Author
Listed:
- Olga Ye Zatsepina
- Mehran Pooladi‐Darvish
Abstract
With the growing concern about climate change, interest in reducing CO 2 emissions has increased. Geological storage of CO 2 is perceived to be one of the most promising methods that could provide significant reductions in CO 2 emissions over the short and medium term. Since a major concern regarding geological storage is the possibility of leakage, trapping CO 2 in a solid form is quite attractive. Unlike mineral trapping, the kinetics of CO 2 ‐hydrate formation is quite fast, providing the opportunity for long‐term storage of CO 2 . Thermodynamic calculations suggest that CO 2 hydrate is stable at temperatures that occur in a number of formations in Northern Alberta, in an area where there are significant CO 2 emissions associated with the production of oil sands and bitumen. In this paper, we study storage of CO 2 in hydrate form at conditions similar to those at depleted gas pools in Northern Alberta. Our numerical simulation results show that the CO 2 storage capacity of such pools is many times greater than their original gas‐in‐place. This provides a local option for storage of a portion of the CO 2 emissions from the oil sands operations in northeastern Alberta. In an earlier paper, we studied hydrate formation during a period of continued CO 2 injection. In this paper, we extend the duration of the investigation to include the period after injection has stopped. In particular, we study the storage capacity of such depleted gas pools and the fate of the hydrate over long periods of time when the injection of CO 2 has slowed down or ceased. We examine the effect of properties of the reservoir and cap/base rocks, as well as operating conditions. In particular, we investigate a shut‐in case as the most realistic condition in CO 2 field sequestration. © 2011 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Suggested Citation
Olga Ye Zatsepina & Mehran Pooladi‐Darvish, 2011.
"Storage of CO 2 hydrate in shallow gas reservoirs: pre‐ and post‐injection periods,"
Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 1(3), pages 223-236, September.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:greenh:v:1:y:2011:i:3:p:223-236
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:1:y:2011:i:3:p:223-236. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2152-3878 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.