IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/greenh/v2y2012i6p445-459.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Uncertainty quantification of CO 2 leakage through a fault with multiphase and nonisothermal effects

Author

Listed:
  • Chuanhe Lu
  • Yunwei Sun
  • Thomas A. Buscheck
  • Yue Hao
  • Joshua A. White
  • Laura Chiaramonte

Abstract

The potential for CO 2 leakage through a permeable fault is a key concern for geologic CO 2 sequestration (GCS) in saline formations. If CO 2 migrates vertically upward through a fault from the storage reservoir to an overlying fresh‐water aquifer, phase change can occur because temperature and pressure decrease with decreasing depth. The decrease in CO 2 density during phase transition causes an additional reduction in temperature. In this paper, we present a computational model for simulating the behaviour of a leaky fault connecting a saline CO 2 storage reservoir and an overlying fresh‐water aquifer. We address phase transition, considering the nonlinear CO 2 enthalpy and viscosity functions. The model results indicate that the CO 2 leakage rate initially increases when CO 2 migration is driven by both buoyancy and overpressure during the period of injection. In the post‐injection period, CO 2 leakage is only driven by buoyancy and the leakage rate decreases. The influence of nonisothermal conditions is more pronounced during the first stage. The deterministic model of this faulted reservoir system is used within an uncertainty quantification (UQ) framework to rigorously quantify the sensitivity of the brine and CO 2 leakage in response to the uncertain model parameters. The results demonstrate that fault permeability is the most sensitive factor affecting both CO 2 and brine leakage rate. Reduced‐order models of CO 2 and brine leakage are developed for the emulation of a large number of sample points, from which probability distributions are derived and can be incorporated in risk assessment of groundwater contamination resulting from CO 2 and brine leakage. © 2012 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

Suggested Citation

  • Chuanhe Lu & Yunwei Sun & Thomas A. Buscheck & Yue Hao & Joshua A. White & Laura Chiaramonte, 2012. "Uncertainty quantification of CO 2 leakage through a fault with multiphase and nonisothermal effects," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 2(6), pages 445-459, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:2:y:2012:i:6:p:445-459
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Changbing Yang & Ramón H. Treviño & Susan D. Hovorka & Jesus Delgado‐Alonso, 2015. "Semi‐analytical approach to reactive transport of CO 2 leakage into aquifers at carbon sequestration sites," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 5(6), pages 786-801, December.
    2. Zan Wang & Mitchell J. Small, 2016. "Statistical performance of CO 2 leakage detection using seismic travel time measurements," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 6(1), pages 55-69, February.
    3. Kim, Min & Kwon, Seoyoon & Ji, Minsoo & Shin, Hyundon & Min, Baehyun, 2023. "Multi-lateral horizontal well with dual-tubing system to improve CO2 storage security and reduce CCS cost," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 330(PB).
    4. Yilin Mao & Mehdi Zeidouni & Roohollah Askari, 2017. "Effect of leakage pathway flow properties on thermal signal associated with the leakage from CO 2 storage zone," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 7(3), pages 512-529, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:2:y:2012:i:6:p:445-459. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2152-3878 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.