IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/jetimm/v1y2017i1p194-203.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On and Off-line Purchase Intention: the Role of Brand Trust as Moderator of Risk Perception

Author

Listed:
  • Marcello Tedeschi

    (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Department of Communication and Economics)

  • Giovanna Galli

    (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Department of Communication and Economics)

  • Maria Cristiana Martini

    (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Department of Communication and Economics)

Abstract

Interpersonal trust is considered a risk moderator in choice under uncertainty (Einhorn, Hogarth, 1988) so it can help people to make decisions otherwise considered too risky (Galli, Nardin, 1997). Specifically, trust has been defined as a multi-dimensional construct, with cognitive and affective dimensions playing a different role to reduce perceived risk in low or high complexity tasks. In marketing field, trust has received increasing interest and research on brand trust scale validation has restated the multi-dimensionality of the construct, with a first detection of two crucial dimensions -competence and benevolence- (Delgado, 2003, 2004). Further research has enclosed other two dimensions, honesty and empathy (Martini, Galli, Arseni, 2016), and has hypothesised an evolutionary pattern, with cognitive dimensions preceding emotional ones in brand trust strengthening. With these premises, the research is aimed to evaluate the role of brand trust as moderator of risk perception in different buying contexts, characterized by increasing perceived complexity of the task. More specifically, the hypotheses are: purchase intention decreases when perceived complexity of the task increases; decreasing purchase intention is due to increasing risk perception; brand trust, with its cognitive and affective dimensions, is able to reduce risk perception and to moderate its impact on purchase intention. To test hypotheses, 432 Italian respondents to a structured online questionnaire had to declare their intention to buy a pair of Nike shoes, facing three different buying contexts: a traditional off-line store, the official online brand store and a famous on-line retailer. The results confirm that buying online is more complex than buying offline, with a corresponding increasing of risk perception and decreasing of purchase intention. Brand trust can reduce risk perception in both off and online contexts, with cognitive dimension playing a crucial role in offline context and emotional dimension in online one.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcello Tedeschi & Giovanna Galli & Maria Cristiana Martini, 2017. "On and Off-line Purchase Intention: the Role of Brand Trust as Moderator of Risk Perception," Journal of Emerging Trends in Marketing and Management, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 1(1), pages 194-203, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:aes:jetimm:v:1:y:2017:i:1:p:194-203
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.etimm.ase.ro/RePEc/aes/jetimm/2017/ETIMM_V01_2017_105.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, 2013. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 6, pages 99-127, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    2. Pappas, Nikolaos, 2016. "Marketing strategies, perceived risks, and consumer trust in online buying behaviour," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 92-103.
    3. Geyskens, I. & Steenkamp, J.E.B.M. & Scheer, L.K. & Kumar, N., 1996. "The effects of trust and interdependence on relationship commitment : A trans-Atlantic study," Other publications TiSEM ef7c8d6c-963d-4ee7-8576-9, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    4. James C. Anderson & David W. Gerbing, 1992. "Assumptions and Comparative Strengths of the Two-Step Approach," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 20(3), pages 321-333, February.
    5. James H. Davis & F. David Schoorman & Roger C. Mayer & Hwee Hoon Tan, 2000. "The trusted general manager and business unit performance: empirical evidence of a competitive advantage," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(5), pages 563-576, May.
    6. Jarvis, Cheryl Burke & MacKenzie, Scott B & Podsakoff, Philip M, 2003. "A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 30(2), pages 199-218, September.
    7. Akbar Zaheer & Bill McEvily & Vincenzo Perrone, 1998. "Does Trust Matter? Exploring the Effects of Interorganizational and Interpersonal Trust on Performance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(2), pages 141-159, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hamzah, Muhammad Iskandar & Ramli, Faten Aisyah Ahmad & Shaw, Norman, 2023. "The moderating influence of brand image on consumers' adoption of QR-code e-wallets," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    2. Maria Cristiana MARTINI & Giovanna GALLI & Marcello TEDESCHI, 2018. "Brand Extension Acceptability in Food and Beverage Product Categories," Journal of Emerging Trends in Marketing and Management, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 1(1), pages 166-175, November.
    3. Bo-Chiuan Su & Li-Wei Wu & Ying-Chi Yen, 2021. "Antecedents and Consequences of Trust and Loyalty in Physical Banks Affecting Mobile Payments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-27, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Isidor, Rodrigo & Schwens, Christian & Hornung, Frank & Kabst, Ruediger, 2015. "The impact of structural and attitudinal antecedents on the instability of international joint ventures: The mediating role of asymmetrical changes in commitment," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 298-310.
    2. Finn, Adam, 2011. "Investigating the non-linear effects of e-service quality dimensions on customer satisfaction," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 27-37.
    3. Maria Figueroa-Armijos & Brent B. Clark & Serge P. da Motta Veiga, 2023. "Ethical Perceptions of AI in Hiring and Organizational Trust: The Role of Performance Expectancy and Social Influence," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 186(1), pages 179-197, August.
    4. Bill McEvily & Akbar Zaheer & Darcy K. Fudge Kamal, 2017. "Mutual and Exclusive: Dyadic Sources of Trust in Interorganizational Exchange," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 74-92, February.
    5. Evanschitzky, Heiner & Iyer, Gopalkrishnan R. & Plassmann, Hilke & Niessing, Joerg & Meffert, Heribert, 2006. "The relative strength of affective commitment in securing loyalty in service relationships," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(12), pages 1207-1213, November.
    6. Holtgrave, Maximilian & Nienaber, Ann-Marie & Ferreira, Carlos, 2017. "Untangling the trust–control nexus in international buyer–supplier exchange relationships: An investigation of the changing world regarding relationship length," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 523-537.
    7. Nicholas Paparoidamis & Constantine Katsikeas & Ruben Chumpitaz, 2017. "The role of supplier performance in building customer trust and loyalty: A cross-country examination," Post-Print hal-01745331, HAL.
    8. repec:pab:wpbsad:12.04 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Judit Oláh & Attila Bai & György Karmazin & Péter Balogh & József Popp, 2017. "The Role Played by Trust and Its Effect on the Competiveness of Logistics Service Providers in Hungary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-22, December.
    10. Chao-Hung Wang & Kuan-Liang Chen, 2018. "Do Relationships have a Dark Side for Innovation Performance in the High-Tech Industry?," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(02), pages 1-22, April.
    11. Branzei, Oana & Vertinsky, Ilan & Camp II, Ronald D., 2007. "Culture-contingent signs of trust in emergent relationships," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 104(1), pages 61-82, September.
    12. Rodriguez, Nuria Garcia & Perez, M Jose Sanzo & Gutierrez, Juan A. Trespalacios, 2008. "Can a good organizational climate compensate for a lack of top management commitment to new product development," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 118-131, February.
    13. Chulmo Koo & Namho Chung & Juyeon Ham, 2017. "Assessing the User Resistance to Recommender Systems in Exhibition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-16, November.
    14. Kanupriya Katyal & Vinay Kanetkar & Sanjay Patro, 2019. "What is a fair fare? Exploring the differences between perceived price fairness and perceived price unfairness," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(2), pages 133-146, April.
    15. Judit Oláh & Yusmar Ardhi Hidayat & Beata Gavurova & Muhammad Asif Khan & József Popp, 2021. "Trust levels within categories of information and communication technology companies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-21, June.
    16. Bahtışen Kavak & Ayşegül E. Sertoğlu & Öznur Ö. Tektaş, 2016. "The Moderating Effect of Knowledge Transfer on Satisfaction-Performance Relationship," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 6(5), pages 49-63, May.
    17. Jennifer Oetzel & Chang Hoon Oh, 2021. "A storm is brewing: Antecedents of disaster preparation in risk prone locations," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(8), pages 1545-1570, August.
    18. Elodie Gentina & Thomas Li-Ping Tang & Qinxuan Gu, 2018. "Do Parents and Peers Influence Adolescents’ Monetary Intelligence and Consumer Ethics? French and Chinese Adolescents and Behavioral Economics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(1), pages 115-140, August.
    19. Harvey, Michael & Reiche, B. Sebastian & Moeller, Miriam, 2011. "Developing effective global relationships through staffing with inpatriate managers: The role of interpersonal trust," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 150-161, June.
    20. Joaquín García-Cruz & Juan Carlos Real, 2012. "Trust as a consequence of perceived commitment: Implications on organizational learning capability and product innovation," Working Papers 12.03, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Business Organization and Marketing (former Department of Business Administration).
    21. Bicen, Pelin & Hunt, Shelby D. & Madhavaram, Sreedhar, 2021. "Coopetitive innovation alliance performance: Alliance competence, alliance’s market orientation, and relational governance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 23-31.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Online buying behaviour; Perceived risk; Perceived complexity; Brand trust.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:jetimm:v:1:y:2017:i:1:p:194-203. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucian Onisor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.