IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v73y2017i1p214-219.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ordinal probability effect measures for group comparisons in multinomial cumulative link models

Author

Listed:
  • Alan Agresti
  • Maria Kateri

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Alan Agresti & Maria Kateri, 2017. "Ordinal probability effect measures for group comparisons in multinomial cumulative link models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(1), pages 214-219, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:73:y:2017:i:1:p:214-219
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/biom.12565
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kelley, Ken, 2007. "Confidence Intervals for Standardized Effect Sizes: Theory, Application, and Implementation," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 20(i08).
    2. Olivier Thas & Jan De Neve & Lieven Clement & Jean-Pierre Ottoy, 2012. "Probabilistic index models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 74(4), pages 623-671, September.
    3. Tong-Yu Lu & Wai-Yin Poon & Siu Cheung, 2014. "A Unified Framework for the Comparison of Treatments with Ordinal Responses," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 605-620, October.
    4. Jing Cheng, 2009. "Estimation and Inference for the Causal Effect of Receiving Treatment on a Multinomial Outcome," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(1), pages 96-103, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jean‐Sauveur Ay, 2021. "The Informational Content of Geographical Indications," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 103(2), pages 523-542, March.
    2. Maria Iannario & Maria Kateri & Claudia Tarantola, 2024. "Modelling scale effects in rating data: a Bayesian approach," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(5), pages 4053-4071, October.
    3. Lu, Jiannan, 2018. "On the partial identification of a new causal measure for ordinal outcomes," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 1-7.
    4. Domenico Piccolo & Rosaria Simone, 2019. "The class of cub models: statistical foundations, inferential issues and empirical evidence," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 28(3), pages 389-435, September.
    5. Benjamin R. Shear & Sean F. Reardon, 2021. "Using Pooled Heteroskedastic Ordered Probit Models to Improve Small-Sample Estimates of Latent Test Score Distributions," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 46(1), pages 3-33, February.
    6. Maria Iannario & Anna Clara Monti, 2022. "Modelling consumer perceptions of service quality for urban public transport systems using statistical models for ordinal data," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 80(1), pages 61-76, April.
    7. Jean-Sauveur Ay & Julie Le Gallo, 2021. "The signaling value of nested wine names," Post-Print hal-03268014, HAL.
    8. Alan Agresti & Maria Kateri, 2019. "The class of CUB models: statistical foundations, inferential issues and empirical evidence," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 28(3), pages 445-449, September.
    9. Jiannan Lu & Peng Ding & Tirthankar Dasgupta, 2018. "Treatment Effects on Ordinal Outcomes: Causal Estimands and Sharp Bounds," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 43(5), pages 540-567, October.
    10. Alan Agresti & Claudia Tarantola, 2018. "Simple ways to interpret effects in modeling ordinal categorical data," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 72(3), pages 210-223, August.
    11. Jiannan Lu & Yunshu Zhang & Peng Ding, 2020. "Sharp bounds on the relative treatment effect for ordinal outcomes," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(2), pages 664-669, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiannan Lu & Peng Ding & Tirthankar Dasgupta, 2018. "Treatment Effects on Ordinal Outcomes: Causal Estimands and Sharp Bounds," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 43(5), pages 540-567, October.
    2. Shuxi Zeng & Fan Li & Peng Ding, 2020. "Is being an only child harmful to psychological health?: evidence from an instrumental variable analysis of China's one‐child policy," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 183(4), pages 1615-1635, October.
    3. repec:jss:jstsof:20:i01 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Rosa Maria Fanelli, 2021. "Barriers to Adopting New Technologies within Rural Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs)," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, November.
    5. Jing Cheng, 2011. "The authors replied as follows:," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(1), pages 323-325, March.
    6. Dennis Dobler & Markus Pauly, 2018. "Bootstrap- and permutation-based inference for the Mann–Whitney effect for right-censored and tied data," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 27(3), pages 639-658, September.
    7. Doll, Monika, 2017. "Relative efficiency of confidence interval methods around effect sizes," FAU Discussion Papers in Economics 22/2017, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Institute for Economics.
    8. Amorim, G. & Thas, O. & Vermeulen, K. & Vansteelandt, S. & De Neve, J., 2018. "Small sample inference for probabilistic index models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 137-148.
    9. Jentsch, Carsten & Leucht, Anne, 2014. "Bootstrapping Sample Quantiles of Discrete Data," Working Papers 14-15, University of Mannheim, Department of Economics.
    10. Fan, Chunpeng & Zhang, Donghui, 2014. "Wald-type rank tests: A GEE approach," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 1-16.
    11. Jiannan Lu & Yunshu Zhang & Peng Ding, 2020. "Sharp bounds on the relative treatment effect for ordinal outcomes," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(2), pages 664-669, June.
    12. Lu Mao & Tuo Wang, 2021. "A class of proportional win‐fractions regression models for composite outcomes," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 77(4), pages 1265-1275, December.
    13. Lu, Jiannan & Ding, Peng & Dasgupta, Tirthankar, 2015. "Construction of alternative hypotheses for randomization tests with ordinal outcomes," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 348-355.
    14. Marko Hofmann & Silja Meyer-Nieberg, 2018. "Time to dispense with the p-value in OR?," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 26(1), pages 193-214, March.
    15. Debajit Chatterjee & Uttam Bandyopadhyay, 2019. "Testing in nonparametric ANCOVA model based on ridit reliability functional," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 71(2), pages 327-364, April.
    16. Edgar Brunner & Frank Konietschke & Arne C. Bathke & Markus Pauly, 2021. "Ranks and Pseudo‐ranks—Surprising Results of Certain Rank Tests in Unbalanced Designs," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 89(2), pages 349-366, August.
    17. G. Baker Stuart & S. Lindeman Karen, 2013. "Revisiting a Discrepant Result: A Propensity Score Analysis, the Paired Availability Design for Historical Controls, and a Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials," Journal of Causal Inference, De Gruyter, vol. 1(1), pages 51-82, June.
    18. Shuxi Zeng & Fan Li & Peng Ding, 2020. "Is being an only child harmful to psychological health?: Evidence from an instrumental variable analysis of China's One-Child Policy," Papers 2005.09130, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2020.
    19. Alan Agresti & Claudia Tarantola, 2018. "Simple ways to interpret effects in modeling ordinal categorical data," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 72(3), pages 210-223, August.
    20. Ejike R. Ugba & Daniel Mörlein & Jan Gertheiss, 2021. "Smoothing in Ordinal Regression: An Application to Sensory Data," Stats, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-18, July.
    21. Andrea Ongaro & Sonia Migliorati & Roberto Ascari & Enrico Ripamonti, 2024. "Testing practical relevance of treatment effects," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 65(7), pages 4121-4145, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:73:y:2017:i:1:p:214-219. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.