Contact information of Cambridge University Press
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help
correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:inorps. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/iop .
Content
September 2008, Volume 1, Issue 3
- 317-319 Let Us Not Become Too Narrow
by Stewart, Greg L.
- 320-322 An Argument for Context-Specific Personality Assessments
by Heggestad, Eric D. & Gordon, Heather L.
- 323-332 Personality Testing and Industrial–Organizational Psychology: A Productive Exchange and Some Future Directions
by Oswald, Frederick L. & Hough, Leaetta M.
- 333-342 Stubborn Reliance on Intuition and Subjectivity in Employee Selection
by Highhouse, Scott
- 343-346 Some New (and Old) Suggestions for Improving Personnel Selection
by Kuncel, Nathan R.
- 347-351 Stubborn Reliance on Human Nature in Employee Selection: Statistical Decision Aids Are Evolutionarily Novel
by Colarelli, Stephen M. & Thompson, Matthew
- 352-354 Intuiting the Selection Context
by Klimoski, Richard & Jones, Robert G.
- 355-358 Why Is It So Hard to Apply Professional Selection Methods in Business Practice?
by Chorągwicka, Beata & Janta, Barbara
- 359-360 Managers Also Overrely on Tests
by Martin, Scott L.
- 361-363 The Role of Perceptions Versus Reality in Managers’ Choice of Selection Decision Aids
by Phillips, Jean M. & Gully, Stanley M.
- 364-366 Why Don’t They Learn?
by Fisher, Cynthia D.
- 367-369 Interviewer Resistance to Structure
by O’Brien, James
- 370-371 Reliance on Intuition and Faculty Hiring
by Mullins, Morell E. & Rogers, Crista
- 372-372 That’s Not the Only Problem
by Thayer, Paul W.
- 373-376 Facts Are Stubborn Things
by Highhouse, Scott
June 2008, Volume 1, Issue 2
- 148-160 Explaining the Weak Relationship Between Job Performance and Ratings of Job Performance
by Murphy, Kevin R.
- 161-166 On the Relationship Between Job Performance and Ratings of Job Performance: What Do We Really Know?
by Woehr, David J.
- 167-173 Integrating Traditional Perspectives on Error in Ratings: Capitalizing on Advances in Mixed-Effects Modeling
by Putka, Dan J. & Ingerick, Michael & McCloy, Rodney A.
- 174-179 No New Terrain: Reliability and Construct Validity of Job Performance Ratings
by Ones, Deniz S. & Viswesvaran, Chockalingam & Schmidt, Frank L.
- 180-182 How Managers Think: Why the Mediated Model Makes Sense
by King, Joseph F.
- 183-184 “When I use a word …”
by Hollenbeck, George P.
- 185-189 What If We Took Within-Person Performance Variability Seriously?
by Fisher, Cynthia D.
- 190-193 Inaccurate Performance Ratings Are a Reflection of Larger Organizational Issues
by Harris, Michael M. & Ispas, Dan & Schmidt, Greg F.
- 194-196 Dynamic Performance and the Performance–Performance Rating Relation
by Reb, Jochen & Greguras, Gary J.
- 197-205 Perspectives on the Relationship Between Job Performance and Ratings of Job Performance
by Murphy, Kevin R.
- 206-246 International Perspectives on the Legal Environment for Selection
by Myors, Brett & Lievens, Filip & Schollaert, Eveline & Van Hoye, Greet & Cronshaw, Steven F. & Mladinic, Antonio & Rodríguez, Viviana & Aguinis, Herman & Steiner, Dirk D. & Rolland, Florence & Schuler, Heinz & Frintrup, Andreas & Nikolaou, Ioannis & Tomprou, Maria & Subramony, S. & Raj, Shabu B. & Tzafrir, Shay & Bamberger, Peter & Bertolino, Marilena & Mariani, Marco & Fraccaroli, Franco & Sekiguchi, Tomoki & Onyura, Betty & Yang, Hyuckseung & Anderson, Neil & Evers, Arne & Chernyshenko, Oleksandr & Englert, Paul & Kriek, Hennie J. & Joubert, Tina & Salgado, Jesús F. & König, Cornelius J. & Thommen, Larissa A. & Chuang, Aichia & Sinangil, Handan Kepir & Bayazit, Mahmut & Cook, Mark & Shen, Winny & Sackett, Paul R.
- 247-254 A Consideration of International Differences in the Legal Context of Selection
by Dunleavy, Eric M. & Cohen, David B. & Aamodt, Michael G. & Schaeffer, Patricia
- 255-257 Legal Environment for Selection in the United States
by Gutman, Arthur
- 258-259 Legal Environment for Selection in India
by Premarajan, R.K. & Thornton, George C. & Padhi, P.K.
- 260-263 International Perspectives on the Legal Environment for Selection: Romania Case
by Cozma, Irina & Woehr, David
- 264-265 The Legal Environment for Selection in Russia
by Praslova, Ludmila
- 266-270 Broadening International Perspectives on the Legal Environment for Personnel Selection
by Myors, Brett & Lievens, Filip & Schollaert, Eveline & Van Hoye, Greet & Cronshaw, Steven F. & Mladinic, Antonio & Rodríguez, Viviana & Aguinis, Herman & Steiner, Dirk D. & Rolland, Florence & Schuler, Heinz & Frintrup, Andreas & Nikolaou, Ioannis & Tomprou, Maria & Subramony, S. & Raj, Shabu B. & Tzafrir, Shay & Bamberger, Peter & Bertolino, Marilena & Mariani, Marco & Fraccaroli, Franco & Sekiguchi, Tomoki & Onyura, Betty & Yang, Hyuckseung & Anderson, Neil & Evers, Arne & Chernyshenko, Oleksandr & Englert, Paul & Kriek, Hennie J. & Joubert, Tina & Salgado, Jesús f. & König, Cornelius J. & Thommen, Larissa A. & Chuang, Aichia & Sinangil, Handan Kepir & Bayazit, Mahmut & Cook, Mark & Shen, Winny & Sackett, Paul R.
March 2008, Volume 1, Issue 1
- 3-30 The Meaning of Employee Engagement
by Macey, William H. & Schneider, Benjamin
- 31-35 Been There, Bottled That: Are State and Behavioral Work Engagement New and Useful Construct “Wines”?
by Newman, Daniel A. & Harrison, David A.
- 36-39 Conceptual Versus Empirical Distinctions Among Constructs: Implications for Discriminant Validity
by Harter, James K. & Schmidt, Frank L.
- 40-43 The Meaning and Bleeding of Employee Engagement: How Muddy Is the Water?
by Saks, Alan M.
- 44-47 Employee Engagement at the Organizational Level of Analysis
by Pugh, S. Douglas & Dietz, Joerg
- 48-51 Is Behavioral Engagement a Distinct and Useful Construct?
by Griffin, Mark A. & Parker, Sharon K. & Neal, Andrew
- 52-55 Defining Employee Engagement for Productive Research and Practice
by Dalal, Reeshad S. & Brummel, Bradley J. & Wee, Serena & Thomas, Lisa L.
- 56-59 Leveraging Employee Engagement: The Practical Implications
by Masson, Rebecca C. & Royal, Mark A. & Agnew, Tom G. & Fine, Saul
- 60-62 Employee Engagement From a Self-Determination Theory Perspective
by Meyer, John P. & Gagnè, Maryléne
- 63-66 Representations of Trait Engagement: Integration, Additions, and Mechanisms
by Hirschfeld, Robert R. & Thomas, Christopher H.
- 67-69 The Word Is Out: We Need an Active Performance Concept for Modern Workplaces
by Frese, Michael
- 70-71 On the Skilled Aspect of Employee Engagement
by Burke, Michael J.
- 72-73 State–Trait Returns! And One Practitioner’s Request
by Vosburgh, Richard M.
- 74-75 Enriched Engagement Through Assistance to Systems’ Change: A Proposal
by Graen, George B.
- 76-83 Engaged in Engagement: We Are Delighted We Did It
by Macey, William H. & Schneider, Benjamin
- 84-97 Why Assessment Centers Do Not Work the Way They Are Supposed To
by Lance, Charles E.
- 98-104 Making Assessment Centers Work the Way They Are Supposed To
by Howard, Ann
- 105-111 Mend It, Don’t End It: An Alternate View of Assessment Center Construct-Related Validity Evidence
by Arthur, Winfred & Day, Eric Anthony & Woehr, David J.
- 112-115 What Does Exercise-Based Assessment Really Mean?
by Lievens, Filip
- 116-120 The Construct Validity of the Assessment Center Method and Usefulness of Dimensions as Focal Constructs
by Rupp, Deborah E. & Thornton, George C. & Gibbons, Alyssa M.
- 121-124 A Pragmatic View of Assessment Center Exercises and Dimensions
by Connelly, Brian S. & Ones, Deniz S. & Ramesh, Anuradha & Goff, Maynard
- 125-127 It Is Not Yet Time to Dismiss Dimensions in Assessment Centers
by Melchers, Klaus G. & König, Cornelius J.
- 128-130 Improving Assessment Centers by the Trimodal Concept of Personnel Assessment
by Schuler, Heinz
- 131-133 Back to Basics of Test Construction and Scoring
by Brannick, Michael T.
- 134-136 Assessment Centers Work, but for Different Reasons
by Moses, Joel
- 137-139 Narrow Standards for Efficacy and the Research Playground: Why Either–Or Conclusions Do Not Help
by Jones, Robert G. & Klimoski, Richard J.
- 140-146 Where Have We Been, How Did We Get There, and Where Shall We Go?
by Lance, Charles E.
Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/s/cup/inorps9.html
