IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/dur/durham/2006_02.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Consequences of Dual and Unilateral Commitment: Evidence from the Health Service

Author

Listed:
  • Tom Redman

    (Durham Business School)

  • Ed Snape

    (Hong Kong Polytechnic University)

Abstract

This paper examines the pattern and consequences of commitment to organisation and union amongst union members in a UK National Health Service (NHS) Trust. Those who perceived the industrial relations climate as positive were more likely to be dually committed to both organisation and union. As anticipated, union commitment predicted union citizenship behaviours and intent to quit the union. However, organisational commitment predicted intent to quit the organisation but not organisational citizenship behaviour, which was predicted by union commitment. Findings suggest that those with a unilateral commitment to the union are more likely than the dually committed to engage in citizenship behaviours aimed at helping fellow members and colleagues, perhaps because they feel unconstrained by any strong loyalty to the organisation.

Suggested Citation

  • Tom Redman & Ed Snape, 2006. "The Consequences of Dual and Unilateral Commitment: Evidence from the Health Service," Department of Economics Working Papers 2006_02, Durham University, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:dur:durham:2006_02
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dro.dur.ac.uk/10372
    File Function: main text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David E. Guest & Philip Dewe, 1991. "Company or Trade Union: Which Wins Workers' Allegiance? A Study of Commitment in the UK Electronics Industry," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 29(1), pages 75-96, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andy W. Chan & Ed Snape, 2000. "Union Weakness in Hong Kong: Workplace Industrial Relations and the Federation of Trade Unions," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 21(2), pages 117-146, May.
    2. Rachel Beaujolin-Bellet & François Grima, 2010. "La transition professionnelle des leaders syndicaux à l'issue d'un plan social," Post-Print halshs-00819018, HAL.
    3. David E. Guest, 1991. "Personnel Management: The End of Orthodoxy?," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 29(2), pages 149-175, June.
    4. Lars W. Mitlacher, 2005. "Temporary Agency Work, the Changing Employment Relationship and its Impact on Human Resource Management," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 16(3), pages 370-388.
    5. Stephen J. Deery & Roderick D. Iverson & Peter J. Erwin, 1994. "Predicting Organizational and Union Commitment: The Effect of Industrial Relations Climate," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 32(4), pages 581-597, December.
    6. Gregor Gall & Jack Fiorito, 2012. "Union Commitment and Activism in Britain and the United States: Searching for Synthesis and Synergy for Renewal," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 50(2), pages 189-213, June.
    7. David Peetz, 1998. "Why Join? Why Stay? Instrumentality, Beliefs, Satisfaction and Individual Decisions on Union Membership," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 9(1), pages 123-148, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dur:durham:2006_02. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tatiana Damjanovic (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deduruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.