IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/metron/v80y2022i1d10.1007_s40300-021-00197-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling consumer perceptions of service quality for urban public transport systems using statistical models for ordinal data

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Iannario

    (University of Naples Federico II)

  • Anna Clara Monti

    (University of Sannio)

Abstract

The paper deals with ordinal response models to evaluate urban public transport systems with the purpose of interpreting consumers’ responses with reference to their profiles. New methodological developments provide opportunities for a more thorough and accurate analysis of perceived service quality. The evaluation of the uncertainty component accounts for accuracy in the assessments. Diagnostic procedures allow to evaluate model specification, with respect to the proportional odds assumption, the adequacy of the mean structure and the occurrence of heterogeneity. The impact of the covariates on the discrete distribution of the observed response is appraised through their marginal effects. The selection of the appropriate covariates leads to the identification of clusters of users, which are compared through ordinal superiority measures. Consequently critical situations are detected.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Iannario & Anna Clara Monti, 2022. "Modelling consumer perceptions of service quality for urban public transport systems using statistical models for ordinal data," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 80(1), pages 61-76, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:metron:v:80:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s40300-021-00197-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s40300-021-00197-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40300-021-00197-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40300-021-00197-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dungang Liu & Heping Zhang, 2018. "Residuals and Diagnostics for Ordinal Regression Models: A Surrogate Approach," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 113(522), pages 845-854, April.
    2. Xuemei Fu & Zhicai Juan, 2017. "Understanding public transit use behavior: integration of the theory of planned behavior and the customer satisfaction theory," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(5), pages 1021-1042, September.
    3. Veall, Michael R & Zimmermann, Klaus F, 1996. "Pseudo-R-[superscript 2] Measures for Some Common Limited Dependent Variable Models," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(3), pages 241-259, September.
    4. Alan Agresti & Claudia Tarantola, 2018. "Simple ways to interpret effects in modeling ordinal categorical data," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 72(3), pages 210-223, August.
    5. D'Elia, Angela & Piccolo, Domenico, 2005. "A mixture model for preferences data analysis," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 917-934, June.
    6. Stelzer, Anselmo & Englert, Frank & Hörold, Stephan & Mayas, Cindy, 2016. "Improving service quality in public transportation systems using automated customer feedback," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 259-271.
    7. Alan Agresti & Maria Kateri, 2017. "Ordinal probability effect measures for group comparisons in multinomial cumulative link models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(1), pages 214-219, March.
    8. Stefania Capecchi & Maria Iannario & Rosaria Simone, 2018. "Well-Being and Relational Goods: A Model-Based Approach to Detect Significant Relationships," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 135(2), pages 729-750, January.
    9. Romina Gambacorta & Maria Iannario, 2013. "Measuring Job Satisfaction with CUB Models," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 27(2), pages 198-224, June.
    10. Dea van Lierop & Madhav G. Badami & Ahmed M. El-Geneidy, 2018. "What influences satisfaction and loyalty in public transport? A review of the literature," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(1), pages 52-72, January.
    11. Jamie Montague Fischer & Mshadoni Smith & Adjo Amekudzi Kennedy, 2014. "Why and How to Use Customer Opinions: A Quality-of-Life and Customer Satisfaction-Oriented Foundation for Performance-Based Decision-Making," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 86-101, January.
    12. Gerhard Tutz & Micha Schneider & Maria Iannario & Domenico Piccolo, 2017. "Mixture models for ordinal responses to account for uncertainty of choice," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 11(2), pages 281-305, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Domenico Piccolo & Rosaria Simone, 2019. "The class of cub models: statistical foundations, inferential issues and empirical evidence," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 28(3), pages 389-435, September.
    2. Alan Agresti & Maria Kateri, 2019. "The class of CUB models: statistical foundations, inferential issues and empirical evidence," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 28(3), pages 445-449, September.
    3. Gennaro Punzo & Rosalia Castellano & Mirko Buonocore, 2018. "Job Satisfaction in the “Big Four” of Europe: Reasoning Between Feeling and Uncertainty Through CUB Models," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 139(1), pages 205-236, August.
    4. de Oña, Juan, 2020. "The role of involvement with public transport in the relationship between service quality, satisfaction and behavioral intentions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 296-318.
    5. Simone, Rosaria & Tutz, Gerhard & Iannario, Maria, 2020. "Subjective heterogeneity in response attitude for multivariate ordinal outcomes," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 14(C), pages 145-158.
    6. Jiannan Lu & Yunshu Zhang & Peng Ding, 2020. "Sharp bounds on the relative treatment effect for ordinal outcomes," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(2), pages 664-669, June.
    7. Stefania Capecchi & Rosaria Simone, 2019. "A Proposal for a Model-Based Composite Indicator: Experience on Perceived Discrimination in Europe," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 141(1), pages 95-110, January.
    8. Rennert, Lindiwe, 2022. "A meta-analysis of the impact of rail stations on property values: Applying a transit planning lens," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 165-180.
    9. Jean‐Sauveur Ay, 2021. "The Informational Content of Geographical Indications," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 103(2), pages 523-542, March.
    10. de Oña, Juan, 2021. "Understanding the mediator role of satisfaction in public transport: A cross-country analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 129-149.
    11. Juan Oña & Rocío Oña, 2023. "Is it possible to attract private vehicle users towards public transport? Understanding the key role of service quality, satisfaction and involvement on behavioral intentions," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 1073-1101, June.
    12. Stefania Capecchi & Maria Iannario & Rosaria Simone, 2018. "Well-Being and Relational Goods: A Model-Based Approach to Detect Significant Relationships," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 135(2), pages 729-750, January.
    13. Gore, Madison & Joshi, Omkar & Chapagain, Binod & Poudyal, Neelam C. & Fairbanks, Sue, 2023. "Visitor satisfaction with WMAs: A case study from Oklahoma," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    14. Gerhard Tutz & Micha Schneider & Maria Iannario & Domenico Piccolo, 2017. "Mixture models for ordinal responses to account for uncertainty of choice," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 11(2), pages 281-305, June.
    15. Manisera, Marica & Zuccolotto, Paola, 2015. "Identifiability of a model for discrete frequency distributions with a multidimensional parameter space," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 302-316.
    16. E. Nardo & R. Simone, 2019. "A model-based fuzzy analysis of questionnaires," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 28(2), pages 187-215, June.
    17. M. Meleddu & M. Pulina & G. Solinas & S. Capecchi, 2019. "Mixture models for consumers' preferences in healthcare," Working Paper CRENoS 201901, Centre for North South Economic Research, University of Cagliari and Sassari, Sardinia.
    18. Juan de Oña, 2022. "Service quality, satisfaction and behavioral intentions towards public transport from the point of view of private vehicle users," Transportation, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 237-269, February.
    19. Sam, Enoch F. & Brijs, Kris & Daniels, Stijn & Brijs, Tom & Wets, Geert, 2020. "Testing the convergent- and predictive validity of a multi-dimensional belief-based scale for attitude towards personal safety on public bus/minibus for long-distance trips in Ghana: A SEM analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 67-79.
    20. Leonardo Grilli & Maria Iannario & Domenico Piccolo & Carla Rampichini, 2014. "Latent class CUB models," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 8(1), pages 105-119, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:metron:v:80:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s40300-021-00197-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.