Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/s/wly/greenh5.html
Content
October 2012, Volume 2, Issue 5
- 386-394 Solution processable polymer‐based nanocomposite coatings for large‐area carbon capture and conversion
by Michael Ashley & Punnamchandar Ramidi & Charles Magiera & Anindya Ghosh & Timothy Bontrager & Timothy G. Scott & Gary Blackburn & Enkeleda Dervishi & Alexandru S. Biris & Tao Wang & Ilker S Bayer & Abhijit Biswas
August 2012, Volume 2, Issue 4
- 217-218 The risk of induced seismicity: is cap‐rock integrity on shaky ground?
by Curtis M. Oldenburg - 219-222 Reflections on storage site monitoring
by Andrew Chadwick - 223-238 Protein‐based carbon capture: progress and potential
by Michael L. Drummond & Thomas R. Cundari & Angela K. Wilson - 239-259 Recent advances in carbon dioxide capture with metal‐organic frameworks
by Yangyang Liu & Zhiyong U. Wang & Hong‐Cai Zhou - 260-278 Workflow using sparse vintage data for building a first geological and reservoir model for CO 2 geological storage in deep saline aquifer. A case study in the St. Lawrence Platform, Canada
by Maxime Claprood & Erwan Gloaguen & Bernard Giroux & Elena Konstantinovskaya & Michel Malo & Mathieu J. Duchesne - 279-303 Simulations of long‐column flow experiments related to geologic carbon sequestration: effects of outer wall boundary condition on upward flow and formation of liquid CO 2
by Curtis M. Oldenburg & Christine Doughty & Catherine A. Peters & Patrick F. Dobson - 304-313 Effect of co‐gasification of biomass and petroleum coke with coal on the production of gases
by Javier Fermoso & Borja Arias & Behdad Moghtaderi & Covadonga Pevida & Marta G. Plaza & Jose J. Pis & Fernando Rubiera - 314-319 Potential for environmental impact due to acid gas leakage from wellbores at EOR injection sites near Zama Lake, Alberta: response to D.M. LeNeveu
by James E. Houseworth & Preston D. Jordan - 320-321 Response to the comment by Houseworth and Jordan
by DM LeNeveu
June 2012, Volume 2, Issue 3
- 145-147 In quest of robust and commercial CO 2 monitoring
by Susan D. Hovorka - 148-150 CCS in Europe: a perspective from the European Commission
by Marlene Holzner - 151-161 Preliminary country‐scale assessment of carbon dioxide storage potential in Iran
by Kamyar Movagharnejad & Azadeh Emamgholivand & Hamed Mousavi & Masoud Sheikhi Kordkheili - 162-171 What chemicals will we need to capture CO 2 ?
by Jason E. Bara - 172-184 Scoping analysis of brine extraction/re‐injection for enhanced CO 2 storage
by Seyyed Abolfazl Hosseini & Jean‐Philippe Nicot - 185-199 A Bayesian belief network (BBN) for combining evidence from multiple CO 2 leak detection technologies
by Ya‐Mei Yang & Mitchell J. Small & Egemen O. Ogretim & Donald D. Gray & Arthur W. Wells & Grant S. Bromhal & Brian R. Strazisar - 200-208 Promoted CO 2 absorption in aqueous ammonia
by Hai Yu & Qunyang Xiang & Mengxiang Fang & Qi Yang & Paul Feron - 209-215 The influence of information on individuals' reactions to CCS technologies: results from experimental online survey research
by Christian Oltra & Roser Sala & Àlex Boso
April 2012, Volume 2, Issue 2
- 75-76 Do we have a rapid solution for CO 2 utilization? A perspective from China
by Chang‐jun Liu - 77-79 Is CCS a fully fledged business proposition or an interesting experiment?
by Muriel Cozier - 80-98 Post‐combustion CO 2 capture: chemical absorption processes in coal‐fired steam power plants
by Jochen Oexmann & Alfons Kather & Sebastian Linnenberg & Ulrich Liebenthal - 99-114 Potential for environmental impact due to acid gas leakage from wellbores at EOR injection sites near Zama Lake, Alberta
by D.M. LeNeveu - 115-125 Greenhouse gas emission from rice‐ and wheat‐growing areas in India: spatial analysis and upscaling
by Arti Bhatia & P.K. Aggarwal & Niveta Jain & H. Pathak - 126-135 Public awareness and opinion on CCS in the province of Québec, Canada
by Jean‐Philibert Moutenet & Karine Bédard & Michel Malo - 136-143 Design and use of a laboratory rig for the study of the chemical‐physical effects on aquatic environments of potential seepage from CO 2 storage sites
by G. Caramanna & Y. Wei & M. M. Maroto‐Valer & Paul Nathanail & M. Steven
February 2012, Volume 2, Issue 1
- 1-2 Why we need the ‘and’ in ‘CO 2 utilization and storage’
by Curtis M. Oldenburg - 3-5 Where now for CCS in the UK?
by Luke Warren - 6-8 Post 2020, CCS will be cost‐competitive with other low‐carbon energy technologies
by Graeme Sweeney - 9-16 The US department of Energy's R&D program to reduce greenhouse gas emissions through beneficial uses of carbon dioxide
by Darin Damiani & John T. Litynski & Howard G. McIlvried & Derek M. Vikara & Rameshwar D. Srivastava - 20-35 Development of adsorbents for CO 2 capture from waste materials: a review
by Mara Olivares‐Marín & M. Mercedes Maroto‐Valer - 36-45 Sensitivity analysis of the build decision for carbon capture and sequestration projects
by Paul S. Fischbeck & David Gerard & Sean T. McCoy - 46-58 Geopolymer as well cement and the variation of its mechanical behavior with curing temperature
by Mohamed M.C. Nasvi & Ranjith P. Gamage & Sanjayan Jay - 59-65 Synthesis of cyclic carbonates from CO 2 and diols via electrogenerated cyanomethyl anion
by Huan Wang & La‐Xia Wu & Jian‐Qing Zhao & Rui‐Na Li & Ai‐Jian Zhang & Hisashi Kajiura & Yong‐Ming Li & Jia‐Xing Lu - 66-74 The role of substituents of chlorostannoxanes on the reactivity of the catalysts during the synthesis of cyclic carbonates using epoxides and carbon dioxide
by Sharon Pulla & Punnamchandar Ramidi & Benjamin L. Jarvis & Pradip Munshi & William O. Griffin & Jerry A. Darsey & Jerry L. Dallas & Vedavalli Pokala & Anindya Ghosh
December 2011, Volume 1, Issue 4
- 285-286 A focus on carbonation for CO 2 mineral sequestration: highlights from ACEME10
by Ron Zevenhoven - 287-293 Process intensification routes for mineral carbonation
by Rafael M. Santos & Tom Van Gerven - 294-304 Optimization of antigorite heat pre‐treatment via kinetic modeling of the dehydroxylation reaction for CO 2 mineralization
by Reydick D. Balucan & Eric M. Kennedy & John F. Mackie & Bogdan Z. Dlugogorski - 305-311 Ammonium salt‐based steelmaking slag carbonation: Precipitation of CaCO 3 and ammonia losses assessment
by Sanni Eloneva & Pekka Mannisto & Arshe Said & Carl‐Johan Fogelholm & Ron Zevenhoven - 312-319 Wet versus slurry carbonation of EAF steel slag
by Renato Baciocchi & Giulia Costa & Elisabetta Di Bartolomeo & Alessandra Polettini & Raffaella Pomi - 320-323 When once is not enough: accounting for CO 2 recycling in EOR operations
by Philip M. Marston - 324-334 Biomass energy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS or Bio‐CCS)
by Clair Gough & Paul Upham - 335-350 Transient CO 2 leakage and injection in wellbore‐reservoir systems for geologic carbon sequestration
by Lehua Pan & Curtis M. Oldenburg & Karsten Pruess & Yu‐Shu Wu
September 2011, Volume 1, Issue 3
- 191-193 Improved understanding of geologic CO 2 storage processes requires risk‐driven field experiments
by Curtis M. Oldenburg - 194-196 The office of carbon capture and storage
by Adam Dawson - 197-199 Good return on CCS investments?
by Jon Evans - 200-210 Is Panarea Island (Italy) a valid and cost‐effective natural laboratory for the development of detection and monitoring techniques for submarine CO 2 seepage?
by Giorgio Caramanna & Nunzia Voltattorni & M. Mercedes Maroto‐Valer - 211-222 Parameters affecting mineral trapping of CO 2 sequestration in brines
by Qi Liu & M. Mercedes Maroto‐Valer - 223-236 Storage of CO 2 hydrate in shallow gas reservoirs: pre‐ and post‐injection periods
by Olga Ye Zatsepina & Mehran Pooladi‐Darvish - 237-247 Integrated modeling of CO 2 storage and leakage scenarios including transitions between super‐ and subcritical conditions, and phase change between liquid and gaseous CO 2
by Karsten Pruess - 248-260 Deterioration of a fractured carbonate caprock exposed to CO 2 ‐acidified brine flow
by Brian Ellis & Catherine Peters & Jeffrey Fitts & Grant Bromhal & Dustin McIntyre & Robert Warzinski & Eilis Rosenbaum - 261-277 Impact of resource‐conserving technologies on productivity and greenhouse gas emissions in the rice‐wheat system
by Himanshu Pathak & Yash S. Saharawat & Mahesh Gathala & Jagdish K. Ladha - 278-284 Mesoporous amine‐bridged polysilsesquioxane for CO 2 capture
by Genggeng Qi & Liling Fu & Xiaonan Duan & Brian Hyun Choi & Michael Abraham & Emmanuel P. Giannelis
June 2011, Volume 1, Issue 2
- 93-95 Climate change is about impact; CCS is about opportunity
by M. Mercedes Maroto‐Valer - 96-98 Clean coal technologies
by John Topper - 99-101 CCS – between a rock and a hard place?
by Andrew Chadwick - 102-104 Health, safety, and environmental risks from energy production: a year‐long reality check
by Curtis M. Oldenburg - 105-118 CarbFix: a CCS pilot project imitating and accelerating natural CO 2 sequestration
by Edda S.P. Aradóttir & Hólmfrídur Sigurdardóttir & Bergur Sigfússon & Einar Gunnlaugsson - 119-133 Perspectives on CO 2 capture and storage
by Filip Johnsson - 134-141 Alberta's new carbon capture and storage legislation
by Nigel D. Bankes - 142-159 The recent development of CO 2 fixation and conversion by ionic liquid
by Jianmin Zhang & Jian Sun & Xiaochun Zhang & Yansong Zhao & Suojiang Zhang - 160-174 Estimating the probability of CO 2 plumes encountering faults
by Preston D. Jordan & Curtis M. Oldenburg & Jean‐Philippe Nicot - 175-179 Using the Choquet integral for screening geological CO 2 storage sites
by Yingqi Zhang - 180-190 NO emissions in oxy‐coal combustion with the addition of steam in an entrained flow reactor
by Lucia Álvarez & Juan Riaza & Maria V. Gil & Covadonga Pevida & José J. Pis & Fernando Rubiera
March 2011, Volume 1, Issue 1
- 1-2 Welcome
by Curtis M. Oldenburg & M. Mercedes Maroto‐Valer - 3-4 Why carbon capture and storage?
by M. Mercedes Maroto‐Valer - 5-7 On carbon footprints and growing energy use
by Curtis M. Oldenburg - 8-10 Restoring confidence at the Cancun Climate Change Conference
by Muriel Cozier - 11-20 On scale and magnitude of pressure build‐up induced by large‐scale geologic storage of CO 2
by Quanlin Zhou & Jens T. Birkholzer - 21-35 CO 2 ‐based energy vectors for the storage of solar energy
by Gabriele Centi & Siglinda Perathoner - 36-47 Ca looping technology: current status, developments and future directions
by E. J. (Ben) Anthony - 48-57 CO 2 mineral sequestration: developments toward large‐scale application
by Ron Zevenhoven & Johan Fagerlund & Joel Kibiwot Songok - 58-71 The potential of aquatic biomass for CO 2 ‐enhanced fixation and energy production
by Angela Dibenedetto - 72-82 Reduction of greenhouse gas emissions by integration of cement plants, power plants, and CO 2 capture systems
by Luis M. Romeo & David Catalina & Pilar Lisbona & Yolanda Lara & Ana Martínez - 83-91 Adapting communication to the public's intuitive understanding of CCS
by Lasse Wallquist & Vivianne H. M. Visschers & Simone Dohle & Michael Siegrist