IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/njopap/v14y2021i2p41-64n8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Opportunities and Barriers of Using Blockchain in Public Administration: The Case of Real Estate Registration in Kazakhstan

Author

Listed:
  • Akhmetbek Yerlan

    (Academy of Public Administration under the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Kazakhstan.)

  • Špaček David

    (Masaryk University, Faculty of Economics and Administration, Brno, Czech Republic.)

Abstract

Blockchain technology has a great potential for improving public administration – its transparency and efficiency. It is also discussed as an instrument for reducing corruption and transaction costs. This paper discusses the potential use of block-chain technology in public administration. It is based on a case-study approach focusing on real estate registration in Kazakhstan. Particular attention is paid to identifying factors hindering the development of the blockchain technology. The paper indicates that the main barriers to further use of blockchain technology in Kazakhstan are insufficient legislation and also the complexity of the technical implementation of blockchain projects and integration with existing systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Akhmetbek Yerlan & Špaček David, 2021. "Opportunities and Barriers of Using Blockchain in Public Administration: The Case of Real Estate Registration in Kazakhstan," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 14(2), pages 41-64, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:njopap:v:14:y:2021:i:2:p:41-64:n:8
    DOI: 10.2478/nispa-2021-0014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2021-0014
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/nispa-2021-0014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frambach, Ruud T. & Schillewaert, Niels, 2002. "Organizational innovation adoption: a multi-level framework of determinants and opportunities for future research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 163-176, February.
    2. Elvira Talapina, 2020. "Application Of Blockchain In Public Administration: Prospects For Legal Regulation," Public administration issues, Higher School of Economics, issue 3, pages 96-113.
    3. Pedro Cavalcante, 2018. "Innovations in the Federal Government During the Post-new Public Management Era," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 22(6), pages 885-902.
    4. Fernanda Momo & Giovana Schiavi & Ariel Behr & Percival Lucena, 2019. "Business Models and Blockchain: What Can Change?," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 23(2), pages 228-248.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Зейнельгабдин А. Б. & Ахметбек Е. Е., 2021. "Блокчейн В Государственном Управлении Казахстана," Вопросы государственного и муниципального управления // Public administration issues, НИУ ВШЭ, issue 3, pages 111-134.
    2. Bentivoglio, Deborah & Bucci, Giorgia & Belletti, Matteo & Finco, Adele, 2022. "A theoretical framework on network’s dynamics for precision agriculture technologies adoption," Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural (RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 60(4), January.
    3. Synek, Stefan & Koenigstorfer, Joerg, 2018. "Exploring adoption determinants of tax-subsidized company-leasing bicycles from the perspective of German employers and employees," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 238-260.
    4. Hwang, Yujong & Al-Arabiat, Mohanned & Rouibah, Kamel & Chung, -->Jin-Young, 2016. "Toward an integrative view for the leader-member exchange of system implementation," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 976-986.
    5. Sabi, Humphrey M. & Uzoka, Faith-Michael E. & Langmia, Kehbuma & Njeh, Felix N., 2016. "Conceptualizing a model for adoption of cloud computing in education," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 183-191.
    6. Hao Zhang & Jie He & Xiaomeng Shi & Qiong Hong & Jie Bao & Shuqi Xue, 2020. "Technology Characteristics, Stakeholder Pressure, Social Influence, and Green Innovation: Empirical Evidence from Chinese Express Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, April.
    7. Humphrey M. Sabi & Faith-Michael E. Uzoka & Kehbuma Langmia & Felix N. Njeh & Clive K. Tsuma, 0. "A cross-country model of contextual factors impacting cloud computing adoption at universities in sub-Saharan Africa," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-24.
    8. Helena Bulińska-Stangrecka & Anna Bagieńska, 2019. "HR Practices for Supporting Interpersonal Trust and Its Consequences for Team Collaboration and Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-18, August.
    9. Rocco Agrifoglio & Concetta Metallo & Primiano Nauta, 2021. "Understanding Knowledge Management in Public Organizations through the Organizational Knowing Perspective: a Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 137-156, March.
    10. Van Lancker, Jonas & Mondelaers, Koen & Wauters, Erwin & Van Huylenbroeck, Guido, 2016. "The Organizational Innovation System: A systemic framework for radical innovation at the organizational level," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 52, pages 40-50.
    11. Nguyen Minh Ha & Pham Anh Nguyen & Nguyen Bach Hoang Phung, 2022. "Technological factors affecting green innovation: Evidence from the manufacturing sector in Vietnam," HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY, vol. 12(1), pages 3-19.
    12. Hutto, Brent & Saunders, Ruth P. & Wilcox, Sara & Jake-Schoffman, Danielle E. & Bernhart, John A. & Dunn, Caroline G. & Kaczynski, Andrew T. & James, Katherine L., 2021. "Pathways of influences leading to adoption of the Faith, Activity and Nutrition (FAN) program in a statewide initiative," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    13. Papazoglou, Michalis E. & Spanos, Yiannis E., 2018. "Bridging distant technological domains: A longitudinal study of the determinants of breadth of innovation diffusion," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(9), pages 1713-1728.
    14. Matta, Vic & Koonce, David & Jeyaraj, Anand, 2012. "Initiation, Experimentation, Implementation of innovations: The case for Radio Frequency Identification Systems," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 164-174.
    15. Alofan, Fahad & Chen, Stephen & Tan, Hao, 2020. "National cultural distance, organizational culture, and adaptation of management innovations in foreign subsidiaries: A fuzzy set analysis of TQM implementation in Saudi Arabia," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 184-199.
    16. Fuller, Tamara & Braun, Michael & Chiu, Yu-ling, 2018. "Increasing worker buy-in for child welfare reform: Examining the influence of individual, organizational, and implementation factors," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 301-306.
    17. Jung Wan Lee & Young Min Kim & Young Ei Kim, 2018. "Antecedents of Adopting Corporate Environmental Responsibility and Green Practices," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(2), pages 397-409, March.
    18. Di Stefano, Giada & Gambardella, Alfonso & Verona, Gianmario, 2012. "Technology push and demand pull perspectives in innovation studies: Current findings and future research directions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(8), pages 1283-1295.
    19. Claudia Melati & Raquel Janissek-Muniz & Carla Maria Marques Curado, 2021. "Decision-Making Quality of Public Managers: Contributions from Intelligence and Knowledge Management," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 25(2), pages 190044-1900.
    20. Lucia-Palacios, Laura & Bordonaba-Juste, Victoria & Polo-Redondo, Yolanda & Grünhagen, Marko, 2014. "Technological opportunism effects on IT adoption, intra-firm diffusion and performance: Evidence from the U.S. and Spain," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(6), pages 1178-1188.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:njopap:v:14:y:2021:i:2:p:41-64:n:8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.