IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/greenh/v1y2011i2p175-179.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using the Choquet integral for screening geological CO 2 storage sites

Author

Listed:
  • Yingqi Zhang

Abstract

For geological CO2 storage site selection, it is desirable to reduce the number of candidate sites through a screening process before detailed site characterization is performed. Screening generally involves defi ning a number of criteria which then need to be evaluated for each site. The importance of each criterion to the fi nal evaluation will generally be different. Weights refl ecting the relative importance of these criteria can be provided by experts. To evaluate a site, each criterion must be evaluated and scored, and then aggregated, taking into account the importance of the criteria. We propose the use of the Choquet integral for aggregating the scores. The Choquet integral considers the interactions among criteria, i.e. whether they are independent, complementary to each other, or partially repetitive. We also evaluate the Shapley index, which demonstrates how the importance of a given piece of information may change if it is considered by itself or together with other available information. An illustrative example demonstrates how the Choquet integral properly accounts for the presence of redundancy in two site‐evaluation criteria, making the screening process more defensible than the standard weighted‐average approach. © 2011 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

Suggested Citation

  • Yingqi Zhang, 2011. "Using the Choquet integral for screening geological CO 2 storage sites," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 1(2), pages 175-179, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:1:y:2011:i:2:p:175-179
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:1:y:2011:i:2:p:175-179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2152-3878 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.