IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/ifwkie/281986.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Land for fish: Quantifying the connection between the aquaculture sector and agricultural markets

Author

Listed:
  • Heimann, Tobias
  • Delzeit, Ruth

Abstract

This study employs a global Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model to quantify the effects of aquaculture production on agricultural markets, food prices and land use. We conduct a scenario analysis simulating, first, the fish sector developments expected by FAO; second, a rebuilding of sustainable wild fish stocks to achieve SDG 14; and third, a stronger expansion in aquaculture production with varying fishmeal supply. The results show direct effects of aquaculture production and limited fishmeal supply on agricultural production, land use, and food prices. Substituting fishmeal with plant-based feed when rebuilding sustainable fish stocks has lower effects on agricultural markets than growth in aquaculture production comparable to the first decade of this century. In addition, expanding aquaculture production increases prices for capture fish via fishmeal demand, instead of reducing capture fish prices by substituting consumer demand. Finally, rebuilding sustainable fish stocks has significant adverse effects on food prices in marine fish dependent regions in the southern hemisphere, and these regions need support in the transition period until sustainable fish stocks are achieved. The results of this study illustrate the interconnectedness of SDG 14 (life below water), SDG 15 (life on land) and SDG 2 (zero hunger).

Suggested Citation

  • Heimann, Tobias & Delzeit, Ruth, 2024. "Land for fish: Quantifying the connection between the aquaculture sector and agricultural markets," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 281986, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:ifwkie:281986
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.108090
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/281986/1/Land-for-fish.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.108090?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hermann Lotze‐Campen & Christoph Müller & Alberte Bondeau & Stefanie Rost & Alexander Popp & Wolfgang Lucht, 2008. "Global food demand, productivity growth, and the scarcity of land and water resources: a spatially explicit mathematical programming approach," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 39(3), pages 325-338, November.
    2. Winkler, Malte Björn Johannes & Peterson, Sonja & Thube, Sneha, 2021. "Gains associated with linking the EU and Chinese ETS under different assumptions on restrictions, allowance endowments, and international trade," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    3. Esther Regnier & Katheline Schubert, 2017. "To What Extent Is Aquaculture Socially Beneficial? A Theoretical Analysis," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 99(1), pages 186-206.
    4. Natale, Fabrizio & Borrello, Alessandra & Motova, Arina, 2015. "Analysis of the determinants of international seafood trade using a gravity model," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 98-106.
    5. Delzeit, Ruth & Klepper, Gernot & Zabel, Florian & Mauser, Wolfram, 2018. "Global economic–biophysical assessment of midterm scenarios for agricultural markets—biofuel policies, dietary patterns, cropland expansion, and productivity growth," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 226014, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    6. Hertel, Thomas W., 2010. "The Global Supply and Demand for Agricultural Land in 2050: A Perfect Storm in the Making?," 2010 Annual Meeting, July 25-27, 2010, Denver, Colorado 92639, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    7. Wenbo Zhang & Ben Belton & Peter Edwards & Patrik J. G. Henriksson & David C. Little & Richard Newton & Max Troell, 2022. "Aquaculture will continue to depend more on land than sea," Nature, Nature, vol. 603(7900), pages 2-4, March.
    8. Claude E. Boyd & Aaron A. McNevin & Robert P. Davis, 2022. "The contribution of fisheries and aquaculture to the global protein supply," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 14(3), pages 805-827, June.
    9. Klepper, Gernot & Peterson, Sonja, 2006. "Marginal abatement cost curves in general equilibrium: The influence of world energy prices," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 1-23, January.
    10. Angel Aguiar & Badri Narayanan & Robert McDougall, 2016. "An Overview of the GTAP 9 Data Base," Journal of Global Economic Analysis, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, vol. 1(1), pages 181-208, June.
    11. Florian Zabel & Ruth Delzeit & Julia M. Schneider & Ralf Seppelt & Wolfram Mauser & Tomáš Václavík, 2019. "Global impacts of future cropland expansion and intensification on agricultural markets and biodiversity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    12. Christian Mullon & Jean-François Mittaine & Olivier Thébaud & Guillaume Péron & Gorka Merino & Manuel Barange, 2009. "Modeling the global fishmeal and fish oil markets," Post-Print hal-00511619, HAL.
    13. Rosamond L. Naylor & Rebecca J. Goldburg & Jurgenne H. Primavera & Nils Kautsky & Malcolm C. M. Beveridge & Jason Clay & Carl Folke & Jane Lubchenco & Harold Mooney & Max Troell, 2000. "Effect of aquaculture on world fish supplies," Nature, Nature, vol. 405(6790), pages 1017-1024, June.
    14. Winkler, Malte & Peterson, Sonja & Thube, Sneha Dattatraya, 2021. "Gains from linking the EU and Chinese ETS under different assumptions on restrictions, adjusted endowments, and international trade," Conference papers 333252, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    15. Halley E. Froehlich & Nis Sand Jacobsen & Timothy E. Essington & Tyler Clavelle & Benjamin S. Halpern, 2018. "Avoiding the ecological limits of forage fish for fed aquaculture," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 1(6), pages 298-303, June.
    16. Thomas W. Hertel, 2011. "The Global Supply and Demand for Agricultural Land in 2050: A Perfect Storm in the Making?-super- 1," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 93(2), pages 259-275.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Heimann, Tobias & Delzeit, Ruth, 2024. "Land for fish: Quantifying the connection between the aquaculture sector and agricultural markets," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    2. Heimann, Tobias & Delzeit, Ruth, 2021. "Land for Fish: A scenario based CGE analysis of the effects of aquaculture production on agricultural markets," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315270, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Heimann, Tobias & Delzeit, Ruth, 2020. "Land for Fish: Does plant-based fodder demand of aquaculture production affect agricultural markets?," Conference papers 330207, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    4. Johannes Ziesmer & Ding Jin & Sneha D Thube & Christian Henning, 2023. "A Dynamic Baseline Calibration Procedure for CGE models," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 61(4), pages 1331-1368, April.
    5. Thomas W. Hertel & Uris Lantz C. Baldos & Dominique van der Mensbrugghe, 2016. "Predicting Long-Term Food Demand, Cropland Use, and Prices," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 8(1), pages 417-441, October.
    6. Delzeit, Ruth & Heimann, Tobias & Schünemann, Franziska & Söder, Mareike, 2021. "DART-BIO: A technical description," Kiel Working Papers 2195, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    7. John T. Saunders & Marcel Adenäuer & Jonathan Brooks, 2019. "Analysis of long-term challenges for agricultural markets," OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers 131, OECD Publishing.
    8. Delzeit, Ruth & Heimann, Tobias & Schünemann, Franziska & Söder, Mareike, 2021. "Scenarios for an impact assessment of global bioeconomy strategies: Results from a co-design process," Kiel Working Papers 2188, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    9. Hertel, Thomas W. & Baldos, Uris Lantz C., 2013. "Looking back to move forward: Evaluating global agricultural land use in integrated assessment models," Conference papers 332383, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    10. Argueyrolles, Robin & Delzeit, Ruth, 2022. "The interconnections between Fossil Fuel Subsidy Reforms and biofuels," Conference papers 333492, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    11. Elke Stehfest & Willem-Jan Zeist & Hugo Valin & Petr Havlik & Alexander Popp & Page Kyle & Andrzej Tabeau & Daniel Mason-D’Croz & Tomoko Hasegawa & Benjamin L. Bodirsky & Katherine Calvin & Jonathan C, 2019. "Key determinants of global land-use projections," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    12. Mekbib G. Haile & Matthias Kalkuhl & Joachim Braun, 2014. "Inter- and intra-seasonal crop acreage response to international food prices and implications of volatility," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 45(6), pages 693-710, November.
    13. Jiang, Hong-Dian & Purohit, Pallav & Liang, Qiao-Mei & Dong, Kangyin & Liu, Li-Jing, 2022. "The cost-benefit comparisons of China's and India's NDCs based on carbon marginal abatement cost curves," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    14. Heimann, Tobias & Argueyrolles, Robin & Reinhardt, Manuel & Schuenemann, Franziska & Söder, Mareike & Delzeit, Ruth, 2024. "Phasing out palm and soy oil biodiesel in the EU: What is the benefit?," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 281955, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    15. Stephen Shisanya & Paramu Mafongoya, 2016. "Adaptation to climate change and the impacts on household food security among rural farmers in uMzinyathi District of Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 8(3), pages 597-608, June.
    16. T. Brunelle & P. Dumas & W. Ben Aoun & Benoit Gabrielle, 2018. "Unravelling Land-Use Change Mechanisms at Global and Regional Scales," Biophysical Economics and Resource Quality, Springer, vol. 3(3), pages 1-14, September.
    17. Rees, Charles & Grovermann, Christian & Finger, Robert, 2023. "National organic action plans and organic farmland area growth in Europe," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    18. Ngoma, Hambulo & Pelletier, Johanne & Mulenga, Brian P. & Subakanya, Mitelo, 2021. "Climate-smart agriculture, cropland expansion and deforestation in Zambia: Linkages, processes and drivers," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    19. Mullon, C. & Steinmetz, F. & Merino, G. & Fernandes, J.A. & Cheung, W.W.L. & Butenschön, M. & Barange, M., 2016. "Quantitative pathways for Northeast Atlantic fisheries based on climate, ecological–economic and governance modelling scenarios," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 320(C), pages 273-291.
    20. Mwambo, Francis Molua & Fürst, Christine & Nyarko, Benjamin K. & Borgemeister, Christian & Martius, Christopher, 2020. "Maize production and environmental costs: Resource evaluation and strategic land use planning for food security in northern Ghana by means of coupled emergy and data envelopment analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Computable general equilibrium (CGE); Aquaculture; Land use; Agricultural markets; Agricultural commodity trade; SDGs; Fishmeal; Soymeal;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:ifwkie:281986. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iwkiede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.