IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v121y2018icp137-148.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Small sample inference for probabilistic index models

Author

Listed:
  • Amorim, G.
  • Thas, O.
  • Vermeulen, K.
  • Vansteelandt, S.
  • De Neve, J.

Abstract

Probabilistic index models may be used to generate classical and new rank tests, with the additional advantage of supplementing them with interpretable effect size measures. The popularity of rank tests for small sample inference makes probabilistic index models also natural candidates for small sample studies. However, at present, inference for such models relies on asymptotic theory that can deliver poor approximations of the sampling distribution if the sample size is rather small. A bias-reduced version of the bootstrap and adjusted jackknife empirical likelihood are explored. It is shown that their application leads to drastic improvements in small sample inference for probabilistic index models, justifying the use of such models for reliable and informative statistical inference in small sample studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Amorim, G. & Thas, O. & Vermeulen, K. & Vansteelandt, S. & De Neve, J., 2018. "Small sample inference for probabilistic index models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 137-148.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:121:y:2018:i:c:p:137-148
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2017.11.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947317302402
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2017.11.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jing, Bing-Yi & Yuan, Junqing & Zhou, Wang, 2009. "Jackknife Empirical Likelihood," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 104(487), pages 1224-1232.
    2. Jan De Neve & Olivier Thas, 2015. "A Regression Framework for Rank Tests Based on the Probabilistic Index Model," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(511), pages 1276-1283, September.
    3. Yang, Hanfang & Zhao, Yichuan, 2015. "Smoothed jackknife empirical likelihood inference for ROC curves with missing data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 123-138.
    4. Olivier Thas & Jan De Neve & Lieven Clement & Jean-Pierre Ottoy, 2012. "Probabilistic index models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 74(4), pages 623-671, September.
    5. Li, Minqiang & Peng, Liang & Qi, Yongcheng, 2011. "Reduce computation in profile empirical likelihood method," MPRA Paper 33744, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Zhao, Yichuan & Meng, Xueping & Yang, Hanfang, 2015. "Jackknife empirical likelihood inference for the mean absolute deviation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 92-101.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yongcheng Qi, 2018. "Jackknife Empirical Likelihood Methods," Biostatistics and Biometrics Open Access Journal, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 7(2), pages 20-22, June.
    2. Xue Yu & Yichuan Zhao, 2019. "Jackknife empirical likelihood inference for the accelerated failure time model," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(1), pages 269-288, March.
    3. Zhao, Yichuan & Su, Yueju & Yang, Hanfang, 2020. "Jackknife empirical likelihood inference for the Pietra ratio," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    4. Hui-Ling Lin & Zhouping Li & Dongliang Wang & Yichuan Zhao, 2017. "Jackknife empirical likelihood for the error variance in linear models," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 151-166, April.
    5. Khan, Ruhul Ali, 2023. "Two-sample nonparametric test for proportional reversed hazards," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    6. Hanfang Yang & Yichuan Zhao, 2017. "Smoothed jackknife empirical likelihood for the difference of two quantiles," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 69(5), pages 1059-1073, October.
    7. Debajit Chatterjee & Uttam Bandyopadhyay, 2019. "Testing in nonparametric ANCOVA model based on ridit reliability functional," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 71(2), pages 327-364, April.
    8. Yu, Xue & Zhao, Yichuan, 2019. "Empirical likelihood inference for semi-parametric transformation models with length-biased sampling," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 115-125.
    9. Zhang, Rongmao & Peng, Liang & Qi, Yongcheng, 2012. "Jackknife-blockwise empirical likelihood methods under dependence," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 104(1), pages 56-72, February.
    10. Yongli Sang & Xin Dang & Yichuan Zhao, 2020. "Depth-based weighted jackknife empirical likelihood for non-smooth U-structure equations," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 29(2), pages 573-598, June.
    11. Yawen Fan & Xiaohui Liu & Yang Cao & Shaochu Liu, 2024. "Jackknife empirical likelihood based diagnostic checking for Ar(p) models," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 39(5), pages 2479-2509, July.
    12. Ejike R. Ugba & Daniel Mörlein & Jan Gertheiss, 2021. "Smoothing in Ordinal Regression: An Application to Sensory Data," Stats, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-18, July.
    13. Dennis Dobler & Sarah Friedrich & Markus Pauly, 2020. "Nonparametric MANOVA in meaningful effects," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 72(4), pages 997-1022, August.
    14. Lisa Parveen & Ruhul Ali Khan & Murari Mitra, 2024. "A two sample nonparametric test for variability via empirical likelihood methods," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 65(7), pages 4243-4265, September.
    15. Yueheng An & Yichuan Zhao, 2018. "Jackknife empirical likelihood for the difference of two volumes under ROC surfaces," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 70(4), pages 789-806, August.
    16. Zhao, Yichuan & Meng, Xueping & Yang, Hanfang, 2015. "Jackknife empirical likelihood inference for the mean absolute deviation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 92-101.
    17. Zhouping Li & Jinfeng Xu & Wang Zhou, 2016. "On Nonsmooth Estimating Functions via Jackknife Empirical Likelihood," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 43(1), pages 49-69, March.
    18. Heng Wang & Ping-Shou Zhong, 2017. "Order-restricted inference for means with missing values," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(3), pages 972-980, September.
    19. Dennis Dobler & Markus Pauly, 2018. "Bootstrap- and permutation-based inference for the Mann–Whitney effect for right-censored and tied data," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 27(3), pages 639-658, September.
    20. Haikady N Nagaraja & Shane Sanders, 2020. "The aggregation paradox for statistical rankings and nonparametric tests," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:121:y:2018:i:c:p:137-148. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.