IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/28057.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Optimizing the stake holder’s perspective on enhancing the service quality in health care

Author

Listed:
  • Nakkeeran, Senthil kumar
  • G, Thiagarajan

Abstract

For the success of health care organizations, accurate measurement of health care service quality is as important as understanding the nature of the service delivery system. Without a valid measure, it would be difficult to establish and implement appropriate tactics or strategies for service quality management. Experts have struggled for decades to formulate a concise, meaningful and generally applicable definition of the quality of health care. However, the complexity and variability of many definitions are very confusing even to experts. Patients, service providers and other parties involved in the process of health care service delivery, understand and describe service quality in different ways. Different perspectives on health care quality lead to different expectations and different methods of quality measurement. Patients tend to evaluate health care quality according to the responsiveness to their specific needs. Most patients define quality as efforts of physicians to do everything possible for a patient. Patient’s expectations about the health care system may differ from those of health care professionals and managers. On the other hand, patients cannot evaluate many technical aspects of health care service quality. Physicians can provide a high level technical quality but still be rated low by patients because of the lack of humanity, responsiveness or satisfaction. For physicians and other health care providers measurement of service quality has typically been driven by medical outcomes. However, outcomes indicative of quality may differ for a patient and physician. Health care administrators often use managerial input measures such as the average number of nursing hours required for an outpatient surgery. This research paper aims to explore the ways and means towards optimizing the competing stake holders perspectives on enhancing the service quality in health care.

Suggested Citation

  • Nakkeeran, Senthil kumar & G, Thiagarajan, 2010. "Optimizing the stake holder’s perspective on enhancing the service quality in health care," MPRA Paper 28057, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 01 Nov 2010.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:28057
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/28057/1/MPRA_paper_28057.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Koerner, Melissa M., 2000. "The Conceptual Domain of Service Quality for Inpatient Nursing Services," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 267-283, June.
    2. Lee, Hanjoon & Delene, Linda M. & Bunda, Mary Anne & Kim, Chankon, 2000. "Methods of Measuring Health-Care Service Quality," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 233-246, June.
    3. Edward Kelley & Jeremy Hurst, 2006. "Health Care Quality Indicators Project: Conceptual Framework Paper," OECD Health Working Papers 23, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahmet Kara, 2013. "A low quality–high cost–low satisfaction trap in public health care: a model and an efficiency-quality-welfare improving stochastic resolution," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 2081-2093, June.
    2. Schwartz, Robert & Deber, Raisa, 2016. "The performance measurement–management divide in public health," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(3), pages 273-280.
    3. Yoko Akachi & Margaret E. Kruk, 2017. "Quality of care: Measuring a neglected driver of improved health," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2017-135, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    4. Silvia Bruzzi & Enrico Ivaldi & Marta Santagata, 2022. "Measuring Regional Performance in the Italian NHS: Are Disparities Decreasing?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 159(3), pages 1057-1084, February.
    5. Bernal-Delgado, Enrique & García-Armesto, Sandra & Peiró, Salvador, 2014. "Atlas of Variations in Medical Practice in Spain: The Spanish National Health Service under scrutiny," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(1), pages 15-30.
    6. Olga Kudelina & Sofya eremina, 2016. "Regional Healthcare Effectiveness," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(1), pages 211-225.
    7. Zeynep Filiz, 2010. "Service quality of travel agents in Turkey," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 793-805, June.
    8. Terraneo, Marco, 2015. "Inequities in health care utilization by people aged 50+: Evidence from 12 European countries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 154-163.
    9. Anna Forgacs & Judit Beke Lisanyi, 2011. "Are Health Systems of Central European Countries the Least Efficient? A Cross Country Comparative Study," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 27-38.
    10. Pavlina Hejdukova, 2016. "Healthcare systems in Austria and the Czech Republic ? the same history, but with some differences," International Journal of Business and Management, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences, vol. 4(4), pages 1-13, November.
    11. Matthias Fischer & Harald Heinrichs, 2018. "Dimensions, Dialectic, Discourse. Three Political Perspectives on the Sustainability of the German Healthcare System," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-22, July.
    12. Harrison, Robert L., 2013. "Using mixed methods designs in the Journal of Business Research, 1990–2010," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(11), pages 2153-2162.
    13. Yoko Akachi & Margaret E. Kruk, 2017. "Quality of care: Measuring a neglected driver of improved health," WIDER Working Paper Series 135, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    14. Duško Čučković & Ilija Ćosić & Milan Delić & Miroslav Miškić & Slavica Ranisavljev Kovačev, 2021. "Influence of Interpersonal Processes on the Performance of Primary Health Care Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-12, November.
    15. Or, Zeynep & Cases, Chantal & Lisac, Melanie & Vrangbæk, Karsten & Winblad, Ulrika & Bevan, Gwyn, 2010. "Are health problems systemic? Politics of access and choice under Beveridge and Bismarck systems," Health Economics, Policy and Law, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(3), pages 269-293, July.
    16. Pemer, Frida & Skjølsvik, Tale, 2019. "The cues that matter: Screening for quality signals in the ex ante phase of buying professional services," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 352-365.
    17. Youness Frichi & Fouad Jawab & Said Boutahari, 2019. "The Mixed-Method 5W2D Approach for Health System Stakeholders Analysis in Quality of Care: An Application to the Moroccan Context," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-25, August.
    18. Zhao, Guangchuan & Cao, Xinbang & Ma, Chao, 2020. "Accounting for horizontal inequity in the delivery of health care: A framework for measurement and decomposition," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 13-24.
    19. Milena Vainieri & Guido Noto & Francesca Ferre & Laura C. Rosella, 2020. "A Performance Management System in Healthcare for All Seasons?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-10, August.
    20. Vaida Servetkienė & Roma Puronaitė & Birutė Mockevičienė & Karolis Ažukaitis & Danguolė Jankauskienė, 2023. "Determinants of Patient-Perceived Primary Healthcare Quality in Lithuania," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-19, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Service quality; Healthcare; Optimization; India;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M1 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration
    • I1 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:28057. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.