, Thomas & Hogreve, Jens & Hoyer, Wayne D., 2011. "Understanding Money-Back Guarantees: Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Outcomes," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 87(4), pages 462-478.
    4. Wu, Fang & Swait, Joffre & Chen, Yuxin, 2019. "Feature-based attributes and the roles of consumers' perception bias and inference in choice," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 325-340.
    5. Shalom Levy & Israel Nebenzahl, 2008. "The influence of product involvement on consumers’ interactive processes in interactive television," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 65-77, March.
    6. Becker-Olsen, Karen L. & Cudmore, B. Andrew & Hill, Ronald Paul, 2006. "The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(1), pages 46-53, January.
    7. Simon P. Anderson & Régis Renault, 2013. "The Advertising Mix for a Search Good," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(1), pages 69-83, April.
    8. Régis Chenavaz & Sajjad M. Jasimuddin, 2017. "An analytical model of the relationship between product quality and advertising," Post-Print hal-01685892, HAL.
    9. Lunardo, Renaud, 2012. "Negative effects of ambient scents on consumers’ skepticism about retailer’s motives," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 179-185.
    10. repec:dau:papers:123456789/12407 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Animesh Animesh & Vandana Ramachandran & Siva Viswanathan, 2005. "Quality Uncertainty And Adverse Selection In Sponsored Search Markets," Working Papers 05-27, NET Institute, revised Oct 2005.
    12. Serife YAZGAN PEKTAS & Azize HASSAN, 2020. "The Effect of Digital Content Marketing on Tourists’ Purchase Intention," Journal of Tourismology, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 6(1), pages 79-98, June.
    13. Grier, Sonya A. & Forehand, Mark R., 2002. "When Is Honesty The Best Policy? The Effect of Stated Company Intent on Consumer Skepticism," Research Papers 1665r, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    14. Korgaonkar, Pradeep & Becerra, Enrique & O’Leary, Bay & Goldring, Deborah, 2010. "Product classifications, consumer characteristics, and patronage preference for online auction," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 270-277.
    15. Zhengrui Jiang & Arun Rai & Hua Sun & Cheng Nie & Yuheng Hu, 2024. "How Does Online Information Influence Offline Transactions? Insights from Digital Real Estate Platforms," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(3), pages 1324-1343, September.
    16. Julie Boyer Dumont, 2010. "Les effets du scepticisme du consommateur face à la publicité sur le processus de persuasion," Post-Print hal-04765193, HAL.
    17. Yang, Jun & Mai, Enping (Shirley), 2010. "Experiential goods with network externalities effects: An empirical study of online rating system," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(9-10), pages 1050-1057, September.
    18. repec:hal:journl:hal-04890665 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Spencer Henson & James Northen, 2000. "Consumer Assessment of the Safety of Beef at the Point of Purchase: A Pan‐European Study," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(1), pages 90-105, January.
    20. Tülin Erdem & Michael Keane & Baohong Sun, 2008. "The impact of advertising on consumer price sensitivity in experience goods markets," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 139-176, June.
    21. Siddharth Bhattacharya & Jing Gong & Sunil Wattal, 2022. "Competitive Poaching in Search Advertising: Two Randomized Field Experiments," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 599-619, June.
    22. Benjamin L. Campbell & Saneliso Mhlanga & Isabelle Lesschaeve, 2016. "Market Dynamics Associated with Canadian Ethnic Vegetable Production," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(1), pages 64-78, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jconsa:v:57:y:2023:i:3:p:1000-1014. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-0078 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.