IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/brjirl/v29y1991i1p75-96.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Company or Trade Union: Which Wins Workers' Allegiance? A Study of Commitment in the UK Electronics Industry

Author

Listed:
  • David E. Guest
  • Philip Dewe

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • David E. Guest & Philip Dewe, 1991. "Company or Trade Union: Which Wins Workers' Allegiance? A Study of Commitment in the UK Electronics Industry," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 29(1), pages 75-96, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:brjirl:v:29:y:1991:i:1:p:75-96
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1467-8543.1991.tb00229.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard Freeman & Jeffrey Pelletier, 1990. "The Impact of Industrial Relations Legislation on British Union Density," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 28(2), pages 141-164, July.
    2. Lois R. Dean, 1954. "Union Activity and Dual Loyalty," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 7(4), pages 526-536, July.
    3. Rachel Bailey & John Kelly, 1990. "An Index Measure of British Trade Union Density," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 28(2), pages 267-270, July.
    4. Leonard Rico, 1987. "The New Industrial Relations: British Electricians' New-Style Agreements," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 41(1), pages 63-78, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tom Redman & Ed Snape, 2006. "The Consequences of Dual and Unilateral Commitment: Evidence from the Health Service," Working Papers 2006_02, Durham University Business School.
    2. Andy W. Chan & Ed Snape, 2000. "Union Weakness in Hong Kong: Workplace Industrial Relations and the Federation of Trade Unions," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 21(2), pages 117-146, May.
    3. David Peetz, 1998. "Why Join? Why Stay? Instrumentality, Beliefs, Satisfaction and Individual Decisions on Union Membership," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 9(1), pages 123-148, June.
    4. Stephen J. Deery & Roderick D. Iverson & Peter J. Erwin, 1994. "Predicting Organizational and Union Commitment: The Effect of Industrial Relations Climate," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 32(4), pages 581-597, December.
    5. Rachel Beaujolin-Bellet & François Grima, 2010. "La transition professionnelle des leaders syndicaux à l'issue d'un plan social," Post-Print halshs-00819018, HAL.
    6. Lars W. Mitlacher, 2005. "Temporary Agency Work, the Changing Employment Relationship and its Impact on Human Resource Management," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 16(3), pages 370-388.
    7. David E. Guest, 1991. "Personnel Management: The End of Orthodoxy?," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 29(2), pages 149-175, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jeremy Waddington, 1992. "Trade Union Membership in Britain, 1980–1987: Unemployment and Restructuring," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 30(2), pages 287-324, June.
    2. Francis Green, 1992. "Recent Trends in British Trade Union Density: How Much of a Compositional Effect?," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 30(3), pages 445-458, September.
    3. Melanie Simms, 2015. "Accounting for Greenfield Union Organizing Outcomes," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 53(3), pages 397-422, September.
    4. Alex Bryson & Lucy Stokes & David Wilkinson, 2023. "Is pupil attainment higher in well-managed schools?," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 129-144, January.
    5. S Milner, 1994. "Charting the Coverage of Collective Pay Setting Institutions 1895-1990," CEP Discussion Papers dp0215, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    6. John H. Pencavel, 2004. "The Surprising Retreat of Union Britain," NBER Chapters, in: Seeking a Premier Economy: The Economic Effects of British Economic Reforms, 1980–2000, pages 181-232, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Jahn, Elke J. & Wagner, Thomas, 2001. "Labour's law?," Discussion Papers 6, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Chair of Labour and Regional Economics.
    8. John Kelly & Caroline Kelly, 1991. "‘Them and Us’: Social Psychology and ‘The New Industrial Relations’," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 29(1), pages 25-48, March.
    9. Legree, Scott & Schirle, Tammy & Skuterud, Mikal, 2014. "The Effect of Labour Relations Laws on Union Density Rates: Evidence from Canadian Provinces," CLSSRN working papers clsrn_admin-2014-42, Vancouver School of Economics, revised 22 Sep 2014.
    10. David Metcalf, 1993. "Transformation of British Industrial Relations? Institutions, Conduct and Outcomes 1980-1990," CEP Discussion Papers dp0151, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    11. Stephen Drinkwater & Peter Ingram, 2005. "Have Industrial Relations in the UK Really Improved?," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 19(2), pages 373-398, June.
    12. Metcalf, David, 1993. "Transformation of British industrial relations? Institutions, conduct and outcomes 1980-1990," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 20981, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Daniele Checchi & Claudio Lucifora, 2002. "Unions and labour market institutions in Europe [‘Deunionisation, technical change and inequality’]," Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po;CES;MSH, vol. 17(35), pages 361-408.
    14. Westermark, A., 1999. "A Model of Union Formation," Papers 1999:8, Uppsala - Working Paper Series.
    15. Cyprien Batut & Ulysse Lojkine & Paolo Santini, 2021. "Which side are you on? A historical perspective on union membership composition in four European countries," Working Papers halshs-03364022, HAL.
    16. Peter Ingram & Neil Rickman & Jonathan Wadsworth, 2013. "Wage claims in the British private sector: 1979–2003," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(3), pages 296-315, May.
    17. Odile Chagny & Frédéric Reynès & Henri Sterdyniak, 2002. "Le taux de chômage d'équilibre. Discussion théorique et évaluation empirique," Revue de l'OFCE, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 81(2), pages 205-244.
    18. Dorian Aliu & Ayten Akatay & Armando Aliu & Umut Eroglu, 2017. "Public Policy Influences on Academia in the European Union," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(1), pages 21582440176, February.
    19. Ian Fitzgerald & Ron Beadle & Kevin Rowan, 2022. "Trade unions and the 2016 UK European Union Referendum," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 43(1), pages 388-409, February.
    20. Getinet Astatike Haile, 2021. "Men, women and unions," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(3), pages 201-217, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:brjirl:v:29:y:1991:i:1:p:75-96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.