IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abg/anprac/v22y2018i61305.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovations in the Federal Government During the Post-new Public Management Era

Author

Listed:
  • Pedro Cavalcante

Abstract

The main goal of this paper is to analyze whether innovations in the federal government follow public management trends, especially in the post-New Public Management (NPM) era. The article, based on exploratory descriptive research, investigates the most frequent trends in terms of principles and guidelines, their evolution in time and the relationship among the trends, and the thematic area of the innovations. To accomplish the goal, we initially conducted a comprehensive literature review to map the post-NPM trends. Next, we used content analysis to verify these initiatives based on the Federal Award of Public Management Innovation (FAPMI) from 2007 to 2015. The empirical findings confirm that more than 90% of these initiatives have at least one post-NPM principle/directive. The recurrent initiatives are collaboration/partnership, coordination/control, and participation/engagement with minor differences between the FAPMI runners-up and winners. A comparison of the trends according to innovation type, depicted by their thematic areas, revealed an overall heterogeneity among these trends. The most frequent type - new arrangement - is highly related to collaboration and partnership, while internal ends initiatives have less common post-NPM principles/directives, such as strengthening bureaucracy and leadership.

Suggested Citation

  • Pedro Cavalcante, 2018. "Innovations in the Federal Government During the Post-new Public Management Era," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 22(6), pages 885-902.
    • Handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:22:y:2018:i:6:1305
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/1305/1324
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/download/1305/1324
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard Shaw, 2013. "Another Size Fits all? Public Value Management and Challenges for Institutional Design," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 477-500, May.
    2. Pollitt, Christopher & Bouckaert, Geert, 2004. "Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 2, number 9780199268498.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Onjewu, Adah-Kole Emmanuel & Walton, Nigel & Koliousis, Ioannis, 2023. "Blockchain agency theory," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    2. Зейнельгабдин А. Б. & Ахметбек Е. Е., 2021. "Блокчейн В Государственном Управлении Казахстана," Вопросы государственного и муниципального управления // Public administration issues, НИУ ВШЭ, issue 3, pages 111-134.
    3. Claudia Melati & Raquel Janissek-Muniz & Carla Maria Marques Curado, 2021. "Decision-Making Quality of Public Managers: Contributions from Intelligence and Knowledge Management," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 25(2), pages 190044-1900.
    4. Akhmetbek Yerlan & Špaček David, 2021. "Opportunities and Barriers of Using Blockchain in Public Administration: The Case of Real Estate Registration in Kazakhstan," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 14(2), pages 41-64, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Asif Mohammad Shahan & Ferdous Jahan & Rizwan Khair, 2021. "A glimpse of light in darkness: Performance‐based accountability in Bangladesh public administration," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(4), pages 191-202, October.
    2. Tamara Guerrero-Gómez & Andrés Navarro-Galera & David Ortiz-Rodríguez, 2021. "Promoting Online Transparency to Help Achieve the Sustainable Development Goals: An Empirical Study of Local Governments in Latin America," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    3. Dietrich Budäus & Dennis Hilgers, 2009. "Reform des öffentlichen Haushalts- und Rechnungswesens in Deutschland," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 377-396, January.
    4. Dixon, Keith, 2009. "Calculative practices in higher education: a retrospective analysis of curricular accounting about learning," MPRA Paper 18295, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Kemmerling, Achim & Bruttel, Oliver, 2005. "New politics in German labour market policy? The implications of the recent Hartz reforms for the German welfare state," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Labor Market Policy and Employment SP I 2005-101, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    6. Claudiu CICEA, 2020. "Performance In Public Management. A Research Agenda With Bibliometric Approach," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2020(35), pages 109-123, December.
    7. Budäus, Dietrich, 2009. "Manifest zum öffentlichen Haushalts- und Rechnungswesen in Deutschland – Mehr Transparenz, Effektivität und Effizienz in Politik und Verwaltungen durch ein einheitliches doppisches Haushalts- und Rech," ZögU - Zeitschrift für öffentliche und gemeinwirtschaftliche Unternehmen, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 32(3), pages 282-318.
    8. Jari Stenvall & Petri Virtanen, 2017. "Intelligent Public Organisations," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 195-209, June.
    9. Richard A. Courtney, 2018. "Network governance in the heritage ecology," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 22(3), pages 689-705, September.
    10. Tóth, Balázs, 2021. "Milyen kapcsolatban állnak a közszféra reformjai a gazdaságpolitikai paradigmákkal? [How reforms of the public sector relate to the paradigms of economic policy]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(2), pages 205-222.
    11. Leroux, Erick & Pupion, Pierre-Charles, 2022. "Smart territories and IoT adoption by local authorities: A question of trust, efficiency, and relationship with the citizen-user-taxpayer," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    12. John Wanna, 2010. "Investigating the Reality of Reform in Modern Budgeting," Chapters, in: John Wanna & Lotte Jensen & Jouke de Vries (ed.), The Reality of Budgetary Reform in OECD Nations, chapter 1, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. Cipolletta, Germano & Fiorani, Gloria & Matei, Ani & Matei, Lucica & Meneguzzo, Marco & Mititelu, Cristina, 2010. "Public Sector Modernization Trends of the Member States of European Union.Trajectories of reforms in Italy and Romania," Apas Papers 267, Academic Public Administration Studies Archive - APAS.
    14. repec:aif:journl:v:31:y:2024:i:1:p:64-75 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Naumenko, Raisa, 2016. "Study Of The Current Status Of Training Of Applicants For Higher Education On The Specialty “Public Management And Administration”," EUREKA: Social and Humanities, Scientific Route OÜ, issue 3, pages 21-28.
    16. Bellò, Benedetta & Spano, Alessandro, 2015. "Governing the purple zone: How politicians influence public managers," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 354-365.
    17. Deborah Wilson, 2011. "Comparative Analysis in Public Management," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 293-308, February.
    18. Bryan DUFOUR & Francesca PETRELLA & Nadine RICHEZ-BATTESTI, 2020. "Understanding social impact assessment through public value theory: A comparative analysis on work integration social enterprises (WISEs) in France and Denmark," CIRIEC Working Papers 2012, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.
    19. Independent Evaluation Group, 2008. "Public Sector Reform: What Works and Why? An IEG evaluation of World Bank Support," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 6484.
    20. Di Virgilio, Francesca & Capalbo, Francesco & Doronzo, Emanuele, 2024. "A bibliometric analysis of digitalization in public sector and human resources management studies. What happened to the trial court organization?," Economics & Statistics Discussion Papers esdp24097, University of Molise, Department of Economics.
    21. Alessio Conti & Giovanni Vetritto, 2019. "ICT from Below: ELISA Program and the Innovation of Local Government in Italy," International Journal of Social Science Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 7(3), pages 70-92, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:22:y:2018:i:6:1305. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Information Technology of ANPAD (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://anpad.org.br .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.