IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v320y2016icp273-291.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantitative pathways for Northeast Atlantic fisheries based on climate, ecological–economic and governance modelling scenarios

Author

Listed:
  • Mullon, C.
  • Steinmetz, F.
  • Merino, G.
  • Fernandes, J.A.
  • Cheung, W.W.L.
  • Butenschön, M.
  • Barange, M.

Abstract

Here we present quantitative projections of potential futures for ecosystems in the North Atlantic basin generated from coupling a climate change-driven biophysical model (representing ecosystem and fish populations under climate change) and a scenario-driven ecological–economic model (representing fleets and industries under economic globalization). Four contrasting scenarios (Baseline, Fortress, Global Commons, Free Trade) were defined from the perspective of alternative regional management and governance of the oceanic basin, providing pathways for the future of ecosystems in the Northeast Atlantic basin by 2040. Results indicate that in the time frame considered: (1) the effects of governance and trade decisions are more significant in determining outcomes than the effects of climate change alone, (2) climate change is likely to result in a poleward latitudinal shift of species ranges and thus resources, with implications for exploitation patterns, (3) the level of fisheries regulation is the most important factor in determining the long term evolution of the fisheries system, (4) coupling climate change and governance impacts demonstrates the complex interaction between different components of this social–ecological system, (5) an important driver of change for the future of the North Atlantic and the European fishing fleets appears to be the interplay between wild fisheries and aquaculture development, and finally (6) scenarios demonstrate that the viability and profit of fisheries industries is highly volatile. This study highlights the need to explore basin-scale policy that combines medium to long-term environmental and socio-economic considerations, and the importance of defining alternative sustainable pathways.

Suggested Citation

  • Mullon, C. & Steinmetz, F. & Merino, G. & Fernandes, J.A. & Cheung, W.W.L. & Butenschön, M. & Barange, M., 2016. "Quantitative pathways for Northeast Atlantic fisheries based on climate, ecological–economic and governance modelling scenarios," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 320(C), pages 273-291.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:320:y:2016:i:c:p:273-291
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.09.027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380015004585
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.09.027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christian Mullon & Jean-François Mittaine & Olivier Thébaud & Guillaume Péron & Gorka Merino & Manuel Barange, 2009. "Modeling the global fishmeal and fish oil markets," Post-Print hal-00511619, HAL.
    2. Rosamond L. Naylor & Rebecca J. Goldburg & Jurgenne H. Primavera & Nils Kautsky & Malcolm C. M. Beveridge & Jason Clay & Carl Folke & Jane Lubchenco & Harold Mooney & Max Troell, 2000. "Effect of aquaculture on world fish supplies," Nature, Nature, vol. 405(6790), pages 1017-1024, June.
    3. Dryzek, John S. & Stevenson, Hayley, 2011. "Global democracy and earth system governance," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(11), pages 1865-1874, September.
    4. Khalilian, Setareh & Froese, Rainer & Proelss, Alexander & Requate, Till, 2010. "Designed for failure: A critique of the Common Fisheries Policy of the European Union," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 1178-1182, November.
    5. M. Barange & G. Merino & J. L. Blanchard & J. Scholtens & J. Harle & E. H. Allison & J. I. Allen & J. Holt & S. Jennings, 2014. "Impacts of climate change on marine ecosystem production in societies dependent on fisheries," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 4(3), pages 211-216, March.
    6. Kraan, Marloes & Hendriksen, Astrid & van Hoof, Luc & van Leeuwen, Judith & Jouanneau, Charlène, 2014. "How to dance? The tango of stakeholder involvement in marine governance research," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(PB), pages 347-352.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Weijerman, M. & Link, J.S. & Fulton, E.A. & Olsen, E. & Townsend, H. & Gaichas, S. & Hansen, C. & Skern-Mauritzen, M. & Kaplan, I.C. & Gamble, R. & Fay, G. & Savina, M. & Ainsworth, C. & van Putten, I, 2016. "Atlantis Ecosystem Model Summit: Report from a workshop," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 335(C), pages 35-38.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Heimann, Tobias & Delzeit, Ruth, 2024. "Land for fish: Quantifying the connection between the aquaculture sector and agricultural markets," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    2. Heimann, Tobias & Delzeit, Ruth, 2020. "Land for Fish: Does plant-based fodder demand of aquaculture production affect agricultural markets?," Conference papers 330207, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    3. Heimann, Tobias & Delzeit, Ruth, 2021. "Land for Fish: A scenario based CGE analysis of the effects of aquaculture production on agricultural markets," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315270, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Heimann, Tobias & Delzeit, Ruth, 2024. "Land for fish: Quantifying the connection between the aquaculture sector and agricultural markets," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 281986, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    5. Zeke Marshall & Paul E. Brockway, 2020. "A Net Energy Analysis of the Global Agriculture, Aquaculture, Fishing and Forestry System," Biophysical Economics and Resource Quality, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 1-27, June.
    6. Ariel E. Turcios & Jutta Papenbrock, 2014. "Sustainable Treatment of Aquaculture Effluents—What Can We Learn from the Past for the Future?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-21, February.
    7. Abdunnur Abdunnur, 2020. "Nexus of Fisheries and Agriculture Production and Urbanization on Ecological Footprint: New Evidence from Indonesian Economy," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(3), pages 190-195.
    8. Juszczyk, Juliusz, 2015. "Światowy rynek łososia hodowlanego – stan i perspektywy," Problems of World Agriculture / Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, vol. 15(30), pages 1-12, September.
    9. Strzelecka, Marianna & Rechciński, Marcin & Tusznio, Joanna & Akhshik, Arash & Grodzińska-Jurczak, Małgorzata, 2021. "Environmental justice in Natura 2000 conservation conflicts: The case for resident empowerment," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    10. repec:mse:cesdoc:13002r is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Asche, Frank & Oglend, Atle, 2016. "The relationship between input-factor and output prices in commodity industries: The case of Norwegian salmon aquaculture," Journal of Commodity Markets, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 35-47.
    12. Zoe G Nichols & Scott Rikard & Sayyed Mohammad Hadi Alavi & William C Walton & Ian A E Butts, 2021. "Regulation of sperm motility in Eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica) spawning naturally in seawater with low salinity," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-24, March.
    13. Nesar Ahmed & Shirley Thompson & Giovanni M. Turchini, 2020. "Organic aquaculture productivity, environmental sustainability, and food security: insights from organic agriculture," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 12(6), pages 1253-1267, December.
    14. Hughes, Conchúr & King, Jonathan W., 2023. "Habitat suitability modelling for an integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA) system along Europe's Atlantic coast," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 484(C).
    15. Nasiritousi, Naghmeh & Hjerpe, Mattias & Buhr, Katarina, 2014. "Pluralising climate change solutions? Views held and voiced by participants at the international climate change negotiations," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 177-184.
    16. Dana Miller & Stefano Mariani, 2013. "Irish fish, Irish people: roles and responsibilities for an emptying ocean," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 529-546, April.
    17. Schouten, Greetje & Leroy, Pieter & Glasbergen, Pieter, 2012. "On the deliberative capacity of private multi-stakeholder governance: The Roundtables on Responsible Soy and Sustainable Palm Oil," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 42-50.
    18. József Popp & László Váradi & Emese Békefi & András Péteri & Gergő Gyalog & Zoltán Lakner & Judit Oláh, 2018. "Evolution of Integrated Open Aquaculture Systems in Hungary: Results from a Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-19, January.
    19. Thaler, S. & Zessner, M. & Weigl, M. & Rechberger, H. & Schilling, K. & Kroiss, H., 2015. "Possible implications of dietary changes on nutrient fluxes, environment and land use in Austria," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 14-29.
    20. Prein, M., 2002. "Integration of aquaculture into crop-animal systems in Asia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 71(1-2), pages 127-146.
    21. Raakjær, Jesper & van Tatenhove, Jan, 2014. "Marine governance of European Seas: Introduction," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(PB), pages 323-324.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:320:y:2016:i:c:p:273-291. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.